investment

Feb. 1 (Asia Today) — South Korea’s efforts to head off a proposed 25% U.S. tariff increase stalled after trade talks in Washington ended without agreement, prompting the auto industry to accelerate investment plans in the United States.

Trade, Industry and Energy Minister Kim Jeong-kwan returned to South Korea after two days of discussions with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on President Donald Trump’s proposed reciprocal tariff hike. The talks, held Wednesday and Thursday in Washington, concluded without concrete results, the ministry said.

During the meetings, Kim stressed that South Korean companies were prepared to expand U.S. investment and said the government was coordinating with the National Assembly to swiftly pass a special law aimed at supporting large-scale Korean investment in the United States.

The proposed legislation is intended to reduce uncertainty for Korean firms and institutionalize strategic economic cooperation between the two countries. Seoul argued that the bill would boost U.S. job creation and economic growth.

U.S. officials, however, reportedly questioned whether the Korean government’s position would translate into concrete action, signaling that legislative intent alone would not be sufficient.

The stalled talks have heightened concerns in South Korea’s auto industry. Hyundai Motor Group, a major exporter to the U.S., is expected to adjust its existing investment strategy to accelerate the pace of spending.

Hyundai Motor President José Muñoz told The Wall Street Journal on Friday that he believes President Trump understands Hyundai’s commitment to the U.S. market and said the company is focused on speeding up its investment plans.

Hyundai previously announced plans to invest $26 billion (about 37.7 trillion won) in the United States by 2030, with a goal of locally producing 80% of the vehicles it sells there.

Industry analysts expect uncertainty surrounding the proposed tariff hike to continue until at least mid-March, as South Korea’s National Assembly plans to process the U.S. investment bill in late February or early March.

Democratic Party policy chief Han Jeong-ae said the bill would first be reviewed by the National Assembly’s finance and economy committee, adding that passage is likely within that timeframe.

The Trump administration has previously indicated it would not discuss tariff reductions until the legislation is approved, suggesting that negotiations on easing the proposed 25% tariff may resume only after the bill’s passage.

Some experts described the tariff threat as a temporary pressure tactic. Kim Pil-soo, a professor of automotive engineering at Daelim University, said the move appears aimed at showcasing policy achievements ahead of U.S. midterm elections, adding that continued investment and passage of the bill could eventually lead to a resolution.

— Reported by Asia Today; translated by UPI

© Asia Today. Unauthorized reproduction or redistribution prohibited.

Original Korean report: https://www.asiatoday.co.kr/kn/view.php?key=20260201010000191

Gold has risen more than 20% since the start of the year, surpassing the significant $5,500 milestone this week.

The precious metal’s rally, seen alongside a lift in commodities such as silver and platinum, is driven by a number of interlinking factors — including geopolitical tensions, rising government debt, and an uncertain outlook for interest rates and inflation.

Gold’s appeal is linked to the narrative that it is a safe haven asset, acting as a “hedge against inflation”. It typically increases in value when the dollar declines, it’s easily sold, and it’s also a tangible, finite commodity.

These factors are significant at a time when questions are being raised about the dollar, as well as fiat currencies like the Japanese yen. As government debt rises, so do fears around inflation and fiscal stability.

In the US, incendiary policies from the Trump administration are increasing market jitters around the health of the economy, prompting what some analysts view as a “sell America” trade. In recent weeks, the president has threatened to conquer Greenland, hinted at US intervention in Iran, sought to influence policy at the Federal Reserve, and launched an attack on Venezuela. To top that off, he’s also threatened more tariffs on trading partners, bringing back a well-worn tactic from 2025.

Although analysts argue that the dollar will not be unseated as the world’s reserve currency anytime soon, it seems investors are diversifying away from the greenback. The US’ next moves remain uncertain, and no one wants to be caught in the crosshairs. As an alternative to fiat currencies, gold may seem like a strong portfolio option.

“Investors previously bought US Treasuries as they were viewed as being quite risk-free. But especially because of the way that some wealth has been weaponised, certain countries are becoming more careful about how they allocate their capital,” said Simon Popple, managing director at Brookville Capital. “The dollar debasement helps the gold price,” he told Euronews.

Even so, Popple and other analysts stress that a major factor lifting the bullion price is far less complicated. As gold continues to make headlines, investors are caught up in the momentum, sparking a buying frenzy.

“People are naturally drawn to things they see moving and they’ve seen gold have an astonishing rally,” said Chris Beauchamp, chief market analyst at IG. “It’s bound to lead to an ignition of interest.”

He added that while gold has beneficial investment properties, the metal’s ability to hold its value is overstated, particularly in the short term. Gold’s position in the market notably shifted after former US president Richard Nixon decided to end direct dollar convertibility to gold in 1971. Put simply, countries no longer fixed their currencies to a specified amount of the precious metal.

“The gold standard is still invoked to suggest the metal is some kind of totemic asset we should have because it’s a fixed store of value. It’s not,” concluded Beauchamp.

Kenneth Lamont, a principal in Morningstar’s Manager Research Department, reiterated this message, also drawing comparisons between gold and crypto. While both are limited in supply, they are both “incredibly volatile”, he stressed.

“If you’re using either crypto or gold to buy something, it might be 30% less from one day to the next. It’s not actually a good store of value in the short term.”

While gold is much more established than bitcoin, and it has historically performed well over the long term, analysts stress that the unpredictability of both assets means the death knell is not yet ringing for fiat currencies.

Whether bullion’s price will continue to climb in the immediate future is a guessing game. Even so, given the precarious nature of global politics, it seems the metal may still have further to run.

Jan. 28 (Asia Today) — South Korea’s opposition People Power Party and the ruling Democratic Party traded accusations Wednesday over U.S. President Donald Trump’s remarks about restoring higher tariffs, with conservatives faulting the government’s diplomacy and liberals arguing Seoul must move quickly to pass pending legislation tied to a bilateral investment package.

The dispute unfolded at a National Assembly Foreign Affairs and Unification Committee hearing, where Foreign Minister Cho Hyun faced questions about what the opposition described as a sudden reversal after the government promoted a tariff outcome that did not require a formal agreement document.

People Power Party floor leader Song Eon-seok said the public had been led to believe tariffs would remain lower once legislation related to U.S.-bound investment was introduced and processed. He said Trump’s renewed tariff warnings felt like a betrayal to many South Koreans and criticized the government for opposing parliamentary ratification procedures, arguing major commitments should be handled through proper legislative channels.

Several People Power Party lawmakers pressed the government over the effectiveness of its communication channel with Washington, mocking earlier claims that a high-level “hotline” had been established and questioning whether Seoul had meaningful leverage if tariff threats resurfaced so quickly.

Rep. Ahn Cheol-soo said the government’s claim that negotiations were so successful they did not require a joint statement was not credible. He argued that if talks had been truly successful, the two sides would have presented the outcome publicly through a joint briefing.

Ruling party lawmakers countered that Trump’s unpredictability is well known and that repeated focus on ratification could slow Seoul’s ability to respond diplomatically and economically. They urged swift deliberation and passage of a special bill tied to U.S. investment commitments, saying similar memorandums and fact sheets with partners are often handled without full treaty-style ratification.

The dispute comes as South Korea moves to implement a bilateral memorandum and related measures that had been linked to tariff levels, while Seoul says it has not received an official U.S. notice of any change.

— Reported by Asia Today; translated by UPI

© Asia Today. Unauthorized reproduction or redistribution prohibited.

Original Korean report: https://www.asiatoday.co.kr/kn/view.php?key=20260129010013250