whos

Warning to anyone who’s ever misplaced their passport

UK passport holders are being urged to check theirs now

UK passport holders are being urged to check the whereabouts of their documents now, particularly if they’ve got any holidays on the horizon.

Many of us have mislaid our passports at some point, so it’s wise to store yours in a specific spot, such as a lockable drawer or cabinet. The Passport Office advises that you must cancel a lost or stolen passport immediately, to minimise the risk of someone else using your passport or stealing your identity. You can also report a lost or stolen passport on behalf of someone else if they’re unable to do so themselves.

However, it’s crucial to search your home thoroughly for your passport before declaring it lost. This is because once you notify the authorities that it’s lost or stolen, you won’t be permitted to use it if it turns up and regardless of how much validity it has remaining.

This is because, when you report a passport as lost or stolen, all the information on the document is forwarded to the National Crime Agency. If you try to travel with it, you’ll be stopped at the border and it will be seized.

If you do locate your lost passport, you should instead cut off the top right-hand corner and post it to the Passport Office alongside a Recovered British Passport Form. You’ll then need to apply for a new passport if you wish to travel abroad.

The current estimated processing time is a maximum of three weeks, though government officials warn it can occasionally take longer “if we need more information, or we need to interview you”. If this applies to you, you’ll receive notification within the three-week timeframe.

A standard adult passport, for those aged 16 and above, costs £94.50 when you apply online, or £107 if you use the paper application form. However, if you require a replacement passport urgently, a one-week fast track document costs up to £191 for an adult.

A one-day premium service costs up to £235.

Source link

Who’s in control in Iran and how will Gulf states react to attacks? | US-Israel war on Iran

An apology comes from Iran’s president, yet missiles are still hitting neighbours.

Tehran has carried out more attacks on Gulf states – despite an apology by the president to Iran’s neighbours.

Civilian targets have been hit, including airports and vital infrastructure.

Who’s in control in Iran – and how will Gulf states react as the attacks continue?

Presenter: James Bays

Guests:

John Brennan – Former director of the Central Intelligence Agency under the administration of US President Barack Obama

Bader Al-Saif – Professor at Kuwait University and fellow at Chatham House, specialising in Middle East history and politics

Trita Parsi – Executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft

Source link

Wait a Second… Who’s Enrique Márquez?

Donald J. Trump was approaching the end of the longest State of the Union address that has been unwrapped before the US Congress since 1964, when he pivoted toward what has happened around “our new friend Venezuela” since the capture of Nicolas Maduro and Cilia Flores on January 3. He talked about the millions of barrels en route to the US and celebrated how the collaboration with Delcy Rodriguez is helping to boost the economies of both countries, giving renewed hope for families who have suffered in Venezuela. And then, he said that, right there, among those seated in front of him, was Alejandra González, the niece of Venezuela politician Enrique Márquez, who had been jailed but was released after the Maduro extraction. Trump then announced, Oprah style, that her uncle was there. “Come down, Enrique!” Trump said, a door just behind González opened, and Márquez entered amid a round of standing applause to embrace his niece. 

A familiar scene from TV, from shows around the world during the last 60 years, Sábado Sensacional included. An emotional moment indeed, but for Venezuela watchers it sure was another plot twist in The Year of What the F: “What the F is Enrique Márquez doing there?”

Enrique Marquez (63, a native from Maracaibo) ran for the election as a rogue candidate supported by another party, Centrados en la Gente, that along with some other organizations got 2% of the vote in July 28, 2024. The Venezuelan Communist Party and REDES, the small political outfit of dissident chavista Juan Barreto, backed him.

Márquez was a victim of the unprecedented crackdown that followed the July 28, 2024 election in Venezuela, unleashed by the chavista regime—with Delcy Rodríguez as vice president—while Maduro blatantly stole the presidential contest that Edmundo González Urrutia won by a landslide.

On January 7, amidst the spike in forced disappearances that came before Maduro’s last presidential inauguration, security forces took Enrique Márquez and threw him in El Helicoide for a year, until January 2026.

But way before that, Márquez was a member of Un Nuevo Tiempo, the Zulia state-based party of Manuel Rosales and Omar Barboza. He was elected for the 2015 National Assembly, where the anti-Maduro coalition held a majority, and became the chamber’s vice president in the first year when Henry Ramos Allup grabbed the spotlight. He had entered institutional politics 15 years earlier, as a lawmaker for center-left party La Causa R in the first Chávez legislature (2000-2006). By 2010, when the opposition was returning to parliamentary politics to face the ruling PSUV, Márquez had joined Rosales and Barboza in UNT. In 2018, as the opposition boycotted that year’s presidential vote amid political bans and State repression on potential candidates, Enrique Márquez decided to back Henri Falcón, who ended up losing against Maduro. Márquez was sacked from his post in UNT as a result. In the years that followed, he held a lower profile as the opposition shifted toward Juan Guaidó’s interim presidency and international pressure as the strategy to remove Maduro from power.

