Month: January 2026

US approves $2.3bn sale of torpedoes, air defences, aircraft to Singapore | Weapons News

Singapore’s Ministry of Defence plans to replace its fleet of Fokker 50 Maritime Patrol Aircraft with Boeing-made P-8A reconnaissance planes.

The United States has approved a $2.3bn weapons sale to Singapore that includes P-8A Poseidon reconnaissance aircraft, lightweight torpedoes, and air defence systems.

The State Department notified the US Congress of the sale on Wednesday, according to a statement on the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) website.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

The proposed sale will allow Singapore to “meet current and future threats by providing a credible maritime force capable of deterring adversaries and participating in US allied operations”, the DSCA said.

“This proposed sale will enhance the foreign policy and national security objectives of the United States by improving the security of a strategic partner that is an important force for political stability and economic progress in Asia,” the statement continued.

Ian Chong, a political scientist, told Al Jazeera that the patrol aircraft are used to protect Singapore’s “extended sea lanes of communication and its very busy waterways” in Southeast Asia.

The acquisition of four Boeing P-8A aircraft is part of Singapore’s long-term plan to replace its ageing fleet of Fokker 50 Maritime Patrol Aircraft, according to its Ministry of Defence.

Singapore Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing announced plans to buy the US aircraft in September, following a meeting with Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon.

The US has $8.38bn in active government-to-government sales with Singapore, which range from munitions to F-35 fighter jets, according to the State Department.

Singapore is due to receive the first aircraft from its outstanding order of 20 F-35s later this year, according to its Defence Ministry.

The US and Singapore cooperate on a range of security issues, and their militaries regularly host joint training exercises.

A P-8A Poseidon performs in the air during the Australian International Airshow in Avalon, Australia March 25, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams
A P-8A Poseidon performs in the air during the Australian International Airshow in Avalon, Australia, in March 2025 [File: Hollie Adams/Reuters]

Source link

Savannah Guthrie shows off ‘new voice’ at ‘Today’ after surgery

“Today” co-host Savannah Guthrie is on the mend after vocal surgery and has been keeping her “new voice” under wraps — mostly.

Guthrie returned briefly to the NBC morning show, calling in to Tuesday morning’s broadcast to share an update about her recovery with her “Today” crew and viewers. The news anchor, 54, has been absent from the “Today” desk since mid-December because of her vocal chord surgery.

The longtime “Today” personality and journalist began her cameo smiling and showing off her white board to her co-hosts Jenna Bush Hager, Carson Daly, Sheinelle Jones, Craig Melvin and Al Roker. Shortly after writing “love you,” Guthrie decided to do away with the whiteboard completely and began to talk.

“So I am still on vocal rest but I’m allowed to talk for about five to 10 minutes every hour,” she told her co-hosts. “This is my new voice — or my old voice. But my new voice.”

“Sounds the same,” Roker observed, while other co-hosts also discussed Guthrie’s sound.

Guthrie explained that her recovery will be “slow” and that she needs to be cautious about how often she talks while on the mend. She joked with Daly that the long weekend with her children tested just how much she can raise her voice post-surgery.

She also used her time on Tuesday’s broadcast to share details about her official return to “Today.” Guthrie told Bush Hager and their co-hosts that she will return to her duties on Monday. Before then, she will be featured in a “Today” story about her surgery set to air on Friday, she said.

Guthrie announced her surgery and her break from “Today” duties on Dec. 19. During that broadcast she told viewers that her “voice has been very scratchy and started to crack a little bit.” At the time, she said she learned she had non-cancerous growths on her vocal cords.

During Guthrie’s “Today” stop, Jones — who underwent the same surgery in 2020 — said “we take our voices for granted.” Guthrie ended her “Today” appearance expressing gratitude for her “Today” family and showing off gift mugs from her supporters.

“See you Friday,” she said.



Source link

Kerry’s Lionizing Shift From Officer to Activist

The week he became an American household name, John F. Kerry carried his credentials pinned to his shirt pocket.

For five days in late April 1971, Kerry wore his battle ribbons on old combat fatigues as he led 1,000 disillusioned Vietnam veterans massed in Washington for a protest against the war they fought.

“Mr. Kerry, please move your microphone,” Sen. Stuart Symington (D-Mo.) prodded the 27-year-old former Navy lieutenant during a climactic appearance before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. “You have a Silver Star, have you not?”

Solemn, gangling, hunched over a witness table, Kerry obliged, showing the cloth bars that stood for his Silver Star, Bronze Star and three Purple Hearts. Kerry’s pained plea — “How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?” — stiffened congressional opposition to the war and made him a peace movement icon for giving voice to veterans weary of death without victory.

The embittered grunts called themselves “Winter Soldiers,” conjuring up Thomas Paine’s vision of a Colonial army of patriots. They dubbed their protest “Dewey Canyon III,” a play on the Nixon administration’s code for secret incursions into Laos. They flashed their decorations everywhere they went that week. Then, in a bitter farewell that still shadows Kerry’s career, he and his peace platoons tossed away honors.

Antiwar Turning Point

A signal moment in the slow fade of American support for the war, the 1971 protest by the Vietnam Veterans Against the War was Kerry’s entry point into public life. No other presidential aspirant of his generation won such early prominence or endured such microscopic scrutiny.

“I did what I thought was the right thing to save the lives of American soldiers,” Kerry said in a recent interview. “It wasn’t easy. I mean, I knew people would be critical, that there would be people who wouldn’t like it.”

Kerry’s two-year transformation — from disaffected patrol boat skipper home from Vietnam to an antiwar leader coming into his own at the Washington protest — sheds insight into the nuances of his character. His determined entry into the upper echelon of the peace movement was a daring high-wire act for a Yale graduate with no constituency beyond his own conscience and ambition.

Poised beyond his years, Kerry spoke out with wounded eloquence as the nation roiled over widening war and mounting American deaths. He faced risks in coming forward, singled out as a threat by no less than President Nixon and targeted by government and military spies in a covert surveillance campaign still coming to light today.

“The powers that be wanted to know what these guys were up to,” recalled John J. O’Connor, a D.C. policeman assigned to infiltrate the VVAW leadership. “They had their hotheads. Not Kerry. He was cool as 12-year-old Scotch.”

Kerry pressed his antiwar troops to work within the system, a moderate course he says is a lifelong inclination. But critics and admirers say his centrism reflected a striver’s calculation. Fellow protesters mocked his prudence and pressed khakis. Even then, they say, Kerry kept one eye cocked on his future, hedging his bets in careful maneuvering that became the hallmark of his political rise.

On the campaign trail, Kerry plays up his exploits as a patrol boat skipper to show his resolve. Yet he revisits his antiwar days warily, aware his old words and actions remain poisoned symbols. Vietnam veterans still rage over Kerry’s Senate speech, reviling him for his incendiary antiwar criticism and for citing unproven atrocities allegedly committed by U.S. troops.

“Going up to testify without confirmation was a slander on the Vietnam veteran,” said W. Hays Parks, a former Marine colonel who served as an infantry officer and military prosecutor in Vietnam.

Even as Dewey Canyon III ended with an admiring burst of media coverage, Kerry’s success was fissured with doubts. Fearing public recriminations, he urged the antiwar veterans to return their decorations in a muted ceremony. But they ignored him, instead flinging their honors away in an angry symbolic rejection of the war.

Massing in parade formation, 700 veterans wept, cheered and swore as they lobbed their decorations like grenades. When Kerry’s turn came, he muttered sorrowfully into a brace of microphones, then lofted his own ribbons.

“I knew I was going to throw them back, but I didn’t know how,” Kerry recalls. After the crowd dispersed, Kerry says, he discreetly tossed away two medals given to him by veterans who could not attend the event. The flinched denouement fed suspicions that Kerry had pretended the medals were his own — even as the renounced honors lay unclaimed for years, hidden away in a police storeroom.

Dewey Canyon III ended for Kerry as catharsis, “like throwing the war over the fence.” But his path to antiwar activism remains an exposed fault line for his generation, a progression Kerry has always insisted was seamless and unavoidable.

“I had to speak out,” he says. “I was compelled.”

Kerry had it relatively easy when he came home from the war in April 1969. He was an admiral’s aide in Brooklyn and had an apartment with his fiancee on Manhattan’s elegant upper East Side.

But Vietnam still gouged his world, erasing old friends. Two weeks after his return, Kerry learned of the ambush death of Don Droz, a fellow patrol boat commander who shared his doubts about the war. Droz’s death left him numb.

“That’s when I decided I really needed to kick into gear,” Kerry recalls.

He vented on paper, intent on composing “a letter to America.” At a Greenwich Village pub, Kerry raised the idea with columnist Pete Hamill, a friend of his sister’s. The letter sat unsent. “He felt he had something to give. It’s the sort of noblesse oblige that doesn’t resonate too much these days,” said close friend George Butler.

Kerry found an outlet piloting Adam Walinsky, a former speechwriter for Robert F. Kennedy, to upstate New York colleges for a lecture series against the war. Aloft in a bucking prop plane, the two men talked about Vietnam, politics and the Kennedys. For Kerry, the talk “crystallized in me that this was something we all needed to do.”

By January 1970, Kerry had left the Navy to run as an antiwar congressional candidate in Boston. Outflanked by the sudden entry of peace activist the Rev. Robert Drinan, Kerry pulled out, canny enough to know his aspirations for office needed a base.

The war kept drawing him back. Newly married and on honeymoon in France, Kerry detoured from his vacation to meet with South and North Vietnamese delegates to the Paris peace talks. How a 26-year-old private citizen without a political track record connected with the negotiators is unclear.

Through an aide, Kerry said he does not recall the details of the session — though he told the Senate in 1971 that negotiators for the communist North assured him that if the U.S. “set a date for withdrawal” from Vietnam, its “prisoners of war would be returned.”

A Veteran Voice

Speaking out against the war at college campuses and fundraisers, Kerry found his voice as an activist. His reputation reached leaders of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War, a group of dissident ex-GIs in New York. “He was just what we needed, the kind of guy who could stand in a room of angry vets and convince them to do something,” said Jan Barry, who founded the group in 1967.

Kerry found his chance in late January 1971. As VVAW members massed in a Detroit motel, Kerry asked to organize a march on Washington. By lobbying Congress and marching in front of cameras, Kerry felt, veterans might turn the tide against the war.

His reception was stormy. Many VVAW leaders, working-class grunts from the heartland, teed off on Kerry, suspicious of his officer’s rank and patrician aloofness. Radicals resented his blunt push for leadership. They finally gave their assent, but added a symbolic tweak of guerrilla theater — a mass return of their combat honors.

“We used each other,” explains Jack Mallory, a former Army captain from Virginia. “He was our front man. We were his stepping-stone to publicity.”

The veterans also were there to amass proof of U.S. war crimes in Vietnam. The “Winter Soldier” hearings were sparked by the 1968 My Lai massacre of 347 Vietnamese civilians.

Prodded by Kerry and other moderators, more than 150 vets filed into the dimly lighted motel hall, spilling horror tales. Bill Crandell, an Ohio infantry officer who led the hearings, described civilians gunned down in “free fire zones” — combat areas where soldiers killed at will. Former Marine Scott Camil detailed a torrent of murders and disembowelings — a grisly account he later gave under oath to the Navy.

Government’s Scrutiny

Media interest was fitful. But hidden among observers were undercover military agents. In 1973, Army investigators detailed the clandestine intelligence operation to Hays Parks, who taught war crimes law at the Army’s Judge Advocate General’s School.

The Army’s Criminal Investigation Division agents told Parks they confirmed some atrocity allegations, but also found that several VVAW members were impostors. The Army never released its findings, Parks said, but “there were enough questions to put the hearings in doubt.”

Unaware of the discrepancies, Kerry cited the “Winter Soldier” findings as fact to the Senate in 1971, comparing the alleged U.S. atrocities with the “ravage” of Mongol conqueror Genghis Khan.

Kerry’s testimony infuriated military lawyers, chief among them William Eckhardt, an Army colonel coordinating the My Lai prosecutions. Eckhardt, now a University of Missouri law professor, says Kerry’s reliance on unproven “show trial” allegations “besmirched those of us who did it right.”

