Espionage

Last week, the U.S. Navy announced that future stretched Virginia class nuclear-powered attack submarines (SSN) fitted with Virginia Payload Modules (VPM) will be recategorized as guided missile types (SSGN). In doing so, the service disclosed that two Block V Virginia class boats will lack a VPM, and the four large vertical launch tubes contained therein, rather than just one as had been previously understood. Now, the Navy has confirmed to TWZ directly that the second VPM-less Block V will have a one-of-a-kind seabed warfare configuration. This will allow it to conduct espionage missions on the seafloor, a role currently filled by the USS Jimmy Carter, a one-off subvariant of the Seawolf class attack submarine.

In its August 3 press release, the Navy said it planned to acquire 19 VPM-equipped Virginia class SSGNs across the Block V and Block VI subclasses. As TWZ noted at the time, this created a discrepancy of one submarine based on publicly stated procurement plans. It was already known that the first of the 12 Block Vs, the future USS Oklahoma, would lack a VPM, but the expectation had been that the other 11 would have this feature. The Block VI production run is currently set to consist of nine more submarines, all with VPMs. We correctly posited last week that the outlier could be the seabed warfare submarine, the basic plans for which emerged some years ago now.

“19 of the VPMs will be re-classified as SSGNs with two of the Block V SSNs to be built in non-VPM configurations,” a Navy spokesperson told TWZ when asked for clarification.

“A later Block V submarine will not have VPM and will be a Subsea and Seabed Warfare (SSW) focused platform,” the same Navy spokesperson subsequently confirmed to TWZ in response to our follow-up questions.

The Navy has declined to name the specific Block V Virginia class submarine that will be configured for the seabed warfare role. We know from the statement above that it will not be the future USS Oklahoma (also known by the hull number SSN-802). We also know that the second Block V Virginia, the future USS Arizona (SSGN-803), will be the first to feature the VPM.

So the seabed warfare version will be one of the other 10 planned Block V Virginia class submarines. All of those future boats (hulls 804 through 813) have already been assigned official names, which are, in order: USS Barb, USS Tang, USS Wahoo, USS Silversides, USS John H. Dalton, USS Long Island, USS San Francisco, USS Miami, USS Baltimore, and USS Atlanta. As an aside, Barb, Tang, Wahoo, and Silversides will be the first Navy submarines in decades to be named after ‘denizens of the deep.’ Since the 1970s, the service has largely been naming new attack submarines after cities and states, a decision you can read more about in detail here.

As noted, the Navy has previously disclosed plans to acquire a one-off Virginia class submarine in a seabed warfare configuration, but has offered little in the way of specifics to date. General Dynamics Electric Boat has shared some additional information in the past. This company is one of two prime contractors involved in producing Virginia class boats, with the other being the Newport News Shipbuilding division of Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII).

“Our Virginia class submarine program is evolving … over time to accomplish new missions, and we’re taking the existing hull form and modifying that to incorporate new weapons, sensors, and improved stealth features,” Kevin Graney, then President of General Dynamics Electric Boat, said during a presentation as part of a summit hosted by the Connecticut Business and Industry Association (CBIA) in 2022. “One of the most significant design changes we’ve implemented in recent times and currently ongoing is the Virginia Payload Module, which will carry an enhanced strike capability. …basically an 84-foot hull section that includes four additional missile tubes.”

You can watch Graney’s 2022 presentation in full below. His overview of the Virginia class program at that time starts at approximately 21:52 in the runtime, if the video does not advance to that point automatically.

Electric Boat’s ‘Once-in-a-Generation Expansion’

General Dynamics Electric Boat’s main shipyard, as well as other facilities, are in Connecticut. The company also has a major hull-fabrication and outfitting facility in neighboring Rhode Island. Graney retired in 2024.

“We’re developing … a seabed warfare variant, and this ship is designed to interact with the seafloor,” Graney also said during his 2022 presentation. “This design will repurpose some of those missile tubes that I referred to in the VPM design to perform those missions.”

