ROBOT baggage handlers will replace humans during an experimental project as a major airline trials a humanoid crew.
The pilot programme was announced by Japan Airlines, where Chinese-made robots will be integrated into ground operations at Haneda Airport in Tokyo.
Sign up for the Travel newsletter
Thank you!
A new program at Haneda Airport in Japan could see human baggage handlers replaced with robotsCredit: ReutersThe robots are programmed to raise an arm when task is completeCredit: Reuters
The country’s biggest airport will host the three-year experiment, where the machines will be tasked with cleaning planes, as well as loading and transporting baggage.
Looking further into the future, the androids could also be operating ground support equipment including baggage tractors, catering trucks and power units.
The airline said bipedal robots were the best suited to working in airport environments, as opposed to other types of robotic machines.
This is because they are quicker and are able to move within and adapt to cramped spaces.
The airline said bipedal robots were the best suited to working in airport environments because they are quicker and can adapt to smaller spacesCredit: EPAThe robots will be integrated with human staff throughout the program to carry out tasks including cleaning planesCredit: ReutersIf the project goes well, the androids could be given further tasks in the futureCredit: ReutersThe project is being rolled out just in time for summer in JapanCredit: Reuters
“Being human-shaped allows their introduction without significant modifications to existing airport facilities or aircraft structures,” a Japan Airlines spokesperson said.
“By combining cutting-edge AI technology with the unique flexibility of humanoid forms, the project aims to realise a sustainable operational structure through labour savings and workload reduction.”
“Currently, the aviation industry faces a serious challenge in ground handling labour shortages,” they continued.
The airline said this was because of increased tourism and a declining working-age population in Japan.
“Ground handling operations require highly skilled personnel to maintain safety, such as aircraft marshalling and baggage/cargo handling, while also imposing significant physical burdens,” they said.
Baggage handlers do one of the least glamorous and thankless jobs in the modern world.
Many workers suffer with back injuries and are often faced with complaints about lost and damaged belongings.
The robots were trialled in Haneda this week, with a demonstration showing a skinny 51-inch robot tapping and pushing large storage containers on rollers.
To demonstrate that a task had been completed, the robots raise a hand.
The machine is made by Unitree Robotics of China and has 43 separate moving parts.
“While airports appear highly automated and standardised, their back-end operations still rely heavily on human labour and face serious labour shortages,” said Tomohiro Uchida of GMO AI & Robotics, the airline’s partner on the project.
Homework can feel stressful when several subjects need attention at the same time. Students may have math problems, science tasks, writing assignments, and reading work all in one evening. Many learners need faster explanations, better organization, or extra practice after class ends. AI homework tools can help by saving time, explaining hard topics, and keeping tasks in order.
Still, the best results come when students use them with care instead of copying answers. A smart tool should support learning, not replace effort. If you are looking for the best AI homework helper, this guide can help.
The table below compares seven popular options by price, device support, and key strengths.
Tool
Best For
Free Plan
Paid Plans
Devices
Main Strength
Edubrain
Multi-subject homework help
Yes
From $3.99/week
Web, mobile browser
Step-by-step + extra study tools
Photomath
Math solving
Yes
$9.99/mo
iOS, Android
Camera-based math help
Socratic by Google
Quick subject help
Yes
None listed
iOS, Android
Photo questions across subjects
ChatGPT
All-purpose homework support
Yes
$8 / $20 / $200
Web, iOS, Android
Flexible explanations
Brainly
Peer homework Q&A
Yes
From ~$2/mo
Web, iOS, Android
Community answers
Quizlet
Revision and memorization
Yes
$7.99/mo
Web, iOS, Android
Flashcards and test prep
Chegg Study
Textbook solutions
No free full plan
From $15/mo
Web, mobile
Structured academic help
Every tool solves a different student problem. Next, we review the best AI for homework in detail.
