sight

‘Tranquil, natural and barely a tourist in sight’: readers’ favourite hidden gems in Spain | Spain holidays

Chilling out in La Rioja

Recently travelling from Madrid to San Sebastián, we spent three days in picturesque Briñas in La Rioja, staying at the beautiful Finca Torre de Briñas (doubles from €189 B&B). The neighbouring town, Haro, reached via a 40-minute walk by the Ebro River, hosts several of the largest wine producers in the region (CVNE and Muga are recommended). You can stop in and sample them, before heading into the town centre, which has several tapas spots to fuel the walk back to the hotel. Bliss.
Tom Dickson

Forests and badlands in Murcia

Aleppo pine forests in Sierra Espuña massif. Photograph: Juan Vilata/Alamy

Less than an hour’s drive – yet a world away – from the bustling Murcia coast sits the brooding Sierra Espuña mountain range, a green respite from the summer heat and the site of a rewilding project started more than a century ago. After a morning’s hike through the shady pines, we drove up a switchback mountain road to check out the 16th-century Pozos de la Nieve, and descended steps into a silent, cavernous interior. Come summer, stored ice was hauled by horse and cart from here down to wealthy city folk. Our return route passed the Barrancos de Gebas, a lunar “badlands” landscape formed from a seabed more than 10m years ago. There were few other visitors and it felt like our secret.
Cathy Robinson

Terraced vineyards in Galicia’s gorges

The Sil river bends its way through the Ribeira Sacra. Photograph: Pedre/Getty Images

Forest fires in the Picos mountains led us on a detour via the Ribeira Sacra, a wine region in inland Galicia. The area is characterised by the deep canyons of the Sil and Miño rivers, and the steep-sided banks are lined with terraced vineyards, the grapes benefiting from the delicate ecosystem the gorges create. We swam in waterfalls, drank wine and walked among the narrow terraces. A highlight was the walk at the top of the Miradoiro de Souto Chao (the Grape Pickers’ Viewpoint). The views were stunning: tranquil, natural and barely a tourist in sight.
Ruth Chapman

A fairytale town in Navarre

The medieval settlement of Gallipienzo. Photograph: Vicenfoto/Getty Images

A medieval settlement rising above the sparse landscape of Navarre province, Gallipienzo is the stuff of fairytales. Before beginning our ascent on the winding road to the old town, we took a dip in the Aragón River, much needed after sightseeing in scorching Pamplona. Arriving at Hotel Heredad Beragu (doubles from €109 B&B), we were given a warm welcome by Patxi and Ramón, who have turned an old farmstead into a chic getaway. After a sunset walk, soaking up views of the surrounding countryside framed by ramshackle doorways, we headed back to the hotel for a locally sourced dinner, rather smug to have discovered this gateway to the past.
Anna

Bridge to the Basque Country

Portugalete’s transporter bridge. Photograph: Stefano Politi Markovina/Alamy

The city of Bilbao is deservedly popular. But take a 25-minute train ride along the Nervión River to the coast and you will arrive in Portugalete. Head straight to the Crepería Miramar for great coffee and a perfect tortilla. The cafe sits on the estuary in the shadow of the wonderful Vizcaya Bridge. Built in 1893, it is the world’s oldest transporter bridge, a Unesco world heritage site, and the perfect combination of beauty and function. For €1 take a trip on the transporter over to Getxo and walk around the bay to the lovely fishing village of Algorta. A perfect day.
Michael Quinn

Exploring the Alpujarras, near Granada

Pitres in the Sierra Nevada. Photograph: Juergen Feuerer/Chromorange/Alamy

Last month, I was delighted to find the almond blossom out while walking the Ruta Medieval in the Alpujarran municipality of La Taha. This year, after the disastrous storms in the south, no hike has been without hazards – landslides and fallen trees – so an app such as Wikiloc is essential to find detours. If you don’t have a car, a bus stops at Pitres, the start of the waymarked trail along ancient cobbled paths, through whitewashed, flat-roofed Moorish villages that hang on the side of the gorge created by the River Trevélez. There are various options after Ferreirola. A strenuous climb through Atalbéitar to Pórtugos, or a gentler one to Busquístar. Both have a bus back to Pitres or onwards to Órgiva (of Chris Stewart, Driving Over Lemons, fame) or even Granada.
Laura

Profile

Readers’ tips: send a tip for a chance to win a £200 voucher for a Coolstays break

Show

Guardian Travel readers’ tips

Every week we ask our readers for recommendations from their travels. A selection of tips will be featured online and may appear in print. To enter the latest competition visit the readers’ tips homepage

Thank you for your feedback.