He made a comeback in 2021, when the Guaidó movement was looking doomed and the Maduro regime was trying to regain a degree of recognition abroad. With a disjointed opposition at home after years where efforts were aimed at the international community, Guaidó critics in the Venezuelan opposition—namely Rosales and Henrique Capriles—decided it was time to move away from the interinato and return to electoral politics. Over at the chavista aisle, National Assembly president and Maduro strategist Jorge Rodríguez convinced the dictator that a new electoral board was necessary to get its opponents running for elections again—according to Rodríguez, this would make the regime look democratic. For that purpose, the National Electoral Council would need to be “more balanced” than the previous ones, and therefore include an additional opposition representative (the arrangement since the Chávez-Tibisay Lucena era was that the opposition could only have one out of five).

And voila. In May 2021, after weeks of negotiations between Rodríguez and the Capriles-Rosales camp, Enrique Márquez was appointed as CNE rector along with Roberto Picón, a software engineer that advised the opposition on electoral strategy throughout the 2010s, and who Maduro kept imprisoned for a year in 2017-2018.

With another three pro-Maduro CNE rectors, Márquez and Picón oversaw the December 2021 regional election that saw the opposition break with years of electoral boycott, an event that showcased chavismo’s growing weakness at the ballot box. The CNE still behaved like a puppet for Maduro, but Márquez and Picón managed to document many of the abuses and protest the decisions taken by Pedro Calzadilla, a history professor and friend of Maduro. 

In May 2023, with the Calzadilla-led CNE under pressure to organize a primary election for Maduro’s rivals in collaboration with a separate independent board, Maduro forced the resignation of his own appointees. Márquez and finally Picón had to quit on the following days too. In the second half of the year, María Corina won an independent primary election with overwhelming support, and Maduro set up the current electoral board embodied by Elvis Amoroso, the man who told the world Maduro won the 2024 elections without showing any proof.

When chavismo refused to allow María Corina Machado from competing in the election, the Unitary Platform faced the need of having someone else running on her behalf. Enrique Márquez was among the names discussed as the candidato tapa (Machado’s stand-in), though some people said Machado did not like him. The candidacy of González Urrutia, an obscure diplomat that was quite far from being a real politician, was finally accepted by CNE. The fraud of the century took place. But after the fraud, Márquez went to the Venezuelan Supreme Court (TSJ) and demanded that the CNE presented the voting tallies that proved that Maduro, as the CNE alleged, was the winner. The TSJ ignored Márquez, but his speech lambasting Amoroso’s CNE and Maduro’s trickery was aired by State television, whose producers were probably not expecting a moment like that. Especially considering that much of society and those who endorsed Machado and González Urrutia were under a state of terror outside.

Soon after, while members of the Machado-led Comando con Venezuela were forced to hide and flee the country, Márquez announced he would dedicate his efforts to bringing together a movement in defense of the Venezuelan Constitution. Between August and December 2024, Márquez attempted to challenge Maduro using the regime’s own authoritarian institutions. For instance, he formally asked the TSJ to review its own ruling backing the CNE’s results. In November, Márquez and a number of moderate and leftwing figures (including Barreto and former presidential hopefuls Andrés Caleca and Falcón) called Chief Prosecutor Tarek William Saab for a meeting in the prosecutor general’s office, to press for the release of people arrested in the post-election crackdown, especially dozens of minors that were still imprisoned back then.

Another possibility is that the Trump administration is pitching Márquez as a reliable figure that could join Delcy’s local management.

All of this went ignored, of course, as the Maduro regime was capping off its transformation into a brutal police State dominated by Diosdado Cabello. In New Year’s Eve, days before he was captured, Enrique Márquez addressed the public with the following message:

On July 28, a social, democratic, civic, constitutional force materialized, one that we must sustain and strengthen. Failing to recognize what happened on July 28 will unfortunately have consequences that will bring more suffering to Venezuelans.

It is necessary to seek mechanisms that open the way to peaceful change, allowing us to achieve democratic coexistence and thus open the doors to the future for a country that is determined to change.

Let us defend our Constitution with perseverance, with civic and citizen strength.