Kerry concedes he “wouldn’t be surprised” if some “Winter Soldier” accounts were phony. But he stands by the bulk of the claims. “Free-fire zones, women getting blown away, children getting blown away, ears being cut off, rapes — people know this,” Kerry said. “These are a matter of record in our history.”

After Detroit, Kerry plunged into protest logistics. He hit the antiwar fundraising circuit, toting chocolate milk and entertaining VVAW members with broken-French imitations of Inspector Clouseau from “Pink Panther” films. In Washington, he laid plans with dissident congressmen and negotiated with federal officials for rally permits.

At battle stations after two years of war protests, Nixon and his aides were uncertain how to respond to angry soldiers. “Kerry was considered a threat,” said John Dean, White House counsel until he turned against Nixon during Watergate.

Nixon wanted the protest scuttled until Dean and speechwriter Patrick Buchanan warned that police violence against the veterans could backfire. Nixon relented, but pressed Charles Colson, his acerbic Special Counselor, for dirt on Kerry and other VVAW leaders. In an undated memo, “Plan to Counteract Vietnam Veterans,” Colson demanded their records scoured.

The FBI was already compiling dossiers. An FBI memo dated Feb. 22, 1971, later obtained by Camil, cited intelligence gathering on “Winter Soldier” participants from New York to Florida. And an FBI memo dated Jan. 25, 1971, found by Gerald Nicosia, a historian of the VVAW movement, reveals the bureau was sharing copies of surveillance reports with Army, Navy and Air Force intelligence before the Detroit meeting.

Kerry was under scrutiny even earlier. His name was forwarded to FBI headquarters in September 1970, Nicosia said. The FBI kept watch until August 1972, when the bureau concluded Kerry had no ties to “any violent-prone group” and closed his file.

Complaining recently that FBI spying was “an offense to the Constitution,” Kerry grimaced when he learned he was also monitored by Washington, D.C. police. O’Connor, the undercover agent who fit in so well with VVAW members that he rose to office manager, told his superiors that Kerry “was one of the top guys, a little elitist, but knows what he’s doing.”

Chartered buses filled with VVAW protesters rumbled toward Washington on Sunday, April 18, 1971. Massing in ragged ranks, more than 1,000 Vietnam veterans filed out the next morning to march across the Lincoln Memorial Bridge toward Arlington National Cemetery.

Fresh from an appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Kerry stood out among the rumpled, bearded veterans, marked by his shaggy hair and neatly pressed fatigues. At the cemetery, officials barred the gate. As the troops turned back, sullenly waving toy guns, someone raised a U.S. flag inverted in the “distress” position.

They pitched camp on the National Mall near the Capitol. Grimy from the bus trip, veterans grabbed showers at the YMCA and slept in bedrolls. Some grumbled that Kerry was not around at night. Settled in at the Georgetown townhouse of Butler’s mother-in-law, he told doubters he needed a place to field phone calls from congressmen and lawyers.

It was there that Kerry heard from an aide to Arkansas Sen. J. William Fulbright. Impressed by a talk he heard Kerry give at a cocktail party, Fulbright wanted him to appear before the Foreign Relations Committee.

‘Letter to America’

After a long day butting heads with VVAW radicals, Kerry bent over his old “letter to America.” Refined over months of fundraisers, it needed final touches. He phoned Walinsky for Kennedyesque pointers, then “sat up all night in the most uncomfortable chair in the house,” recalled Butler. When dawn broke, Kerry was still scribbling away in longhand.

Hurrying to the hearing room on the morning of April 22, Kerry passed scores of veterans pressing from the back of the hall and peeping from doorways. He launched into a grim catalog of the “winter soldier” atrocities, describing a deathscape of decapitations, torture and razed villages.

The U.S. had “created a monster,” Kerry warned — soldiers “given the chance to die for the biggest nothing in history.” He told of their anger, sense of betrayal and their hope that the nation might look back on Vietnam as a turning point “where soldiers like us helped it in the turning.”

“He had the guts to say wrong is wrong,” said Chris Gregory, a former Army medic who watched, mesmerized, wedged against a far wall. “It was brave. There was a price to be paid for talking like that.”

Kerry is still paying. For three decades, Vietnam veterans who supported the war have recoiled at his words. Robert Turner, an Army officer interrogating Vietcong defectors at the time in the war zone, recalls pulsing with rage as he read accounts of the speech. “He made us all look like monsters,” Turner says.

Kerry admits he “can wince sometimes” at “the language of an angry young man.” But he stands by his indictment of the war policy and its architects: “It was honest at the time and it’s honest today.” Conceding he is “sensitive” to the fury his old words evoke, Kerry says he tried even then to “distinguish the war from the warrior.”

But that day, Kerry left the Senate chamber an instant celebrity. Film clips played on the nightly news. They were impressed, too, at the White House. An Oval Office tape machine caught Chief of Staff H.R. Haldeman admitting that Kerry “did a hell of a great job.” Nixon seconded: “He was extremely effective.”

But Kerry still faced trouble over how to handle the protest’s parting gesture. Nervous about how the nation might perceive a mass turn-in of decorations, he urged VVAW leaders to lay their honors down with dignity on a table shrouded in white cloth. He was outvoted. The vets chose to heave their medals in protest, then turning them over to the sergeant-at-arms at the Capitol.

Kerry’s objections left VVAW officers convinced “he was out,” said Jack Smith, a former Marine who ran the event. At the White House, Colson dashed off a memo to Haldeman: “John Kerry is not participating — would be a total loss of all he has accomplished this week.”

He was swaying “between patriotism and protest,” recalls Kerry’s brother-in-law, David Thorne. But when protesters mustered for their last day of protest on the morning of April 23 — 33 years ago today — Kerry was still with them.

Overnight, police had erected a high wire fence around the Capitol, preventing the veterans from turning in their combat honors. Enraged, they decided to leave them behind.

For nearly two hours, the antiwar troops heaved medals, ribbons, berets, dog tags, and snapshots of dead comrades at a sign marked, “Trash.” Maimed vets threw their canes. One discarded an artificial leg. Some let loose with the medals of veterans who could not attend. And several now admit tossing medals offered by strangers.

As former Marine aviator Rusty Sachs prepared to throw his own decorations, someone handed him a Silver Star and a Distinguished Flying Cross. “What do I do with these things?” he recalls wondering. He thought of dead comrades, then pitched the medals away after a tear-strewn speech that many VVAW members describe as the event’s emotional highlight.

At the end of the long line, Kerry unfastened the ribbons he wore for a week. Nearing “dozens of cameras, countless people watching,” Kerry “took out the ribbon plate, pulled them off, said something — I do this sadly, or I do this with regret — and threw them over the fence.”

He waited until “after everybody and all the cameras dispersed.” Then, he took out two medals from his fatigue pocket and “threw the other things away.” Emotionally spent, weeping, he embraced his wife.

“He looked fractured,” recalls Chris Gregory.

The medals Kerry threw were not his own. One, he says, was offered from a patient in a Brooklyn VA hospital. The other was a Bronze Star handed over by a World War II veteran at a Massachusetts fundraiser — an incident also recalled by Gregory. Kerry never asked their names.

Myths of the Medals

Kerry says he never claimed to have thrown the medals as his own. But as his reputation grew as a shrewd political operator after his 1984 senate election, Kerry was dogged by a troubling political myth.

He was accused of discarding his ribbons and the medals of others in 1971 to appear as an antiwar hero, while keeping his own medals for use as political props years later — a charge echoing this election year.

“It’s so damn hypocritical to get these awards, throw them in the dirt and then suddenly value them again,” said B.G. Burkett, a Vietnam veteran and author who critiques Kerry’s antiwar stance.

“I never ever implied that I did it,” Kerry says wearily, adding: “You know what? Medals and ribbons, there’s almost no difference in distinction, fundamentally. They’re symbols of the same thing. They are what they are.”

The war honors abandoned by the “Winter Soldiers” sat for years in boxes shelved in the Capitol Police Department’s property room. The honors lay ignored for two decades, long after Kerry’s exit from the VVAW in late 1971 and his immersion into politics.

They remained hidden as the years passed, unclaimed by the protesters who bitterly flung them away, forgotten, too, by the war supporters who cherish them as symbols of valor.

Finally, police ran out of space. “Last thing I wanted to do was throw them away again,” said former Deputy Chief James Trollinger. But when aides approached him “sometime in the early 1990s,” asking for permission to remove the decorations, Trollinger reluctantly agreed.

Three boxes bulging with medals and ribbons were hauled away to a local forge, destined to be melted down as scrap.

Times Researcher John Beckham contributed to this report.

*

(BEGIN TEXT OF INFOBOX)

From military officer to antiwar activist

1966-1969: John F. Kerry enlists in the Navy in 1966, undergoes officer training and volunteers for duty in Vietnam. He serves there from November 1968 to April 1969, including 4 1/2 months as a swift-boat commander in the rivers of the Mekong Delta. After being wounded for third time, he is sent stateside.

April 11, 1969: Returning from the Vietnam War, Lt. j.g. Kerry is assigned as an admiral’s aide in Brooklyn.

Jan. 3, 1970: Kerry takes an honorable discharge from the Navy to run as a Democrat for a Massachusetts congressional seat, then withdraws from the race in February after the entry of the eventual winner, the Rev. Robert Drinan.

May 1970: On his honeymoon in France after marriage to Julia Thorne, Kerry meets as a private citizen with South and North Vietnamese delegates to the Paris Peace Talks.

September 1970: Kerry’s name is forwarded to FBI headquarters after speaking to Vietnam Veterans Against the War rally near Philadelphia. Agents covertly monitor Kerry’s activities until August 1972.

Jan. 31, 1971: Kerry attends VVAW’s “Winter Solider” meeting in Detroit, winning approval to organize an antiwar rally in Washington and participating as a moderator in hearings that raise claims of widespread American war crimes in Vietnam.

April 18, 1971: Kerry arrives in Washington to lead VVAW members in the “Dewey Canyon III” antiwar demonstration.

April 22, 1971: Kerry testifies before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, criticizing the Nixon administration’s war policy and citing “Winter Soldier” war crimes claims.

April 23, 1971: As 700 VVAW protesters angrily throw away their war honors to condemn the war, Kerry joins in by discarding his combat ribbons and the medals given to him by others, but retains his Silver Star, Bronze Star and other medals awarded for Vietnam service.

Source: Times research

Los Angeles Times

Source link

Harry Brook: England white-ball captain on being punched by bouncer in New Zealand

Brook is in Colombo leading England in their white-ball series against Sri Lanka, which begins with the first one-day international on Thursday.

Speaking for the first time since the New Zealand incident was made public, the Yorkshire batter said:

  • he was not with any other England players when he was “clocked” by the nightclub bouncer

  • he reported the incident to England management during the third one-day international

  • he thought there was a possibility he would be sacked, but did not consider resigning

  • he has apologised to his team-mates and acknowledged he has “work to do” to regain their trust

  • there is now a midnight curfew in place for England players and staff, but rejected allegations of a drinking culture

  • Test captain Ben Stokes “wasn’t best pleased” when he was told

Brook was placed in charge of England’s white-ball teams last summer – the tour of New Zealand was his first overseas as captain.

Though he said he did not want to “go into any details” of the Wellington incident, he said it began with some players “going out for food”.

“There was no intention of going out, no intention of putting ourselves in a tricky situation,” he said.

“I took it upon myself to go out for a few more and I was on my own there. I shouldn’t have been there.

“I was trying to get into a club and the bouncer just clocked me, unfortunately. I wouldn’t say I was absolutely leathered. I’d had one too many drinks.”

Brook did not confirm what time he returned to the England hotel, but said it was “late enough”. The following day he was out for six as England slumped to 44-5 in a game they eventually lost by two wickets.

Midway through the game in Wellington, he reported the incident to England management. He was subsequently fined around £30,000 and given the final warning, with the disciplinary proceedings concluded before the Ashes tour.

