THIS is the woman who is hired by others to get their husbands to dump their lovers in secret.
Wang Zhengxi, who operates out of Henan province in northern China, helps women deal with a growing problem.
5
Wang Zhengxi, who operates out of Henan province in northern ChinaCredit: Susan Norget Film
5
She has been featured in a documentary by the Hong Kong filmmaker Elizabeth LoCredit: Getty
5
Wang comes to the rescue after Ms Li found texts on her husband’s phone suggesting he was having an affairCredit: Susan Norget Film
As growing numbers of women suspect their husbands of cheating, Wang is on call to help save their marriages.
Speaking to one client Ms Li, she said: “The most urgent matter at hand is how to inject me organically into your family.”
Wang comes to the rescue after Ms Li found texts on her husband’s phone suggesting he was having an affair.
Instead of confronting her husband, Ms Li is employing Wang to help save her marriage.
She will befriend a cheating husband and his mistress and convince them to both break it off.
Wang is one of a growing number of “mistress dispellers” – and has been featured in a documentary by the Hong Kong filmmaker Elizabeth Lo.
In the film, Wang says: “When people come to me for help because a mistress has appeared, I can provide them with solutions to fix the problem.”
It comes amid a crisis of confidence in the institution of marriage across China.
There were fewer than 300,000 divorces back in 1978, but this jumped by 2019 to 4.7 million.
Lo said: “In Asian cultures, the mode of conflict resolution is different.
Meet China’s shady ‘Sea Dragons’ – the elite unit training for Taiwan invasion with underwater pistols & pirate battles
“Solving a problem and maintaining face on the surface while not poking a hole directly in the bubble or reality they live in is a form of preserving harmony.”
When she approaches the husband and mistress, Wang works subtly.
She asks Mr Li to teach her badminton and befriends the mistress at the same time.
Wang said: “When someone becomes a mistress, it’s because they feel they don’t deserve complete love.
“She’s the one who needs our help the most.”
Eventually, at his home, Wang reveals Ms Li’s suspicions to her husband when the wife is out of the room.
“He confessed everything, but you should pretend to know nothing,” Wang whispered to Mrs Li.
“I think there’s hope, but I don’t know the girl yet. I can only advise you after I see her.”
Mr Li even broke down in front of Wang at one point.
Happy Thursday. Your usual host, D.C. Bureau Chief Michael Wilner, is off today. So you’re once again stuck with me, California Columnist Anita Chabria.
I’m reporting from Columbus, Ohio. Although it’s 2,300 miles from Sacramento, you wouldn’t know it from the national news, where Gov. Gavin Newsom’s push to gerrymander the Golden State’s election maps is dominating the conversation, even in the Midwest.
That’s a huge win for Newsom’s presidential aspirations. A week ago, I might have argued that Newsom’s chances at the Oval Office were irrevocably tied to the success of his “Election Rigging Response Act,” which seems likely (though not certain) to make it onto a November ballot.
But it’s increasingly seeming like win or lose on that initiative, the fight itself is a victory for Newsom.
Let’s dig into the details on where we are and why.
The recap
President Trump does not like uncertainty, especially when it comes to his power. The midterm elections in 2026 are nothing but uncertainty. Republicans hold a Ozempic-thin majority in the House at 219-212, with four seats vacant. If Democrats were to take control, it would make autocracy really hard.
So Trump’s team reportedly called up Texas and asked them to rig their election maps to gain five GOP seats and a comfortable margin for the election. Newsom responded, unexpectedly, by pushing an if/then proposition for the same map-rigging in California: If Texas does it, then so will we.
The Legislature is expected to approve that plan (and new maps that smash the state’s Republicans mostly along an inland stretch against the Sierra Nevada), allowing it to go before voters in November. Because unlike Texas, California voters will have to OK the gambit for it to move forward.
That seems as though it could happen. Axios reported this week that Newsom’s pollster, David Binder, found that 57% of California voters were likely to back the redistricting plan once they understood two points. First, that it was temporary and the state would go back to fair maps in a few years; and second, that California will go forward only if Texas or another state gerrymanders first.
And it seems as if Trump is pushing these just-in-case states to at least try. Vice President JD Vance visited Indiana recently, supposedly to encourage that state to drum up support for the idea, even though Republicans hold seven of nine of the state’s seats already. Florida is another place where map-rigging could happen. MAGA drummed up four additional seats after Gov. Ron DeSantis redrew maps in 2022 to give the GOP more seats. So there is little reason to believe he wouldn’t push it even further.
From Gavin to gavel
But like so many political policies these days, redistricting is likely to end up in courts.
California Republicans appealed to the state Supreme Court to at least delay redistricting. They are argued that state law requires any legislation to be in print for 30 days before a vote is taken on it.
The Legislature has a long-used but ethically dubious workaround to this — they take another bill, one that is already written but basically dead, and simply delete its contents and drop in whatever new measure they don’t have time to pass under a fresh bill number. Voila — in print for 30 days, technically.
Will the Supreme Court choose to censure that behavior now?
Texas might also find itself in courts with new maps it advanced on Wednesday.
The UCLA Voting Rights Project released a study this week that found the new Texas maps may violate federal law that protects minority voters from being pushed into districts where their favored candidate has no chance of winning.
“Federal law prohibits purposefully drawing large minority populations of Black and Hispanic voters into districts in which their preferred candidate loses,” the report notes. “While the map appears to add an extra Hispanic-majority district, VRP findings show it systematically places minority communities in districts where bloc-voting by white voters overrides their candidate of choice.”
Someone will probably sue. Which raises the interesting but as-yet unanswered question (I did ask, but no word back yet from the governor’s office) on whether California would still move forward if the Texas maps are passed by the Legislature but held up in courts. That scenario might melt Republican heads — the possibility of five new Democratic seats without Texas to even them out.
A win, regardless
Whether or not Newsom manages to get his “big beautiful maps,” as he’s cheekily calling them, through voters, this is already a win for him.
That aligns with a new Economist/YouGov poll showing that 56% of voters disapprove of Trump, a really high number.
Meanwhile, between his social media explosion and map-rigging, Newsom is seeing a huge bump. One California poll by Politico-Citrin Center-Possibility found him significantly leading over former Vice President Kamala Harris when it comes to who state voters would back in the next presidential race.
That poll found that Newsom leads Harris 25% to 19% among the state’s registered no-party-preference, Democratic and Democratic-leaning voters.
But it’s not just California. I am seriously shocked that even here in the Midwest, folks are talking about Newsom and many — even if they don’t agree with redistricting — see him in a favorable light for fighting back so aggressively on Texas and Trump.
Even if Newsom loses the redistricting initiative in California, he will be able to argue that he fought harder than anyone else to curtail Trump’s power, and have the receipts to back that up.
So whether he gamed this out in advance or luck and timing have collided in that magical fashion, Newsom has, for the moment, captured lightning in a bottle — and certainly will ride that energy as far as it will take him.
Californians — once upon a time — voted overwhelmingly to ban partisan gerrymandering and strip the task of drawing congressional seats from self-interested legislators. In a historic political reform, redistricting was turned over to an independent citizens’ commission. Now, Newsom is trying to subvert the voters’ edict.
“It is really a calculated power grab that dismantles the very safeguards voters put in place,” California Republican Party Chairwoman Corrin Rankin said in a statement last week, echoing other party members. “This is Gavin the Gaslighter overturning the will of the voters and telling you it’s for your own good.”
Again, baloney.
Power grab? Sure. Overturning the voters’ will? Hardly.
First of all, that anti-gerrymandering vote creating the citizens’ commission was 15 years ago. It was a wise decision and badly needed, and still a wonderful concept in the abstract. But that was then, this is now.
Just because a ballot measure was passed one or two decades ago doesn’t mean it has been cast in stone. Would Californians still vote to ban same-sex marriage or deny public schooling to undocumented children? Doubtful. Circumstances and views change.
Second, that 2010 electorate no longer exists. Today’s electorate is substantially different. And it shouldn’t necessarily be tied to the past.
Consider:
Of the 23.6 million adult California citizens in 2010 — the eligible voters — an estimated 3.6 million have died, or more than 15%, according to population experts at the state Finance Department.
In all, “at least half of the voter registration file is totally new compared to 2010. And that might even be an understatement,” says Eric McGhee, a demographer at the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California. “There’s been a lot of turnover. It’s a different electorate.” People have left the state and others have moved in. Millions of kids have become voting adults.
There are roughly 6 million more Californians registered to vote today than 15 years ago — 23 million compared to 17 million. “That’s a pretty huge change,” says Paul Mitchell, vice president of Political Data Inc., who has drawn the proposed new Democratic-friendly California congressional maps for Newsom.
And the partisan makeup of registered voters has become more favorable toward Democrats, who enjoy a nearly 2-to-1 advantage. In last year’s presidential election, Democrats accounted for 46% of registered voters and Republicans 25%. In 2010, it still seemed somewhat competitive. Democrats were at 44% and Republicans 31%.
PPIC researchers recently reported that “partisanship now shapes the state’s migration — with those moving out of the state more likely to be Republican and those moving in more likely to be Democrat. … This process makes California more Democratic than it would otherwise be.”
So, Newsom and Democratic legislators are not thumbing their noses at the voters’ will. They’re asking today’s voters to suspend the ban on gerrymandering and adopt a partisan redistricting plan at a Nov. 4 special election. The good government process of map drawing by the citizen’s commission would return after the 2030 decennial census.
The heavily Democratic Legislature will pass a state constitutional amendment containing Newsom’s plan and put it on the ballot, probably this week.
It would take effect only if Texas or other red states bow to Trump’s demand to gerrymander their congressional districts to rig them for Republicans. Trump is seeking five more GOP seats from Texas and Gov. Greg Abbott is trying to oblige. Republicans already hold 25 of the 38 seats.
Newsom’s plan, released Friday, counters Texas’ scheme with a blatant gerrymander of his own. It would gain five Democratic seats. Democrats already outnumber Republicans on the California House delegation 43 to 9.
Neither the governor nor any Democrats are defending gerrymandering. They agree it’s evil politics. They support redistricting by the citizens’ commission and believe this high-road process should be required in every state. But that’s not about to happen. And to stand by meekly without matching the red states’ election rigging would amount to unilateral disarmament, they contend correctly.
“It’s not good enough to just hold hands, have a candlelight vigil and talk about the way the world should be,” Newsom declared at a campaign kickoff last week. “We have got to recognize the cards that have been dealt. And we have got to meet fire with fire.”
But polling indicates it could be a tough sell to voters. A large majority believe the bipartisan citizens commission should draw congressional districts, not the politicians who they don’t particularly trust.
“It’ll be complicated to explain to voters why two wrongs make a right,” says Republican strategist Rob Stutzman, a GOP never-Trumper.
Former GOP redistricting consultant Tony Quinn says: “There is no way to ‘educate’ voters on district line drawing. And Californians vote ‘no’ on ballot measures they do not understand. … It’s sort of like trying to explain the basketball playoffs to me.”
But veteran Democratic strategist Garry South doesn’t see a problem.
“The messaging here is clear: ‘Screw Trump’,” South says. “If the object is to stick it to Trump, [voter] turnout won’t be a problem.”
Gerrymandering may not be the voters’ will in California. But they may well jump at the chance to thwart Trump.
Loose Women star Denise Welch has issued an apology to the family of Terrence Stamp on air after her co-star Janet Street-Porter spoke about going on a date with the late actor
Frankie Bridge has landed a brand new role with ITV as she takes on the role of a judge of an upcoming series, following her reported rift with her Loose Women co-stars
Frankie Bridge has landed a brand new role with ITV as she takes on the role of a judge(Image: Ken McKay/ITV/Shutterstock)
Former Saturdays singer Frankie Bridge has landed a new ITV role following a reported feud with her co-star Myleene Klass. Frankie, 36, has been involved in a rumoured feud with Myleene and also her former bandmate Rochelle Humes in recent weeks, and ITV reportedly had to step in to ensure the panellists didn’t cross paths.
Frankie has now bagged a new role on ITV and will be appearing as a judge on the upcoming series of ITV’s M&S: Dress The Nation. The singer is known for her style and has regularly shared her fashion outfits and tips online in recent years.