That is my commitment to Venezuelans.

I wish you all the best in 2025. Happy New Year!

Enrique Márquez

On January 7, amidst the spike in forced disappearances that came before Maduro’s last presidential inauguration, security forces took Enrique Márquez and threw him in El Helicoide for a year, until January 2026.

Now, Trump is presenting Márquez as living proof of how many people are getting freedom in Venezuela thanks to him and the US military. This is in sync with Delcy Rodriguez’s attempt to sell herself as an open ruler, who announces that El Helicoide will be closed and that an insufficient amnesty law would heal the wounds of political polarization. However, hundreds of political prisoners remain in jail, and El Helicoide is just one gulag in an entire archipelago where crimes against humanity have been committed by the chavista regime. 

The surprising appearance of Enrique Márquez in Washington DC has sparked another interpretation. Is Donald Trump launching a campaign to sell Márquez as a transition leader, once he decides that Delcy Rodriguez has reached her expiration date?

Marquez is one of the people that has been discussed as a potential transition figure in Venezuela, given his personal prestige and ties with moderate sectors of opposition and chavismo that go back decades. 

In other words, on paper he has the profile to act like a hinge between a sector of the opposition that is not entirely loyal to Machado, and an old brand of chavismo that was marginalized by Nicolás Maduro. For example, Márquez is a founding member of the Grupo de Boston, an old parliamentary caucus set up during the 2000-2006 National Assembly composed of chavista and opposition lawmakers meant to interact and exchange views with US Congress representatives. And he has links to Francisco Arias Cárdenas, an Army general and close comrade of Chávez that briefly became his opponent before returning to the comandante’s coalition (Arias Cárdenas, once a presidential candidate and former Zulia governor, now has a seat in the National Assembly that just approved an amnesty law). Apart from this, Márquez has little name recognition within Venezuela. After having read this, you probably know more about him than most people in the country.

Another possibility is that the Trump administration is pitching Márquez as a reliable figure that could join Delcy’s local management. For instance, appointing him to lead the elections authority, after showing up as an honored guest in Trump’s State of the Union address, would go a long way to show that the US is in control and that elections, while not imminent, could be somewhat free and fair. 

Was Marquez just an actor in a Trump TV stunt? Perhaps, that should be our base scenario. But maybe he’s something else. Time will tell. Or Corporate.

Source link

Coronation Street gives away who’s really targeting Bernie – and it’s not Mal

Coronation Street’s latest episode showed who had cut Bernie Winter’s face out of her wedding photo amid a stalking ordeal at the hands of Mal Roper on the ITV soap

There was an unexpected twist involving Bernie Winter on Coronation Street on Tuesday.

After being terrorised by newcomer Mal Roper recently, she was horrified at the start of the week by a scary discovery. She’d gone home after a run-in with Mal to find her face had been cut out of her wedding photo.

She confronted Mal over this on Tuesday, making it clear she suspected him. She warned him to stay away from her, concerned for her safety after he locked her in the café.

His increasing infatuation with Bernie, who has rejected him, has led to sinister scenes. But as he denied being the one who broke into her home and destroyed the photograph, Bernie was unconvinced.

READ MORE: Who was the girl with Jodie on Coronation Street? True link to villain ‘rumbled’READ MORE: Coronation Street star teases Jodie’s downfall as villain ‘exposed’

Ensure our latest headlines always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as your Preferred Source in your Google search settings.

Fans soon learned the shocking truth though as the real culprit and the person really targeting Bernie was exposed onscreen. Towards the end of the episode, we saw Jodie opening her mystery trinket box.

The box contains several random items, incluidng a lighter, a bracelet and a locket. As she opened it, she was holding the cutout face of Bernie, and she placed it into the box.

So Jodie entered the home and destroyed the photo, not Mal. This confirms that Jodie is targeting Bernie too, clearly on some sort of revenge mission after their run-in at the café earlier in the week.

So does Bernie need to watch her back, and how far will Jodie go to get back at her? It comes as Bernie faces trouble this week, when someone attacks Mal.

He’s found seriously injured and Bernie, having threatened to kill him, is arrested amd taken to the police station for questioning. Bernie prostests her innocence, adamant that she did not harm Mal.

When it becomes apparent that someone overheard her threatening Mal, she’s forced to defend herself. Teasing the scenes ahead, actress Jane Hazlegrove said: “It’s not a good look because she’s been heard threatening him.