Askes if he expected to be sacked, Brook said: “It was definitely playing through my mind.”

On resigning, he added: “No, it never came into my mind. I left that decision to the hierarchy. If they’d have sacked me from being captain, then I’d have been perfectly fine with it as long as I was still playing cricket for England.”

Source link

Rock up to London: discovering stones and fossils from around the world on an urban geology tour | England holidays

In the heart of London’s Square Mile, between the windows of a tapas restaurant, a 150m-year-old ammonite stares mutely at passersby. The fossil is embedded in a limestone wall on Plantation Lane, sitting alongside the remnants of ancient nautiloids and squid-like belemnites. It’s a mineralised aquarium hiding in plain sight, a snapshot of deep time that few even glance at, a transtemporal space where patatas bravas meet prehistoric cephalopods.

How often do you give thought to the stones that make up our towns and cities? To the building blocks, paving slabs and machine-cut masonry that backdrop our lives? If your name’s Dr Ruth Siddall, the answer to that question would be yesterday, today and every day for the foreseeable. Her passion is urban geology, and it turns out that the architecture of central London – in common with many places – is a largely unwitting showcase of Earth science through the ages.

Ruth Siddall admires a wall made from 2bn-year-old dolerite from Zimbabwe in Euston, London. Photograph: Julie Hill

“This is York stone,” she says, pointing at the slabs beneath our feet as we wander the pavement of Eastcheap. An e-scooter swishes past. “It’s a fine-grained sandstone, around 310m years old, quarried in the Peak District. It was once a prehistoric riverbed – you can still see the ripples in the surface – although to picture the world back then you need to imagine Sheffield looking like the Brahmaputra [river, which spans China, India and Bangladesh].”

I’ve joined Ruth, a distinguished geologist and very affable company, on one of the walking tours she offers around different parts of the capital. Her own enthusiasm for street-level geology kickstarted in Athens in the early 1990s where, post-PhD, she was tasked with cataloguing a collection of rocks from Greek ruins. “It was essentially a big pile of rubble,” she smiles, “but it was an absolutely fascinating project. It got me hooked.”

In the decades since – and drawing inspiration from her former colleague Eric Robinson, a pioneer of urban geology – she has seen her adopted home of London in a new light. For Ruth, the city’s walkways, shop facades and statue plinths aren’t merely civic structures. They have epic stories to tell, not only in terms of their social history but their material origins, too. “London is huge, but unlike some cities it has no local building stones of its own,” she says. “It’s basically in a basin of clay, so all the stones you see around us have had to come from elsewhere.”

A column of anorthosite on Great Tower Street in the City. Photograph: Ben Lerwill

It brings fresh meaning to the idea of a rock biography. Around 10 years ago, in partnership with a fellow geologist, Dave Wallis, Ruth helped to establish London Pavement Geology, a website and app that gives a free comprehensive list of sites of geological interest around the capital, and increasingly in other UK towns and cities too (my wishlist is currently topped by the lobe-finned fish suspended in Edinburgh’s Caithness flagstones). Her guided walks, offered through the longstanding tour company London Walks (search for “geology”), will this year run on a roughly monthly basis, starting in spring.

Over two hours, we come across sedimentary, igneous and metamorphic rocks from places as disparate as Australia, Brazil and China, each stone type having been selected for its aesthetic value by the architects of the day. Outside a travel agency, Ruth identifies serpentinite, a Cretaceous stone from the Italian Alps. A pillar outside a pub turns out to be made of smooth 290m-year-old larvikite from Norway (magma that cooled kilometres beneath the surface of the planet, and, conveniently, easy to wipe down after a heavy night). And we linger over the Monument column, its Portland stone base crammed with Jurassic oyster shells and pitted with prehistoric shrimp burrows.

It’s a time-travelling, mind-boggling tour. We attract looks – it transpires that if you peer at something usually considered unremarkable, people stare at you – but frankly, when you’re hurdling geological epochs at every corner, who gives a schist? The Monument itself, of course, commemorates the Great Fire of London, which more than any other event accelerated the use of stone architecture in the capital. The Romans were the first to import stone building blocks here, but it wasn’t until the restructuring of London began in the late 1660s that natural, hard-wearing materials became more commonplace.

Ruth Siddall points out an ammonite on Plantation Lane. Photograph: Ben Lerwill

There’s nothing commonplace, however, about many of the stones we stop at. Near St Paul’s Cathedral – the steps of which hold 30cm-long fossilised orthocones (“They looked a bit like swimming carrots,” says Ruth) – the limestone exterior of a wine bar displays an even rarer find: a small vertebrate bone from 150m years ago. “Possibly a pterosaur,” she explains, “but we might never know.”

Best of all, perhaps, is the co-working space we pass on Houndsditch, its exterior constructed of gneiss from a meteorite impact crater in South Africa. About 6,000 miles from its place of origin, the stone’s surface is still patterned with crack-like veins of black impact glass, which also contain traces of the meteorite’s extraterrestrial minerals. Oh, and it crashed to earth a mere 2bn years ago. Now there’s something to mull over when January feels like it’s going slowly.

The walk was provided by London Pavement Geology. Ruth leads guided walks with London Walks, £20 for adults on a group tour, walks.com

Source link

New Zealand PM Christopher Luxon calls national election for November 7 | Elections News

New Zealanders are set to go to the polls later this year amid a sluggish economy and rising unemployment.

New Zealand will hold a national election on November 7, the country’s centre-right prime minister has said.

Christopher Luxon announced the election date on Wednesday as he touted his government’s record on the economy and crime.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Luxon said inflation had fallen from 7 percent to 3 percent and there were 38,000 fewer self-reported victims of crime on his government’s watch.

“When we took office, the country was going in the wrong direction, and it’s taken a lot of hard work in the last two years to start turning things around,” the prime minister said in a statement.

“Continuing to deliver on our plan to fix the basics and build the future so that Kiwis around the country get more results like these will remain our focus in the lead – up to the election later this year,” he added.

Luxon’s National Party formed a coalition with the populist New Zealand First and pro-business ACT parties after delivering a crushing defeat to the centre-left Labour Party at the 2023 election.

Luxon, a former chief executive of Air New Zealand, ran on a platform focused on law and order and cost-of-living issues in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

But his government’s record has faced growing scrutiny amid sluggish economic conditions. New Zealand’s economy contracted during three out of the last six quarters that ended in September, and unemployment in November rose to 5.3 percent, the highest in nearly two decades.

Recent opinion polls have suggested the National Party is losing ground to Labour, led by Chris Hipkins, though his party would still retain power with the help of its coalition partners under the most recent projections.

New Zealand holds elections for its unicameral parliament every three years, but it is up to the government of the day to choose the exact date.

Coalition governments are the norm in New Zealand because of the country’s mixed-member proportional system, which replaced first-past-the-post voting in 1996.

Source link

Palestinians in Gaza confront reality behind ceasefire’s second phase | Israel-Palestine conflict News

Gaza City – Khaled Abu Jarrar spends his days trying to find ways to get his wife treatment for her recently diagnosed liver cancer.

The 58-year-old, originally from the town of Beit Hanoon in northern Gaza, but displaced with his family for the last year and a half in Gaza City, knows that his wife needs to travel abroad urgently.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

It is why he is so desperate for the Rafah crossing, previously the Gaza Strip’s main access point to the outside world, to open.

Israel has kept it firmly shut for most of the past two years, as it conducted its genocidal war on Gaza, killing more than 70,000 Palestinians.

Khaled is looking towards Gaza’s new administration – a group of Palestinian technocrats overseen by United States President Donald Trump’s so-called “board of peace” – to change things.

The National Committee for Gaza Management (NGAC) met for the first time last week, in the Egyptian capital, Cairo. It will manage Gaza’s day-to-day affairs in place of the Palestinian group Hamas as part of the second phase of the Gaza ceasefire plan.

The US announced that the second phase had begun last week.

Khaled now wants to see tangible results from the NGAC and the second phase, starting with the opening of the Rafah crossing. But he is sceptical.

“I hope it’s a committee with real powers, not just words on paper,” Khaled told Al Jazeera. “Otherwise, it will be a failed committee.”

His pessimism is understandable. Israel has continued to attack Gaza, killing more than 400 Palestinians since the beginning of the ceasefire.

It has also made clear its opposition to the NGAC, and makes little effort to allow for life in Gaza to improve. One of Israel’s most recent moves has been to order the shutdown of international humanitarian organisations providing vital medical care and food aid in Gaza.

“On the ground, the shelling never stops,” Khaled said, as he followed news on the NGAC from inside a shelter set up in the former Legislative Council building in western Gaza City.

“In the media, they talk about withdrawals and reconstruction, but on the ground, the bombing continues from the north and the south, and things seem even more complicated.”

Man stands in front of tent
Khaled Abu Jarrar hopes the new committee set up to administer Gaza will have real powers and authority [Abdelhakim Abu Riash/Al Jazeera]

Waiting for solutions

Khaled’s living arrangements in a government building are not unusual. Thousands of displaced people have found shelter in the structures from which Gaza was once administered, or buildings that have at least partially survived Israel’s targeting.

This reality underlines the difficulty the NGAC and any administration will face when attempting to govern Gaza.

And it makes any talk of new committees and administrations hinge on a series of simple questions for the displaced: Will the technocrats be able to overcome the restrictions imposed on Gaza by Israel? Will they be able to deliver tangible changes to the lives of Palestinians exhausted by displacement and loss?

The committee is presented as a politically “neutral” framework, made up of non-factional figures with administrative and technical expertise. It will be led by Ali Shaath, a former Palestinian Authority (PA) deputy minister.

But many Palestinians believe its success depends less on its composition and more on its ability to operate in an environment that Israel still dominates, and is unwilling to allow to rebuild.

Palestinian political analyst Ahed Farwana referred to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s recent comments, in which he described the second phase of the ceasefire as “symbolic”, as evidence that Israel has no intention of cooperating.

“So far, things are unclear for the committee, because it depends on serious implementation of the second phase’s obligations,” Farwana told Al Jazeera.

Many of the obligations on Israel in the first phase of the ceasefire, such as halting attacks, a full Israeli withdrawal from a specified area of Gaza, and the opening of the Rafah crossing, have not happened.

Farwana believes that Netanyahu does not want to pay the political cost in Israel of allowing the ceasefire to progress and fully declaring an end to the war, particularly as he will face an election sometime this year.

If anything, Farwana expects Israel to continue violating the ceasefire and expanding its buffer zone, while it cites excuses such as that one remaining Israeli body has not been handed over from Gaza. Hamas has said that it is unable to reach the body because of the amount of rubble left behind by Israeli attacks.

“If there is real American pressure, there will be real change and implementation of the second phase,” Farwana said, arguing that the ceasefire’s partial success was largely tied to pushes made by the US administration. “[But] leaving the field to Netanyahu will not produce results.”

View of Gaza legislative building arch
Palestinians use what remains of the Gaza Legislative Council building in Gaza City for shelter [Abdelhakim Abu Riash/Al Jazeera]

Israeli restrictions

Israeli officials deny the existence of limits on the quantity of aid coming into Gaza. However, international organisations and local Palestinians point to delays in permit approvals, as well as prolonged inspection procedures that slow access and restrict the entry of goods Gaza desperately needs, including non-food items and heavy materials for infrastructure.

The United Nations and aid agencies have repeatedly called for crossings to be opened and the facilitation of aid entry, stressing that the humanitarian situation in Gaza remains catastrophic and that a large share of agreed-upon aid has yet to enter since the implementation of the ceasefire.

The continued closure of the Rafah crossing, in particular, has left Gaza almost entirely dependent on other entry points, such as Karem Abu Salem (Kerem Shalom), which is subject to complex inspection procedures and full Israeli security control.

Against these obstacles, discussions about Gaza’s new administration become more complex, as any committee’s authority to manage services and reconstruction is directly linked to its ability to operate within restrictions on the movement of materials.

Asmaa Manoun is waiting desperately for things to improve.

The 45-year-old, originally from northern Gaza’s Jabalia refugee camp, is a mother of five, but one of her children was killed during the war.