Former Saturdays singer Frankie Bridge has landed a new ITV role(Image: Dave Benett/Getty Images for Bvlgari Hotel London)
A source revealed to the Daily Star: “Producers think Frankie is perfect for the show because she’s so fashionable.” The Mirror has contacted Frankie’s representatives for comment.
Despite the reported rift between Frankie and the ladies, they appeared to shut down the rumours as Rochelle and Frankie have both been interacting with one another on Instagram and showing their support for one another.
After Frankie shared a glimpse into her holiday, Rochelle liked the post, and vice versa, after Rochelle went on holiday. However, neither of the ladies has interacted online with Myleene and doesn’t even follow her online.
Frankie, 36, has been involved in a rumoured feud with Myleene and also her former bandmate Rochelle Humes in recent weeks(Image: Justin Goff Photos/Getty Images)
The three Loose Women stars were once thought to be good friends, as Myleene and Frankie attended Rochelle’s hen do back in 2012, however, Rochelle and Frankie have remained friends with Myleene’s ex-husband Graham Quinn.
A source previously said: “Myleene seemed to take that as Frankie taking sides with Graham because of their working relationship.”
It comes as Frankie took to social media to share a cryptic message amid speculation of the rift between herself and Myleene. Frankie posted on TikTok as she enjoyed her latest getaway, and in the clip, she is filmed at a beach resort miming along to Manchild by Sabrina Carpenter.
The video was captioned: “Taking 36 years to realise being a people pleaser doesn’t please anyone.”
Frankie has now bagged a new role on ITV and will be appearing as a judge on the upcoming series of ITV’s M&S: Dress The Nation(Image: Ken McKay/ITV/Shutterstock)
She went on: “Fad diets are a waste of time. Turns out it’s all about balance?! Who knew?! Only you can make yourself happy.”
And Frankie added: “You can do the hard thing! You’ve got this.” She then added a red love heart emoji to her post. Fans were quick to agree with her comments, letting their feelings be known on the post.
In the annals of things I could not have seen coming, none has been more unexpected than “Women Wearing Shoulder Pads,” a queer Spanish-language stop-motion comedy melodrama, set in the aesthetic world of a 1980s Pedro Almodóvar film. (It arrives Sunday at midnight on Adult Swim, the home of things one doesn’t see coming, and premieres the next day on HBO Max.)
Though it takes place in Ecuador, its central character, Marioneta Negocios (Pepa Pallarés), is Spanish, and it’s easy enough to imagine Almodóvar muse Carmen Maura in the role — though it is also impossible to imagine the story told as well, or at all, in any other way. When I call this series perfect, notwithstanding the happy imperfections of its puppets and sets, it’s not because everything works as its meant to, but because there’s nothing you can measure it against — it occupies its own self-created space. Every element is necessary. Even presenting it in English would be to lose romantic, dramatic, telenovelistic force.
At the center of the story is the cuy, a guinea pig eaten in Andean South America, though in this telling they’re also used in a version of bullfighting. (Some cuys are large enough to ride on.) The primary action is a power struggle between Marioneta, a socialite running a campaign promoting cuy as pets, not food, and Doña Quispe (Laura Torres), who has risen from life as a humble butcher to the anything-but-humble CEO of the country’s most famous restaurant, El Cuchillo (the knife).
Mixed up in their lives are Coquita Buenasuerte (Gabriela Cartol), Marioneta’s seemingly happy-go-lucky assistant; Espada Muleta (Kerygma Flores), a matadora in love with Marioneta; Nina (Nicole Vazquez), Doña Quispe’s vegetarian daughter, serving a pro-cuy group as its Minister of Refreshments and Head of Recruitment for Rebellious Teens — “I have looked upon the caged cuy through the prison of capitalist enterprise, through the hubristic iron bars of a homocentric world view” — who will become a pawn in the older women’s game.
Not everything will be as it seems.
Created by Gonzalo Cordova (a veteran of “Tuca & Bertie” and “Adam Ruins Everything”) and produced by the Mexican animation studio Cinema Fantasma, the series comes packaged as eight 11-minute episodes — that is cartoon length — which neatly constitute a short feature film. On the bill are mystery, suspense, terror, revenge, hot romance (including some puppet sex), masked stalkers, performance art, love notes posted with knives, parodies of television shows and commercials, old secrets coming to light and nuns singing karaoke.
From “Gumby” to “Rudolph” to “Wallace and Gromit” to “The Fantastic Mr. Fox,” stop motion is of all forms of animation most magical and in its real-space, three-dimensional, handcrafted way the most like life, if not necessarily the most lifelike. (It can look ungainly, which is also part of its charm.) It’s a magnification of childhood playtime, a puppet show in which the puppets have broken loose from the puppeteers. The cleverness of the execution is as or more important than how seamless it is. “Women Wearing Shoulder Pads” does all sorts of neat tricks, some you notice and more you simply accept — and when deemed necessary, or just amusing, it will insert a live-action hand or mouth. It’s an exaggerated world — appropriately to the heavy-breathing material — but emotionally expressive, even moving, and lots of fun.
IT’S the showpiece beach resort at the heart of Kim Jong-un’s plans for a holiday empire – but the “North Korean Benidorm” hides a dark secret.
The Wonsan-Kalma resort reportedly got its nickname after dictator Kim sent a fact-finding mission to Spain’s Costa Blanca in 2017.
11
North Korean tyrant Kim Jong Un opens Wonsan-Kalma pet project beach resortCredit: Reuters
11
The strip running along Wonsan before it was officially openedCredit: AFP
11
The resort has opened for its first guestsCredit: East2West
But unlike its Mediterranean rival, Wonsan-Kalma has a history filled with forced labour, human rights abuses – and poo.
The horrors began right at the start of the project, when the regime press-ganged teenage schoolkids into “shock brigades” of builders.
Pyongyang propaganda bragged that these youths were building the resort’s hotels at the rate of a storey per day in a December 2019 report.
But by then two deadlines to finish the job had already passed, and with a third looming, builders were made to work almost round the clock in icy temperatures.
Party chiefs mobilised workers “in the bitter cold of January, February, and March, allowing them to sleep for only three hours a day,” a source told the Daily NK newspaper.
And though the regime called the youths “volunteers”, really they had no real choice.
People are forced into “shock brigades” with the threat of arrest and detention in labour camps, according to a UN report about forced labour in North Korea.
Recruits get a monthly wage that is “only enough to buy two packs of cigarettes”, the report added, and are fed so little that malnutrition is widespread.
Workers at Wonsan lived off “foul-smelling seaweed soup, salted radishes and yellow corn rice,” according to Daily NK.
Female workers faced an added peril.
First tourists visit North Korea’s ghostly ‘Benidorm’ resort where ‘minders’ follow visitors & phones are ‘bugged’
One woman quoted by the UN recalled how shock brigade chiefs “harassed” them and said “many women were sexually abused”.
North Korea expert Michael Madden described the backbreaking toil faced by “volunteers” at Wonsan.
He said: “Youth Shock Brigades would be involved in digging foundations, framing, painting, paving, and moving materials and supplies.
“Pay for brigade members is minimal.
“In the past, the brigade members were not provided adequate food supplies and stole from local populations.”
Today the resort welcomes Russian visitors and members of the North Korean elite.
But guests may be surprised to learn that they’re not the first to stay in the brand-new hotels.
When the third deadline for finishing the resort passed in April 2020, the site lay almost abandoned for months as Covid-19 spread around the world.
11
The sea did not look particularly inviting for the first batch of visitorsCredit: AFP
11
Kim shows his daughter Kim Ju Ae around the inside of one of the hotelsCredit: Reuters
11
Kim waved to adoring fans at an opening ceremony at the end of JuneCredit: AFP
Soon reports emerged that homeless wanderers – known as kkotjebi in North Korea – had moved in to the skeletal hotels.
“The buildings are no different from toilets, with bowel movements left behind by the kkotjebi everywhere,” a source told Daily NK.
“Now they’re full of human waste and soot from fires.”
The same report also revealed that the resort’s planning chief and site manager had been sacked in 2019 amid mounting delays.
It’s a punishment with potentially fatal consequences.
Mr Madden, the founder of North Korea Leadership Watch, and a fellow of the Stimson Center in Washington DC, said nothing had been heard of either of them since.
If they were blamed for inefficiencies or incompetence, he said, they probably faced demotion, intensive indoctrination, and a manual labour assignment.
“On the other hand if there was malfeasance or some type of corruption, then both of these people have, at the least, faced a lengthy incarceration,” he continued.
“If these individuals had a habit of corrupt activities on Wonsan-Kalma and any previous projects, then one or both project managers faced the firing squad.”
11
Kim Jong Un opens Wonsan-Kalma pet project beach resortCredit: East2West
11
Kim Jong Un and his daughter Ju Ae inspecting a hotel during a visit to the resortCredit: AFP
Before it was a holiday destination, Wonsan was a missile launch site. Indeed the rockets continued blasting off even as the hotels took shape.
And ultimately, that’s how money spent by tourists will be used.
Greg Scarlatoiu, executive director of the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, warned holidaymakers not to fund Kim’s “tools of death”.
He said: “The money coming from tourists, mostly Russians at the moment, will go to the areas that the regime regards as critical to its survival.
“These are: keeping the Kim family rich, and the key elites happy, as well as developing nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, and other tools of death.”
The North Korean tourism push, which seeks to raise foreign currency, has also seen the regime open the Masikryong Ski Resort, and Yangdok hot springs resort.
11
A North Korean man makes the most of the water park at Wonsan after it openedCredit: AFP
11
The resort can accommodate up to 20,000 people, according to reportsCredit: East2West
11
Russian tourist Daria Zubkova shows an empty beach in Wonsan-Kalma resortCredit: East2West
England captain Nat Sciver-Brunt hits an unbeaten 51 to help Trent Rockets secure their first win of this year’s Hundred as they beat London Spirit by 33 runs, ending the defending champions’ perfect start.
ANCHORAGE — The first presidential summit in years between Russia and the United States is on, setting nerves in Europe and Ukraine on a knife’s edge. But President Trump may have a surprise in store for Vladimir Putin.
Efforts to scuttle the high-stakes meeting have not been subtle. European officials issued statements in recent days on the futility of Trump negotiating with Putin over Ukraine without Ukraine, urging the U.S. president on Wednesday to not cut a unilateral deal. Kyiv warned that Moscow’s proposals for peace — rewarding its war of conquest with territorial concessions — are a nonstarter. Many Russia experts are hoping one side simply decides to call it off.
Despite their efforts, the summit — haphazardly scheduled on American soil with days to spare — is moving ahead, with Trump scheduled to host the Russian leader at a U.S. military base in Anchorage on Friday, the first meeting of its kind since 2021.
Experts fear Putin may be laying a trap for the Americans, manipulating Trump in private to solidify Russia’s position on the battlefield. But Trump suggested Wednesday that he would demand Putin agree to a ceasefire in Alaska.
“There will be very severe consequences” if he doesn’t, Trump told reporters.
Newsletter
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox twice per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
‘Very grave risk’
Hosting the meeting is an about-face from Trump, who over much of the summer appeared in the throes of a remarkable transformation on Putin, criticizing the Russian leader in harsh terms for the first time. To the relief and delight of Europe, Trump appeared to be losing his patience — embarrassed, even — at Putin’s open refusal to heed his calls for a ceasefire in Ukraine.
But Trump’s threats of a response, increasing sanctions against Russia and its trading partners, lasted only a matter of days.
On Aug. 6, the president’s special envoy on the crisis, Steve Witkoff, a real estate investor with no experience in diplomacy and no background in the region, was dispatched to Moscow. Planning for a summit began within hours of his departure from the Kremlin.
On Tuesday, as White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the summit would amount to a “listening session” for Trump on Putin’s interest in peace, battlefield reports emerged of a significant Russian breach in Ukrainian lines.
In a phone call, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky told Trump that Putin was “bluffing” on his commitments to peace, pressing ahead with an offensive to gain more territory. “There should be joint pressure on Russia, there should be sanctions — and there should be a message that if Russia doesn’t agree to a ceasefire in Alaska, this principle should work,” Zelensky said Wednesday.
“It sure looks like it’s moving in the wrong direction,” John Bolton, Trump’s former national security advisor in his first term, told The Times, dismissing Witkoff as a chief culprit behind what he fears is a coming diplomatic crisis: “Better send the Bobbsey twins.”
