Finance Desk

Europe Vies To Close Stablecoin Gap

France pushes euro stablecoins and tokenized deposits as EU banks race to close the gap with dollar-led digital payments.

France is pressing European banks to accelerate the development of euro-denominated stablecoins, as policymakers grow concerned that the region might fall further behind the U.S. in the shift toward digital payments and tokenized finance.

Recently, French Finance Minister Roland Lescure publicly called for more euro-based stablecoins and urged banks to explore tokenized deposits, saying the limited circulation of euro-pegged tokens compared with dollar-backed alternatives was “not satisfactory,” during a pre-recorded address to a crypto industry conference.

Meanwhile, a consortium of European banks, called Qivalis, plans to launch a more competitive alternative to dollar-pegged stablecoins in the second half of this year, subject to approval from the Dutch central bank.

Qivalis, which includes banks like ING, UniCredit, and BNP Paribas, was formally unveiled in December and has received continued praise from European authorities. Referring to the initiative, Lescure said, “That is what we need, and that is what we want.” At the same time, he strongly encouraged banks to further explore launching tokenized deposits.

Enter Fireblocks

Late in April, the consortium selected Fireblocks as the technology provider for its planned MiCA-compliant euro stablecoin, a step that provides it with the tokenization, wallet, and settlement infrastructure needed to move the project from planning to a planned launch in the second half of 2026.

Around the same time, Societe Generale’s digital assets unit, SG-Forge, said it was expanding its crypto client base to 15 firms, including exchanges, brokers, and wallet providers, showing that bank-linked activity is growing but remains small.

Stablecoins are already widely used in crypto trading and are increasingly being explored for settlement, cross-border payments, and liquidity management, but the market remains overwhelmingly dollar-based as industry participants debate whether euro-pegged coins face demand or regulatory constraints.

Recent research from RBC Capital Markets found that two-thirds of European banks surveyed still view demand for euro-pegged stablecoins as limited. Conversely, Jean-Marc Stenger, CEO of SG-Forge, has argued that a better-regulated infrastructure remains a key condition for broader adoption.

“[There is] a very, very strong need for well-regulated, robust offering in the crypto and stablecoin space,” he said in an interview with Reuters.

Source link

Delcy’s Fragile Reopening Meets the Old Power Crisis

When US Energy Secretary Chris Wright visited Venezuela in February, he left Miraflores with an ambitious message. After meeting Delcy Rodríguez in Miraflores, he told reporters: “This year, we can drive a dramatic increase in Venezuelan oil production, in Venezuelan natural gas production and Venezuelan electricity production.”

Three months later, large parts of the country are enduring heavy electricity rationing, with daily cuts lasting between five and eight hours. Even after the government imposed a 45-day electricity-saving plan in late March to cope with high temperatures and surging demand, the situation continues to deteriorate. As the system faces renewed strain, the US Embassy in Caracas publicized a meeting with Ronald Alcalá, Delcy’s new electric energy minister, where US Chief of Mission John Barrett said Washington will “work with the interim authorities to rebuild the power grid.”

“The three-phase plan of President Trump and Secretary Rubio focuses on restoring reliable energy supply through experience, investment, and collaboration with the US,” Barrett’s brief statement read.

Caracas has resorted to nationwide measures like banning cryptocurrency mining, as power consumption recently reached its highest levels in nearly a decade. El Pitazo reported that current nationwide rationing has exceeded those seen in 2012 across much of the country, with Caracas remaining the main exception.

The latest chapter of this long-running crisis arrives at a sensitive moment for the post-Maduro regime. As has been widely reported, Rodríguez is trying to boost some parts of the economy and attract foreign investment into oil, gas and mining. But the country’s electrical system—weakened by decades of underinvestment, mismanagement and institutional collapse—has re-emerged as an obstacle.

For Luisa Palacios, a Venezuelan professor and energy executive that served as CITGO’s chairwoman, the current blackout cycle reveals something deeper than previous ones.

“This new episode should serve as a wake-up call about the urgency of restructuring the country’s electrical system,” she says. “We are witnessing a stress test of the system even under a modest recovery in demand.

