lying

Swindall Convicted of Lying in Probe of Money Laundering

Former Rep. Pat Swindall was convicted today of nine counts of perjury for lying to a federal grand jury about a money-laundering scheme.

The 38-year-old conservative Republican, who served two terms in Congress from Atlanta’s suburbs before being defeated in November, could receive up to five years in prison plus fines of $250,000 on each count at sentencing Aug. 25.

Swindall left the courtroom saying he was “numb, disappointed, but not terribly surprised,” as his wife, Kim, stood behind him, wearing a lilac maternity dress and clutching his hand.

‘Have Been Forgiven’

“I had said months before that I had gotten into something,” Swindall said, referring to a tearful apology he issued after the case became public last year. “I confessed publicly and openly, and for that I feel I have been forgiven by God and my constituents.

“I’m prepared to do whatever I have to do. If I have to go to prison, I’ll go to prison and I’ll have a good attitude about it.”

The jury deliberated 17 hours over four days after nearly four weeks of testimony. Swindall was indicted in October on 10 counts of perjury. U.S. District Judge Richard C. Freeman dismissed one count during the trial.

The former congressman was accused of lying to a grand jury in 1988 about his 1987 negotiations with an IRS agent posing as a drug-money launderer and with Swindall associate Charles LeChasney, later convicted of money laundering.

Among other things, Swindall was found guilty of perjury for denying that he had been told that the $850,000 he was seeking from the agent to finish building his luxurious home contained proceeds from drug trafficking.

Appeal Planned

Swindall’s chief attorney, Richard Hendrix, said he will appeal.

Swindall, a lanky, boyish lawyer, went to Congress in 1984 from the city’s affluent eastern suburbs as a conservative, fundamentalist Christian. Under the cloud of the perjury indictment, he lost to Democrat Ben Jones, who appeared in “The Dukes of Hazzard” television series.

The jury heard secretly taped conversations with the undercover agent, Mike Mullaney, in which Swindall was told that the $850,000 “certainly” included drug money and that he would be part of an operation to “wash” cash. Swindall proposed that a mortgage company be set up by LeChasney as a “buffer” to allow him to “borrow” the agent’s money.

In their last conversation after Swindall had received a $150,000 advance, he told Mullaney, “If Charles wants to launder y’all’s money, fine. But I can’t do that. . . . I can borrow the money from Charles.”

Swindall was a largely unknown lawyer and furniture store owner when he was elected in an upset in 1984, toppling veteran Democrat Elliott Levitas.

‘Biblical Score Card’

Swindall, a Presbyterian, took his campaign to evangelical churches, distributing a “Biblical score card” in his race against Levitas, who is Jewish.

In his two terms, Swindall staunchly voted with the Reagan right and acquired a reputation as somewhat of a gadfly, voting against such popular programs as school lunch funding and aid to African famine victims. He filed a brief with the Supreme Court advocating the teaching of “creationism” in schools.

Source link

Mexico accuses former U.S. ambassador of lying over cartel case

July 9 (UPI) — Mexico’s Attorney General’s Office formally accused former U.S. Ambassador Ken Salazar of violating his diplomatic duties by allegedly misleading Mexican authorities about the 2024 capture of alleged Sinaloa cartel co-founder Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada.

The accusation alleges that Salazar knowingly made false statements when he said U.S. agencies had not participated in the operation that led to Zambada’s capture and transfer in July 2024.

The complaint followed reports by Mexican media outlets Milenio and Azteca Noticias that the FBI recently displayed the aircraft used in the operation at the War Eagles Air Museum in Santa Teresa, N.M., describing it as an FBI success.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum backed the Attorney General’s Office on Thursday, saying the former ambassador misled the Mexican government by insisting that U.S. agencies had no role in the operation.

Sheinbaum said Mexico’s consulate in New Mexico directly verified that the aircraft was on display at the museum.

“On Aug. 9, 2024, then-U.S. Ambassador to Mexico Ken Salazar said his government did not participate in this operation, that it was not a U.S. aircraft, nor its pilot, nor its agents or personnel in Mexico, but rather an operation between cartels,” Attorney General Ernestina Godoy said.

The Attorney General’s Office also said it had identified the pilot who flew the aircraft that transported Zambada. Although authorities did not identify the person, Mexican media reported the pilot may be Mauro Núñez, also known as “El Jando,” who is described as a trusted pilot for Los Chapitos, the faction of the Sinaloa cartel led by the sons of Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán.