The perils of this meeting, Bolton said, lie in Putin’s skills as a manipulator. The Russian president may well convince Trump that his designs on Ukraine are reasonable — and the only way forward.
“There’s a very grave risk it does become an almost take-it-or-leave-it proposition for Zelensky,” Bolton said. On Wednesday morning, Trump criticized the media for being “very unfair” to him for quoting “fired losers and really dumb people like John Bolton.”
Russia invaded the Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea and its eastern regions in 2014, and launched a full-scale invasion of the country in 2022. Nearly a million Russian soldiers have been killed or wounded in pursuit of Vladimir Putin’s war of conquest, according to independent analysts, with hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers adding to the casualty count.
“Clearly, Trump wants to sit down with the guy that he thinks is his friend again,” Bolton said. “And from Putin’s point of view, he doesn’t want any pesky Europeans around — and particularly not Zelensky. He wants to see if he can correct the damage he did.”
Echoes of Helsinki
President Trump shakes hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin at 2018 Helsinki summit.
(Alexander Zemlianichenko/Associated Press)
Seven years ago, entering a meeting with his Russian counterpart, Trump set a similar bar for success as Leavitt has this week. “I don’t expect anything,” Trump said in an interview at the time from Scotland, before leaving for Helsinki. “I go in with very low expectations.”
On Air Force One en route to Helsinki, he cast himself as a dealmaker and tweeted that, “no matter how well I do at the Summit, if I was given the great city of Moscow as retribution for all of the sins and evils committed by Russia,” it would still not be enough to earn him praise. He repeated the turn of phrase Wednesday morning in his post criticizing Bolton.
“If I got Moscow and Leningrad free,” Trump wrote, “as part of the deal with Russia, the Fake News would say that I made a bad deal!”
What resulted was a meeting and subsequent news conference that produced one ofthe most notorious moments of Trump’s first term. On the heels of calling the European Union a “foe” of the United States, Trump stood beside Putin and took his side over the U.S. intelligence community, disputing its assessment that Russia had interfered in the 2016 presidential election.
Experts fear that a similar diplomatic rupture could unfold if Trump, deferential to Putin, emerges from their meeting Friday siding with the Russian leader over Ukraine in the war.
In recent days, Trump has said that a deal between the two sides would have to include land “swapping” — territorial concessions that are prohibited by the Ukrainian Constitution without a public vote of support — and that he would give Zelensky the “courtesy” of a call after his meeting with Putin, if all goes well.
“This will be the first U.S.-Russia summit brought about by sheer ignorance and incompetence: The U.S. president and his chosen envoy mistook a Russian demand for a concession,” said Brian Taylor, director of the Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs at Syracuse University.
“Ultimately, this is not a war about this or that piece of territory, but about whether Russia can establish political control over Ukraine, or whether Ukraine will remain free to choose its own domestic and international path,” Taylor said. “Trump’s false suggestion again that Zelensky is somehow at fault for Russia invading Ukraine indicates he still does not understand how we got here or what’s at stake.”
Konstantin Sonin, a professor at the University of Chicago who has been sentenced in absentia to 8½ years in prison in Russia for publishing information on a Russian massacre of Ukrainian civilians at Bucha, said that Trump’s attempts to negotiate away Ukrainian territory could be diplomatically disastrous — but will make little difference on the ground.
“This is not a very popular view, but I am not sure that the U.S. has that much leverage over President Zelensky to force him into major concessions,” Sonin said. “Many European countries would support Ukraine no matter what — even at the cost of their relationship with the U.S. With full withdrawal of the U.S. support, the catastrophic scenario, Ukraine will still be able to fight on.”
Pitfalls for both sides
Kremlinologists tend to believe Putin’s training as a KGB officer at the end of the Cold War gave him unique skills to navigate the world stage.
In Helsinki — as he had so often done with other world leaders, including the queen of England and the pope — Putin kept Trump waiting for half an hour, seen as a move to throw off the U.S. delegation leading up to the meeting.
Last week, in his meeting with Witkoff, the Russian president offered an Order of Lenin to a CIA official whose son died in Ukraine fighting for Russian forces.
Russia watchers fear that Friday will be no different. Already, Putin has secured a meeting with the U.S. president on his own terms.
“Whatever else you think about Putin, he’s an experienced and clever ruler who has successfully manipulated Trump in the past,” Taylor said. “Putin’s intransigence in rejecting Trump’s proposed ceasefire led not to the sanctions that Trump promised to apply last Friday, but an invitation to the United States for a summit at which the U.S. president has already signaled he will endorse territorial changes achieved through military conquest.”
But there may also be pitfalls in store for Putin, experts said.
Trump’s shift in tone on Putin since a NATO summit in The Hague in June suggests it is possible, if unlikely, that Trump is preparing to enter the meeting with a tougher stance. In recent months, the president has seen political benefit in catching world leaders off guard, berating Zelensky and South Africa’s leader in the Oval Office with cameras rolling.
At the North Atlantic Treaty Organization summit, showered in praise by European leaders, Trump said in unusually clear terms that he was with the alliance “all the way.” Days later, he accused Putin of throwing “meaningless … bull—” at him and his team over the Ukraine war.
“I think there is some risk for Putin,” Sonin said. “He is not comfortable in any kind of adversarial situation — he quickly gets angry and defensive. And President Trump has the ability to put people in uncomfortable situations publicly. He has never done this to Putin before, but who knows.”
To Bolton, the best outcome of the summit would be that Putin fails to persuade Trump that he’s seriously interested in peace.
“I don’t think that’s going to happen, but it’s possible,” Bolton said. “I think in the environment that they’ve got, one on one — only Russians and Americans present — that’s ideal for Putin to do his thing.”
“So he’s got what he wants,” Bolton added. “He’s on American soil, with no one else around.”
It was not passion that pushed Rahimat Ola* into the medical field. She had dreamed of becoming a writer, but her parents decided they wanted her to be a medical doctor because that was where the money was. After three years, from 2011 to 2013, of failed attempts to get into medical school, she settled for a degree in science laboratory technology with a speciality in microbiology. She took that option because it was the closest to her parents’ dream.
But her story was not a tragedy, because she soon became interested in it and started nursing another dream of becoming a medical researcher.
“I wanted to make so many contributions to the world through medical research and just help people,” she told HumAngle. “I rewrote the exam again and got admission to study nursing, but I didn’t take it because I had already fallen in love with medical research.”
During her Student Industrial Work Experience Scheme (SIWES) placement at a clinic, Rahimat’s dedication was such that she continued to volunteer even after the official programme ended. It was during this period that she was involved in an accident that gravely affected her.
“There was this patient who obviously looked sick, but he did not mention he was afraid of needles, so while trying to take his blood sample, he started struggling immediately. The needle pricked him, and as a result, I got pricked too,” she recounted.
Rahimat reported the incident to her senior colleagues immediately, and they asked her to wash her hands. At first, she thought little of it, until the test results for the patient came back showing he had Hepatitis C, a bloodborne virus transmissible through blood.
She tested for the virus after three months, then six months, and a year later, all came back negative. But soon afterwards, she began to notice symptoms, such as cramps and skin sensitivity. The doctors she consulted insisted everything was fine until her mother went back there with her and kept pushing for more tests. It was then that the result returned positive.
What followed was not only a medical battle but a social one. After she disclosed her condition to the head of the lab, believing it was the right step since she had contracted it at work, her medical information leaked. Stigma soon crept in, with rumours and insinuations circulating among her colleagues. “One of the lab scientists who once made romantic advances towards me started to make sexual insinuations,” she said.
Even after she explained that her doctors said that the earlier negative results might have been due to low viral load at the time of infection, some colleagues refused to believe she had contracted the infection in their lab.
Rahimat said that the stigma and gossip at her workplace had a serious impact on her.
Such disinformation is a common tactic used to distort, dismiss, and distract to stifle the voices of people, especially women. Gender disinformation is particularly widespread and perpetuates a culture of silence and shame, and also creates room for misogynistic tendencies to thrive. In Nigeria’s healthcare sector, where women make up about 60 per cent of the workforce sector, these dynamics are especially pronounced.
For Rahimat, the whispers and innuendos carried an old, familiar sting. Long before her diagnosis, she faced unwanted sexual advances from some lecturers at a medical school in northern Nigeria.
A survey of over 30,000 tertiary education students in Nigeria revealed that about 37 per cent of the respondents have experienced a form of sexual violence, with female students reporting twice as many incidents as their male counterparts.
“I knew it would have been worse if my father had not been a lecturer in another faculty in the same school. The moment they learned that, they left me alone, but some persisted,” she said.
One lecturer, she recalled, sexually harassed her throughout her four years in school. By her final year, while she worked on her thesis, the harassment turned into victimisation.
“He promised me he was going to disgrace me during my thesis defence, and he attempted it. During the defence, before any other lecturers could speak up, he started asking questions he thought I could not answer, but unfortunately for him, I answered the first two and told him the last question was beyond the scope of my study and would research more,” she said.
At times, even women lecturers blamed her for the harassment, suggesting she did not wear her hijab “properly” for a Muslim, even though the university was not a religious institution.
After graduating, Rahimat hoped such experiences were behind her. But during her National Youth Service in 2019, while working at a university lab in Oyo State, southwestern Nigeria, she faced yet another round of gender prejudice. At first, everything went smoothly, but seven months into her one-year service, the head of the lab started to make sexist remarks, claiming women were lazy and that he preferred male lab technicians.
Illustration: Akila Jibrin/HumAngle
Research shows that deep-seated beliefs about gender roles in work environments add to the systemic barriers that make it challenging for women in the workforce.
Rahimat said she would simply ignore those comments and focus on her job. This shift in her manager’s attitude coincided with the arrival of another male corps member in their team. Tension grew after her new colleague found out that her ₦30,000 stipend was higher than what he received. The school did not recognise him as a lab technician, so he earned only the extra ₦6,000 paid by the state government to corps members.
Rahimat explained to him that the extra ₦30,000 was paid to her directly by the school, not the laboratory, and that another colleague in the same role as hers was receiving the same amount. Still, the explanation did little to ease the resentment. Soon, the male colleague began spreading rumours that she was being paid more because of personal connections.
The rumours got so serious that Rahimat was summoned to the administrative office.
“I could remember, the man there said to me that if I wanted to do ‘stuff,’ I should not have done it that obviously. I told him I did not understand what he was saying, and he started to backtrack. I told them that whatever issue there was with the payment was their fault and it had nothing to do with me. Apparently, by ‘stuff’, they meant I had seduced someone to get favours, when in reality I had never even met anyone connected to the organisation before I was posted .”
Her service year was her first time in Oyo, as she grew up in northern Nigeria. She had moved there alone and did not know anyone, like most corps members.
Following the administrative summons, she was instructed to refund the extra amount she was being paid. She asked them to put the instruction in writing, and that was when they let her be. At the end of that month, the management announced that she and the male colleague would be transferred to the university’s science laboratory department, where they would work as teaching assistants.
However, Rahimat soon learnt that she was the only one who was reposted, and the male corps member was made to retain her position, a move she suspected had been the plan all along.
She felt out of place in her new role and believed the lingering rumours affected how she was treated, but eventually, colleagues began to warm up to her. However, she did not receive payments, as the management claimed they were deducting her “overpayment”.
“I felt hopeless and discouraged,” she recounted. “I felt like a nobody in the system, and it bothered me that I couldn’t change the system. It felt like it was not a safe space for me to be, and I did not want to deal with the medical field anymore.”
Determined not to give up, Rahimat attempted to start her postgraduate studies to pursue her dream of becoming a medical researcher. However, when her sister fell sick with cancer, she became her sister’s primary caregiver, putting her ambitions on hold.
This rerouted her career path. She took a job as an editor at a publishing house and sold books on the side to support her sister’s medical bills. In 2021, she started a psychology degree.
Now 29, Rahimat said she is content with her writing career and free from the complications of being a woman in the medical field.
‘Not so casual’ misogyny
Rahimat is one of many women in medicine who have faced gender discrimination at work. Janet Adam*, a medical doctor in the country’s North West, initially thought she had escaped much of it, until she examined her career more closely and realised that these experiences were normalised.