One huge challenge is to bring back investment and expertise required, Palacios wrote in February along with Francisco Morandi, an AES Corporation executive who did strategic planning for Electricidad de Caracas. However, some major companies are hesitating to join after meetings with officials last month, Reuters reported. One executive shared his view: “I returned very skeptical from Venezuela (…) The power plants have not been properly repaired in 10 years, so the needs are almost infinite. But they still have no clue on how we would get paid.”

“The electricity sector is a highly capital-intensive sector that requires large investments to be made before a single cent of profit is seen,” Palacios told Caracas Chronicles. “That is why counterparty risk is fundamental in the electricity sector: ensuring that the user pays you, and on time, is essential.”

The most immediate problem is straightforward. Except for Haiti, Venezuela is the only country in the region where power consumption has actually declined over the past decade, according to OLADE, with per capita consumption falling by roughly 30% since 2014. Nevertheless, the country still does not generate enough electricity to meet demand.

Palacios was firm in the idea that it is necessary to move beyond the State’s central role in power generation, which can’t afford the necessary investments, and that the time to do so is now. 

“Without increasing power generation offered significantly by the private sector and improving transmission and distribution, the country won’t recover from the structural electric crisis that today remains the main bottleneck in terms of infrastructure”.

One of the central proposals advanced by Palacios and other energy experts is to restore thermal generation using Venezuela’s own natural gas resources. Large volumes of gas currently burned or flared during oil production could instead feed thermal plants and combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) facilities, systems that generate electricity more efficiently by combining gas and steam turbines. Such a shift would not only reduce pressure on the hydroelectric system but also lower emissions associated with gas flaring.

“This could be the single biggest climate action Venezuela could take in the short term,” Palacios argues. 

Other proposals involve allowing independent power producers to generate electricity for specific industrial regions and oil hubs, reducing pressure on the fragile national grid. She has also suggested the creation of autonomous microgrids operating in “island mode” (localized systems capable of functioning independently when the national grid fails) to provide more reliable service to critical industrial, commercial, and residential areas. Battery storage systems could also help stabilize electricity supply.

Renewable energy is also part of the conversation. Venezuela relies on largely clean, hydroelectric energy, but Palacios sees potential for solar, wind and biofuel projects. Other oil-producing neighbors like Brazil, Colombia and Argentina serve as prime examples in that sense.

The challenge is not just technical. Broadly speaking, there is agreement among specialists about what Venezuela’s electrical system needs, and what requires fixing: new thermal generation, modernization of transmission infrastructure, decentralized generation capacity, tariff reform, and a new regulatory framework capable of attracting investment. The financing problem is huge: rebuilding Venezuela’s grid would require enormous amounts of long-term capital. Gelvis Sequera, who chairs the domestic Association of Electrical and Mechanical Engineers, places the required investment at around $20 billion.

“The electricity sector is a highly capital-intensive sector that requires large investments to be made before a single cent of profit is seen,” Palacios told Caracas Chronicles. “That is why counterparty risk is fundamental in the electricity sector: ensuring that the user pays you, and on time, is essential.”

But many investors remain cautious. According to Reuters, several companies that recently held meetings with Venezuelan officials left unconvinced about the prospects of doing business. One executive summarized the dilemma bluntly: “The power plants have not been properly repaired in 10 years, so the needs are almost infinite. But they still have no clue how we would get paid.”

The vicious cycle of regional power cuts affecting refineries and fuel production, and therefore also undermining the power sector, needs a major overhaul to finally be brought to an end.

When considering whether to deploy capital in Venezuela, investors are less confused about the needs and more about the ifs. They are uncertain about whether the Venezuelan State can offer credible guarantees, stable regulation, enforceable contracts, and reliable payment mechanisms over the long term.

As Palacios put it: “Power infrastructure is a low-margin business, established for the long term and highly dependent on regulatory and macroeconomic risks.” For that reason, she argues that regulatory clarity, transparent tariffs, and technically competent institutions are indispensable if Venezuela hopes to attract serious capital into the sector.

This also raises uncomfortable political questions about the future role of CORPOELEC, the omnipotent overseer of Venezuelan electricity. Founded by Hugo Chávez in 2007, the public company serves as the power grid’s service provider, operator and developer.