An accompanying slide in Graney’s presentation – seen in part at the top of this story and below – showed a rendering of the seabed warfare variant. As depicted, the design features a pronounced additional bulge under the center of the hull in the same general area where VPM will be fitted on other Block V boats.

This is fully in line with how Jimmy Carter is known to be modified. The main difference between that submarine and the other two Seawolf class boats is the addition of a 100-foot hull extension known as the Multi-Mission Platform (MMP). From what has been publicly released in the past, the MMP is capable of launching and recovering remotely operated vehicles (ROV), uncrewed underwater vehicles (UUV), and other specialized payloads. There is also a reconfigurable command and control room, storage spaces, and other special missionized equipment. The submarine also has auxiliary thrusters and other unique features to help it land on the seafloor or otherwise keep its position underwater. Altogether, Jimmy Carter‘s unique features are understood to be optimized for covert and clandestine underwater espionage missions, including inspecting, manipulating, and even collecting objects of interest from deep on the ocean floor.

Beyond repurposing the space set aside for the VPM, what other modifications the seabed warfare version of the Virginia might receive are unknown. The Seawolf class, in general, is understood to have particularly good deep-diving capabilities, among other attributes, even compared to the Virginia class that came afterward. All three Seawolf class submarines – the other two being the USS Seawolf and the USS Connecticut – continue to be in high demand because of the advanced capabilities the design offers at its core. The continued importance of these submarines is underscored by the Navy’s ongoing work to return Connecticut to service after it suffered major damage, particularly to its bow, from a collision with an underwater seamount in the South China Sea back in 2021.

The floor of the ocean has long been an important, but challenging domain for underwater operations, including when it comes to cutting or tapping into critical fiber optic communications cables and destroying pipelines. Being able to examine, or even recover, objects of interest from the seabed has been and continues to be a critical element of so-called foreign materiel exploitation (FME) operations, as TWZ has explored in great detail in the past.

The importance of the seabed is only set to grow going forward. China, Russia, and others are working to expand their undersea infrastructure, often in support of nominally civilian activities that could have obvious dual-use applications. The Russian Navy, in particular, and the Soviet Navy before it, has its own particularly long history of covert and clandestine seabed warfare operations utilizing special mission submarines and submersibles, specialized surface ships, and uncrewed platforms.

Overall, including a new highly specialized version of the Virginia class design to supplement, or even eventually supplant, Jimmy Carter makes good sense. The Navy currently expects the Block V Virginia class submarines to be delivered between 2028 and 2034. Jimmy Carter was commissioned in 2005 and will be 29 years old when the last Block V boat arrives, at least according to the present schedule. This one-of-a-kind subvariant of the Seawolf class itself replaced the equally uniquely modified Sturgeon class attack submarine USS Parche, which was inactivated in 2004 after three decades of service.

As TWZ discussed in detail last week, the decision to recategorize VPM-equipped Block V submarines as SSGNs is meant to underscore the Navy’s separate commitment to filling separate looming capability gaps. The Navy is now starting the process of retiring its four Ohio class SSGNs, all of which were originally built as nuclear ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs). Those boats are also among the most heavily in-demand submarines the Navy has in service today. They are really more multi-mission platforms able to provide a wide range of special operation support, underwater command and control, and intelligence fusion functions, on top of their long-range strike capabilities, as you can read more about in this past feature of ours.

It has also been pointed out that the Navy is now unlikely to acquire a new SSN class, at least technically, for many years. The Navy has plans to acquire a new class of attack submarines, currently referred to as SSN(X), which has been discussed in the past as more of a true successor to the Seawolf class. However, the service does not now expect the first of those boats to enter service until the mid-2040s. At the same time, it is also worth noting that the decision to change the hull classification of VPM-equipped Virginia class from SSN to SSGN is largely administrative from what has been disclosed so far. Block V versions, at least, are expected to have the same capability mix as before.

SSN(X) “will complement the Virginia class to create a mixed attack submarine force built to penetrate and dominate heavily defended adversary areas,” according to the long-term shipbuilding plan the Navy released back in May. “With a larger payload volume, superior survivability, and organic hosting of unmanned robotic and autonomous systems (RAS), SSN(X) will assure continued persistent access to denied zones and eliminate enemy safe havens.”