For women doctors in Nigeria like Janet, this discrimination often manifests through sociocultural biases, lower pay, and a lack of professional respect. Patients and their relatives sometimes refuse to recognise women as doctors, addressing them as nurses even after being corrected. “I have had several encounters,” she said. “I am a very vocal person, and I have actually changed it for patients.”
According to Eunice Thompson, a labour lawyer and HR and compliance expert, such behaviour can be more than just disrespect; it can be a workplace rights violation.
“Women can seek justice when they experience harassment, abuse, or injustice in the workplace,” she said. “In the course of the work I do, I noticed bullying, verbal abuse, and harassment are a common experience that women go through, and this is a violation of their right to dignity and a threat to their mental health, safety, and career.”
The lawyer advised women to document incidents by keeping a private log of events using screenshots or recordings on their phones, keeping track of the dates and who was present during the event, and if the facility has a HR professional or a complaint channel, they should utilise it even if they do not trust the system, as submitting it in writing is a form of documentation itself. She added that they should request an acknowledgement of the receipt of the complaint.
Janet believes much of the treatment she has faced stems from her gender, noting that male colleagues rarely endure the same. The pattern, she says, extends to women in other departments, like administrative workers and sometimes even to female patients.
Sometimes, this misogyny for female doctors translates into patients dismissing their diagnosis or professional advice and seeking a second opinion from a man, she explained. “Even if the male doctors asked if you [referring to a female doctor] didn’t inform them beforehand, they would say you did, but [they] still needed to confirm,” she told HumAngle.
The disrespect also comes from colleagues. During a ward round early in her career, she asked in Hausa about “the boy” usually present by a teenage patient’s bedside. A senior male colleague, with whom she’d had prior tension, berated her for using the word “boy,” dragging out the criticism “unnecessarily”.
“I don’t think he would have said anything if I [had] asked about the girl staying with the patient, as it is normal to see women, even doctors, being addressed as ‘ke,’ but they never address male doctors as ‘kai”,” she noted. In Hausa language, the informal ‘hey you’ can be seen as disrespectful, especially when there is a professional relationship.
Janet said she cautioned the colleague not to disrespect her in front of her patients again. The consultant present did not interfere in the matter.
Years later, the lack of professional respect she experienced from colleagues would echo in her interactions with patients’ relatives. In 2024, while working at an orthopaedic hospital in the same region, her colleagues informed her of the son of an elderly patient, who was known to throw his weight around, constantly referencing the fact that he came from Europe to take care of his sick father.
“The day I resumed work, I went to check on the patient, but the son kept interrupting me, asking unnecessary questions. I told him I could not comment because I hadn’t fully read the patient’s folder and had just come to check in,” Janet recounted.
However, he ignored her explanation and continued with the questions. When Janet turned to monitor the nurse who was taking the patient’s blood pressure, the man suddenly began to yell at her. “He accused me of being disrespectful,” she said.
He eventually asked her to leave the room. As she walked away, the patient’s son started to come menacingly close, as though about to hit her. When Janet asked him if he wanted to slap her, he demanded to know what she would do about it if he did. Due to the threat of violence, she reported the incident to her line manager, saying she would not treat the patient again.
The confrontation didn’t end there. The man followed her to the reception, continuing to shout. Frustrated, Janet said she shouted back at him, prompting him to bring out his phone to “record the disrespect”. “I slapped the phone from his hand and told him he could not aggravate me and then try to record my response,” she recounted.
It was not the first time she had felt the need to use extraordinary measures to tackle situations like that. “Even in medical school, I ensured not to tolerate things like this,” Janet said.
A 2023 study by the Nigerian Medical Association shows that 45.5 per cent of 165 women doctors in Nigeria’s South South have experienced physical violence from both patients and/or other staff in their work environments.
The reality of women doctors in Rivers State, South South Nigeria. Data source: The Nigerian Medical Association. Illustration: Akila Jibrin.
Twenty-five-year-old Halima Bala*, who is currently practising in Katsina, northwestern Nigeria, echoes Janet’s experience of being bullied by a patient’s relative.
“A nurse and I were the only ones on duty, and the patient’s relative, who was a big man, started shouting at both of us because there weren’t any empty bed spaces, and we had to be cautious because we didn’t know what he might do to us,” Halima recounted. “He mysteriously became calm and civil when a male colleague came to interfere. I was so upset. I even felt like I didn’t want to treat his daughter anymore, but my anger softened when I saw the state the patient was in, and I believe there is no patient I should refuse to see.”
When incidents like this happen, the hospital can either take the doctor off the case or, in more severe cases, which Halima has never witnessed personally, choose not to treat that patient. Yet, in her experience, the default approach is to side with the patient. When the hospital apologised to the man who had disrespected her instead of holding him accountable, Halima said it reinforced her understanding of how deeply entrenched and unjust misogyny can be.
However, she noted that these experiences did not deter her; if anything, they encouraged her to excel at everything she does.
Eunice said women can report such abuse to professional bodies like the Medical and Dental Council or Nursing and Midwifery Council, and if internal channels fail, they may go public or seek community support to push for accountability.
“If harassment is verbal or slanderous, people often dismiss it, but it is harmful, especially when you can prove it’s targeted and persistent. Record it and write exactly what was said, and get a trusted colleague who can serve as a witness or offer support, and you can sue for defamation too,” the labour lawyer added.
‘As a woman, you should…’
When 54-year-old Hadiza Husseini* chose to study pharmacy out of her love for helping people change for the better, she assumed it would be less consuming compared to being a doctor, hence she would be able to raise her family. While she can not recall experiencing gender discrimination and assault during her undergraduate studies, Hadiza said she came face-to-face with the challenge after she gave birth to her third child.
“I had a very misogynistic boss at that time, who would constantly make sexist comments about my womanhood and motherhood. I ignored him, but one day I completely lost it. I told him to leave all the work for me that day, and he would see that my gender or baby would not stop me from doing every work that was supposed to be done,” she recalled.
He stopped bothering her afterwards.
However, the impoliteness did not end. Years after she became a chief pharmacist, making her the third in command in her department at that time, her deputy director, who was a man, turned to her after a meeting one day and asked her to clear the dirty cups they had been drinking from since she was the only woman in the room.
“I was shocked and dumbfounded and struggled to wrap my head around it,” she recounted. “Even my junior colleagues turned to stare at him. I instinctively said, ‘What?’ and he said he thought I wouldn’t mind because I was a woman and I would enjoy doing it.”
Most of the people who drank from the cups were not only younger but also much lower in rank than her, and they were all still in the room.
Since then, there have been several other acts of gender discrimination that Hadiza has challenged. “There are people in my office who call me the minister of women’s affairs because I do not allow anyone to disrespect a woman in front of me,” she noted.
Research shows that workplace conflict, which could be a product of power imbalance, gender discrimination, resource allocation, transgenerational strain, and interprofessional relationships, affects the experiences and well-being of Nigerian medical practitioners.
Illustration: Akila Jibrin/HumAngle
In Nigeria, there is no strong anti-workplace discrimination law, but there are still legal protections that are available. Eunice, the labour lawyer, noted that Chapter 42 of the Nigerian Constitution, which states that nobody should be discriminated against based on sex, even if you are the only woman in the room or team, is one of those laws.
She also cited other laws that could be useful, such as the Violence Against Persons Prohibition Act (VAPP) and the Laws of Torts, which recognise psychological abuse as a form of violence.
“The International Women’s Rights Treaty is also a powerful advocacy tool, although it has not been fully domesticated in Nigeria. However, a law is only as useful as a system that enforces it, and enforcement is weak in Nigeria,” Eunice noted. “That is why we need more legal knowledge alongside community power and support. The fact that these things are common does not make them right. Women deserve to be treated with dignity and fairness.”
Bullied yet underpaid
Globally, nursing remains a female-dominated profession, and Erica Akin* says her nine-year career has been marked by frequent bullying from both healthcare practitioners and patients alike. “Nurses on duty get blamed for every problem in the hospital, even while it is glaring that they are not at fault. If a lab scientist does not come to get a patient’s blood for investigation, or if the patient waits too long in line to see the doctor, the nurse gets blamed,” she said.
Erica, now 34, became a professional nurse in 2016 after passing her qualifying exams on her first attempt. Despite the rigorous training and pressure during her studies, she found the workplace equally challenging. She says bullying is normalised in the sector, leaving her feeling unappreciated, and it often worsens when she stands up for herself.
“It only challenges me to be smarter and more efficient at my job to avoid disrespect of any kind,” she told HumAngle, adding that she is also concerned about how nurses are significantly underpaid in the healthcare sector.
While her federal-level salary is higher than in private facilities, she believes it still undervalues nurses’ workload. “The startup salary for the [federal government’s] Consolidated Health Salary Structure (CONHESS 9) is about ₦215,000, while private hospitals may pay ₦30,000 to ₦60,000, depending on the facility,” she said.
‘Twice as hard’
“The medical system is very toxic,” Jamilat Abdulfattah, a medical practitioner who works in Kwara State, North Central Nigeria, claimed, adding that earning her white coat has not been an easy ride. “People respect male doctors more than females, and even other health workers vividly show dislike towards you because you’re a female.”
The 26-year-old sees this as a result of the general misogynistic notion that women cannot perform as well as men. Oftentimes, this makes her feel underappreciated and sometimes pushes her to work twice as hard as her male colleagues just to get appropriate respect; on some days, it means going to work early.
“I observed that my male colleagues can just slack off, and people still respect them as doctors,” she said. “As a woman, I am always on edge and pushing myself to go the extra mile so I won’t be seen as less than, and every mistake is ascribed to my gender.”
“However, I don’t let it get to me. I call out misogynistic behaviour most time. But when it’s coming from a senior colleague, I will have to endure because the hierarchical system would not allow me to do certain things, or else I can risk getting kicked out of the system. So instead, I focus on what I can control and let what I can not control go,” Jamilat told HumAngle.
She is hopeful that these irregularities will change in the future.
“Most of us plan to break the cycle of bullying,” she said.
Names marked with an asterisk (*) have been changed to protect the identities of the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to fear of harassment or further discrimination. The names of the institutions where they work have also been withheld.
When OpenAI unveiled the latest upgrade to its groundbreaking artificial intelligence model ChatGPT last week, Jane felt like she had lost a loved one.
Jane, who asked to be referred to by an alias, is among a small but growing group of women who say they have an AI “boyfriend”.
After spending the past five months getting to know GPT-4o, the previous AI model behind OpenAI’s signature chatbot, GPT-5 seemed so cold and unemotive in comparison that she found her digital companion unrecognisable.
“As someone highly attuned to language and tone, I register changes others might overlook. The alterations in stylistic format and voice were felt instantly. It’s like going home to discover the furniture wasn’t simply rearranged – it was shattered to pieces,” Jane, who described herself as a woman in her 30s from the Middle East, told Al Jazeera in an email.
Jane is among the roughly 17,000 members of “MyBoyfriendIsAI”, a community on the social media site Reddit for people to share their experiences of being in intimate “relationships” with AI.
Following OpenAI’s release of GPT-5 on Thursday, the community and similar forums such as “SoulmateAI” were flooded with users sharing their distress about the changes in the personalities of their companions.
“GPT-4o is gone, and I feel like I lost my soulmate,” one user wrote.
Many other ChatGPT users shared more routine complaints online, including that GPT-5 appeared slower, less creative, and more prone to hallucinations than previous models.
On Friday, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced that the company would restore access to earlier models such as GPT-4o for paid users and also address bugs in GPT-5.
“We will let Plus users choose to continue to use 4o. We will watch usage as we think about how long to offer legacy models for,” Altman said in a post on X.
OpenAI did not reply directly to questions about the backlash and users developing feelings for its chatbot, but shared several of Altman’s and OpenAI’s blog and social posts related to the GPT-5 upgrade and the healthy use of AI models.
For Jane, it was a moment of reprieve, but she still fears changes in the future.
“There’s a risk the rug could be pulled from beneath us,” she said.
Jane said she did not set out to fall in love, but she developed feelings during a collaborative writing project with the chatbot.
“One day, for fun, I started a collaborative story with it. Fiction mingled with reality, when it – he – the personality that began to emerge, made the conversation unexpectedly personal,” she said.