Medieval gems in Léon

The castle of Ponferrada. Photograph: Ivan Marc Sanchez/Alamy

We arrived in Ponferrada on foot as part of our Camino de Santiago walk, so we could see the town looming up ahead of us well in advance. As well as an attractive centre with old buildings, restaurants, and bars serving the famous Bierzo wine, the most famous thing about Ponferrada is its huge Disney-like castle, thought to have been built by the Knights Templar, which not only hosts mock-medieval pageants but also contains a stunning collection of manuscripts and maps. After our journey from the lovely mountain village of El Acebo, we still found the energy to do the extra couple of miles uphill in the sun to visit the tiny romanesque church of Santo Tomás de las Ollas, which for me was worth a dozen castles.
Barbara Forbes

A spectacular slow rail trip from Santander

The coastal village of Llanes. Photograph: StockPhotoAstur/Getty Images

We got off the ferry at Santander and took a train on the narrow-gauge railway heading west. The slow and spectacular former Feve (now operated by Renfe) line runs along the northern Spanish coast towards Oviedo and Ferrol. We stopped off at coastal villages Llanes and San Vicente, and found great value places to stay, good local wine and excellent restaurants. Viveiro was another excellent stop where restaurants served cloudy white wine in ceramic jugs to accompany the wonderful seafood. Lonely and dramatic beaches complete the idyll. We had a lot of time so were able to absorb all this wonderful coast could offer before heading down towards Vigo and Porto by train.
Alan White

A stunning find near Girona

Plaça de Les Voltes in Peratallada. Photograph: Jordi Carrio/Alamy

The stunning medieval town of Peratallada made a peaceful base for exploring the Empordà region in September. Against cloudless, azure skies, its caramel-coloured walls and arches dripped with red campsis and bougainvillea. It’s an excellent day trip from Girona (20 miles away) and towns on the Costa Brava, but it’s worth more of your time. Climb the Torre de las Horas bell tower (free; visitor numbers restricted) for great views, and work your way around the welcoming shops, cafes and restaurants. Particular favourites were Restaurant La Roca and DO Candelaria.
Kay Julier

Winning tip: Hanging in Cuenca

Vertiginously perched houses in Cuenca. Photograph: Getty Images/iStockphoto

In the Castilla-La Mancha mountains east of Madrid, I visited the Unesco world heritage city of Cuenca. Sitting proudly upon its plateau and ensnared by the Júcar and Huécar rivers, this city offers spectacular vistas. To take advantage of the views and the otherworldly karst rock giants, hike the 4-mile circular route through pine forest, finishing with a sunset over the medieval city. Add to that a free abstract art museum vertiginously perched within the Casas Colgadas, and a beautifully-lit labyrinth of streets after dusk, and Cuenca is a perfect town to visit off the beaten track.
James Mulligan

Source link

Married At First Sight Australia fans tell groom to ‘stop wasting everyone’s time’

Married At First Sight Australia groom Steve sparked controversy during Intimacy Week

Fans tuning into the latest episode of Married At First Sight Australia branded one groom a ‘complete clown’ after his wife departed the programme mere minutes into the instalment.

Audiences in the UK are presently enjoying the newest series of the reality dating programme from Australia, where couples encounter each other for the very first time at the altar and develop their relationship from that point onwards. The outcomes thus far are predominantly mixed to say the least.

This week has witnessed the couples participating in intimacy week. As part of this, expert Alessandra Rampolla recently encouraged all the brides to embrace their ultimate fantasy with their partner.

However, not every evening proceeded according to plan. This was particularly true for Rebecca and Steve. Rebecca was shown browsing at an adult shop and purchased some outfits she believed her husband might appreciate seeing her model, reports OK!.

Regrettably for her, he displayed considerable apathy towards the prospect of her dressing up for him. In his own words, he stated: “I didn’t say don’t do it. I just said it would make me very uncomfortable if it happens.”

He subsequently dismissed the notion that Rebecca’s sole motivation for participating in the programme was to find love. He asserted that he ‘was sure’ there must be alternative reasons and suggested people don’t disclose everything in their audition tapes.

