defectors

July 31 (Asia Today) — Nearly half of the North Korean defectors tested last year after living near the Punggye-ri nuclear test site showed chromosomal changes above a minimum detection threshold, South Korea’s Unification Ministry said Friday.

The ministry cautioned, however, that the findings did not establish a connection between the individuals’ radiation exposure and North Korea’s nuclear tests.

The Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences conducted biological radiation tests on 59 defectors from eight cities and counties near Punggye-ri in North Hamgyong Province.

The group included former residents of Kilju, Hwadae, Kimchaek, Myonggan, Myongchon, Orang, Tanchon and Paekam.

Tests found stable chromosomal abnormalities above the minimum detection level in 26 people, or 44.1% of those examined.

Stable chromosomal abnormalities can reflect radiation accumulated from birth until the date of testing. The measurement can include exposure from natural sources, medical procedures and work environments.

The institute said the test cannot determine when the exposure occurred or identify its source.

Age, smoking, alcohol use, heavy metals and other factors can also affect the results, it said.

Researchers conducted an additional test for unstable chromosomal abnormalities among the 26 people whose initial readings exceeded the detection threshold.

That second test, which is more useful for identifying relatively recent radiation exposure, produced above-threshold results in six people.

Older age complicates findings

The average age of the 26 people with elevated results was 52.8, or 13.2 years older than the average age of the 33 participants whose results remained within the normal range.

The group with elevated readings had also spent less time near Punggye-ri than the group with normal results.

Researchers found differences in drinking-water sources as well. Piped water was more common among participants with elevated readings, while a greater share of the normal group reported using water from mountain streams.

The findings did not demonstrate that the 26 participants were exposed to radiation from underground nuclear explosions, the institute said.

“There are limitations to interpreting the stable chromosome-aberration test results as exposure caused by past nuclear tests,” the institute said.

It said the participants with elevated readings were older on average and had several possible contributing factors, including medical radiation exposure.

The institute recommended continued health examinations and long-term monitoring for participants whose biological dose assessments exceeded the minimum detection level.

It said the results should be interpreted carefully because of possible confounding variables.

More environmental information would be needed to conduct a reliable assessment, including radiation measurements around former residential areas, drinking-water tests and radioactivity measurements from local food, the institute said.

No cancer cases identified

The Unification Ministry also provided detailed medical examinations to five defectors whose radiation tests conducted from 2017 through 2024 had produced readings above the detection threshold.

The ministry said no confirmed or suspected cancer cases were identified among the people examined during the latest program.

South Korea conducted similar examinations of defectors from areas near Punggye-ri in 2017, 2018, 2023 and 2024 after concerns were raised about possible radiation leakage from the test site.

Across tests conducted since 2017, researchers have identified chromosomal abnormalities in some former residents of the region, but they have not established that North Korea’s nuclear tests caused them.

North Korea carried out six underground nuclear tests at Punggye-ri between 2006 and 2017.

The country has not allowed international nuclear inspectors to conduct an independent environmental assessment at the site.

North Korea has maintained that its nuclear tests were conducted safely and did not release radioactive material into surrounding communities.

— Reported by Asia Today; translated by UPI

© Asia Today. Unauthorized reproduction or redistribution prohibited.

Original Korean report: https://www.asiatoday.co.kr/kn/view.php?key=20260731010011734

WASHINGTON — For much of President Trump’s second term, Republican senators have largely stayed in line, wary of the consequences of defying a president with a history of targeting those who cross him. This week, that dynamic noticeably shifted.

Senate Republicans blocked two of Trump’s legislative priorities, angered by the push to create a $1.8-billion federal fund to compensate people who claim to have been politically persecuted, including rioters who assaulted the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. The revolt forced Republican leaders to pull a planned vote on legislation to fund the president’s immigration crackdown and security features for the president’s White House ballroom project.

In response, the president defended the fund and lashed out at its critics.

“I gave up a lot of money in allowing the just announced Anti-Weaponization Fund to go forward,” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. “Instead, I am helping others, who were so badly abused by an evil, corrupt and weaponized Biden Administration, receive, at long last, JUSTICE”!