“Venezuela needs to seriously rethink the role of CORPOELEC and the State in providing such a fundamental service,” Palacios says. “It is not possible to solve this crisis with the current management structure.” At the moment, however, there are few signs that such reforms are imminent.

“To build and rebuild a reliable system will depend on having the right actors on the table”, she continues, pointing out that multilateral organizations can provide technical capacity and long-term financing that can “de-risk investment”, giving some assurances to the private sector.

“There’s a lot of Venezuelan entrepreneurship more than willing to invest in a system with clear rules based on international standards”.For now, as hopes of an economic recovery reach their highest levels since the Chávez era, Venezuelans long accustomed to blackouts are desperate to avoid a repeat of the worst 2019-esque scenarios. The contradiction is also acute for Delcy Rodríguez, whose critical infrastructure problem is one of the most immediate constraints on the reopening she is attempting. The vicious cycle of regional power cuts affecting refineries and fuel production, and therefore also undermining the power sector, needs a major overhaul to finally be brought to an end.

Source link

U.S. Antimony targets $125M 2026 revenue while planning 1,000 tons per month 99.9% hydromet output in 2028 (NYSE:UAMY)

Earnings Call Insights: United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) Q1 2026

Management View

  • CEO Gary Evans said, “This is no longer just an antimony company” and pointed investors to a portfolio spanning “antimony, cobalt, gold, tungsten, and zeolite,” alongside ramping processing capacity and government-linked demand.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclaimer: This article was automatically generated by an AI tool based on content available on the Seeking Alpha website, and has not been curated or reviewed by humans. Due to inherent limitations in using AI-based tools, the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of such articles cannot be guaranteed. This article is intended for informational purposes only. Seeking Alpha does not take account of your objectives or your financial situation and does not offer any personalized investment advice. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank.

Source link

IMF Won’t Participate in Venezuela Debt Restructuring

The IMF resumed Venezuela ties after a six-year freeze, focusing on data rather than debt relief.

After announcing its resumption of its dealings with Venezuela under acting president Delcy Rodriguez on April 14, the International Monetary Fund plans to take a wait-and-see approach to the Latin American country’s plans to restructure its reported $170 billion in external debt.

The IMF and World Bank halted deals with Venezuela in 2019, citing the government’s failure to provide mandatory economic data and disputing the legitimacy of President Nicolás Maduro’s administration. Venezuela’s reintegration into the global financial system is now underway. The U.S. is helping to facilitate the change following the removal of Maduro in January by U.S. forces, with Vice President Rodriguez as interim leader.

“Restoring fiscal and debt sustainability is obviously a very important priority for Venezuela, and we do stand ready to support the authorities in this very important step that they’re taking,” said Julie Kozack, an IMF spokesperson, during a press briefing. “Typically, when a country chooses to restructure its debt, the discussions are between the country’s authorities and their creditors. The Fund does not participate in those discussions.”

Resuming Business as Usual

The IMF has started regular discussions with the Ministry of Finance and the Banco Central de Venezuela.

“These discussions have focused mostly on the production and provision of economic data,” Kozack said. “Providing and producing this economic data is a requirement under our articles of agreement so that we can assess the macroeconomic developments and provide policy advice ultimately to Venezuela.”

Since the Latin American country resumed work with the IMF, it regained access to its special drawing rights, but the nation has not requested financing from the IMF, said Kozak. “Any financing would require a formal request from the authorities.”

Reaching Debt Sustainability

In the meantime, the Venezuelan government expects to release a macroeconomic framework and debt analysis to the international financial community in June, said the office of the Vice Presidency for Economy in a prepared statement.

“The current debt overhang constrains external financing, limits public investment capacity, and prevents full re-engagement with the international financial system,” wrote the statement’s authors. “It needs to be substantially reduced for Venezuela to engage in a virtuous circle.”

The government plans to normalize the government’s and state oil company PDVSA’s outstanding commercial debt to restore public debt sustainability.

Nic Wirtz contributed to this story

Source link

Fed rate hikes could be coming, making bank stocks attractive – Regan Capital CIO (KBE:NYSEARCA)

May 14, 2026, 3:29 PM ETState Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE), KBWB, FTXO, , , , , , , , By: Max Gottlich, SA News Editor

Bank building

ultramarine5/iStock via Getty Images

Despite U.S. President Donald Trump’s public expectations that incoming Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh will cut interest rates, one investment expert believes the central bank may actually be forced to move in the opposite direction.