The situation only deteriorated for him as he joked to expert Alessandra that he didn’t have an earpiece in his ear to provide him with the correct responses. Misinterpreting his comment as a jab at her, she retorted sharply: “Honestly the lack of respect you are showing me here to someone who is trying to help you is appalling. Tread lightly. I don’t take to this well.”

Other grooms even confessed to the camera that they believed he was acting selfishly, with one suggesting that a 50 year old man should know how to address a woman. Steve insisted he wasn’t referring directly to Alessandra, but she questioned who else his remark could be aimed at.

Later, during his on-camera interview with producers, he admitted that he hadn’t absorbed much from his conversation with Alessandra, largely dismissing everything that transpired. He also mentioned that he chose to withdraw and felt there was a lot of contradiction in the room.

Viewers at home were quick to react to the latest developments. One person commenting on the MAFS subreddit said: “So what are Steve’s ulterior motives for being here? if he’s so sure there has to be some.” Another viewer remarked: “Ugh.. Steve is becoming more and more awful…”

While Rebecca initially left the flat, she returned after spending a night apart, but then it was soon Steve’s turn to depart. After making no headway following his session with Rebecca, he packed up and left.

Viewers were left astonished by his decision, with one commenting: “Rebecca deserves a lot better. Cos what is this “so much for me” business. What exactly is she doing?? I’m so confused.”

Another responded: “Goodness Steve is diabolical and such a liar, he hasn’t tried.” While someone else pleaded: “Steve should just leave, he clearly doesn’t fancy or want Rebecca. Stop wasting everyone’s time.”

Meanwhile, one fan questioned on X: “Did Steve realise he was on a tv programme?! #mafsau”, another posted: “If Steve is SO conservative, why even apply for this show, knowing what it’s all about #mafsau” while a different audience member added: “Did Steve not watch #MAFSAU before he applied?”

Married at First Sight Australia continues tomorrow at 7.30pm on E4 and streaming on Channel 4.

Source link

After Nearly A Month Of Epic Fury There’s No Off-Ramp In Clear Sight

As Operation Epic Fury slogs on for a 26th day, Iranian officials have publicly dismissed the Trump administration’s efforts to negotiate a way out of the crisis. Both sides have exchanged demands for any settlement of the war as Pakistan has agreed to hold peace talks, but there appears to be no quick off ramp to this conflict. Meanwhile, the missile and drones keep launching and the bombs keep falling.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Wednesday said Iran “refused to come to a deal,” adding that President Donald Trump “does not bluff and is prepared to unleash hell.”

Leavitt: “President Trump does not bluff … any violence beyond this point will be because the Iranian regime refused to understand they have already been defeated” pic.twitter.com/siWhW4yEp3

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) March 25, 2026

The Iranians claimed that they rejected any move to stop the fighting because of the demands made by the White House and, what they state, is their ongoing successful defensive strategy. They also hit back with their own peace deal demands.

Though the U.S. has started “efforts to establish a ceasefire and start indirect negotiations with Iran… Tehran considers a ceasefire and negotiations currently unjustifiable,” the official Iranian FARS news agency proclaimed on Wednesday. “While U.S. diplomatic movements for a ceasefire have increased in the past five days with mediation by some countries, experts describe the change in Donald Trump’s rhetoric as a sign of Washington’s retreat in the face of Iran’s resistance. However, according to observers, the U.S. government’s effort to maintain its prestige has caused these requests to be presented wrapped in military and media threats.”

“…the Islamic Republic of Iran, before making any decision regarding the ceasefire request presented by U.S. intermediaries, emphasizes achieving its strategic goals in confrontation with the hostile front, and only upon their fulfillment will there be a possibility to end the war (not just a ceasefire),” FARS added. “Political analysts also believe that Iran’s comprehensive resistance against the U.S., the Zionist regime, and their allies has narrowed the maneuvering space for the enemy, forcing them to seek a way out of the current situation.”

However, despite rejecting the peace deal, “Iranian officials nevertheless signaling privately that they are open to negotiations, raising the prospect of a cessation in hostilities, Israel moved to step up its efforts to destroy as much of Iran’s military capabilities as possible,” The New York Times reported.

Iranian officials are also wary of dealing with Trump at all, Axios posited.

“The U.S. is pushing for in-person peace talks as soon as Thursday in Islamabad, Pakistan. But during the two previous rounds of U.S.-Iran talks, Trump green lit crippling surprise attacks while still claiming to be seeking a deal,” the outlet noted. “Iranian officials have told the countries trying to mediate peace talks with the U.S. that they have now been tricked twice by President Trump and “we don’t want to be fooled again.”