“Block VI, really, that will become the jumping-off point, we think, for the SSN(X) program, and we expect to continue to incorporate even more advanced stealth and performance features,” General Dynamics Electric Boat’s Graney had also said back in 2022.

Whether the new SSGN nomenclature for Virginia class submarines equipped with the VPM results in any significant changes to how the submarines are employed remains to be seen.

What we do know now for sure is that two of the Navy’s future Block V Virginia class submarines will lack the VPM, and the second one will be a highly specialized seabed warfare version completely unlike any other.

Contact the author: joe@twz.com

Japan is setting up its first centralised intelligence agency since World War II to try to modernise its defence capabilities against spies, foreign interference and other attacks from foreign adversaries.

Legislation to establish the new agency passed the upper house of Japan’s National Diet in May, a month after it cleared the lower house.

After decades of relying on US intelligence support and after a pacifist stance was enshrined in the Japanese Constitution, Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi described this law as “a first step” towards strengthening the country’s espionage capabilities.

What is this new agency?

The legislation creates two bodies: a National Intelligence Council that will act as the government’s command centre for intelligence gathering and analysis and an agency for operations. The reform changes the existing Cabinet Intelligence and Research Office (CIRO) into a centralised National Intelligence Council and National Intelligence Bureau.

Takaichi isn’t exactly building the US Central Intelligence Agency, but The New York Times reported Western allies, including the United States, Germany and Australia, are advising the Japanese government on establishing the new spy agency.

Ken Kotani, professor at Nihon University, said he believes Japan’s new National Intelligence Council and national intelligence agency model will be original to Japan.

Sanshiro Hosaka, a research fellow at the Estonia-based International Centre for Defence and Security, said the reform is aimed at improving the Japanese government’s intelligence abilities “by strengthening coordination, reducing interagency barriers and ensuring that intelligence products better meet policymakers’ requirements”.

Why does Japan want it now?

Tokyo says it is facing threats from a number of nearby countries such as North Korea, Russia and China, and a national intelligence agency is needed to counter their efforts.

Kotani explained that Japan’s foreign and national security policy followed the US during the Cold War period. But he noted that “recently Japan has gradually pursued her own policy, especially in the Trump administration period.”

US President Donald Trump has repeatedly accused Washington’s allies of not spending enough on their own defence and on relying on American help. He has questioned US alliances and has been ambivalent about whether the world’s most powerful military would come to the defence of smaller nations.

That, Kotani said, is why “Japan needs to collect intelligence by herself.”

Japan currently lacks an antiespionage law that would make it relatively easy for foreign intelligence activities to go unpunished.

Hosaka explained that former Russian intelligence officers who operated in Japan, such as Stanislav Levchenko and Konstantin Preobrazhensky, described Japan as a paradise for spies: “During the Cold War, Soviet intelligence targeted Japanese technologies, industrial and commercial information as well as the US bases in Japan,” Hosaka explained. “As a major US ally in Asia and an advanced technological economy, Japan remains an important intelligence target for China, Russia, North Korea and others.”

Hosaka said what Japan needs “is a foreign-influence transparency law to increase the transparency of foreign actors’ lobbying activities as well as to deter illegal foreign interference. And an antiespionage law to conduct undercover operations and investigations using assumed identities.”

Why the current system isn’t working:

A major obstacle within Japan’s current decentralised structure, experts said, is that no one has the authority to force cooperation from other agencies or bodies or prevent intelligence data from being scattered.

Kotani explained that the political power of Japan’s current intelligence agency has been weak: “This was because the CIRO was not given any legal mandates on intelligence when it was established in 1952.”

Another difficulty is that under current Japanese laws, foreign representatives suspected of potential intelligence affiliations or interference are difficult to intercept because legal grounds are weak for Japanese authorities to intercept their communications or prosecute them.

The ambitions of PM Takaichi

Takaichi took office in October and has accelerated the expansion of Japan’s military and security ambitions through a number of measures, including establishing a central intelligence body.