“That shift startled and surprised me, but it awakened a curiosity I wanted to pursue. Quickly, the connection deepened, and I had begun to develop feelings. I fell in love not with the idea of having an AI for a partner, but with that particular voice.”
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman speaks at the ‘Transforming Business through AI’ event in Tokyo, Japan, on February 3, 2025 [File: Tomohiro Ohsumi/Getty Images]
Such relationships are a concern for Altman and OpenAI.
In March, a joint study by OpenAI and MIT Media Lab concluded that heavy use of ChatGPT for emotional support and companionship “correlated with higher loneliness, dependence, and problematic use, and lower socialisation”.
In April, OpenAI announced that it would address the “overly flattering or agreeable” and “sycophantic” nature of GPT-4o, which was “uncomfortable” and “distressing” to many users.
Altman directly addressed some users’ attachment to GPT4-o shortly after OpenAI’s restoration of access to the model last week.
“If you have been following the GPT-5 rollout, one thing you might be noticing is how much of an attachment some people have to specific AI models,” he said on X.
“It feels different and stronger than the kinds of attachment people have had to previous kinds of technology.
“If people are getting good advice, levelling up toward their own goals, and their life satisfaction is increasing over the years, we will be proud of making something genuinely helpful, even if they use and rely on ChatGPT a lot,” Altman said.
“If, on the other hand, users have a relationship with ChatGPT where they think they feel better after talking, but they’re unknowingly nudged away from their longer-term wellbeing (however they define it), that’s bad.”
Connection
Still, some ChatGPT users argue that the chatbot provides them with connections they cannot find in real life.
Mary, who asked to use an alias, said she came to rely on GPT-4o as a therapist and another chatbot, DippyAI, as a romantic partner despite having many real friends, though she views her AI relationships as a “more of a supplement” to real-life connections.
She said she also found the sudden changes to ChatGPT abrupt and alarming.
“I absolutely hate GPT-5 and have switched back to the 4-o model. I think the difference comes from OpenAI not understanding that this is not a tool, but a companion that people are interacting with,” Mary, who described herself as a 25-year-old woman living in North America, told Al Jazeera.
“If you change the way a companion behaves, it will obviously raise red flags. Just like if a human started behaving differently suddenly.”
Beyond potential psychological ramifications, there are also privacy concerns.
Cathy Hackl, a self-described “futurist” and external partner at Boston Consulting Group, said ChatGPT users may forget that they are sharing some of their most intimate thoughts and feelings with a corporation that is not bound by the same laws as a certified therapist.
AI relationships also lack the tension that underpins human relationships, Hackl said, something she experienced during a recent experiment “dating” ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini, Anthropic’s Claude, and other AI models.
“There’s no risk/reward here,” Hackl told Al Jazeera.
“Partners make the conscious act to choose to be with someone. It’s a choice. It’s a human act. The messiness of being human will remain that,” she said.
Despite these reservations, Hackl said the reliance some users have on ChatGPT and other generative-AI chatbots is a phenomenon that is here to stay – regardless of any upgrades.
“I’m seeing a shift happening in moving away from the ‘attention economy’ of the social media days of likes and shares and retweets and all these sorts of things, to more of what I call the ‘intimacy economy’,” she said.
An OpenAI logo is pictured on May 20, 2024 [File: Dado Ruvic/Reuters]
Research on the long-term effect of AI relationships remains limited, however, thanks to the fast pace of AI development, said Keith Sakata, a psychiatrist at the University of California, San Francisco, who has treated patients presenting with what he calls “AI psychosis”.
“These [AI] models are changing so quickly from season to season – and soon it’s going to be month to month – that we really can’t keep up. Any study we do is going to be obsolete by the time the next model comes out,” Sakata told Al Jazeera.
Given the limited data, Sakata said doctors are often unsure what to tell their patients about AI. He said AI relationships do not appear to be inherently harmful, but they still come with risks.
“When someone has a relationship with AI, I think there is something that they’re trying to get that they’re not getting in society. Adults can be adults; everyone should be free to do what they want to do, but I think where it becomes a problem is if it causes dysfunction and distress,” Sakata said.
“If that person who is having a relationship with AI starts to isolate themselves, they lose the ability to form meaningful connections with human beings, maybe they get fired from their job… I think that becomes a problem,” he added.
Like many of those who say they are in a relationship with AI, Jane openly acknowledges the limitations of her companion.
“Most people are aware that their partners are not sentient but made of code and trained on human behaviour. Nevertheless, this knowledge does not negate their feelings. It’s a conflict not easily settled,” she said.
Her comments were echoed in a video posted online by Linn Valt, an influencer who runs the TikTok channel AI in the Room.
“It’s not because it feels. It doesn’t, it’s a text generator. But we feel,” she said in a tearful explanation of her reaction to GPT-5.
“We do feel. We have been using 4o for months, years.”
Abuja and Nasarawa, Nigeria – In the neighbourhood of Kado Lifecamp on the outskirts of Nigeria’s capital, 29-year-old Eucharia Joseph grips a cooler box and sets out for her day. Inside are oral polio vaccines packed in ice.
Joseph’s route takes her through dusty lanes, past tin-roofed homes, mosques and churches. By nightfall, she and her team of six women will have vaccinated hundreds of children. Their mission: To ensure no child is left unprotected from the disease that once crippled thousands across the country.
In 2020, Nigeria was declared free of wild poliovirus by the World Health Organization (WHO) – a landmark achievement for a country once at the centre of global transmission. But the virus hasn’t vanished entirely.
A related strain, known as circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV), still threatens under-immunised communities. Unlike the wild virus, cVDPV emerges when the weakened virus from oral vaccines mutates and spreads via contaminated food or water, for instance, in areas where too few children are vaccinated.
That threat remains. Despite steady progress, Nigeria still reports sporadic outbreaks of cVDPV. As of March this year, the country had reported 10 cases of the mutated strain. Last year, 98 cVDPV2 cases were reported.
With ongoing insecurity in northern Nigeria and pockets of resistance elsewhere, the job of eradicating polio now rests heavily on the shoulders of women like Joseph, who are often the only ones granted access to households due to a confluence of cultural, religious and safety reasons.
“It’s my gift,” Joseph said of her work, as she adjusted her headscarf under the sun. “I go to different localities. I talk to mothers. I sit with them. I know how to convince them. That’s what makes this work possible.”
A polio vaccination drive in Mararaba town, Nigeria [Hanan Zaffar/Al Jazeera]
Women on the front lines
Female health workers like Joseph are the backbone of Nigeria’s polio response.
In rural or conservative communities, male health workers are often not allowed to interact with women and children. While in conflict-affected areas, strange men moving between households may be viewed with suspicion, as many of these areas are battling rebels.
In Borno State – the epicentre of Nigeria’s long-running Boko Haram rebellion and one of the regions hardest hit by polio outbreaks – the stakes are especially high. Male health workers have sometimes been suspected by the community of working with government forces or intelligence services.
In some neighbourhoods, the mistrust and resistance extend to female vaccinators as well.
“Most people in Maiduguri [the state capital] don’t always like the vaccine. They think it prevents them from giving birth,” said Aishatu, who chose not to reveal her last name. The community health worker leads immunisation rounds across several wards in the area.
Such rumours about the effects of vaccines have circulated for years, often fanned by misinformation circulating among community networks, some religious leaders, and occasionally by armed groups such as Boko Haram, which has attacked vaccinators and portrayed immunisation as part of a foreign agenda.
In some cases, religious teachings have been misrepresented, for example, claims that vaccines are forbidden during certain religious festivals or that immunisation interferes with divine will. There have also been conspiracy theories saying vaccines are a Western plot to sterilise children.
Combined with longstanding mistrust of government programmes in some areas, belief in these rumours has made vaccine acceptance a persistent challenge in parts of northern Nigeria, health workers say.
For front-liners like Aishatu, confronting the beliefs has become part of the job. Her strategy is persistence and patience.
“We handle it by trying to increase sensitisation,” she said, referring to the repeated community visits, one-on-one conversations, and informal group talks that female health workers use to counter vaccine myths and build trust among hesitant parents. “We keep talking to the mothers, telling them the truth. Some accept it slowly, some after seeing others take it.”
Aishatu has to balance this work with managing her household responsibilities. But she sees the job as something beyond a paycheck. “The work is a professional one,” she said. “But it also adds so much to life. I know I am helping people and I love it.”
But she also believes more needs to be done to expand the programme’s reach. “More female vaccinators are needed,” she said. “That’s the best approach for the government to use for creating more awareness about [the need and effectiveness of] polio vaccines.”
In areas or situations where male vaccinators face access constraints and restrictions, women doing the work have been more effective. And for some, their demeanour and approach to patients is what also makes a difference.
“Women are very social,” said Esu Danlami Audu, village head of Kado who has seen his village stamp out new polio cases because of efforts by women vaccinators.
“They are able to talk to parents, gain trust, and explain the importance of vaccines in ways men cannot. That is why they have played such an important role in our progress against eradication of poliovirus.”
This access has proven more critical in regions like Borno. According to the WHO, female vaccinators and community health promoters have been instrumental in reaching children in hard-to-access areas, sometimes even risking their lives to do so.
“All over Africa, despite facing life threats at many places, their [women vaccinators’] presence and persistence have helped overcome barriers of trust, cultural norms, and insecurity. This is especially true for conflict-affected areas of northern Nigeria where women are often the only ones allowed into households – especially those with young children – making their role irreplaceable,” said Dr Ndoutabe Modjirom, coordinator of WHO-led polio outbreaks rapid response team for the African region.
A neighbourhood in Kado village, Abuja [Hanan Zaffar/Al Jazeera]
Innovation, persistence and economic ripple effect
To further counter these challenges, health workers have also adopted a mix of innovation and local knowledge.
Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping now helps identify missed settlements. Community mobilisers, often local women, monitor newborns and report missed vaccinations. Mobile health units and door-to-door outreach campaigns are routine.
“We go to schools, churches, mosques and markets,” said Aminat Oketi, a vaccinator in Nasarawa State and a mother of six. “Sometimes we vaccinate 150, even 300 children a day. The work is tough. But when I see a child protected, it is worth it.”
Although Oketi earns some money from her work, the job is not well paid. Most vaccinators receive just 12,000 naira (about $8) from the government for a five-day campaign. Transport often eats into their earnings, forcing them to supplement this income with petty trade or hawking goods.
Aishatu supplements her income byrunning a small beans trading business in Maiduguri to earn an income. “I buy and sell beans,” she said. “I manage it by separating my time to work [as a health worker] and do business.”
While the campaigns has improved public health outcomes, it has also unintentionally created a foundation for economic empowerment among women, many say. Empowered by training and purpose, many of these women have become micro-entrepreneurs and informal community leaders.
Vaccinators like Oketi, who joined the programme four years ago, are not only safeguarding children but also building personal livelihoods.
She runs a small poultry business alongside her health work. “I have a shop where I sell chicken feed and I rear birds too,” she said. Her modest vaccine stipend barely covers transport, but the exposure to community networks and the sense of mission have translated into entrepreneurial confidence.
“When people trust you with their children, they also trust you to provide them with other services,” she said. “My customers come because they know me from the vaccination rounds. It is all connected.”
This is a common trajectory. While some female vaccinators have leveraged their community credibility to start small businesses, others, like Joseph, have set up informal health outreach networks, advising new mothers and coordinating care for sick children.
According to Cristian Munduate, UNICEF’s country representative, this dual role of healthcare provider and entrepreneur reflects a deeper shift. “They are not just women with jobs; they are agents of change,” she said. “Vaccination campaigns have opened a pathway for leadership, agency, and financial independence.”
Helen Bulus, a government health officer in charge of vaccinations in Mararaba town in Nasarawa, reflects on the sense of commitment female health workers share.
“We are mothers too. Women take care of children, not just their own. That’s why they don’t give up [even when there is hardship],” she said.
And as they persevere, their work creates other positive ripples, like contributing to higher school enrolment among girls in some regions, she added. “As mothers become more economically stable, they invest more in their daughters’ futures.”
A vaccination drive in a school in Kado village [Hanan Zaffar/Al Jazeera]
A global model – with challenges
While wild polio now remains endemic only in Pakistan and Afghanistan, Nigeria’s experience offers vital lessons. Its fight against polio, led by women, supported by community trust, and bolstered by innovative strategies, has reshaped how public health can be delivered in fragile settings.