Edubrain
Edubrain is the strongest all around homework option for students who want one place for many school tasks. It works as a free homework helper with support for math, science, writing, and more. Users can get step by step solutions, answer corrections, formula display, and help through image or PDF uploads. It also includes the Edubrain chemistry AI tool for science tasks that need formulas or reactions. A student can use it in one evening for algebra homework, then switch to a written assignment without changing apps.
The free plan covers core tools, while AI Plus adds more features and deeper support. This makes it a smart choice for busy students who want one dashboard for daily study. Many users may also see it as a top homework helper because it covers several needs in one place.
Pros
Many useful features
Free access available
Supports image and PDF uploads
Broad help across subjects
Good for busy schedules
Cons
Many options may feel crowded at first
Weekly pricing may not suit everyone
Full tools may require upgrade
Photomath
Photomath camera based system lets users scan printed or handwritten problems with a phone and get answers in seconds. The app then shows step by step explanations with clear visual breakdowns, so students can follow each part of the method.
The free plan covers core solving tools, while Premium adds deeper learning tips and extra guidance. Photomath works best for algebra, arithmetic, and routine math practice that needs quick support. It is less useful for non math subjects, but it does daily math tasks very well.
Pros
Easy to use for most students
Fast results from camera scans
Clear math explanations
Good for worksheet checks
Cons
Mainly focused on math only
Premium needed for best features
Less useful for writing or science tasks
Socratic by Google
It works as a photo input assistant, so users can take a picture of a question and get support in seconds. The app covers math, science, literature, history, and other common school subjects. Socratic also connects users to educational resources, lessons, and short guides that can build understanding.
Its zero cost model makes it a smart choice for families on a budget. Many students also see it as useful free software for students because it helps with several subjects in one app. The tool focuses on speed and simple use rather than deep advanced study.
Pros
Fully free to use
Supports many school subjects
Trusted Google ecosystem
Fast photo question help
Cons
Lighter depth than paid tools
Limited advanced customization
Less suited for complex coursework
ChatGPT
ChatGPT is a flexible study assistant for students who need help in many subjects. It can support writing, summaries, explanations, and reasoning in one place. Plans include Free, Go, Plus, and Pro, so users can match cost to their needs. A student may use it for math one day and essays the next. Its key strength is chat based support with follow up questions. Many learners choose it as AI for studying because it fits many school tasks.
Pros
Highly versatile across subjects
Strong explanations and summaries
Useful for writing and study support
Good for many school tasks
Cons
Quality depends on prompts
Advanced plans cost more
Answers may need fact checks
Brainly
Brainly is a peer learning platform for students who want help from other people. Its Q and A system lets users post homework questions and get answers from students, tutors, and educators. This is useful late at night when quick help is needed. The platform covers math, science, writing, and more. Free access gives basic use, while paid plans add extra tools. Brainly suits learners who like shared ideas, short explanations, and different solution methods.
Pros
Fast answers for common questions
Active user community
Affordable paid tier
Helpful across many subjects
Cons
Answer quality can vary
Less structured than AI solvers
Some replies may lack full detail
Quizlet
Quizlet offers flashcards, quizzes, and practice modes that help students review key facts. A student can use it after homework to study vocabulary, history dates, or science terms before a test. Paid plans add ad free use and extra study tools. It works well beside solver tools because one app explains problems, while Quizlet helps store facts. Many students include it with other homework helper apps for full study support. Quizlet is best for exam preparation.
Pros
Strong memorization tools
Popular and trusted platform
Flexible practice modes
Cons
Not a direct solver
Some features behind paywall
Chegg Study
Chegg Study is a premium option for students who want structured academic support. It is known for textbook solutions and an expert Q and A model that helps with course questions. Paid tiers start around monthly plans, while Study Pack options may include math tools, writing help, and added study resources.
This can suit a college bound student who uses textbook heavy courses and needs regular support each week. The platform focuses on organized help rather than quick one line answers. Chegg Study is often most useful for students with steady workloads.