Skyler Weinand, Chief Investment Officer at

Source link

Mobix Labs bull run: 90% surge on defense & critical minerals re-rating

Mobix Labs (MOBX) stock jumped nearly 90% to around $3.24 on Thursday, pushing its monthly gain to about 65%. The stock is now up 41.04% YTD, beating the S&P 500 (SP500) return of 8.75%.

The rally started after Mobix Labs announced

Source link

US 30-year bond yield tops 5% as Kevin Warsh takes Fed helm and inflation rises

Published on

Long-term US borrowing costs climbed to levels not seen since before the global financial crisis after the Treasury auctioned $25bn (€21.3bn) in 30-year bonds at a high yield of 5.058% on Wednesday, according to the department’s own data.


ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT

The sale came only hours after the US Senate voted to confirm former Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh as the next chairman, succeeding Jerome Powell.

The auction result immediately complicated the backdrop for Warsh’s arrival at the central bank, underlining the pressure facing policymakers as inflation is rising.

At the time of writing on Thursday, US 30-year bonds are trading at 5.02% while 10-year notes are selling with a yield of 4.44%.

US inflation figures released earlier this week showed consumer prices rose 3.8% from April 2025 as the 10-week Iran war pushed energy costs higher and distanced inflation from the Federal Reserve’s 2% target.

Producer price data also pointed to persistent underlying cost pressures across the economy, reinforcing expectations that the central bank may struggle to ease monetary policy quickly.

Rising Treasury yields have broad implications for the economy because they influence borrowing costs on mortgages, corporate debt and other forms of credit.

Higher long-term yields can also increase financing costs for the US government at a time when public debt is nearing $40 trillion (€34.1tn).

Investors are increasingly concerned that a combination of resilient economic growth, elevated energy prices and sustained government borrowing could keep inflationary pressures alive despite two years of restrictive monetary policy.

The yield on the benchmark 30-year Treasury bond being auctioned above 5% is a symbolic threshold last reached in 2007 before the onset of the global financial crisis.

While market conditions today differ substantially from that period, the move nonetheless underscores the sharp repricing that has taken place in global bond markets over the past two years.

Kevin Warsh inherits a difficult policy environment

Kevin Warsh takes over the Federal Reserve at a delicate moment for the US economy.

The former Morgan Stanley banker and Fed governor has previously argued in favour of maintaining the central bank’s credibility on inflation, while also signalling support for reforms to the institution’s communication strategy and balance sheet policies.

Warsh’s confirmation comes as financial markets remain divided over how aggressively the Federal Reserve should respond to persistent inflation pressures.

Some investors believe rates may need to stay higher for an extended period, while others warn that maintaining tight monetary conditions for too long could weigh heavily on economic growth and employment.

The main driver of the rise in inflation is the current disruption to global energy markets caused by the Iran war which also leaves the central bank at the mercy of geopolitics and not able to effectively control the situation.

Analysts stated that Wednesday’s Treasury auction illustrated the immediate challenge confronting the incoming Fed chair.

Elevated bond yields can help tighten financial conditions without additional rate increases from the central bank, but they can also amplify risks for heavily indebted households, businesses and the federal government itself.

For Warsh, the market reaction served as an early reminder that restoring confidence on inflation may prove more complicated than simply holding interest rates at restrictive levels.

Source link

Shoulder Innovations forecasts $65M-$68M 2026 net revenue as it raises guidance following Q1 growth (NYSE:SI)

Earnings Call Insights: Shoulder Innovations (SI) Q1 2026

Management View

  • “I’m very pleased to report that 2026 is off to a strong start” and the company “deliver[ed] first quarter net revenue of $16.7 million, an increase of 65% year-over-year and 16% sequentially,” with “first quarter gross margin” at “77.7%,” according to (Executive chairman, CEO & president

Seeking Alpha’s Disclaimer: This article was automatically generated by an AI tool based on content available on the Seeking Alpha website, and has not been curated or reviewed by humans. Due to inherent limitations in using AI-based tools, the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of such articles cannot be guaranteed. This article is intended for informational purposes only. Seeking Alpha does not take account of your objectives or your financial situation and does not offer any personalized investment advice. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank.