“She is definitely going to be under suspicion so in the end telling Dev has not made it go away. If anything, things have got worse.” Asked whether the plot and the attack on Mal will have far-reaching consequences for Bernie and her family, Jane confessed that it’s not looking good.

She spilled: “Definitely, she knows she’s messed up. If she had told the full truth from the start they might not have got to this place but here they are and it is down to her.”

Coronation Street airs weeknights at 8:30pm on ITV1 and ITV X. * Follow Mirror Celebs and TV on TikTok , Snapchat , Instagram , Twitter , Facebook , YouTube and Threads .



Source link

Human or Bot? Who’s Really on the Other Side?

From what one should eat to what one should say, AI chatbots on your phone have the final say. The choice of bots, though, is totally in your hands, but what choice you will make with it is barely in your hands. Are you by any chance handing your decision-making power to bots, which you assume makes your life easy? If yes, then let’s consider a few things before your next chatbot conversation. First, understand the dual system model by Daniel Kahneman. According to that, there are two types of systems in the human brain. System 1 is associated with fast, intuitive, emotional, and automatic thinking. System 2 is associated with analytical, slow, effortful, and deliberate thinking. The majority of the technology that is available for the general masses urges individuals to use system 1, as it does not require much effort. Decision-making needs system 2 and is complex and requires time and effort, though this is something that people tend to avoid at all costs. Machines were built to reduce human effort, and artificial intelligence is there to reduce the decision-making efforts, something that differentiated the individual from the technology or innovation earlier.

Now at the state level, artificial intelligence is being integrated; take the example of the United States National Defense Strategy of 2022, where the inclusion of artificial intelligence in decision-making processes was of prime importance. At the systematic level, unfortunately, until now, there have not been concrete efforts towards establishing rules regarding artificial intelligence, except for the Bletchley Declaration, which was a landmark international agreement on AI safety. Though at the individual level, rather than being careful, people are playing with and handing over their decision-making power. As was reported by the BBC, in an interview, Megan Garcia, the mother of a 14-year-old, said that an AI chatbot encouraged her son to commit suicide. Another case involving a young Ukrainian woman with poor mental health received suicide advice from an AI chatbot. Another report by Vice of a person who committed suicide after having multiple conversations with a chatbot over environmental issues. AI chatbots that run on algorithms have been taken as emotional support beings, which they are not.

They are given different names to grab the attention of the user, such as “your goth friend,” “your possessive girlfriend,” and several others. They are targeting the emotional side, or System 1, of the user, and they have been quite successful in that. Everyone today almost has an AI chatbot with whom they have a conversation at least once a day. According to Chabot’s 2025 statistics, more than 987 million people use AI chatbots today. ChatGPT dominates the AI chatbot market share with 81.85%, using it globally, followed by OpenAI’s GPT-4, Microsoft Co-Pilot, Google Gemini, Claude, and DeepSeek with 11.05%, 3.07%, 2.97%, 1.05%, and 0.01%, respectively. With that, it is becoming dangerous and needs to be handled with more care and caution. The responsibility lies on individuals as much as it lies on the state and the international organizations.

Technology has been advancing for decades, and it has been creating ease and comfort for its users. Artificial intelligence, being one such technology, is beneficial too, but it should be used to enhance the mental capabilities and not hand over one’s control over things. AI is expanding and advancing at an immeasurable speed, and it will not wait for people to wake up and make better decisions for themselves. Social media platforms will not adjust themselves to the needs of the time, as they are markets, and all they care about is what is bought, which is the thing that should be sold. If people are buying the emotional support AI, then there will be multiple chatbots with attention-grabbing titles.

An individual might take it as a joke or play with it for fun, but what they do not realize is that they are providing their personal and sensitive information to a machine whose data can be sabotaged. People nowadays, without realizing, would jump on the ongoing trends without realizing what it will do to their data. The trend of Ghibli-style photos, where photos were being generated to the extent that it led to the melting of OpenAI’s servers, prompted the company to temporarily implement rate limits. In addition to that, it resulted in an intellectual property issue involving Studio Ghibli centers. As it mimicked the iconic style of Studio Ghibli, which has been working for decades, AI stole the art, and there was no genuine accountability. This is how dangerous it gets: stealing someone’s work and then getting away with it without being charged or held accountable. This intellectual property theft by AI resulted in Hollywood writers’ protest, leading to the establishment of the 2023 WGA AI contract. WGA (Writers Guild of America) led to AI not being treated as a writer and prevented it from getting any credit or being considered “literary material.” Where the threat is so imminent, laws are not efficient, control is lost, and profit is being generated, would you really let bots decide what you will do in your life?

Source link