She now lives with her husband Mohammad – injured during the war – in the stairwell of a partially-destroyed building in Gaza City. A simple tarpaulin barely shelters them.

Couple sit in shelter next to stairs
Asmaa Manoun and her husband, Mohammad, live under in a stairwell and are desperate for the situation in Gaza to improve [Abdelhakim Abu Riash/Al Jazeera]

Those conditions explain why Asmaa did not initially hear the news of the establishment of the NGAC, and talk of the beginning of the second phase of the ceasefire.

“Most of the time, my phone isn’t charged, and the internet isn’t available,” she said. “Usually, we hear things from people around us in the camp, and discussions circulate among them.”

Asmaa had initially left southern Gaza, where she had been living displaced, to Jabalia in an attempt to return home. But constant Israeli shelling and gunfire, including a bullet that she said killed a woman in the tent next to her, ended the experiment and made it clear that safety was still a far-off prospect.

Mohammad, 49, stood beside Asmaa as she talked. His hope for the new committee was clear: organise aid entry and distribution, and manage Gaza after the chaos that it had been through.

“We hear a lot, but in reality, we are in the same place we’ve been for two years,” he said.

“The situation in Gaza is beyond difficult. We can barely manage. For many months, we haven’t received aid, food parcels, or tents. Things are chaotic, and Israel is interested in this chaos, and in using aid as punishment.”

Source link

‘Summer House’ stars Amanda Batula, Kyle Cooke are divorcing

Kyle Cooke and Amanda Batula’s marriage is over, the “Summer House” reality stars announced Monday on social media, validating rumors of a split that have been circulating for a while.

“After much reflection, we have mutually and amicably decided to part ways as a couple,” the couple said in a joint statement posted on both of their Instagram stories. “We share this with a heavy heart and kindly ask for your grace and support while we focus on our personal growth and healing.

“It feels ironic to ask for privacy during this time since we’ve always tried to be open and honest about our relationship, but your kindness and respect will go a long way as we try to navigate our next chapter.”

It’s unclear exactly when that “next chapter” began, as rumors that the relationship was on the rocks have been circulating for more than a year.

“We are not perfect. We’ve never tried to portray a perfect couple. We wear it all on our sleeve. Yeah, 10 years in, 4 years in a marriage, all on camera, it hasn’t been easy,” Cooke told Access Hollywood in an interview at BravoCon 2025 in November. “Particularly when you have people offering up some, um, trolling info.”

Around the same time, an “insider” told Page Six that the two had been “going through a challenging time” but were still committed to working things out. Celebrity rumor account Deuxmoi said it got a message in December that the marriage was done, and commenters on that post noted that Cooke had been missing from several significant events that Batula documented on social media.

“We’ve gone to therapy. We’ve worked on ourselves,” Batula told Us Weekly a year before that. “It’s very eye-opening getting to watch yourself back [on TV] and see how you handle different situations. So, we’ve learned a lot and have grown from it. … We’re still working on it.”

Batula and Cooke began dating during the first season of “Summer House,” which premiered in 2017 but was filmed in 2016. He proposed to her in the final episode of Season 3, which was filmed in 2018, then the couple saw their wedding postponed until September 2021 — it aired during the Season 6 finale — because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Both Bravo stars will appear in “Summer House” Season 10, which premieres Feb. 3 and streams the next day on Peacock. Bravo said viewers will see “tension” between the two during the season.

“Summer House” debuted in 2017 with a cast that included Cooke and featured Batula in recurring role. The show follows a group of people sharing a Hamptons beach house on weekends for a summer, and the cast has shifted over the life of the show.

“Having these experiences is not something that people get to do or would do,” Batula said at BravoCon 2024. “I mean, again, we’re in our 30s and 40s, and you wouldn’t really share a house together like this. Being able to have these moments to look back on and these experiences is something that’s really special.”



Source link

The unknown enemy – Los Angeles Times

JONATHAN D. TEPPERMAN is deputy managing editor of Foreign Affairs magazine.

DESPITE THE recent elections in Iraq, which brought that country one step closer to full sovereignty and independence, attention in the United States remains firmly fixed on an issue closer to home: if and when Washington should pull out its troops.

Since Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) broached what had been a taboo subject, the domestic debate over withdrawal has bogged down in partisan squabbling. The deadlock involves more than just politics. Part of the reason it’s so hard to decide whether U.S. troops should leave Iraq is that no one can accurately predict what will happen if they do. And that’s because no one knows who, exactly, they are fighting.

Almost three years into the war, Washington still has very little sense of the size or power of the Sunni insurgency in Iraq. Whether the Sunnis would keep fighting if the Americans left, or, in a nightmare scenario, march on Baghdad, depends in large part on whether they have enough manpower or firepower for the job.

Yet nobody seems to know the answer. Since Vice President Dick Cheney famously predicted in May that the insurgency was “in its last throes,” both the White House and the Pentagon have scrupulously avoided providing any hard numbers for the fighters who remain. Last January, Gen. Mohammed Shahwani, Iraq’s intelligence director, estimated that there were as many as 40,000 hard-core Sunni fighters. In October, Gen. John Abizaid, the head of Central Command (which includes Iraq), set the figure at “no more than 20,000.”

As for U.S. policy analysts, the only thing they can agree on is that, in the words of Michael O’Hanlon of the Brookings Institution (who tracks developments in Iraq’s security and reconstruction), “nobody knows, and our estimates could easily be off by 50 to 100%.”

Nor is there much agreement on how powerful the insurgents are, or whether Sunnis fighters could stage a violent grab for power if U.S. troops went home. Writing in the current issue of the Atlantic, Nir Rosen, a journalist who spent 16 months in Iraq following the invasion and who now favors a U.S. withdrawal, argues that “Sunni forces could not mount” a major assault after a U.S. pullout because they “wield only small arms and explosives, not Saddam’s tanks and helicopters, and are very weak compared with the cohesive, better armed and numerically superior Shiite and Kurdish militias.”

However, other Iraq experts disagree. Juan Cole of the University of Michigan, who opposes withdrawal, points out that although the Sunni Arabs may be numerically weak (they make up only about 20% of Iraq’s population), they have powerful advantages. “Sunni Arabs were the officer corps and military intelligence [in Saddam Hussein’s army], and the more experienced NCOs, and they know how to do things that the Shiites and Kurds don’t.” Before the invasion, Cole said, they “were also the country’s elite and have enormous cultural capital and managerial know-how” — know-how now that may be sufficient to take on the much larger Kurdish and Shiite militias, not to mention the newly elected Iraqi government, should the Americans leave.

At least, that’s the argument. Who is right — and why is it so hard to reach consensus? Part of the problem is inherent in any type of armed struggle. Military strategists since Karl von Clausewitz and Sun Tzu have written about the “fog of war” and the near impossibility of obtaining accurate information on the battlefield. Even during conventional conflicts such as the Cold War or the Persian Gulf War, the Pentagon has never been good at accurately estimating the size of its enemy.

The difficulty multiplies exponentially when the war is unconventional — that is, a counterinsurgency. Part of the problem is that in Iraq, the insurgents have split into small, ill-defined factions — up to 100 by some reports. And unlike regular soldiers, they don’t stand up to be counted. Even if they did, determining who is a full-fledged “insurgent” (as opposed to a supporter) is difficult. And Robert Pape, a professor at the University of Chicago and the author of “Dying to Win,” a survey of suicide bombing going back to 1980, warns that estimating the size of terrorist factions in Iraq is especially hard because “most suicide bombers are walk-in volunteers, not longtime members of the terrorist organizations” — which means that their numbers constantly fluctuate.

Much of the difficulty in estimating the size of the Sunni insurgency in Iraq, then, is structural, and would exist in any such conflict. This war, however, is not just any conflict. If it is distinguished by anything, it is this: Since before the fighting even began, so many critical, supposedly well-established “facts” — from the presence of weapons of mass destruction, to Hussein’s ties to Al Qaeda, to the number of capable Iraqi troops trained by the U.S. government — have turned out to be false, or at least unverifiable. U.S. forces, meanwhile, continue to suffer from a shortfall of reliable intelligence, a problem that has dogged them from the start.

This leaves Washington policymakers with an unappealing choice: Stick with an increasingly unpopular and bloody counterinsurgency that it still does not fully understand, or leave the fight as they entered it, running essentially blind.

Source link

Paddy Pimblett vs Justin Gaethje: UFC 324 – I can teach Pimblett ‘some lessons’, says Gaethje

Justin Gaethje is confident he can “teach” Paddy Pimblett “some lessons” when the pair meet in the octagon on Saturday at UFC 324.

The lightweights will contest the interim title in Las Vegas, with the experienced 37-year-old Gaethje admitting he is the underdog.

Pimblett, 31, said he expects to finish Gaethje within three rounds and described the American as a “boxer with leg kicks”.

“I hope he’s overconfident in himself, just like I was when I was 30 years old, so I can teach him some lessons,” Gaethje told BBC Sport.

“This is 25 minutes in time. Nothing from the past, nothing from the future can determine it. It’s about being perfect. Who’s more perfect? Who makes mistakes? Who doesn’t make mistakes, who’s more prepared?

“I want to take Paddy into the fourth, fifth round. Really hurt him, and I’m looking forward to it.”

Source link

Air Force One, en route to Davos, returns to U.S. over electrical issue

U.S. President Donald Trump walks on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, January 20, 2026. President Trump was heading to Davos, Switzerland, to attend the World Economic Forum when Air Force One was forced to return to the United States due to an electrical issue. Photo by Aaron Schwartz/UPI | License Photo

Jan. 21 (UPI) — Air Force One with President Donald Trump on board was forced to return to Maryland’s Joint Base Andrews late Tuesday due to an electrical issue with the aircraft, officials said.

Trump had boarded Air Force One at 9:34 p.m. EDT Tuesday, with wheels up shortly afterward. The plane was en route to Zurich Airport as the president is scheduled to speak at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Wednesday, when it was forced to return.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters in a statement that after takeoff, the crew identified “a minor electrical issue” and that “out of an abundance of caution,” the plane was returning to Joint Base Andrews where the president would board a replacement aircraft before continuing on to his destination.

Air Force One landed at Joint Base Andrews at 11:07 p.m., according to a statement from the White House. Two replacement planes were on the tarmac, a second pool note stated.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Leavitt, Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Homeland Security Adviser Stephen Miller and several others were aboard Air Force One with Trump.

This is a developing story.

Source link

Labeling Kidnapping a ‘Capture,’ Media Legitimate Violation of International Law

Despite the brazen violation of international law, media outlets have attempted to cover for the Trump administration. (Archive)

Corporate media have deployed a lexicon of legitimation in their coverage of the deadly US invasion of Venezuela and the abduction of President Nicolás Maduro, along with his wife and fellow politician Cilia Flores. Major news outlets have routinely described these events using words like “capture” (New York Times1/3/26) or “arrest” (BBC1/3/26), which presents them as a matter of enforcing the law against fugitives or criminals, and carries the built-in but false assumption that the US had the right or even duty to conduct its operation in the first place.

The ludicrous premise is that any time an arrest warrant is issued somewhere in the United States, the US has the right to do anything, anywhere in the world, in pursuit of the subject—including bombing another country, invading it, killing its citizens, and spiriting away its president and first lady. Cornell Law School professor Maggie Gardner (Transnational Litigation Blog1/5/26) rebuked the idea that the US merely enforced the law in Venezuela, pointing out (emphasis in original):

Under customary international law, a sovereign can only exercise enforcement jurisdiction in the territory of another sovereign if it has that sovereign’s consent. This hard line limiting enforcement powers to a sovereign’s own territory is clear and well-established.

Venezuela, of course, didn’t consent to being bombed, or to having Maduro and Flores taken from the country at gunpoint. Accordingly, what happened in Caracas is best understood not as the US enforcing the law, but as the US breaking international law. It’s misleading, therefore, to use language like “capture” and “arrest,” which evoke the US upholding the law, to describe blowtorch-wielding, heavily armed US forces taking Maduro and Flores prisoner in the middle of the night (BBC1/4/26).