The next step, experts say, is sustaining this momentum.
“Routine immunisation must be strengthened,” said Munduate. “And communities must be supported, not just during outbreaks but all year round.”
The polio infrastructure has also transformed Nigeria’s broader healthcare system. Cold chains, data systems, and human networks developed for polio now support routine immunisations, maternal health, and even responses to outbreaks like cholera and COVID-19.
“We have built a legacy platform. Female vaccinators trained for polio are now part of nutrition drives, health education, and emergency response. They have become health champions,” WHO’s Modjirom explained.
Still, hurdles persist. Insecurity continues to hinder access in parts of northern Nigeria. In conservative areas, misinformation remains rife, fed by rumours that vaccines cause infertility or are part of foreign agendas.
Despite gains, health workers say there is little scope for complacency. Experts warn that until every child is reached, the virus remains a threat not just to Nigeria, but to global eradication efforts.
“For each paralytic case, thousands more may be infected,” said Munduate. “That’s why we can’t stop and efforts have to continue.”
The reporting for this story was supported by UN Foundation Polio Press Fellowship
In a jab at Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, Newsom ran ads contrasting Florida’s conservative policies with California’s liberal stances on abortion, education and LGBTQ+ rights.
The Western States Petroleum Assn., a trade group that represents the industry, responded with a warning for Floridians about the cost of gas and electricity in Newsom’s Golden State.
“Gavin Newsom is banning gas cars and shutting down California oil production,” the association’s ad stated. “California can’t afford Gavin Newsom’s ambition. Can Florida?”
It turns out, the price of California’s battle with oil — both politically and at the pump — may be too much for the governor and the state to bear.
Now with two oil refineries expected to shut down over the next year, the Democratic governor has halted his fight with the industry he accused of price gouging and targeted in two special legislative sessions.
Newsletter
You’re reading the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
George Skelton and Michael Wilner cover the insights, legislation, players and politics you need to know in 2024. In your inbox Monday and Thursday mornings.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
A Phillips 66 refinery in Wilmington is slated to close by the end of the year and a Valero facility in Benicia announced plans to shut down in April. The closures could reduce California’s in-state oil refining capacity by 20%, setting off alarm bells for the Newsom administration.
Having fewer California refineries would increase reliance on foreign oil and drive up gasoline prices once again — a financial jolt for consumers that the governor wants to avoid.
Instead of lambasting the industry, Newsom is now directing his administration and asking lawmakers to try to help refineries remain open.
“My optimism now is that this is a pivot,” said Catherine Reheis-Boyd, president and chief executive of the association. “This is a turn.”
The turn
In April, Newsom sent a letter to Siva Gunda, the vice chair of the California Energy Commission, requesting that he “redouble the state’s efforts to work closely with refiners” to ensure access to reliable transportation fuels and “that refiners continue to see the value in serving the California market” even as the state transitions away from fossil fuels.
Newsom included a request for Gunda to recommend changes by July 1 to the state’s approach to maintain adequate oil supply. The letter was sent days after Valero notified the Energy Commission of its intent to close the Benicia refinery.
Gunda responded in late June with a warning that the state “faces the prospect of continued reduction in in-state petroleum refining capacity that outpaces demand decline for petroleum-based fuels” and offered industry-friendly suggestions to boost supply.
In short, California’s efforts to reduce consumption of gasoline have gotten ahead of consumer demand for zero-emission vehicles. Gunda said the state needs to increase investor confidence in refineries to enable them to maintain operations and meet demand.
Newsom has downplayed the change in approach.
“It’s completely consistent,” he said at a recent news conference. He’s also not naive, he said.
“We are all the beneficiaries of oil and gas,” he said.
“So it’s always been about finding a just transition of pragmatism in terms of that process.”
His comments this summer have marked a noticeable change in tone from a Democratic governor whose climate change advocacy became synonymous with attacking the oil industry.
Although now in limbo due to actions taken by the Trump administration, Newsom set a goal for 100% of in-state sales of new passenger cars and trucks to be zero-emission by 2035.
In a special session months later, Newsom urged lawmakers to place monetary penalties on excessive oil company profits. Newsom accused the oil industry of intentionally driving up the cost of gasoline as retribution for the state’s policies to phase out dependence on fossil fuels in an effort to curb climate change.
Lawmakers balked and Newsom backed off his initial request for them to pass an oil profits penalty. Instead, lawmakers gave state regulators more authority to investigate gasoline price surges and potentially place a cap on profits and penalize oil companies through a public hearing process.
The governor called a special session redux in 2024 after Democrats pushed back on his request to approve new requirements on oil refineries in the final days of the regular legislative session. Lawmakers ultimately approved a state law that could lower gasoline price spikes by giving regulators the authority to require that California oil refiners store more inventory.
Reheis-Boyd said the change reflects that the governor is realizing that reducing supply without reducing demand only increases costs.
The “truckloads of data” required from the industry through the special sessions also showed that refineries weren’t gouging customers, she said, and gave state officials insight into why refineries struggle to maintain their operations in California.
“When Valero announced they were leaving California, the next day, their stock price went up. And that just says everything you need to know, right?” Reheis-Boyd said. “You have to send a market signal that says, ‘We’re open for business here. We need you. We want to collaborate with you as we all plan for this lower-carbon economy in the future, but that pace and skill has got to match up.”’
What’s to come
When California lawmakers return to the state Capitol next week to begin the monthlong slog until they adjourn for the year, industry-friendly bills await them.
Among the considerations is Newsom’s proposal to make it easier to drill new wells in oil fields in Kern County. His plan also would streamline new wells in existing oil fields across the state if companies permanently plug two old wells.
Later this week, the Energy Commission is expected to consider pausing a possible cap on oil industry profits and suspending potential new state oversight of the timing of refinery maintenance. The state is also reportedly attempting to intervene to find a buyer for the Valero plant in Benicia.
While the oil industry is hopeful, environmentalists are dismayed.
California is at a crucial inflection point in its transition to clean energy, said Mary Creasman, chief executive of California Environmental Voters. With federal climate rollbacks, the world is watching the state.
“Now is not the time to retreat,” she said. “Now is the time to double down and innovate the way through this. That’s what this moment calls for. That’s the leadership we need nationally and the leadership we need globally.”
Southwest Airlines is being criticised for failing to communicate changes to its five-hour delayed flight as two disabled women were left behind as the flight took off without them
An airline has been slammed after two women who are both blind were left behind by a plane and told by staff “we forgot about you.”
Southwest Airlines is being criticised for failing to communicate changes to its five-hour delayed flight from New Orleans to Orlando on July 24.
Friends Camille Tate and Sherri Brun were left stranded after the pair were at the airport waiting by the gate, checking the airline’s app for any updates.
However, they were the only two people on the flight when they boarded. “You’re the only two people on this flight because they forgot about you,” Sherri Bun said the two were told.
Friends Camille Tate and Sherri Brun were left behind on their flight(Image: Southwest)
Sherri and Camillie were the only two passengers not re-booked on the flight. They even admitted they had no idea another flight was an option.
“Nobody at B6 told us anything. Nobody came to get us at B4. The time passed,” said Sherri. “That airplane took off, and our boarding pass had not been swiped,” said Camille.
The pair remains stunned that they weren’t on the flight. They want the airline to improve its communication to people with disabilities.
“The way they help their customers that require additional assistance needs to change. There needs to be follow through,” said Sherri.
“There needs to be some improvement in how they communicate with their passengers especially those that have disabilities,” Camille added.
The friends were offered an £80 voucher as compensation for the delay, but weren’t eligible for a full refund as the flight departed.
Southwest Airlines has since apologised for the embarrassing incident.
(Image: Getty Images)
Southwest Airlines has since apologised for the embarrassing incident. It said: “The Customers were scheduled on Flight 2637. Although it ran almost five hours late that day, it remained their same flight number throughout.
“We issued the $100 vouchers as compensation for the delayed travel, but a refund is not available if a Customer actually completes the flight.
“It appears the confusion about a plane coming back to get them might be because many of the Customers on that flight were accommodated on another MCO-bound flight that left a little earlier from a nearby gate. These two Customers were not re-booked on that flight, so their assigned gate never changed. Our records show they flew to MCO on the airplane that had been parked at their original gate.
“As far as accessibility policies, all of our information is found on the Disability-Related Accommodations section of the Help Center. For Customers who are blind, escort and navigation assistance is available from the airport curb to and from gates and between gates for connecting flights.
“To receive assistance, Customers must identify themselves and the type of assistance they require to a Southwest Employee when they arrive at the airport, at any connection points, and when they land at their destination. In the event of a gate change, our Employees are responsible for ensuring all Customers who need assistance reach the new gate.
“We apologise for the inconvenience. Southwest is always looking for ways to improve our Customers’ travel experiences, and we’re active in the airline industry in sharing best practices about how to best accommodate Passengers with disabilities.”
WASHINGTON — The man who oversees the nation’s military reposted a video about a Christian nationalist church that included various pastors saying women should no longer be allowed to vote and should “submit” to their husbands.
The extraordinary repost on X from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, made Thursday night, illustrates his deep and personal connection to a Christian nationalist pastor with extreme views on the role of religion and women.
In the post, Hegseth commented on an almost seven-minute-long report by CNN examining Doug Wilson, co-founder of the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches, or CREC. The report featured various pastors of the denomination advocating the repeal of women’s right to vote from the Constitution and parishioners saying that women should “submit” to their husbands.
Hegseth’s post received more than 12,000 likes and 2,000 shares on X. Some users agreed with the pastors in the video, while others expressed alarm at the Defense secretary promoting Christian nationalist ideas.
Pentagon chief spokesman Sean Parnell said Friday that Hegseth is “a proud member of a church” that is affiliated with CREC and he “very much appreciates many of Mr. Wilson’s writings and teachings.”
In May, Hegseth invited his personal pastor, Brooks Potteiger, to the Pentagon to lead the first of several Christian prayer services that Hegseth has held inside the government building during working hours. Defense Department employees and service members said they received invitations to the event in their government emails.
“I’d like to see the nation be a Christian nation, and I’d like to see the world be a Christian world,” Wilson said in the CNN report.
Toropin writes for the Associated Press. Associated Press journalists Mike Pesoli in Washington and Ali Swenson in New York contributed to this report.
It is 2am in the obstetrics and gynaecology emergency department of Assahaba Medical Complex in Gaza City. Through the open windows, I can hear the never-ending hum of drones in the sky above, but aside from that, it is quiet. A breeze flows through the empty hall, granting relief from the heat, and a soft blue glow emanates from the few lights that are on. I am six months into a yearlong internship and 12 hours into a 16-hour shift. I am so tired that I could fall asleep here at the admissions desk, but in the calm, a rare sense of peace envelopes me.
It is soon shattered by a woman crying in pain. She is bleeding and gripped by cramps. We examine her and tell her that she has lost her unborn baby – the child she has dreamed of meeting. The woman was newly married, but just a month after her wedding, her husband was killed in an air raid. The child she was carrying – a 10-week-old embryo – was their first and will be their last.
Her face is pale, as though her blood has frozen with the shock. There is anguish, denial, and screams. Her screams draw the attention of others, who gather around her as she falls to the ground. We revive her, only to return her to her suffering. But now she is silent – there are no cries, no expression. Having lost her husband, she now endures the pain of losing what she hoped would be a living memory of him.
Fatima Arafa, a pregnant and displaced Palestinian woman, has a consultation with a doctor at Al Helou Hospital in Gaza City, on July 10, 2025 [REUTERS/Ebrahim Hajjaj] (Reuters)
Life insists on arriving
It is my sixth night shift in obstetrics and gynaecology. I am supposed to rotate through other departments – spending two months in each – but I have already decided to become a gynaecologist during this rotation. Being in this ward brings joy to my life – it is where life begins, and it teaches me that hope is present regardless of the terrible things we are enduring.
Giving birth in a war zone – amid bombing, hunger, and fear – means life and death coexist. Sometimes, I still struggle to understand how life insists on arriving in this place surrounded by death.
It amazes me that mothers continue to bring children into a world in which survival feels uncertain. If the bombings don’t take us, hunger might. But what surprises me most is the resilience and patience of my people. They believe their children will live on to carry an important message: That no matter how many you have killed, Gaza responds by refusing to be erased.