Pros
Strong textbook coverage
Access to expert help
Broader paid study ecosystem
Cons
Subscription cost may add up
Best value depends on usage frequency
AI homework tools work best when students use them with care. First, try the question on your own before you ask for help. This shows what you know and where you need support. Use the explanations to learn the method, not only the final answer.
For important homework, quizzes, or projects, double check answers with class notes or another source. Avoid copying full responses into your work, since this can hurt real learning. Use AI tools for review, planning tasks, and saving time during busy weeks. Parents can also guide students by setting clear study habits.
Conclusion
AI homework tools can lower stress and save time when school tasks build up. Each tool has a different purpose, so choose based on your needs. It is smart to start with free plans first. Use these tools in a balanced way that supports learning, practice, and better habits. For students and parents, the best choice is one that helps progress each week.
Advanced artificial intelligence tools could significantly reduce video game development costs, potentially saving nearly half of expenses and unlocking around $22 billion in annual profits for game makers, according to Morgan Stanley analysts. AI can automate tasks like creating game environments, generating dialogue, and testing software, making production faster and cheaper. However, these financial gains may not be evenly spread across the gaming industry.
Morgan Stanley estimates that global spending on video games will reach $275 billion this year, with 20%, or about $55 billion, reinvested into game development and operations. Game development, which is typically costly and labor-intensive, could become more efficient as AI allows for smaller teams and quicker enhancements post-launch. A prime example is Take-Two Interactive’s Grand Theft Auto VI, in development since 2018 and expected to launch in November 2026.
Potential winners from this AI integration include major gaming platforms like Tencent, Sony, and Roblox, along with large publishers such as Take-Two and Electronic Arts, which can utilize AI across multiple titles. Conversely, companies with weaker franchises may struggle, facing increased competition as AI reduces costs for making mid-scale games. The report also discusses how AI could enhance revenue by keeping games engaging, encouraging spending on add-ons, in-game purchases, and subscriptions. Publishers may increasingly focus on enhancing existing franchises rather than relying solely on new game releases.
Volkswagen Group announced plans to equip new cars for China with AI “agents” starting in the second half of this year. This strategy aims to help Volkswagen compete with fast-growing Chinese automakers in areas like electrification and digital features.
At an event in Beijing, the company revealed that its vehicles will utilize a China-specific electronic architecture to offer “onboard AI agents,” allowing for intuitive, human-like interaction while ensuring personal data protection. These AI agents can perform complex tasks, such as finding top-rated restaurants, making reservations, driving to the location, and organizing parking.
Volkswagen is shifting its image in China, aiming to be seen as a leader in electric and intelligent vehicles rather than just a traditional manufacturer. The company plans to introduce over 20 new electrified vehicles, totaling 50 new models by 2030, as part of its “largest ever electric mobility offensive. “
CEO Oliver Blume emphasized that their initiatives signal Volkswagen’s return to the market. The collaboration with Horizon Robotics aims to make this AI technology accessible across the mass market.
Within a year where big language models write press releases, student papers, and even peer-reviewed articles with a single press of a button, guesswork is not an option that teachers, editors, and grant reviewers can afford. They require valid methods of determining whether they are looking at a page that was designed by a human being or generated by an algorithm. The boundary is more than ever indistinct: text generators of the modern era do not only imitate idiosyncratic diction, they also reference sources and sprinkle their text with rhetorical flourishes, which traditionally were the bane of automation. But there are still prints, prints of fingers, that are revealed by a rigorous check-up.
Why Detection Matters in 2026
The rapid improvements in transformer efficiency have made generative writing infrastructure, rather than a novelty. Bots write corporate knowledge bases, marketing newsletters, and institutional reports, which are then lightly edited by humans. In the case of academia, this automation endangers the standards of originality; in journalism, it may endanger the standards of credibility; in the case of educators, it may bring about a decline in the learning outcomes when the essays are sent to silicon.