Mexican media reported that “El Jando” is facing proceedings in federal court in Washington.

The Attorney General’s Office also pointed to what it described as a causal link based on the close timing between judicial benefits granted in the United States to Ovidio Guzmán López, one of Guzmán’s sons, and Zambada’s alleged kidnapping on Mexican territory.

Mexican authorities contended the events were not coincidental, but rather part of a coordinated strategy and an unlawful agreement between Los Chapitos and U.S. agencies, primarily the FBI.

The formal accusations further strain relations between Mexico and the United States by directly accusing a U.S. federal law enforcement agency of violating Mexico’s sovereignty and alleging that Salazar misled the Mexican government.

However, officials from the Attorney General’s Office said that while they could establish Salazar’s responsibility for withholding information, he would not face criminal consequences because he is protected by diplomatic immunity.

Salazar rejected the allegations in a statement posted on social media, reiterating the position he maintained while serving as ambassador.

“It was not our plane, not our pilot and not our operation,” Salazar wrote.

The dispute comes as excerpts from Salazar’s forthcoming memoir, The Borders: My Fight for an Inclusive United States, have begun circulating, prompting additional friction with the Mexican government.

Source link

Love Island fans terrified by ‘lying’ Samraj as he continues to string Priya along

LOVE Island fans have been left terrified by “lying” Samraj’s behaviour as he continued to string along Priya.

The 25-year-old has been juggling both Mica and Priya over the last week but fans have noticed the Islander isn’t being honest about his feelings.

Samraj was seen comforting Priya in the kitchen as he insisted his chat with Mica didn’t mean they were ‘getting back together’
Samraj told Mica that she was his number one and his feeling for her ‘haven’t gone away’

He told Mica, 21, a few episodes ago that business development manager Priya was “giving him the ick,” and she was his first choice.

But, he hasn’t let Priya privy to that information as he continued to act as if they’re relationship is flourishing.

During last night’s instalment of the famous ITV2 dating show, Samraj left fans taken aback by his “unfair” treatment of Priya, 25.

After returning from a chat on the terrace with Mica, Priya asked him if they were getting back together – which he denied.

CHEEKY BOY

Love Island villa is thrown into chaos as Samraj grabs Jasmine’s BUM


DUMPED AGAIN?

Love Island’s recoupling result revealed as Samraj & Ellie face dumping again

Samraj told viewers he doesn’t want ‘to spend lots of time’ with Priya Credit: ITV
Samraj has been slammed by fans for stringing Priya along Credit: ITV

Priya hugged him saying: “I actually quite missed you, I wanted to speak to you…

“I feel like you hate me today.”

Samraj replied: “No, I don’t hate you. My mind is just in a really weird place, I swear.”

“You’re head,” Priya questioned.

He continued: “Not about us it’s just about like I think Sam going was just like the icing on the thing but I really do appreciate you being so concerned about me.”

Priya then tried to get Samraj to open up on his cheeky terrace rendezvous.

However he quickly shut it down, saying: “No we were just speaking because we were downstairs we got, not by you, but interrupted twice before and I was upstairs and Mica was like ‘Oh lets finish our conversation.’”

Poor Priya explained she was asking because things change so quickly in the villa and it was clear she didn’t want to waste her time if the feelings weren’t reciprocated.

Love Island fans were left fuming as Samraj lied to face her face repeatedly and strung her along.

One fan wrote: “Samraj is the reason why I don’t trust men #LoveIsland”

“Samraj, tell Priya you don’t like her This is not fair at all,” added a second fan.

Another viewer penned: “Samraj, why you lying?”

Meanwhile, a fourth fan said: “Why is Samraj lying like this HAAAAAA men can lie I’m so scared????”

Later on Samraj carried on his ruse, telling Priya he fancies her more and “wouldn’t be sharing a bed with her otherwise.”

But, during the previous episode fans watched on as Samraj told Mica he hasn’t said anything because Priya “will be mad.”

Speaking to the camera in the beach hut, Samraj confessed: “I can’t knock Priya because she’s given me everything I wanted and asked for. I feel like if I sit here and say ‘Everything is going swimmingly, it’s amazing… I’d be lying.’

“I don’t want to spend loads of time with her.”

Love Island continues tonight at 9:00pm on ITV2 and ITVX.

Source link