‘Abducted, so to speak’

I used the news aggregator Factiva to examine New York TimesWall Street Journal and Washington Post coverage from January 3 through January 5, the day of the US’s attack on Venezuela and the first two days after these developments. The papers published a combined 223 pieces that featured Maduro’s name, and 166 of these (74%) used the term “capture” or a form of it, such as “captured” or “capturing.” Sixty of these pieces, or 27%, included the word “arrest” or variations on the term, like “arrested” or “arresting.”

“Abduction” or “kidnapping”—synonyms that mean to take someone away unlawfully and by force—are far more suitable words for what the US did to Maduro and Flores. Only two pieces in the Post and one in the Journal used any form of “abduct” (such as “abduction”) in any of the articles that refer to Maduro—1% of the combined total articles. In each case, the term appears in quotation marks. The Times ran no pieces in which the word appeared.

The Post (1/3/26) shared a perplexing perspective from Geoffrey Corn—head of the Center for Military Law and Policy at Texas Tech University, and a former top legal adviser to the US Army—who said that the US Supreme Court has been clear since the late 19th century that “you can’t claim that you were abducted and therefore the court should not be allowed to assert authority over you.” The article went on:

“Maduro is not going to be able to avoid being brought to trial because he was abducted, so to speak, even if he can establish it violated international law,” Corn said, adding that in his view, the administration’s overnight military operation lacked any “plausible legal basis.”

So, despite Corn’s view that the US attack was illegal, he couldn’t bring himself to present Maduro’s abduction as literal rather than figurative.

That article, as well another in the Post (1/3/26) and one in the Wall Street Journal (1/5/26), quoted Democratic Senator Mark R. Warner:

If the United States asserts the right to use military force to invade and capture foreign leaders it accuses of criminal conduct, what prevents China from claiming the same authority over Taiwan’s leadership? What stops Vladimir Putin from asserting a similar justification to abduct Ukraine’s president?

Even as Warner is skeptical about the US’s actions in Venezuela, he still uses the language of “capture” for Maduro, while using “abduct” for a hypothetical scenario in which the official enemy Putin carries out a parallel crime. None of the articles that included Warner’s quote  commented on this linguistic inconsistency.

The word “abduct” was never used in the voice of a reporter from any of these papers to describe what the US had done.

‘It’s not a bad term’

Venezuelan officials, including Maduro himself (New York Times1/5/26), say that he was “kidnapped” by the US. They’re not the only ones. On Democracy Now! (1/3/26), Venezuelan journalist Andreína Chávez and US-based Venezuelan historian Miguel Tinker Salas both used that word to characterize what the US did to Maduro and Flores.

Canada’s national broadcaster, the CBC (1/5/26), regarded the idea that Maduro was “kidnapped” as at least meriting serious discussion. Co-anchor Andrew Chang asked:

Did the US military just kidnap Nicholas Maduro?… “Kidnap” is a loaded word because it implies illegality. Maybe a more neutral way of describing Maduro’s capture is as an “abduction,” but the US government calls it an “arrest.”…

This isn’t some nerdy question about semantics. It’s a question about law, and whether the US has the legal right to extract world leaders from their homes, and maybe even whether other countries might have that right, too.

Notably, when Trump was told that Venezuela’s acting President Delcy Rodríguez said it was a “kidnapping,” he didn’t push back, saying, “It’s not a bad term.”

However, the only times “kidnap” appeared in the TimesJournal or Post in relation to Maduro and Flores—in 10 pieces, or 4% of the coverage—came when that term was attributed to representatives of the Venezuelan state. Suggesting to readers that a government that has been demonized in US media for decades is the only source that regards Maduro and Flores as having been “kidnapped” is tantamount to suggesting that no credible sources take that position.

The three papers combined to run zero articles treating as an objective fact the view that America “abducted” or “kidnapped” a sitting head of state in defiance of international law, while they regularly used “captured” and “arrested” outside of quotation marks, as if those word choices are merely flat descriptions of reality.

ICE also ‘arrests’

These linguistic choices matter. “Capture” and “arrest” paint Trump, Delta Force and the CIA as righteous heroes protecting their country—as well as Venezuela and the rest of the world—from the villainous Maduros. “Abduct” and “kidnap” morally invert the good guy and bad guy roles, and would portray US actors as the wrongdoers.

This particular form of word play is part of a pattern for corporate media under this Trump administration. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) round-ups of migrants in the United States have featured what can most accurately be described as abductions or kidnappings of people—off the streets, at courts, in workplaces and elsewhere—by armed, masked and unaccountable agents, into unmarked vehicles. It’s little surprise, then, that immigration lawyers, members of Congress, and law professors (LA Times10/21/25), among others, routinely use the word “abduct” to describe these events.

And describing ICE’s practices as “kidnappings” isn’t some fringe view. Rep. Jesus “Chuy” Garcia (D-Ill.) uses the word (Independent12/5/25), as does Rolling Stone editor Tim Dickinson (7/2/25), and the academic and author Natasha Lennard of the New School for Social Research in New York (Intercept7/1/25). ICE’s victims (Mother Jones7/18/27NPR7/27/25) and their families (Guardian4/15/256/10/256/26/25) frequently describe their ordeal in such terms.

Yet corporate media eschew such language for the same sanitized “arrest” or “capture” language they employed for Maduro and Flores. When I used Factiva to pair “ICE” with the words “abduct” or “kidnap,” just two articles turned up that included the perspective that ICE “abducts” people (New York Times7/13/25Washington Post12/3/25), both attributed to critical sources. Five (2%) included a version of the word “kidnap,” all in quotation marks.

Three of these quotes were from the much-maligned Venezuelan government (New York Times3/18/2511/25/25Washington Post5/4/25), one came from a man whose father and daughter-in-law had been detained by ICE (Washington Post3/21/25), and another from a member of the Chicago Board of Education (New York Times10/22/25).

The language is freighted in the same way, whether it is migrants under attack from US jackboots, or those same forces unleashed against socialist politicians in Global South countries seeking to escape imperial domination.

The views expressed in this article are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Venezuelanalysis editorial staff.

Source: FAIR

Source link

Historic Radford Studio Center in default amid Hollywood slowdown

Radford Studio Center, the storied movie lot that gave Studio City its name, is in financial distress and is expected to be returned to lenders as declining film and television production racks the entertainment industry.

Formerly known as CBS Studio Center, the Los Angeles lot has been home to generations of landmark television shows including “Gunsmoke” and “Seinfeld.”

Hackman Capital Partners, one of the world’s largest independent studio operators, has defaulted on a $1.1-billion mortgage and investment bank Goldman is leading a takeover of the historic property. Bloomberg first reported on the news.

A street sign on the lot of the Radford Studio Center in Studio City.

A street sign on the lot of the Radford Studio Center in Studio City.

(Gary Coronado / Los Angeles Times)

The move follows Hackman’s aggressive push in recent years to buy up studios to capitalize on anticipated growth, especially in the TV business. As of last year, the company had $10 billion in assets under management.

Founded by silent film comedy legend Mack Sennett in 1928, the lot became known as “Hit City” in the decades after World War II as popular TV shows such as “Leave It to Beaver,” “Gilligan’s Island,” “The Mary Tyler Moore Show,” “The Bob Newhart Show” and “Will & Grace” were made there.

Culver City-based Hackman Capital Partners and Square Mile Capital Management teamed up to buy the Radford Avenue property from ViacomCBS in 2021 with a winning bid of $1.85 billion after a competitive battle for the 55-acre studio beloved by the television industry.

At the time, the staggering price tag underscored the value — and scarcity — of TV soundstages in Los Angeles as content producers scrambled for space to shoot TV shows and movies to stock their streaming services. It was one of the largest ever real estate transactions for a TV studio complex in Los Angeles.

A framed photo of John Wayne, Max Terhune and Ray Corrigan.

A photo of actors John Wayne, center, Max Terhune, left, and Ray Corrigan in the movie “Three Texas Steers,” filmed in 1939, hangs on a wall at Radford Studio Center.

(Gary Coronado / Los Angeles Times)

Since then, production has substantially declined. L.A. continues to battle the loss of production to other states and countries, as well as the continued effects on the industry of the pandemic and the 2023 dual writers’ and actors’ strikes. Cutbacks in spending at the major studios after a surge in streaming-fueled TV production have further damped film activity in Southern California.

Total film and television shoot days for 2025 dropped 16.1% compared with the previous year, according to a recent report. The production decline has left many in Hollywood without work for months or even years.

Last year’s 19,694 shoot days was the lowest total since 2020, according to the nonprofit FilmLA, which tracks filming in the Greater L.A. area. In 2024, the total was 23,480 shoot days.

“While the year-end numbers are disappointing, they are not unexpected,” Philip Sokoloski, spokesman for FilmLA, said in a statement. “Although our overall numbers remain low, there are dozens of incentivized projects that have yet to begin filming.”

Financial incentives to film in California are offered through the state’s revamped film and television tax credit program approved by state legislators and signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom last year. The new program now has a cap of $750 million, up from $330 million.

“We are continuing to work with the Radford lenders on a path forward for this asset,” Hackman Capital spokesman Nathan Miller said in a statement. “This is a challenging time for all suppliers and independent studio owners and operators in the U.S.”

Republic Avenue on the lot of Radford Studio Center in 2023.

Republic Avenue on the lot of Radford Studio Center in 2023.

(Gary Coronado / Los Angeles Times)

Miller added: “We have substantial capital behind us, hold 50% of our assets without debt, and remain geographically diverse, with 55% of our studios outside the U.S. This will help us to navigate through these troubled waters.”

Among its 19 properties are studios in England, Ireland, Scotland and Canada.

A sticking point in Radford’s financial challenges is MBS Group, which provides lighting and other production services for shooting locations and was acquired by Hackman Capital in 2019. In the last year, Bloomberg said, MBS broke away from Hackman while continuing to manage many of the firm’s properties, including Radford.

In a December letter to investors, Hackman said MBS had thwarted its efforts to restructure the loan, spurring its decision to return the property to lenders, Bloomberg said.

“MBS delivered a proposal requiring significant adverse changes to the Radford equipment rental agreement that would undermine the projected economics of the loan restructuring,” Hackman said in the letter.

Hackman is considered Hollywood’s largest landlord.

In 2019, Hackman Capital purchased CBS’ other sprawling complex in Los Angeles — the 25-acre Television City adjacent to the Original Farmers Market and the Grove — for $750 million.

Hackman Capital also owns the Manhattan Beach Studios Media Campus and the historic Culver Studios in Culver City, where “Gone With the Wind,” “Rebecca” and “E.T.” were filmed. Amazon Studios now operates from the site.

Times staff writer Samantha Masunaga contributed to this report.

Source link

Controversial Judge Dodges Not Only Critics, but Bullet : Courts: Assassination try follows Visalia jurist’s order that child abuser use birth control. He also is being sued by ex-client over property he gained by foreclosure.

Just when it seemed things couldn’t get any more tumultuous for Judge Howard R. Broadman, things did.

The Tulare County Superior Court judge already was the center of a national furor over his order that a child abuser submit to surgical implantation of a birth control device as a condition of probation. Broadman also had been named in a lawsuit claiming that he bilked a former legal client out of her home and land. And he had been the subject of both ridicule and praise for “creative” sentencing techniques, such as ordering a thief to wear a T-shirt proclaiming his guilt.

Indeed, controversies involving Broadman seemed to be on overload here in Visalia, a conservative farming town of 75,000 in the heart of the San Joaquin Valley. But last month, an ex-mental patient turned up the heat even further.

Ray Bodine was sitting in the spectator section of Broadman’s courtroom during a divorce case when he spotted a woman wearing red shoes. Bodine recognized the shoes as a signal from the Mother of God that he should go ahead with his plan to kill Broadman as part of his war on contraception. Bodine slipped a revolver from his briefcase, aimed at the middle of the judge’s forehead and fired. . . .

Howard Richard Broadman is a trim, dapper man who stands about 5 feet, 7 inches tall. His carefully groomed black beard is tipped with white at the chin and his dark eyes glance sharply about his courtroom from beneath bushy brows.