European Union legislators and some U.S. states now mandate AI disclosure on projects funded by the government, and large journals are requesting provenance statements in the same vein as conflict-of-interest disclosures. Although this would be achieved through disclosure, enforcement is based on detection. Not checking authorship may open the door to plagiarism lawsuits, damage reputations, or even allow plagiarism or algorithmic fake news to creep into print. Proper screening can therefore safeguard integrity as well as liability, and human merit and machine assistance remain honorably separated.
Key Linguistic Signals Still Holding Up
Long before you open a dedicated detector, close reading can raise red flags. AI prose often exhibits low burstiness, sentence lengths fluctuate within narrow bands, and high lexical predictability, especially in mid-length passages. Repeated use of transitional adverbs such as “moreover,” “furthermore,” and “overall” in rhythmic sequences is another giveaway. Similarly, large models smooth out idiosyncratic contractions, turning informal drafts into formally homogenized copy. When a reviewer suspects such fingerprints, a quick trip to Smodin to check if text is AI generated offers an immediate probability score without exporting the manuscript. Still, numbers alone are insufficient; the linguistic context of the assignment, the native proficiency of the writer, and genre conventions must frame interpretation.
Burstiness versus Perplexity: What the Metrics Really Say
Two metrics dominate current detector dashboards. Perplexity gauges how surprised a language model is by the next token in a sentence; lower perplexity usually signals machine-like predictability. Burstiness, borrowed from information theory, measures variation across consecutive sentences or paragraphs. Human writers inadvertently mix terse observations with longer reflections, creating uneven cadence, whereas AI output remains impressively even. Detectors from OpenAI, Turnitin, and Sapling combine both numbers in a heat-map interface, but analysts should understand their limits. An expert human editor deliberately smoothing tone for readability will lower burstiness and perplexity, triggering false flags. Conversely, a basic paraphrase of AI text can raise both metrics, slipping past simple thresholds. Treat these scores as starting points, not verdicts.
The last year was characterized by market consolidation in the detection market. Rather than dozens of browser extensions that have questionable provenance, five professional platforms have become dominant: Smodin, GPTZero-Pro, Turnitin AI Indicator, Copyleaks, and the free-of-charge DetectGPT-X consortium. They both are based on their own training corpora, and therefore, the agreement between them is convincing. GPTZero-Pro is good at sentence-level labeling and has a classroom API.
Turnitin is LMS-based but is English-centric. Copyleaks can also analyze code snippets or prose, and is used in computer-science classes. Smodin is more concerned with breadth and sub-second throughput, with a thousand-word manuscript taking less than five seconds. Comparative reviews, such as Quillbot vs Grammarly vs Smodin, show that no single tool prevails in every context. Experienced editors therefore run suspect passages through at least two detectors before escalating to human forensic analysis.
Layered Verification Workflow
Professional reviewers in 2026 rarely trust an automated score in isolation. A common three-layer pipeline balances speed and accuracy.
First, bulk ingestion: run every incoming document through a fast detector with a liberal threshold – say, flag anything above 35% probability.
Second, targeted analysis: export only the flagged segments into a slower, sentence-granular model for localized scoring; Copyleaks or Smodin excel here.
Third, manual audit: a subject-matter expert reads the highlighted sentences aloud, listening for tonal monotony and checking citations against primary sources.
The layered approach maximizes reviewer time by spending human effort where algorithmic consensus already signals risk. Crucially, every step is logged, satisfying the audit requirements now mandated by several accreditation bodies.
Beyond Algorithms: Human Tactics That Still Work
Detecting contextual instincts of an experienced reviewer is beyond the capability of even the most advanced detector. Spontaneous oral defense is, in classroom essays, as effective as ever: tell a student to recite a paragraph that he or she allegedly composed, and the discrepancies will be revealed soon. Cross-interviewing quoted sources in journalism frequently shows whether or not the author actually interviewed them or just picked up publicly available transcripts – AI can not create personal anecdotes with the same level of detail when it comes to follow-ups.