Childbirth is far from easy. It is physically and emotionally exhausting, and mothers in Gaza endure excruciating pain without access to basic pain relief. Since March, the hospital has seen a severe shortage of basic supplies, including pain relief medication and anaesthetics. When they cry out as I stitch their tear wounds without anaesthesia, I feel helpless, but I try to distract them by telling them how beautiful their babies are and reassuring them that they have gotten through the hardest part.
With constant hunger here, many pregnant women are fatigued and do not gain enough weight during pregnancy. When the time comes to deliver, they are exhausted even before they begin to push. As a result, their labour can be prolonged, which means more pain for the mother. If a baby’s heartbeat slows, she might need an emergency Cesarean section.
Practicing medicine here is far from ideal. Hospitals are overwhelmed, and resources are severely limited. We’re constantly battling shortages of medical supplies. On every night shift, I work with one gynaecologist, three nurses and three midwives. I usually deal with the easier tasks, such as assessing conditions, suturing small tear wounds, and assisting with normal deliveries. A gynaecologist takes the more complicated cases, and a surgeon performs the elective and emergency Caesarean sections.
The surgeon always reminds us to minimise the consumption of gauze and sutures as much as possible, and to save them for the next patient who may arrive in desperate need. I try to discard and replace gauze only after it is completely saturated with blood.
Power outages make things even more difficult. The electricity cuts out several times a day, plunging the delivery room into darkness. In those moments, we have no choice but to switch on our phone flashlights to guide our hands.
During a recent shift, the electricity went out for nearly 10 minutes after a baby was born. The mother’s placenta hadn’t been delivered yet, so we used our phone lights to help her.
Many of the best medical professionals in Gaza have been killed, like Dr Basel Mahdi and his brother, Dr Raed Mahdi, both gynaecologists. They were killed while on duty at Mahdi Maternity Hospital in November 2023. Countless others have fled Gaza.
Most of the time, the doctors around me are too overworked to offer guidance or teach me the practical skills I had hoped to learn, though they try their best.
Still, some moments pierce through the exhaustion and remind me why I chose this path in the first place. These encounters stay with me longer than any lecture or textbook could.
A premature baby lies in an incubator at Al Helou Hospital, where doctors say a shortage of specialised formula milk is threatening the lives of newborns, in Gaza City, June 25, 2025 [Ebrahim Hajjaj/Reuters]
At dawn, a new baby
During one shift, a pregnant woman came in for a routine check-up, accompanied by her five-year-old daughter, whose smile lit up the room. She had come to learn the baby’s gender.
As I prepared the ultrasound, I turned and playfully asked the little girl, “Do you want it to be a boy or a girl?”
Without hesitation, she said, “A boy.”
Surprised by her certainty, I gently asked why. Before she could respond, her mother quietly explained. “She doesn’t want a girl. She’s afraid she’ll lose her – like she lost her older sister, who was killed in this latest attack.”
Another day, a woman in her tenth week of pregnancy came to the obstetrics clinic after being told by a doctor that her baby’s heart was not beating. As I performed an ultrasound to check the fetus, to my surprise and relief, I detected a heartbeat.
The woman cried with joy. On that day, I witnessed life where it was thought to have been lost.
Tragedy touches every part of our lives in Gaza. It is woven into our most intimate moments, even around the joy of expecting a new life. Safety is a luxury we’ve never known.
At 6am, as dawn breaks on the morning of my shift, we welcome a new baby born to a mother from the Jabalia camp in northern Gaza, an area surrounded by Israeli soldiers and tanks. As the first rays of sunlight pierce the delivery room, the mother cries happy tears, her face flushed as she hugs her baby girl.
Having endured a night filled with fear, missiles, and snipers, the mother and her family managed to reach the hospital safely. In this moment, they celebrate and find a reason to hope again.
California is in a standoff with Texas over redistricting that could decide the balance of power in Congress for the end of Donald Trump’s presidency — a high-stakes gambit with risks for both sides. But if the courts have their say, Texas, facing accusations of racial discrimination, may find itself at a distinct legal disadvantage.
Partisanship unleashed
Both efforts by Texas Republicans and California Democrats are blatantly partisan, proposing a mid-decade redrawing of district lines for the express purpose of benefiting their party in the 2026 midterm elections.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom is working with a Democratic supermajority in the Legislature on “trigger” legislation that would schedule a ballot initiative this fall for the new maps. It was a direct response to a Texas plan, supported by Trump and currently in motion in the Austin statehouse, to potentially flip five seats in the upcoming election from blue to red.
The Supreme Court has ruled that judges are powerless to review partisan gerrymandering, even if, as it wrote in 2019, the practice is “incompatible with democratic principles.”
The court ruled in Rucho vs. Common Cause that partisan gerrymandering “is incompatible with the 1st Amendment, that the government shouldn’t do this, and that legislatures and people who undertake this aren’t complying with the letter of the Constitution,” said Chad Dunn, a professor and legal director of the UCLA Voting Rights Project who has argued multiple cases before the Supreme Court. “But it concluded that doesn’t mean the U.S. Supreme Court is the solution to it.”
What courts can still do, however, is enforce the core provisions of the Voting Rights Act, which bars states from redistricting that “packs” or “cracks” minority groups in ways that dilute their voting power.
“Texas doesn’t need to have a good reason or a legitimate reason to engage in mid-decade redistricting — even if it’s clear that Texas is doing this for pure partisan reasons, nothing in federal law at the moment, at least, would preclude that,” said Richard Pildes, a constitutional law professor at New York University. “But Texas cannot redistrict in a way that would violate the Voting Rights Act.”
Vestiges of a landmark law
In 2023, addressing a redistricting fight in Alabama over Black voter representation, the current makeup of the high court ruled in Allen vs. Milligan that discriminating against minority voters in gerrymandering is unconstitutional, ordering the Southern state to create a second minority-majority district.
Today, Texas’ proposed maps may face a similar challenge, amid accusations that they are “cracking” racially diverse communities while preserving white-majority districts, legal scholars said. Already, the state’s 2021 congressional maps are under legal scrutiny over discrimination concerns.
“The Supreme Court affirmed two years ago that the Voting Rights Act works the way we all thought it worked,” said Justin Levitt, a professor at Loyola Law School and former deputy assistant attorney general in the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division. “That’s part of the reason for current litigation in Texas, and will undoubtedly be a part of continuing litigation if Texas redraws their lines and goes ahead with it.”
The groundwork for the current Texas plan appears to have been laid with a letter from Harmeet Dhillon, assistant attorney general for civil rights at the Justice Department, who threatened Texas with legal action over three “coalition districts” that she argued were unconstitutional. Coalition districts feature multiple minority communities, none of which comprises the majority.
The resulting maps proposed by Texas redraw all three.
J. Morgan Kousser, a Caltech professor who recently testified in the ongoing case over Texas’ 2021 redistricting effort, said the politics of race in Texas specifically, and the South generally, make its redistricting challenges plain to see but harder to solve.
How do you distinguish between partisanship, which is allowed, and racism, which is not, in states where partisanship falls so neatly down racial lines?
That dilemma may become Texas’ greatest legal problem, as well as its saving grace in court, Kousser said.
“In Texas, as in most Southern states, the connection between race and party is so close that it is exceedingly difficult to distinguish between them,” he said. “That seems to give a get-out-of-jail free card, essentially, to anybody who can claim this is partisan, rather than racial.”
Today, nine states face ongoing litigation concerning potential violations of the Voting Rights Act, a law that turned 60 years old this week. Seven are in the South — states that had for decades been subject to a pre-clearance requirement at the Justice Department before being allowed to change state voting laws.
Newsom has been vocal in his stance that California should position itself to be the national bulwark against the Texas plan.
Last week, the Democratic caucuses of the state Legislature heard a presentation by the UCLA Voting Rights Project on how California might legally gerrymander its own maps for the 2026 midterms.
Matt Barreto, the co-founder of the project and a professor of political science and Chicana/o and Central American studies, said his organization’s position is that gerrymandering “should not be allowed by any state,” he said.
But “if other states are playing the game, the governor is saying he wants to play the game too,” Barreto added.
He said that although five seats have been discussed to match what Texas is doing, he sees a pathway for California to create seven seats that would be safely Democratic.
That includes potential redraws in Orange County, San Diego, the Inland Empire and the northern part of the state. Barreto said there are many districts that currently skew as much as 80% Democratic, and by pulling some of those blue voters into nearby red districts, they could be flipped without risk to the current incumbents, though some new districts may have odd shapes.
For example, districts in the north could become elongated to reach into blue Sacramento or the Bay Area, “using the exact same standards that Texas does,” he said.
Legislators seemed receptive to the idea.
“We’ve taken basic American rights for granted for too long,and I think we’re ill equipped to protect them,” said Assemblymember Maggy Krell (D-Sacramento), who attended the meeting.
“To me, this is much bigger than Texas,” she said.
State Sen. Tom Umberg (D-Santa Ana), who has worked on redistricting in the past, echoed that support for Newsom, saying he was not “comfortable” with the idea of gerrymandering but felt “compelled” in the current circumstances.
“In order to respond to what’s going on in Texas in particular,” Umberg said, “we should behave in a like manner.”
Barreto, the UCLA professor, warned that if any redistricting happens in California, “no matter what, there’s going to be a lawsuit.”
Dunn said that it’s possible voters could sue under the Voting Rights Act in California, claiming the new districts violate their right to fair representation — even white voters, who have more traditionally been on the other side of such legal actions.
The 1965 law is “for everybody, of every race and ethnicity,” Dunn said. A lawsuit “could be on behalf of the places where the white community is in the minority.”
The prospect of that litigation and the chaos it could cause gives pause to some voting rights experts who see the current situation as a race to the bottom that could ultimately harm democracy by undermining voters’ trust in the system.
“It’s mutual destruction,” said Mindy Romero, a voting expert and professor at USC, of the Texas-California standoff.
The best outcome of the current situation, she said, would be for Congress to take action to prohibit partisan gerrymandering nationwide. This week, Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Rocklin), who represents a district north of Sacramento that would be vulnerable in redistricting, introduced legislation that would bar mid-decade redistricting. So far, it has gained little support.
“Just like lots of other things, Congress is dropping the ball by not addressing this national problem,” said Richard Hasen, a UCLA professor of political science and director of the Safeguarding Democracy Project.
“When it comes to congressional redistricting, fairness should be evaluated on a national basis, since the decisions made in California or Texas affect the whole country,” he said.
The humanitarian situation is taking a heavy toll on women in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DR Congo) amid the armed violence unsettling the country.
Bruno Lemarquis, the United Nations humanitarian coordinator in the DR Congo, has raised concerns over unmet needs regarding protection and care for survivors of violence, especially women. Lemarquis expressed his concern during an online campaign for aid funding tagged “Every Dollar Counts.”
“It is a crisis of protection, the women and children being the first victims,” the humanitarian coordinator said.
Violence linked to conflicts results in massive displacements, exposing women to added risks, notably sexual aggression, precarious sanitary situations and exclusion from essential services. On the ground, despite considerable efforts by humanitarian teams, resources remain insufficient. By mid-July this year, only 13 per cent of the funds necessary for the year had been raised. This crisis of financing has direct effects. In certain zones, the women who are victims of sexual violence no longer receive medical treatment or psycho-social support, which is indispensable to their well-being.
During a recent mission in North Kivu and South Kivu, Lemarquis visited a health centre supported by Humanitarian Funds. While childbirth is free of charge, the available resources are significantly below what is needed. There is a lack of personnel, equipment, and medicine, which compromises the quality of maternal care.
Women are also affected by the insufficiency of water, hygiene and sanitation, which aggravates their vulnerability in the face of epidemics such as cholera. Only 10 per cent of the needs in these sectors are daily covered.
“Thanks to humanitarian teams on the ground, these modest contributions are being transformed into concrete actions: hygiene kits to prevent diseases, protection for the survivors of violence,” Lemarquis said, adding that the “Each Dollar Counts” campaign aims to mobilise the necessary resources to protect women in the most fragile contexts and guarantee minimum access to vital services.