The president also called Republican senators who broke with him quitters who are “screwing the Republican Party.”

The friction, which has been building for weeks, is being watched as potential test to the limits of Trump’s grip on his party amid an already tense political environment heading into the midterm elections.

“This is kind of a perfect storm,” former Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “It may be that this time you can point to it and say this is when the great migration begins, away from some of the president’s policies and away from the fear that the president can target you.”

Whether this week marks the beginning of that moment — or simply another episode of political turbulence that fades — is the central question now handing over Trump’s second term.

Not the first break — but an escalation

This is not the first time Republicans have broken with the president. In November, Congress overwhelmingly voted to force the Justice Department to release of the Jeffrey Epstein files, an effort that Trump unsuccessfully tried to thwart for months.

The Epstein vote showed that on the right issue, under the right circumstances, Republicans could be moved to defy Trump. This week, the creation of the fund changed the circumstances again, and the number of Republican senators willing to act quickly grew.

This moment comes after months of rising costs during the war in Iran, efforts by the president to oust members of his own party and now a set of proposals that are proving hard to defend in an election year.

“What you have is basically a bunch of people who feel a bit under siege,” said Bob Olinksy, the senior vice president of Structural Reform and Governance at the Center for American Progress. “At the same time, they know that most of what the president is doing is unpopular, and they’re the ones who are going to be standing for reelection in November.”

Republicans push back

Senate Republicans leaders are now asking the Department of Justice to reconsider the terms of the fund, underscoring just how politically toxic the idea has become within the president’s own party.

Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) told reporters that the politically speaking, the fund is “unexplainable.” Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) told the New York Times the fund should be in real trouble. Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) called the fund “utterly stupid” and “morally wrong.”

Sen. Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican whom Trump has singled out for going against him, was equally unsparing, saying he opposed “using billions of taxpayer dollars to compensate convicted felons and thugs who attacked police.” He also criticized the administration for pushing domestic and foreign policy issues that he says are bad for housing and the military.

“If opposing these things makes me a RINO [Republican In Name Only], then I gladly accept that nickname,” Tillis wrote on X. “We need Republicans to do well in November, but the stupid stuff is killing our chances!”

The Republican push back comes as the concern about self-dealing runs deep across the electorate.

A recent poll Economist/YouGov poll found that 59% of Americans believe Trump is using his office for personal gain, though that belief is sharply divided among partisan lines. A CNN poll found that 37% of Americans say Trump puts the good of the country above his personal gain, while 32% say he is in touch with the problems of ordinary Americans.

Asked if the political environment influenced the actions this week, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters that there is a “political component to everything we do around here.”

Funds and tax immunity clauses

Senate Democrats are wondering if the fund will mark a watershed moment for Republicans.

“Have Republicans finally found a bridge too far?” Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) told reporters after Republicans left Washington without funding Trump’s priorities.

Democrats have called the fund an illegal abuse of power designed to line the pockets of Trump’s allies with taxpayer dollars. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) called it a “pure theft of public funds.”

The fund was created as part of a settlement resolving a $10-billion lawsuit Trump personally brought against the Internal Revenue Service over the leak of his tax returns. Alongside it, the deal says the IRS is “forever barred and precluded” from pursuing any tax claims against Trump and his businesses.

Under the tax immunity clause, Trump and his family could save more than $600 million, according to an analysis by Forbes.

The fund, however, has been the target of most of the bipartisan ire. Mostly because Trump and administration officials have not ruled out that it could stand to benefit people who carried out violence during the Jan. 6 riot.

The public funds, if disbursed, would come from the federal judgment fund, which is a Congress-approved ongoing appropriation that allows the Justice Department to settle cases and make payouts. In the past, Republicans have taken issue with the fund. The GOP-controlled House Judiciary Committee characterized it an abuse in 2017.

Several of the president’s allies have already talked about tapping into the fund.

Michael Cohen, Trump’s former attorney who served prison time in relation to campaign finance violations, said he plans to apply for compensation.

Former Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio, who was convicted of seditious conspiracy and later pardoned by Trump, told CBS News he would seek a payout from the fund.

“I was targeted,” Tarrio said. “And I do believe that this fund does apply to me.”