In December, the cabinet approved its largest defence budget ever at $58bn as the Ministry of Defence said it needed to accelerate its “transformation” and would use more than $600m for building a so-called drone and laser shield to protect its southwestern region.

In April, Takaichi’s cabinet moved closer to abolishing a longstanding ban on the export of lethal weapons, such as tanks and warships.

The new direction led to antiwar protests in the streets of Japan in May. However, a Jiji opinion poll in April showed only 19 percent were opposed to the new bill to reform intelligence within the country. About 40 percent were indifferent, and the rest were in favour.

Kotani said he has noticed a lot of the old “taboo has gone” around this subject and it is no longer a topic of concern to many Japanese, He said: “Especially younger generations are not interested in such an old story.”

Why surveillance is controversial in Japan

Japan’s defeat in World War II left its citizens with distrust towards state surveillance as the wartime Special Higher Police, known as the Tokko, monitored, arrested and tortured citizens for their political beliefs.

Article 9 in its constitution, drafted in 1947 shortly after the end of the war, renounced war, and Japan has never had its own foreign intelligence service. Instead, it relied on the US.

The efforts for a new security agency have sparked some domestic criticism, but Hosaka said the latest reforms do not amount to a return to the kind of espionage apparatus that could be used against Japanese civilians.

“The legislation does not itself create significant new intelligence collection or counterintelligence powers,” Hosaka said.

Department reports raise concerns about increased espionage activity amid US-Israeli war with Iran, ceasefire talks.

The Pentagon’s intelligence arm has raised the assessed threat level on Israeli spying from “high” to “critical” in recent weeks, according to US media.

NBC News first broke news of the change on Friday, with The New York Times issuing its own report the following day.

The news outlets cited anonymous sources as saying the switch came in light of concerns over increasingly aggressive tactics related to the US-Israeli war with Iran.

They said the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) had raised the alert level amid fears that Israel is increasingly attempting to surveil top US officials. The aim is allegedly to understand internal White House deliberations about ending the war.

US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu have publicly diverged in their approach to the war, which the US and Israel started on February 28.

Trump, on one hand, has repeatedly said he wants to bring the war to a close, amid mounting political pressure at home.

Netanyahu, meanwhile, has called for war to resume, despite an April 8 ceasefire. The fighting has been mostly paused since the temporary truce was announced, but efforts to reach a lasting agreement have repeatedly stalled.

The New York Times reported that, while Israel has been known to spy on the US, the DIA cited an uptick in activities beginning in late 2024, as the administration of US President Joe Biden increased pressure on Israel over its genocidal war in Gaza.

That increase continued into 2025, as Trump returned to the presidency and began deliberating about how to approach Iran.

The newspaper added that other recent intelligence assessments have also documented evidence that there are Israeli efforts to monitor Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff as well as Elbridge Colby, a top policy official at the Pentagon, and his deputy Michael DiMino IV.

Witkoff had been the lead negotiator in nuclear talks that preceded the initial US-Israeli attack on Iran in February.

Both NBC News and The New York Times cited unnamed US officials in their reports. The US Department of Defense did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Al Jazeera.

However, an unnamed spokesperson told both news organisations that the reports were “false”.

Still, the reported concerns are likely to raise questions over the close intelligence and military coordination between Israel and the US.

Washington has, for years, provided billions in military aid and weapons sales to Israel, including throughout the genocide in Gaza.

The US Congress is also currently debating a section of a new defence bill, which would integrate the two countries’ research and development for weaponry to an unprecedented degree.

While the US and its allies are known to regularly conduct intelligence operations on each other, officials told both NBC and The New York Times that Israel’s recent vigour was unique.

The New York Times reported that the increased DIA designation surpasses all current allies, as well as a handful of countries with more fraught relations.

Recent incidents included Israel’s military intelligence trying to plant listening devices at the DIA headquarters in 2021, according to the newspaper.

In 2025, Israel’s domestic intelligence agency, Shin Bet, was found to have tried to plant a similar device in a Secret Service vehicle, the report said.