He was known as an energetic and aggressive divorce lawyer in Visalia when then-Gov. George Deukmejian appointed him to the Municipal Court in 1986. He was elevated to the Tulare County Superior Court in 1988.

His rulings have been the focus of almost constant controversy, and some critics question his fitness for the bench. The continuing furor over his birth control order and the related near-miss by an assassin’s bullet led Broadman to disqualify himself from further involvement in that case this month.

Broadman is viewed as both impetuous and likable, sometimes by the same person. He is called a “wild card” and a “loose cannon” as well as “innovative” and “courageous.”

His words from the bench are sometimes brusque and impatient.

“He doesn’t suffer fools well,” observed Joseph Altschule, who practices law in Visalia.

Altschule says he likes Broadman and considers him intelligent and sincere, but he routinely asks that the judge be disqualified from hearing his cases.

“He is tremendously stubborn and he has an ego as big as all outdoors,” Altschule said of Broadman. “And when you bring that mix to the bench you have some problems. . . . Howard’s attempt to be creative gets him in trouble, and in some ways he’s his own worst enemy.”

A prosecutor who asked not to be identified said of Broadman:

“He’s viewed as an unpredictable wild card. . . . You can go into court and you can’t know whether the defendant is going to walk out the door five minutes later or whether he’s going to get the absolute maximum (sentence).”

But Broadman has supporters in the legal profession.

Richard Cochran, president of the Tulare County Bar Assn., said that most of the directors of that organization agreed with Broadman’s controversial birth control order.

“I think the majority felt that he did something that was creative and innovative,” said Cochran. “A lot of the judges in the courthouse (give) the usual and conventional sentences. My feeling about his (sentences) is that he is courageous.”

Letters to the local newspaper, the Visalia Times-Delta, indicate that there is widespread community support for Broadman’s birth control decision.

Broadman first gained national attention as the result of a December, 1989, case in which he offered probation to a thief on the condition that the man agree to wear a T-shirt proclaiming his guilt. Russell Hackler, 30, had stolen two six packs of beer, but was on parole for robbery and faced the possibility of four years in prison as a repeat offender.

The front of the T-shirt read, “MY RECORD AND TWO SIX PACKS EQUAL FOUR YEARS.” The back said, “I AM ON FELONY PROBATION FOR THEFT.”

“I was kind of dumbfounded,” recalled Deputy Public Defender Berry Robinson, who represented Hackler. “I turned to my client and said, ‘You’d be real stupid to turn this down.’ ”

Some praised the sentence as creative, but eight months later Hackler was again before Broadman, charged with violating probation due to an arrest for burglary. A witness said Hackler bought beer with coins stolen in the burglary–he remembered him because the defendant was wearing his infamous T-shirt at the time.

Broadman sentenced Hackler to four years in prison.

In some other “creative” judicial actions, Broadman:

* Allowed a child molester to serve time at home on the condition that he post a sign outside his house reading, “Do not enter, I am under house arrest.”

* Required an alcoholic to stand in court and swallow Antabuse, a medication that causes violent nausea if alcohol is ingested.

* Ordered a husband and wife in a divorce case to take turns living in the family home so that the children would not have to shuttle back and forth.

* Ordered a young female drug addict convicted of narcotics possession not to get pregnant as a condition of probation. But when she was a half hour late to a subsequent hearing because she had taken her children to school, Broadman sent her to prison.

Such rulings have generated publicity, but last December the judge received media attention of another kind when a former divorce-case client sued him for allegedly bilking her out of her house and land.

Darleen Woods charged in a $1.5-million lawsuit filed Dec. 10 that Broadman–who represented her in a long and complicated divorce action in the early to mid 1980s–had improperly foreclosed on her property to satisfy a $58,000 legal bill. Woods maintains that she was left penniless when Broadman sold the real estate for $330,000 last summer and kept all the proceeds for himself.

Woods’ suit charges that Broadman pressured her into putting her property up for collateral against the legal bill and that he “laundered” the foreclosure proceedings by signing the lien over to his mother so his own name would not be involved.

Woods, 58, says she is broke, unskilled and living with a daughter and son-in-law. Broadman declined to be interviewed by The Times for this article, but he disputed Woods’ claims last December in the Visalia Times-Delta.

“I’m an ethical man,” he was quoted as saying in the Dec. 20 article. “I don’t swindle people.”

Oliver Wanger, a Fresno attorney representing Broadman, says the judge received the lien on Woods’ property through a normal business transaction and legally sold the lien to his mother, Margaret Drew of Gore, Okla.

“It wasn’t done to hide anything,” said Wanger. “It was a private transfer that is in no way against the law.”

Broadman’s mother reportedly paid her son $40,000 for the property in 1987. Drew foreclosed on the real estate in 1988 for the price of the debt which had by then reached about $58,000, with interest.

But Drew could not sell the property because the title was clouded and Broadman bought it back from his mother last year for $58,000, according to the Times-Delta. Broadman told the newspaper that he spent several months and $100,000 clearing the title. Records show that he sold the real estate for $330,000 last August.

If it did indeed cost Broadman $100,000 to clear the title, simple arithmetic indicates he collected his debt and made $200,000 or so on the foreclosure of Woods’ former home and land.

Even so, says Broadman’s attorney, the transaction was perfectly legal and Woods’ suit is without merit.

Less than a month after Woods’ suit was filed, the Broadman spotlight shifted away from that controversy to one which caused a national uproar.

On Jan. 2, Darlene Johnson, 27-year-old mother of four and nearly eight months pregnant, stood before Broadman to be sentenced for severely beating two of her daughters, ages 5 and 6.

Broadman asked the woman if she would be willing, as a condition of probation, to use a new long-term birth control device called Norplant, which is implanted under the arm. Other conditions of probation included a year in the county jail with credit for time served, and mandatory counseling and parenting classes. The prosecution was seeking a state prison sentence.

Johnson agreed to the terms of probation, but changed her mind about the birth control device after leaving the courtroom, maintaining that she agreed to it only because she was afraid of being sent to prison. A hearing to reconsider the Norplant order was set for Jan. 10.

By that time Broadman’s order was the subject of a national controversy over the morality and constitutionality of a judge requiring a woman to use a birth control device. Critics–pointing out that Johnson is a poor black woman and Broadman a well-to-do white man–also saw elements of class, race and sex discrimination.

In his argument on behalf of Johnson, attorney Charles Rothbaum compared Broadman’s Norplant order to an old science fiction film “in which these aliens came down to Earth and implanted these devices in the back of persons’ necks and used that to control their activity.”

But Broadman upheld his order in a prepared decision.

Johnson “has been convicted of brutally beating her children,” he said. “It is in the defendant’s best interest and certainly in any unconceived child’s interest that she not have any more children until she is mentally and emotionally prepared to do so.”

Rothbaum, joined by the American Civil Liberties Union, is appealing the decision. In the meantime, Johnson is serving the county jail portion of her probation. Her fifth child was born in February.

A short, friendly woman, Johnson is afraid she will have to choose between prison and Norplant when she gets out of jail in June.

She has never been married, but says she plans to do so and says she does not believe in using birth control.

“If God blesses me to have more (children),” she said, “I’ll have more.”

Harry Raymond Bodine agrees with that point of view. Vehemently.

Bodine is in Tulare County Jail facing 15 years to life in prison on a charge of attempting to murder a public official. A hearing to determine his mental competency to stand trial is scheduled for May 17, according to his attorney, Michael Cross. Bodine, 45, is a muscular 5-feet, 11-inches tall and weighs 200 pounds. A small blue cross dangles over his red county jail T-shirt as he smiles pleasantly and talks about his life and beliefs.

Bodine is a second generation orchard grower in Tulare County. He was president of his high school class, attended Catholic seminaries, received a degree in philosophy, decided against the priesthood, married, was convicted of misdemeanor sexual molestation of his 10-year-old stepdaughter, divorced and was sent to the state mental hospital in Napa for seven months in 1987 after threatening to kill his wife’s new husband.

Bodine has been arrested at demonstrations protesting abortion clinics, but his goals were broader than other abortion opponents.

“I was helping,” he said, “with the idea that sooner or later I would convert them to a more dramatic civil war.”

Bodine believes he is on a holy mission to stamp out contraception and is guided by the Mother of God.

After hearing about Broadman’s ruling in the Johnson case, Bodine says he decided to kill the judge and began target practice with a revolver down by the river.

He was so nervous on the day that the Mother of God gave him the go-ahead sign to kill Broadman that he drank some Pepto-Bismol to quiet his stomach. The woman with red shoes was, for some reason, the signal that Our Lady chose.

When Bodine’s revolver went off in the courtroom, attorney Philip Bianco was representing a woman in a divorce case.

“My client went under the desk, holding onto her husband for the first time in three months,” said Bianco.

Bodine says he looked at the bench, saw that it was empty and thought he had killed the judge. There was no bailiff in the room, so Bodine placed his gun on a table and sat down to wait for someone to come arrest him for murder.

But Broadman was not dead. He was crouching behind the bench, wondering if he had been shot and checking himself for blood. There was none. The bullet missed Broadman’s head by inches and tore through the wall behind him.

In the meantime, bailiffs arrived, shoved the compliant Bodine to the floor and began handcuffing him.

Broadman, when he realized how close to death he had come, flew into a rage and–still wearing his black judicial robe–rushed at Bodine.

Bianco and two other men tried to hold Broadman back, but the judge lunged forward, sprawling across the bodies of the bailiffs and Bodine on the courtroom floor.

“All three of us couldn’t hold the guy,” said Bianco. “He was completely white. His heart was going as fast as it could go. He was like a bird dog that had just run a quarter of a mile.”

Prevented from getting at Bodine physically, Broadman subsequently filed a civil suit against his assailant, seeking to take away the man’s 29 acres of orchards as punishment for the shooting. That action caused still another controversy, this time over the propriety of a Superior Court judge suing a mentally ill person.

Bodine says he will not defend himself against Broadman’s suit.

“The Scriptures say if a man sues you for your jacket,” he explained, “give him your shirt, as well.”

Bodine says he might, however, be willing to punch it out with Broadman over the property if he were to meet him on the street.

Times staff writer Mark Stein contributed to this story

Source link

Australian Open 2026: Emma Raducanu loses to Anastasia Potapova in second round

While she improved to beat 197th-ranked Mananchaya Sawangkaew in the Melbourne first round, she looked undercooked against Potapova.

Russian-born Potapova also made a huge amount of errors in a poor-quality first set which started with five breaks of serve before Raducanu pulled away.

Raducanu served for the first set at 5-4 but was broken back by Potapova, who promptly pulled away with the tie-break.

After Potapova took a lengthy break at the end of the set, she made a fast start to the second and broke twice for a 3-0 lead.

The pair exchanged breaks before Potapova asserted her authority and cruised to victory, with a subdued Raducanu making a hasty exit.

Eyes had inevitably drawn towards the potential meeting with Sabalenka – but this loss was a sharp reminder of where Raducanu’s level remains.

Meanwhile, British qualifier Arthur Fery was also knocked out after a 7-6 (7-4) 6-1 6-3 loss to Argentina’s Tomas Martin Etcheverry in the men’s second round.

Source link

Pretty ‘jewel’ seaside town that gets the most sunshine in the UK

This beautiful town gets 573 hours more sunshine a year than the UK average

At this time of year, it can seem as if the weather in the UK is particularly miserable. The cold, wet weather isn’t helped by the fact the sun continues to set early in the day.

But this won’t be the case forever, with clocks set to go forward in March giving us much longer days. And some parts of the country will get even more sun than others.

Certain areas typically get more sunshine due to their location and local climate. Taking the top spot in the UK for this is a “small” but charming town you may not have heard of.

Located on the Isle of Wight off the south coast of England, Shanklin boasts the most sunshine hours a year. Based on Met Office data, it gets 1,976 hours of sunshine per year.

This is 573 hours more than the UK average and 44 more than the runner-up of Folkestone in Kent. This data was analysed by Sunsave Energy, which said on its website: “The Isle of Wight receives the gold medal for sunshine.