Proposers of grants rely on the history of revision: real writers build up untidy drafts, comments, and time-stamped edits, whereas AI-written submissions tend to be a one-clean submission. The other sure path is stylometric comparison with a previously known and verified work of a given author; identity footprints like infrequent collocations or recurrent metaphors are exceptionally constant over time. Notably, all human checks develop explanatory accounts – which probability numbers do not have – to assist institutions in justifying decisions in case they are questioned.
The only sure method that could be used today to distinguish between silicon and soul is the combination of statistical detectors and active human inquiry.
One last note: even the AI detectors change every month. When giving a score, always record the model version and calibration date used, since thresholds change as generators get better. Record raw text you tested, detector output, and Human commentary. This audit trail is future-proof, and it allows your decision to be duplicated, the foundation of transparent scholarship and review, in the classroom, newsroom, and laboratory.
ASML occupies a critical position in the global semiconductor supply chain as the sole producer of extreme ultraviolet lithography systems. These machines are essential for manufacturing the most advanced chips used in artificial intelligence applications. As demand for AI computing has surged, driven by data centre expansion and high performance processing needs, the semiconductor industry has entered a new investment cycle focused on capacity growth.
Strong earnings and upgraded forecast
ASML reported first quarter earnings that exceeded expectations and raised its 2026 revenue outlook to between 36 billion and 40 billion euros. This revision signals stronger than anticipated order inflows and reinforces the scale of demand emerging from the AI sector.
The company’s performance reflects a broader trend in which chip demand is outpacing supply. According to CEO Christophe Fouquet, customers are accelerating expansion plans well beyond the near term, indicating confidence in sustained AI driven growth.
ASML as a strategic enabler of AI growth
Investors increasingly view ASML as a foundational player in the AI ecosystem rather than a conventional manufacturer. Its tools are used by leading chipmakers such as TSMC, which produces advanced processors for firms like Nvidia and Apple.
This positioning places ASML at the upstream end of the value chain. Instead of competing in chip design or production, it supplies the essential infrastructure that enables both. As a result, its growth is tied to the entire semiconductor sector rather than any single company.
Supply constraints and industrial limits
Despite strong demand, structural constraints remain significant. Semiconductor fabrication plants require years to build and involve complex global supply chains. ASML itself faces production bottlenecks due to the precision and cost of its machines, which can reach hundreds of millions of dollars per unit.
Even with plans to increase shipments of its leading systems in 2026 and 2027, capacity expansion is gradual. This creates a persistent imbalance where demand continues to exceed supply, reinforcing pricing power across the industry.
Geopolitical and regulatory risks
A key uncertainty for ASML lies in export controls, particularly regarding sales to China. Proposed restrictions in the United States, including the MATCH Act, could limit the company’s ability to supply Chinese customers. Currently, China represents a significant portion of ASML’s revenue.
However, the global shortage of advanced chips may mitigate this risk. Reduced access to one market could be offset by demand from others, especially as countries and companies compete to secure semiconductor supply chains.
Market response and valuation concerns
ASML’s share price has risen sharply, reflecting investor optimism around AI driven growth. The company is often described as a “picks and shovels” investment, benefiting from the broader expansion of the industry regardless of which firms dominate end products.
At the same time, analysts caution that valuations are elevated. The current pricing assumes sustained high growth, leaving limited room for setbacks related to supply constraints or regulatory changes.
Analysis
The upgrade in ASML’s forecast highlights a structural shift rather than a temporary cycle. AI is not only increasing demand for chips but also reshaping the entire semiconductor value chain. ASML’s monopoly in EUV technology gives it a unique strategic advantage, effectively making it a gatekeeper for next generation chip production.
However, this dominance also exposes the company to geopolitical pressures and operational challenges. The interplay between technological leadership, supply limitations, and regulatory dynamics will determine whether current growth trajectories can be maintained.