Source link

Two-thirds of Europe’s LNG imports to come from the US amid increased reliance

Published on

Europe’s reliance on American liquefied natural gas is set to increase further next year as the EU continues efforts to phase out Russian fossil fuel imports, according to new analysis published by the IEEFA on Wednesday.


ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT

The report estimates that the US could supply close to two-thirds of Europe’s LNG imports in 2026, reinforcing Washington’s dominant position in the continent’s gas market after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the Iran war reshaped global energy flows.

According to IEEFA, the US already accounted for 57% of Europe’s LNG imports in 2025, a sharp increase compared with pre-war levels.

The organisation warned that the share could continue rising over the coming years if current import trends persist and additional long-term supply contracts enter into force.

The findings come as most European governments seek to fully eliminate Russian gas imports by 2027 under the European Commission’s REPowerEU strategy.

Since 2022, EU member states have rapidly expanded LNG purchases, particularly from the US, to compensate for declining Russian pipeline deliveries.

The IEEFA stated that the shift had improved Europe’s short-term energy security but also created a growing concentration risk.

The think tank argued that replacing dependence on Russian gas with heavy reliance on another single alternative supplier could expose Europe to future political and market instability.

Lower demand but higher imports and investment

The report noted that LNG imports from the US generally come at a higher cost than pipeline gas because of liquefaction, shipping and regasification expenses.

The IEEFA estimates that EU countries spent roughly €117 billion on US LNG imports between early 2022 and mid-2025.

Several European policymakers and regulators have previously warned against excessive dependence on imported LNG.

Earlier this year, European Commission Executive Vice President Teresa Ribera said the bloc should avoid replacing one energy dependency with another and accelerate investment in renewable power and electrification instead.

The European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators has also raised concerns about supply concentration risks linked to the growing role of US LNG in the European market.

The increase in LNG imports also comes despite a broader decline in European gas consumption in recent years.

High prices following the energy crisis, industrial weakness, energy-saving measures and faster deployment of renewable energy have all contributed to lower demand.

The IEEFA data shows Europe’s LNG imports declined in 2024 as gas consumption fell to its lowest level in more than a decade. However, imports rebounded in 2025 amid colder weather conditions and efforts by governments to replenish storage sites.

At the same time, several EU countries continue expanding LNG import infrastructure.

Germany, which previously relied heavily on Russian pipeline gas, has rapidly developed floating LNG terminals and emerged as one of the largest buyers of US LNG in Europe.

Analysts have also questioned whether Europe risks building excess LNG import capacity as long-term gas demand is expected to weaken further during the energy transition in the coming years.

Source link

Exclusive: EU negotiators find deal on key clauses of the EU-US deal

Published on

EU lawmakers have reached a provisional deal to make the EU-US trade agreement suspendable in the event of a market disruption caused by a surge in US imports, Euronews has learned from two sources close to the talks.


ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT

Intense negotiations have been underway between EU governments and the European Parliament over the implementation of the deal, which would cut EU tariffs on US goods to zero, under pressure from the Trump administration.

The US has suggested it will double tariffs on European cars if an agreement to swiftly implement the deal is not approved by the European Parliament by 4 July

MEPs have been pushing for tougher conditions since the agreement was clinched last summer between Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, arguing that it must not become a vehicle for extortion of the EU.

The deal sees tariffs tripling on EU goods entering America, although the duties are not stackable, while US industrial goods are reduced to zero. Members of the European Parliament have been delaying a vote to implement the accord, arguing that it needed to be rebalanced and include clauses to protect the EU’s interests.

In recent days, a provisional compromise was found on a safeguard mechanism allowing the EU to reimpose tariffs on US industrial goods if a surge in imports disrupts the European market. The details of the wording of the clause are still under discussion.

Negotiators also agreed in principle to include a “sunset clause” that would automatically terminate the deal unless renewed. Parliament initially sought an expiry date of March 2028, though the final timeline remains under negotiation, the sources said.