“Located just off the south coast of England, this little island is famous for its sunny weather, seafront promenades and beach huts. It’s no surprise that Queen Victoria regularly chose to retreat here.

“The Met Office has several climate stations on the Isle of Wight, but it’s the one in the small town of Shanklin (population: 9,000) that tops the UK sunshine charts. With 1,976 hours of sunshine per year, the Isle of Wight is a whopping 573 hours up on the UK average (1,403).”

READ MORE: ‘Record hot weather for 2026’ as Met Office says when UK will get warm againREAD MORE: Met Office says Northern Lights could be visible this week as maps reveal where

Shanklin is a well-established holiday spot that can be found on the south-east coast of the island. Families can enjoy its beautiful sandy beach, amusement arcades, and shops.

For nature lovers, Shanklin Chine is a must-see coastal ravine, featuring waterfalls, trees and lush vegetation. Visit Isle of Wight, the island’s official tourist information site, explains: “One of the jewels of Sandown Bay, the town of Shanklin has long been known as a traditional holiday destination and has everything you need for a great family holiday or to go to with friends or as a couple. With lots of seafront hotels, amusement arcades and crazy golf, it is the epitome of the British beach resort.

“But Shanklin these days is so much more than that. It has a thriving town centre with a host of independent shops, restaurants and pubs and its own theatre.

“Then there is the history of the town, from it being the home of the poet Keats to its vital role in the Second World War. Whatever you like to do on holiday, then Shanklin is certainly a place to ‘Say Yes’ to.”

The other sunniest places in Britain, as per Sunsave Energy, were:

  • Folkestone, Kent – 1,932 hours of sunshine a year
  • Bognor Regis, West Sussex – 1,919 hours
  • Hastings, East Sussex – 1,915 hours
  • Weymouth, Dorset – 1,904 hours
  • Eastbourne, East Sussex – 1,892 hours
  • Southend-on-Sea, Essex – 1,884 hours
  • Ramsgate, Kent – 1,846 hours
  • Walton-on-the-Naze, Essex – 1,824 hours
  • Swanage, Dorset – 1,806 hours
  • Bournemouth, Dorset – 1,779 hours

Source link

Defector group asks rights panel to block new label for arrivals

North Korean defector Mr. Kim views the city center area through a window, in Seoul, South Korea, 17 January 2024 (issued 22 January 2024). Mr. Kim is one of few North Koreans who managed to flee and directly reach the South between 2020 and 2023 due to strict border closures during the Covid pandemic. On the night of 06 May 2023, he and his family were able to quietly sail through patrolled waters in the Yellow Sea and cut across the maritime border between both Koreas. Mr. Kim has refused to give his full name in order to protect relatives on both sides of the border. File. Photo by JEON HEON-KYUN/ EPA

Jan. 20 (Asia Today) — A group of North Korean defectors on Tuesday petitioned South Korea’s National Human Rights Commission to block the Unification Ministry’s move to change how defectors are labeled, saying the shift could undermine their identity and deepen divisions within the community.

The group, which calls itself the Association of North Korean Defectors Opposing the Forced Use of the Term “North-bound residents,” said the ministry’s preferred wording goes beyond accommodating the choice of some defectors and amounts to imposing a new designation on most of them.

Lee Eun-taek, the group’s representative, said in a statement that the change risks infringing on “the identity and dignity that individual defectors have chosen for themselves” and is fueling unnecessary conflict among defectors.

“What we seek to protect is the rights and identity of those who have chosen to live as North Korean defectors,” Lee said, adding that diverse views within the community should be respected and that no term should be used to erase someone else’s identity.

Lee urged the commission to prevent defectors from being deprived of the right to choose how they are identified, saying “a name” reflects a person’s life experience and should not be decided by state power or politicians.

The Unification Ministry said in last year’s work report that it intended to change the terms “North Korean defectors” and “North Korean refugees” to “North-bound residents.” The ministry has used the new phrasing internally since this year and plans to adopt it as legal terminology once it becomes socially established, the report said.

— Reported by Asia Today; translated by UPI

© Asia Today. Unauthorized reproduction or redistribution prohibited.

Source link

When The Pope Talks About Multilateralism

What if I told you that the Pope, beyond his shepherding on how his followers should conduct their daily lives, also speaks extensively about international politics?

It was evident during Pope Leo XIV’s “State Of The World” address last week.

In his first such event since being elected to the Papal throne back in May last year, the Pope addressed a wide range of issues. Using a classic from Augustine, titled ‘The City of God,’ as the base of his speech, the Pope further elaborated his thoughts on three main topics: the first being the importance of diplomacy as well as the use of language within it; the second being human rights which includes freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, and religious freedom; and the final headline being the world peace. The third, of course, came at the right time: just days after the US attack in Venezuela, a Catholic-majority country.

But, there is a specific aspect of the speech that I found particularly intriguing, especially since it was uttered by a religious leader like the Pope: multilateralism.

In his address, the Pope highlighted the ‘weakness of multilateralism’ as a ’cause for concern at the international level.’ He also lamented the rise of the use of force at the global scale, mentioning that ‘diplomacy that promotes dialogue and seeks consensus among all parties is being replaced by a diplomacy based on force.’ The main question then emerges: why does the Pope have to address this issue? Why multilateralism?

Holy See’s Foreign Policy: A Holy Diplomacy

You probably have seen that in many contemporary and academic literatures, the terms ‘Vatican’ and ‘Holy See’ are often used interchangeably. While acceptable, we have to acknowledge that the two do have distinctions.

The ‘Vatican’ is a physical territory which hosts the iconic Basilica of Saint Peter, the ever-crowded Saint Peter’s Square, the magnificent Sistine Chapel, and the famous Vatican Museum. Meanwhile, the ‘Holy See’ is the spiritual and administrative centre of the Roman Catholic Church and is a subject of international law. In other words, the Holy See is the body of government. Thus, it is the Holy See, not the Vatican, that represents all of the Catholic faithful on the global stage, including at the United Nations. However, for the purpose of simplicity, I will use those two terms interchangeably.

How long, then, has the Holy See been participating as an actor on the global stage?

According to Jodok Troy, the Holy See is ‘one of the oldest participants in the international society of states.’ Similarly, a paper by Janne Matlary claims that the Holy See has always been an international actor, even before the concepts of Westphalian statehood and sovereignty were formulated. In the same research, Matlary adds that the Vatican’s foreign policy is fueled by ‘the rich intellectual tradition of the Catholic Church,’ which means not only do they draw their foreign policy solely from teachings of the Scripture, but also those from Church Fathers such as Augustine of Hippo and Thomas Aquinas.

Pope Leo XIV, in his first audience with members of the Diplomatic Corps in May last year, reiterated three pillars of missionary work that simultaneously act as ‘aim[s] of the Holy See’s diplomacy.’ Those are peace, justice, and truth.

Imagine a classical building, those three aspects will act this way: truth as the foundation, justice as the supporting pillars, and peace as the entablature.

Peace is, evidently, highly regarded by the Holy See.

We should also understand the Vatican’s sense of peace since it does not merely mean an absence or pause of war and conflict.  

The Vatican’s understanding of peace can be found in the concept of ‘just peace’; it should permeate every aspect of society. Matlary explains that to achieve just peace, it requires ‘just distribution of goods’, respect of human rights, as well as ‘honest investigation’ of atrocities that may have been conducted in a conflict. That very concept was also reiterated by the Pope himself in his last year’s address, explaining that peace should engage and challenge human beings, regardless of our cultural background or religious affiliation, demanding first of all that we work on ourselves.’

Departing from the Pope’s statement, it is obvious that the Holy See put human beings as an imago Dei at the very centre of its diplomacy.

Pope Leo XIV emphasised that Papal diplomacy is ‘inspired by a pastoral outreach…at the service of humanity.’

Similarly, Pietro Parolin, the Vatican’s Secretary of State under the late Pope Francis (as well as under the current Pope Leo XIV), stated that the diplomacy run by the Holy See is a ‘human diplomacy’ and therefore all diplomatic actions should revolve around ‘real people.’

We can conclude that, according to the Vatican’s perspective, one of the ways in which humans can work for peace is through dialogue and consensus in a multilateral setting. It, then, brings us to the main question of this article: why multilateralism?

The Global Reach of Catholicism

The first answer is that Catholics are scattered in most, if not all, of the countries all over the world. From peaceful nations to those with conflicts, such as those in the Middle East and Latin America, you can find a multitude of faithful. The latest data from the Vatican claimed that there are around 1.4 billion Catholic faithful worldwide.

Despite having less than 50 hectares of sovereign area, the Holy See, being the ecclesiastical centre of the Roman Catholic Church, regards every Catholic faithful as its subject. In other words, Catholics worldwide do obey the authority of the Pope. Daniel Binchy, in an address to the Chatham House in 1945, even went on to say that Papal sovereignty “does not depend on the small territory over which he rules.”

We can, therefore, safely say that Papal influence transcends Westphalian-style sovereignty. It transcends modern state boundaries.

For Catholics worldwide, the Pope is regarded as the ‘Vicar of Christ,’ a title that has been passed throughout millennia since the foundation of the Church by the Apostle Paul. As for non-Catholics

As far as my knowledge goes, that case is particular to the Holy See.

Doesn’t that make the Holy See somewhat cosmopolitan?

Referring back to Binchy’s address eight decades ago, he agreed to the idea that the Holy See has ‘acquired an essentially cosmopolitan outlook.’ He further elaborated that the Holy See’s ‘attitude’ is, in fact, ‘supra-national [sic] rather than international’ and it was passed down from the ‘universalist’ idea from the olden age of the Roman Empire.

I, on the other hand, have to dissent from that idea.

The opinion of the Holy See being ‘cosmopolitan’ is actually a mischaracterisation of its global presence that might seem ‘overarching’ for some.

The Holy See, in fact, subscribes to the principle of subsidiarity, which holds that matters should be handled by the most direct authority. In the case of international politics, the direct authority refers to the state government. The principle is also mentioned in Pope Pius XI’s 1931 encyclical, Quadragessimo Anno.

Therefore, it is clear that the Holy See, despite its unique capacity to transcend borders, still consider that states worldwide and their governments are sovereign over their own citizens. It then makes a clear statement about the need for multilateralism.

It is also important to note that most multilateral cooperation happened within what we know as multilateral institutions. And, for the Holy See, those institutions are useful for the continuity of its diplomacy.

For that reason, we come to the second answer: the Holy See prefers multilateralism since it can utilise multilateral institutions to amplify its diplomatic message.

A Need for an Amplifier

In the words of Sarah Teo, multilateralism ‘facilitates the institutionalisation of rules and norms that are relatively beneficial to all participants, regardless of economic size or military capability.’ She, then, argues that multilateral institutions are ‘more open and fair’ and that they could ‘help to restrain major powers from imposing their preferences on the smaller states.’

It is obvious that the Vatican does not possess material resources such as military and economic power in order to be on a par with other states. Instead, they become a norm entrepreneur, taking on the task to define an appropriate standard of behaviour in the international society.

Being a norm entrepreneur is quite common among states of lesser power, such as small and middle powers. It compensates for the lack of material power a country failed to possess.

Papal ‘human-centred’ diplomacy, along with peace, justice, and truth being the aim, is universally accepted, and, regardless of which state you belong to, you will find yourself in agreement with these points. Thus, these are the bases for the Vatican’s norm entrepreneurship.The act of serving as a norm entrepreneur is, therefore, the core of Papal diplomacy.

How does the Holy See project its norm entrepreneurship in a multilateral setting?

It is through the United Nations that the Holy See has been projecting its norm entrepeneurship in the global setting.

The UN, as the centre of multilateral diplomacy, has witnessed the play of the Vatican’s ‘holy diplomacy’ since its elevation to a permanent observer/non-member status within the institution.

The current Pope Leo XIV spoke highly of the United Nations, highlighting its achievements in mediating conflicts, promoting development, and helping states protect freedoms and human rights over the eight decades since its inception.