ASML’s stronger outlook underscores the depth of the AI driven semiconductor boom. While demand momentum remains robust, the company operates within a constrained and politically sensitive environment. Its future performance will depend on balancing rapid industry expansion with the physical and geopolitical limits shaping the global chip ecosystem.
ANASTACIA Kingsnorth has been a queen of social media since starting her YouTube Channel aged 11 – but now a fierce backlash is threatening her empire.
The Brit content creator, 25, has ventured into podcast hosting, has written her own book and been the face of many ad campaigns.
Sign up for the Showbiz newsletter
Thank you!
Anastacia Kingsnorth has faced huge backlash following her latest ad collaborationCredit: tiktok/@anastasiakingsnorthShe used AI to create a short clip promoting German brand Air UpCredit: tiktok/@anastasiakingsnorthFans have called out the fact she seemingly used AI – which is not environmentally friendlyCredit: tiktok/@anastasiakingsnorthThe 25-year-old rocketed to fame on YouTube aged 11Credit: Getty
Her height meant she could scoop up a pink water bottle branded with the Air Up logo before she took a sip.
The slurp appeared to transport her into both a new location – the roof of Buckingham Palace – and a new denim pinstripe outfit.
She wrapped the clip by visiting locations including St Paul’s Cathedral and Big Ben.
Yet on TikTok, her followers have alleged she has used AI to create the scenes – and claimed the technology goes against Air Up’s environmentally friendly credentials.
Criticisms came from two angles – the nature of content creation as a creative process, and also for AI using huge volumes of water, seemingly going against green principles.
The Sun has gone to Anastacia’s rep for comment.
Fans have claimed Anastacia, whose content focusses on lifestyle, leisure and beauty, has abandoned the “creative process” with her latest venture.
One TikTok user, who works in marketing, ranted: “Honestly, I am not happy about it.
“And I don’t think a lot of people are, judging by the comments on the video”.
The Influencer Insider – Get all the gossip on all your favourite online stars
Want to know more about the influencer who faked cancer? Read all about Brittany Miller and her sham career here.
We have all the inside gossip about Ladbaby mum’s incredible weight loss here.
And talking of weight loss, we know all about what is going on with B&M queen Becki Jones, which you can read up on here.
If health influencers are your thing, then read this on the man behind Tonic Health and his dubious claims here.
She added: “It really cuts down on what content creation really is.
“If you work in marketing like myself you will know that this is totally wrong.
“The whole point of content creation is creative process”.
Fans of Anastacia, who has previously collaborated with ITV bosses for a Love Island promotion, continued to take to the comments in fury.
One simply posted: “Who’s idea was this?? Omg”.
A second mused: “I do like some of their content, but Ana and her family don’t seem hugely aware or maybe even that bothered by environmental issues unfortunately. (a LOT of consumption etc!)”.
A third added: “The funny part about it is , the ad is for a refillable water bottle (to try and tackle plastic waste etc) but then it the ad is literally AI!! you couldn’t write it honestly”.
A fourth mused: “The hypocrisy of these ‘influencers’ is gross tbh”.
“I’m surprised the brand approved it to be honest…says a lot about them too! I think being aware of the environmental impact AI has is important too”.
And another user surmised: “For me its the context of the ad being for a refillable water bottle while using AI which uses tons of water. It is a little ironic”.
Campaigners have previously flagged the significant carbon, energy and water use that AI requires.
Previously, Sasha Luccioni, climate lead at AI company Hugging Face told The Guardian: “What I’m worried about is that we’re deploying AI in such a way that we don’t have a good idea of the energy use.
“We’re essentially operating on the hypothesis that it’s not a problem – or that if it is a problem it will somehow be solved – instead of getting ahead of it.”
While Anastacia has posted the video to her Instagram grid, the brand is yet to feature it on their page.
Others have called out the fact AI could take away from her ‘creative’ process as a content creatorCredit: tiktok/@anastasiakingsnorthShe is rumoured to have a net worth of more than £1millionCredit: Getty