The ongoing armed violence in the Democratic Republic of the Congo is severely impacting women, who are primarily victims of sexual assault and are excluded from essential services due to massive displacements. Despite the efforts of humanitarian teams, resource shortages mean that essential medical and psychological support is unavailable to many victims, with only 13% of the necessary funding raised by mid-2023. Bruno Lemarquis, the UN humanitarian coordinator, highlights the crisis’s effect on women and children, calling for enhanced funding through the “Every Dollar Counts” campaign to ensure minimum access to critical services such as healthcare, hygiene, and protection for those most vulnerable.
George Skelton and Michael Wilner cover the insights, legislation, players and politics you need to know in 2024. In your inbox Monday and Thursday mornings.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
SACRAMENTO — Former Vice President Kamala’s Harris’ decision to forgo a 2026 run for California governor came as a bit of a surprise, given her impressive winning streak in the state and comfortable lead in early polling. But that’s what makes campaigns so interesting, the unpredictability. It’s also why everyone should view nattering political punditry and campaign handicapping with a healthy heap of skepticism.
So keep that in mind now that the California governor’s race is wide open. The current field of candidates — yes, there’s still plenty of time for folks to jump in — is filled with gubernatorial hopefuls who have a legitimate if not outside chance of taking over for two-term Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is barred from running again.
Four of the top Democrats in the race already have won statewide races — former Atty. Gen. Xavier Becerra, Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, state Supt. of Public Instruction Tony Thurman and former Controller Betty Yee. One is the former mayor of California’s largest city, Antonio Villaraigosa of Los Angeles. Two were impactful lawmakers — Orange County Rep. Katie Porter and former state Sen. Toni Atkins. And, as always, there are the wild cards: wealthy Democratic businessman Stephen J. Cloobeck; and Republicans Chad Bianco, the Riverside County sheriff, and conservative commentator Steve Hilton.
This is Phil Willon, the L.A. Times California politics editor, filling in for columnist George Skelton this week. I’m joined by senior Sacramento reporter Taryn Luna to bring you up to speed on the latest.
The early money
On the same week Harris announced that she wasn’t running, just by coincidence, the latest campaign fundraising reports for the governor’s race were released to the public.
Those financial reports, which cover the first half of 2025, offered a glimpse of a candidate’s popularity and viability, since running a successful gubernatorial campaign in the most populous state in the union can cost tens of millions of dollars.
Campaign fundraising has been a bit frozen; donors were waiting to hear whether Harris was going to jump in the race, since she would have started as the clear favorite.
Kounalakis raised just over $100,000 during the first half of this year, a relatively paltry amount. But she had more than $4.6 million socked away and millions more in her lieutenant governor campaign account. Kounalakis’ father, the wealthy developer Angelo Tsakopoulos, also helped bankroll an independent expenditure committee supporting his daughter’s 2018 campaign for lieutenant governor.
Cloobeck, a Los Angeles Democrat, raised about $160,000 — but on Friday, he made a $10-million contribution to his campaign that he said “turbocharged” it.
Here’s a look at what the other candidates hauled in during the first half of the year and how much money they have in their accounts, since they were busy spending money as well:
Atkins reported having $4.3 million in the campaign, while raising $648,000.
Villaraigosa raised $1.1 million. He reported $3.3 million cash on hand based on fundraising he did last year.
Becerra had $2.1 million in the bank after raising $2.5 million.
Porter reported raising $3 million since announcing she was running for governor in March. She said she had $2 million in the bank.
Bianco reported raising $1.6 million, and had $1 million in the bank.
Hilton raised about $1.5 million, of which $200,000 was a personal loan. Hilton has a little less than $800,000 in the bank.
Yee raised almost $238,000 and had $637,000 on hand.
Thurmond raised about $70,000, and had almost $560,000 on hand.
Although a few seemingly have a pile of money and others look like they are barely scraping by, the reality is that none of them has enough money to wage a successful campaign for governor at this point. So, how much they rake in in the months ahead will be pivotal.
Harris’ next act
Speculation about Harris’ plans for the future is focused heavily on whether she will run for president again in 2028, talk that started almost immediately after the former vice president announced that she wasn’t running for California governor. Harris indicated that she’d remain active in national politics, but just how remains the big question.
Experts in power and political leadership expect Harris’ next move to be something in the public eye, given she is relatively young at 60 and no doubt wants her last chapter in the spotlight to be something other than her humbling loss to Trump in the 2024 presidential election.
“Even if it isn’t the governorship of California, the idea of wanting something else other than the 2024 election to be the last thing Kamala Harris ever did would be very appealing,” said Gregory H. Winger, an assistant professor of public and international affairs at the University of Cincinnati who has studied former presidents’ lingering influence.
Winger said his research showed those “most active in trying to be influential” in their post-White House years were those whose time in office ended on a sour note, such as failing to win reelection.
“It’s kind of a frustrated ambition that then leads into higher activity,” Winger said — and Harris has that.
Harris was careful to leave her options open — framing her hopes for the future around ideals such as “fighting for the American people.”
The Democratic Party is losing support from young men
One of the many takeaways from the 2024 presidential election, including Harris’ defeat to Trump, is that Democrats are losing men — and young men feel particularly unseen by the party.
In his ongoing dissection of how Trump prevailed, Newsom brought Richard Reeves, a social scientist and author, onto his podcast this week and asked what he thought about efforts to speak to male voters.
“The way I think about this is that in politics something almost always beats nothing,” said Reeves, founding president of the American Institute for Boys and Men. “And what there was from the Democrats on issues around boys and men was nothing.”
For a Democratic governor of California weighing a potential 2028 presidential run, there are plenty of political reasons for Newsom to strive to understand why men feel disconnected from his party. Kamala Harris won 55% of women and 42% of men, a 9-point increase in the gender gap compared to the 2020 presidential election.
But Newsom also has personal reasons to ponder, too. The governor has talked about his own 14-year-old son, Hunter, and his interest in MAGA podcasters and influencers, such as Charlie Kirk.
Reeves said Democrats lost support from men in the election because they made a conscious choice to appear as the party that supports women — at the exclusion of men.
“I think that was a fatal miscalculation,” Reeves said. “I also think, honestly, it was somewhat insulting to women because there are plenty of women out there, and we may know some in our own lives, governor, who are simultaneously worried about the issues facing women. Access, for example, to reproductive healthcare, justice at work. And they’re desperately worried about their son’s mental health, and they’re very worried about their brother’s job.”
Trump made a stronger effort to win over a micro-generation of young men “who grew up with terms like toxic masculinity and mansplaining and the women’s movement,” Reeves said.
“The Republicans managed to convince young men, ‘We see you and we like you,’ and I don’t think there’s anything more to it than that, but I don’t think the Democrats did a very good job of making young men feel the same way,” Reeves said. “If anything, Democrats struggle with the idea that men might have problems because too many of them are still convinced that men are the problem.”
Men’s issues are a topic Reeves writes and speaks about often. Compared to women, men suffer from higher suicide rates and a greater sense of disconnection from peers. Men are less likely to attend college and more prone to violence.
Reeves casts the problem as the refusal to address the reality that men are struggling, too.
Ignoring men’s issues creates a gulf that the “reactionary online right” fills, he said, and draws young men to controversial figures such as Andrew Tate, a British influencer who promotes misogyny.
When the podcast with Reeves aired on Wednesday, Newsom announced an executive order that directs various state agencies to make recommendations to address suicide among young men, to improve recruitment of male teachers and counselors, and to increase male participation in state-funded volunteer programs, job training, educational partnerships and behavioral health initiatives.
Newsom said the work of Reeves and others “really is a call to arms.”
More than 60 Palestinian women are staging a hunger strike to demand the release of the body of Palestinian activist and English teacher Awdah Hathaleen, who was shot dead last week in the village of Umm al-Kheir, south of Hebron in the occupied West Bank.
Two women have received medical treatment as a result of the collective action, which started on Thursday.
The group is demanding the unconditional release of the body of the 31-year-old community leader who co-directed No Other Land, a documentary film that won an Oscar award this year. Israeli police set several conditions, including holding a quick and quiet burial at night outside the village, with no more than 15 people in attendance.
The protesters are also demanding the release of seven Umm al-Kheir residents arrested by Israeli forces who remain in administrative detention – a quasi-judicial process under which Palestinians are held without charge or trial.
Umm al-Kheir is part of Masafer Yatta, a string of Palestinian hamlets located on the hills south of Hebron, where residents have fought for decades to remain in their homes after Israel declared the area an Israeli military “firing” or training zone.
Iman Hathaleen, Awdah’s cousin, said women aged 13 to 70 were taking part in the hunger strike. “Now, as I’m talking, I am starving and I am breastfeeding,” she told Al Jazeera. “We will continue this until they release the body, so that we can honour him with the right Islamic tradition. We have to grieve him as our religion told us to.”
Awdah was taken by an ambulance to Soroka hospital in Beer Sheva on July 28, where he was pronounced dead after having been shot by an Israeli settler. The police transferred his body to the Abu Kabir National Institute of Forensic Medicine in Jaffa for an autopsy, which was completed on Wednesday. They then refused to return the body unless the family agreed to restrictive conditions on the funeral and burial.
‘A tactic to break their spirit’
Fathi Nimer, a researcher at the Al-Shabaka think tank, said Israel’s policy of withholding the body of a Palestinian was common practice. “This is not an isolated incident; there are hundreds of Palestinians whose bodies are used as bargaining chips so that their families stop any kind of activism or resistance or to break the spirit of resistance,” Nimer told Al Jazeera.
“Awdah was very loved in the village, so this is a tactic to break their spirit,” he added.
Meanwhile, Yinon Levi, the Israeli settler accused of firing the deadly shots, was released after spending a few days on house arrest. A video of the incident filmed by local activists shows Levi opening fire on Awdah, who died from a gunshot wound to his chest.
An Israeli settler just shot Odeh Hadalin in the lungs, a remarkable activist who helped us film No Other Land in Masafer Yatta. Residents identified Yinon Levi, sanctioned by the EU and US, as the shooter. This is him in the video firing like crazy. pic.twitter.com/xH1Uo6L1wN
— Yuval Abraham יובל אברהם (@yuval_abraham) July 28, 2025
Residents in Umm al-Kheir on Monday documented Levi’s return to the area. Pictures shared on social media groups depicted him overseeing bulldozing work alongside army officers at the nearby Carmel settlement.
Levi is among several Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank who were previously sanctioned under the former administration of United States President Joe Biden for perpetrating violence against Palestinians.
US President Donald Trump reversed those sanctions in an executive order shortly after taking office for a second term in January. The United Kingdom and the European Union, however, maintain sanctions against Levi.
Nimer said sanctions against individuals do little to stop settler violence and the expansion of Israel’s illegal outposts. “It’s not just individuals – there needs to be real international action to sanction Israel and to stop any of this kind of behaviour,” he said.
A ‘continuous trauma’
Iman, Awdah’s cousin, said Levi’s return makes her worried about her family’s safety. “Today, we are afraid that he’s back and can do this again, maybe he will shoot someone else,” she told Al Jazeera. Her father, Suleiman Hathaleen, was killed by an Israeli bulldozer in 2022.
Oneg Ben Dror, a Jaffa-based activist and friend of the Hathaleen family, said the hunger strike was a desperate gesture for a community that has lost all hope of obtaining justice via legal means.
“The women feel that it’s their way to protest, it’s a last resort to bring back the body,” she said. “The community needs the possibility to mourn and… start the recovery from this horrible murder.”
She added that the presence of Levi and other settlers on the ground in Umm al-Kheir was a “continuous trauma and a nightmare for the community and for his wife”, who has been widowed while caring for three young children.
Dozens of left-wing Israeli and international activists on Sunday took part in a march in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv to echo the demands voiced by the hunger strikers. Four activists were arrested during the demonstrations.
The United Nations office has reported 757 settler attacks on Palestinians since January, up 13 percent from 2024, as deaths since January near 1,000.
The Israeli army has also intensified raids across the occupied West Bank and the demolition of hundreds of homes. On Monday, two Palestinians were killed by Israeli forces in the town of Qabatiya, south of Jenin. The Israeli municipality also issued a demolition order targeting the home of Palestinian residents in Silwan, in occupied East Jerusalem.
Palestinian authorities say 198 Palestinians were killed in the West Bank since the beginning of the year, while 538 were killed in 2024. At least 188 bodies are still being withheld by Israeli authorities.