The UN was built on the ashes of the Second World War, which had ‘brought untold sorrow to mankind.’ Therefore, it is enshrined in its Charter that the purposes of the UN are to maintain international peace and security, to develop friendly relations among nations, to achieve international cooperation in solving international problems, and to be the centre for harmonising the actions of nations.

For the Holy See, the aforementioned purposes share similarities with its conception of diplomacy.

According to an article by Alan Chong and Jodok Troy, both the Holy See and the United Nations represent a ‘universal idealist mission’ such as pursuing peace and working on the ‘universalisation of human rights.’

Even back in the 1960s, Pope Paul VI stated that the Holy See’s role in the United Nations is as an ‘expert of humanity.’

Vatican’s commitment to humanity through multilateral means is also evident in the Pope’s recent address to the diplomatic corps, where he emphasised the need for a “more focused” policy aimed at the “unity of the human family instead of ideologies.” We can also interpret that particular statement as the Pope’s call for reform at the UN, just in time for the growing need for multilateralism.

The slow demise of multilateralism is, therefore, a nightmare for the Holy See.

Not only will it lose its influence in international politics, but the Holy See will eventually have to worry about the safety and security of its subjects worldwide, for when multilateral diplomacy fails, it will lead to the ‘ushering in’ of the ‘diplomacy of force’ that will put humankind in danger.

Therefore, it is right and just that the Pope use his platform and call for efforts to renew the institutions where multilateral diplomacy takes place.

Source link

Heartbreaking moment David Beckham fights back tears over being a proud dad

DAVID BECKHAM has fought back tears over being a proud dad in a resurfaced clip amid his ongoing feud with his son Brooklyn.

The aspiring chef released a bombshell statement on Monday as he slammed his parents for “controlling” him and said he has no intention of reconciling with them.

David Beckham fought back tears as he spoke about being a proud dad in a resurfaced clip from his Netflix documentary series
The father and son duo were seen having a laugh together in the episode

In his Netflix documentary series BECKHAM, which released in October 2023, David opened up about how proud he is of his four children.

As he fought back tears, he expressed: “They could be little s**ts but they’re not and that’s why I say I’m so proud of my children.

“And I’m so in awe of my children, the way they’ve turned out,” the proud dad admitted while speaking directly to camera.

In scenes shown in the episode in question, David and his eldest son were seen cooking up a storm in the kitchen.

READ MORE ON THE BECKHAMS

BECKOLLECTIONS MAY VARY

5 big contradictions in Brooklyn v Beckhams – so what’s the truth?


‘NICOLA OR US’

Beckhams believe they’ll only speak to Brooklyn again if he splits from wife

Aside from Brooklyn, David and Victoria are also parents to Romeo, Cruz and Harper.

The 26-year-old finally broke his silence after months of reports about the family feud.

He expressed: “I have been silent for years and made every effort to keep these matters private.

“Unfortunately, my parents and their team have continued to go to the press, leaving me with no choice but to speak for myself and tell the truth about only some of the lies that have been printed.

“I do not want to reconcile with my family. I’m not being controlled, I’m standing up for myself for the first time in my life.

“For my entire life, my parents have controlled narratives in the press about our family.

“The performative social media posts, family events and inauthentic relationships have been a fixture of the life I was born into.

“Recently, I have seen with my own eyes the lengths that they’ll go through to place countless lies in the media, mostly at the expense of innocent people, to preserve their own facade.

“But I believe the truth always comes out.

“My parents have been trying endlessly to ruin my relationship since before my wedding, and it hasn’t stopped.”

He went on to accuse his mum of trying to sabotage his wedding with Nicola Peltz by allegedly taking over his first dance and cancelling making the wedding dress at the eleventh hour.

David spoke out for the first time today as he admitted his children had “made mistakes” on social media.

Speaking live on CNBC’s financial program Squawk Box, Becks said: “I have always spoken about social media and the power of social media . . . For the good and for the bad.

“What kids can access these days, it can be dangerous.

“But what I have found personally, especially with my kids as well, use it for the right reasons.

“I’ve been able to use my platform for my following, for UNICEF.

“And it has been the biggest tool to make people aware of what’s going on around the world for children.

“And I have tried to do the same with my children, to educate them.

“They make mistakes, but children are allowed to make mistakes. That is how they learn. That is what I try to teach my kids.”

The former Manchester United star added: “You sometimes have to let them make those mistakes as well.”

Brooklyn launched a scathing attack on his parents in a bombshell statementCredit: Getty

Source link

Feds subpoena Minnesota leaders in immigration investigation

Federal prosecutors served six grand jury subpoenas Tuesday to Minnesota officials as part of an investigation into whether they obstructed or impeded federal law enforcement during a sweeping immigration operation in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area, a person familiar with the matter said.

The subpoenas, which seek records, were sent to the offices of Gov. Tim Walz, Atty. Gen. Keith Ellison, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, St. Paul Mayor Kaohly Her and officials in Ramsey and Hennepin counties, the person said.

The person was not authorized to publicly discuss an ongoing investigation and spoke to the Associated Press on condition of anonymity.

An investigation is underway into whether Minnesota officials obstructed federal immigration enforcement through public statements they made, two people familiar with the matter said Friday. They said then it was focused on the potential violation of a conspiracy statute.

Mayor says subpoenas are to stoke fear

Walz and Frey, both Democrats, have called the probe a bullying tactic meant to quell political opposition. Frey’s office was ordered to produce a long list of records to a grand jury on Feb. 3, including “cooperation or lack of cooperation with federal law enforcement” and “any records tending to show a refusal to come to the aid of immigration officials.”

“We shouldn’t have to live in a country where people fear that federal law enforcement will be used to play politics or crack down on local voices they disagree with,” Frey said.

Her, a Hmong immigrant and a Democrat, said she’s “unfazed by these tactics” and will stand up for her community.

The subpoenas came as the Trump administration urged a judge to reject efforts by Minnesota and its largest cities to stop the immigration enforcement surge that has roiled Minneapolis and St. Paul for weeks.

The Justice Department called the lawsuit, filed soon after the fatal shooting of Renee Good by an immigration officer, “legally frivolous.” Lawyers argued that the Department of Homeland Security is acting within its legal powers to enforce immigration laws.

Operation Metro Surge has made the state safer with the arrests of more than 3,000 people who were in the country illegally, the government said Monday in a court filing.

“Put simply, Minnesota wants a veto over federal law enforcement,” Justice Department attorneys wrote.

Ellison said the government is violating free speech and other constitutional rights with its unprecedented sweeps. He described the armed officers as poorly trained and said the “invasion” must cease.

The lawsuit filed Jan. 12 seeks an order to halt or limit the enforcement action. More filings are expected, and it’s not known when U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez will make a decision.

Hard to track arrests

Ilan Wurman, who teaches constitutional law at University of Minnesota Law School, doubts the state’s arguments will be successful.

“There’s no question that federal law is supreme over state law, that immigration enforcement is within the power of the federal government, and the president, within statutory bounds, can allocate more federal enforcement resources to states who’ve been less cooperative in that enforcement space than other states have been,” Wurman told the Associated Press.

Julia Decker, policy director at the Immigrant Law Center of Minnesota, expressed frustration that advocates have no way of knowing whether the government’s arrest numbers and descriptions of the people in custody are accurate. U.S. citizens have been dragged from their homes and vehicles during the Minnesota surge.

“These are real people we’re talking about, that we potentially have no idea what is happening to them,” Decker said.

Police say ICE is targeting off-duty officers

In a separate lawsuit, Menendez said Friday that federal officers can’t detain or tear gas peaceful protesters who aren’t obstructing authorities.

Good, 37, was killed on Jan. 7 as she was moving her vehicle, which had been blocking a Minneapolis street where Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers were operating. Trump administration officials say the officer, Jonathan Ross, shot her in self-defense, although videos of the encounter show the Honda Pilot slowly turning away from him.

Since then, the public has repeatedly confronted officers, blowing whistles and yelling insults at ICE and U.S. Border Patrol. They, in turn, have used tear gas and chemical irritants against protesters. Bystanders have recorded video of officers using a battering ram to get into a house as well as smashing vehicle windows and dragging people out of cars.

Police in the region, meanwhile, said off-duty law enforcement officers have been racially profiled by federal officers and stopped without cause. Brooklyn Park Police Chief Mark Bruley said he has received complaints from residents who are U.S. citizens, including his own officers.

“Every one of these individuals is a person of color who has had this happening,” Bruley said during a news conference.

President Trump last week threatened to invoke an 1807 law and send troops to Minnesota, though he has backed off, at least in his public remarks.

Karnowski and Richer write for the Associated Press. Richer reported from Washington. AP reporters Ed White in Detroit and Sarah Raza in Minneapolis contributed to this report.

Source link

Jude Bellingham: England midfielder responds to partying claims

Jude Bellingham has dismissed reports about his lifestyle off the pitch as “outside noise”, adding his celebration after scoring in Real Madrid’s Champions League win over Monaco was intended as “a bit of a joke back to the fans”.

Bellingham scored Real Madrid’s final goal – and his first of 2026 – in a comfortable 6-1 Champions League victory and marked the occasion by performing a drinking gesture.

The moment quickly drew attention online.

The celebration came after well-known Spanish YouTuber AuronPlay, who has over 29 million subscribers, made viral comments about Bellingham before Real Madrid faced Levante at the weekend.

He claimed Belliingham “loves alcohol too much” and has visited “every nightclub in Spain”, suggesting this is affecting the midfielder’s form.

Bellingham was subsequently among the players singled out for boos and whistles from the stands during the 2-0 win against Levante.

“It feels like anyone now can get a camera, say what they want and the whole world just believes them with no evidence,” Bellingham told TNT Sports after Tuesday’s Champions League fixture.

Source link

KOSPI surge pulls 35T won from big banks as stock cash rises

Traders work at Hana Bank in Seoul, South Korea, 19 January 2026. South Korea’s benchmark Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI) rose 63.92 points, or 1.32 percent, to close at 4,904.66. Photo by JEON HEON-KYUN/ EPA

Jan. 20 (Asia Today) — Bank deposits in South Korea are falling sharply as investors shift cash toward the stock market during the KOSPI’s rally, raising concerns in the financial sector about an accelerating “money move,” industry data showed Tuesday.

Demand deposits at the five major banks – KB Kookmin Bank, Shinhan Bank, Hana Bank, Woori Bank and NH Nonghyup Bank – totaled 673.9145 trillion won ($455.6 billion), down 4.99% from the end of last month, a decline of 35.3973 trillion won ($23.9 billion), the financial sector said.

Time deposits also edged lower, slipping to 938.2555 trillion won ($634.3 billion) from 939.2863 trillion won ($635.0 billion) in December.

Market participants attributed the outflows to a shift into securities-related cash, including investor deposits – standby funds used directly for stock purchases – and cash management accounts.

Investor deposits rose to 91.2182 trillion won ($61.7 billion) as of Friday from 77.912 trillion won ($52.7 billion) at the end of November, the data showed. Cash management account balances climbed to 102.9779 trillion won ($69.6 billion) from 98.0722 trillion won ($66.3 billion) over the same period.

The increase in investor deposits has tracked the KOSPI’s gains, the report said. Investor deposits hovered near 60 trillion won ($40.6 billion) in June last year when the index was around 2,000, then topped 80 trillion won ($54.1 billion) on Oct. 13. As the KOSPI resumed a steady rise in January and touched 5,000, investor deposits moved above 90 trillion won ($60.8 billion), reaching 92.8537 trillion won ($62.8 billion) on Jan. 8.

Banks revived deposit products paying interest in the 3% range in the second half of last year, but they are facing competition from alternatives such as integrated investment accounts known as IMAs, introduced in December, the report said.

The IMA products are marketed as offering principal protection if funds are held to maturity while targeting returns above 4%, the report said. About 220 billion won ($149 million) flowed into one product on its first day, it added.

A banking industry official said the reappearance of 3% deposit products reflects an attempt to respond to the money move. The official said the decline in time deposits remains modest, but banks are monitoring the trend closely.

— Reported by Asia Today; translated by UPI

© Asia Today. Unauthorized reproduction or redistribution prohibited.

Source link