‘Sunrise’ clause sparks tensions

However, talks remain at a standstill over a proposed “sunrise clause” defining when the agreement would begin to apply. The EU Parliament wants the implementation date to start only once Washington complies with the 15% tariff cap, while the Commission opposes the condition and wants it done immediately, one source said.

The sunrise clause was introduced by MEPs after a US Supreme Court ruling in February declared the 2025 US tariffs illegal, prompting Washington to introduce new duties on EU goods that now average above the agreed ceiling, therefore in violation of the deal.

The European Commission is also pushing to remove references to the EU’s Anti-Coercion Instrument, seen as the EU’s trade bazooka that could curtail US access to the European single market in unprecedented ways.

The Commission is also pushing back against provisions allowing the suspension of the deal if Trump were to threaten the bloc’s territorial integrity again, one of the source said.

Following Trump’s threats earlier this year to target EU countries refusing to support a US acquisition of Greenland, MEPs also added provisions allowing the suspension of the deal in the event of threats to the EU’s territorial integrity.

The Anti-Coercion Instrument is one of the EU’s strongest market defence tools, designed to counter economic pressure from third countries through measures including restrictions on licenses and intellectual property rights. Its use was repeatedly discussed at the height of transatlantic trade tensions last year, but never approved.

EU negotiators are aiming to finalise the agreement by June ahead of a plenary vote in the European Parliament the same month, in time for the 4 July deadline set by Trump.

Source link

EU’s New Greenwashing Regulations Bring Sharper Penalties

New EU greenwashing regulations threaten hefty penalties and litigation for financial institutions and corporations that fail to verify their ESG marketing.

Under new EU greenwashing regulations, companies making false or misleading sustainability claims could face hefty penalties as the Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition Directive takes effect on September 27. The most brazen scofflaws should expect fines of up to a 4% of the company’s annual gross income, product recalls, and possible class-action lawsuits, under the directive.

Though the Directive sets a framework, it leaves the precise levels of those penalties to each European Union member state, Mateusz Leźnicki, a senior associate at global law practice Dentons’ Warsaw office, told Global Finance. “That said, the stakes are high — in a number of jurisdictions, penalties for large-scale greenwashing directed at consumers can reach up to 10% of a company’s annual turnover, with personal liability for individual managers on top.”

Related: Sustainable Finance Awards 2026: Environmental Rollbacks Ding Markets

The complete penalty landscape is still evolving as implementing the directive into local commercial regulations is an ongoing process. Germany and Italy already have implemented the enabling legislation, while France, Belgium, and Poland are in advanced stages of transposing the directive into national law.

Historically, France, Germany, the Netherlands, the Nordic countries, and Poland have been the most active enforcers in this space, while the Central and Eastern European markets have been less developed, Leźnicki said.

“The full penalty landscape will only become clear as member states complete their transposition, which remains ongoing in many jurisdictions,” he added. “We are closely monitoring developments across all EU jurisdictions for our clients, as the situation is highly dynamic.”

Prohibited Practices

The Directive’s list of 12 prohibited practices includes the use of “empty” marketing terms associated with sustainability, like “green,” “environmentally friendly,” “energy efficient,” and “biodegradable,” that cannot be demonstrated. It also now requires that any sustainability-related claim made by a company about its product be verified by an independent third party. Other issues addressed by the Directive include planned obsolescence and limitations on aftermarket repairs.

The blacklisted practices hit almost every aspect of a business, including marketing, sales and distribution channels, sales and product teams, product development, supply chains, finance and corporate communications, according to a joint Web posting by My Green Labs, a non-profit that supports sustainable scientific research, and global law firm Eversheds Sutherland.

Impact on Financial Services

Companies outside manufacturing should pay close attention, as the directive covers any commercial communications containing environmental claims, including those made by financial institutions.

“For financial products specifically, the picture is more nuanced: Retail-facing financial products marketed with sustainability or ESG claims may fall within scope where dedicated sector-specific regulation — such as SFDR [the E.U.’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation] — does not already cover the ground,” said Leźnicki. “The boundaries here are still being tested, and the interaction between the Directive and financial services regulation is exactly the kind of question companies should be seeking specific legal advice on before September 2026.”

Source link