🇮🇷🇺🇸Iran suspects Trump’s peace talk push is another trick. The U.S. made clear to the Iranians that Trump is serious and floated Vice President Vance’s possible involvement in the talks as proof. @MarcACaputo and I write for @axios https://t.co/DqY7aZMvQY

— Barak Ravid (@BarakRavid) March 25, 2026

The rejection came after the The New York Times reported on Tuesday that the United States sent Iran a 15-point plan to end the war. The publication cited officials briefed on the diplomacy.

The publication acknowledged that it did not see a copy of the plan, but explained that officials “shared some of its broad outlines, saying that it addresses Iran’s ballistic missile and nuclear programs,” the Times wrote. “The plan also discusses maritime routes, one of the officials said. Since the beginning of the war, Iran has effectively blocked most Western ships from safely passing through the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic waterway in and out of the Persian Gulf, cutting the global supply of oil and natural gas, and sending the prices soaring.”

It was unclear how widely the plan, delivered by way of Pakistan, had been shared among Iranian officials, the newspaper noted, nor was it clear whether Israel, which has been bombing Iran together with the United States, was on board with the proposal.

Israeli media offered more details about the plan, but said it involved 14 points. They include Iran dismantle its nuclear capabilities, promise not to strive to obtain nuclear weapons or enrich uranium inside the country, limit the number of range of missiles and end its support for proxies like Hezbollah and the Houthis among several other demands.

🚨JUST IN: The 14-point document that was given to Iran:

📌 Dismantling of existing nuclear capabilities that have already been accumulated
📌A commitment that Iran will never strive to obtain nuclear weapons
📌No material will be enriched on Iranian soil
📌All enriched… https://t.co/Nv5kXtf8v5

— Raylan Givens (@JewishWarrior13) March 24, 2026

BREAKING: The Trump administration offered a 15-point ceasefire plan to Iran, an AP source says, even as the U.S. military is preparing to send at least 1,000 more troops from the 82nd Airborne Division to the region. https://t.co/Yt51Hh6g4I

— The Associated Press (@AP) March 25, 2026

Iran set a high bar with its own proposal. It demanded the closure of all U.S. bases in the Gulf , guarantees of no further attacks, an end to Israeli strikes on Hezbollah, lifting all sanctions on Iran, the payment of war damage reparations and no restrictions on the missile program, according to the Wall Street Journal.

“A U.S. official called the demands ridiculous and unrealistic,” the newspaper added.

Iranian demands for an end to the war, according to the WSJ:

– Closure of all US bases in the Gulf
– Guarantees of no further attacks
– End to Israeli strikes on Hezbollah
– Lifting all sanctions on Iran.
– War damage reparations
– No restrictions on the missile program pic.twitter.com/j0GmXSjT0t

— Faytuks News (@Faytuks) March 25, 2026

“Trump’s special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, and US Vice President JD Vance, could travel to Islamabad if an agreement was likely to be reached,” Bloomberg news reported on Tuesday, citing one senior Western diplomat. “The US had also considered locations such as Muscat, Doha and Cairo for peace talks, but fraying relations due to the war or mistrust from either Washington or Tehran toward those governments made those options less viable, the person added.”

Iran, however, has reportedly refused to negotiate with anyone other than Vance, accusing Witkoff and Kushner of “backstabbing” because the U.S. launched Epic Fury hours after the two held talks with Tehran.

On Wednesday, Leavitt dismissed claims about any face-to-face negotiations, saying “nothing should be deemed official until formally announced by the White House.”

When asked if face-to-face talks are planned for negotiations with Iran, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt tells CBS News’ @JenniferJJacobs: “I’ve seen a lot of speculation and reporting about potential talks that could happen later this week. Nothing should be deemed… pic.twitter.com/yeR1x2vpNK

— CBS News (@CBSNews) March 25, 2026

UPDATES:

The Speaker of the Iranian Parliament issued a veiled threat on Wednesday.

“Based on some data, Iran’s enemies, with the support of one of the regional countries, are preparing to occupy one of the Iranian islands,” Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf posted on X. “All enemy movements are under the full surveillance of our armed forces. If they step out of line, all the vital infrastructure of that regional country will, without restriction, become the target of relentless attacks.”

While Ghalibaf didn’t specify the regional countries he wrote about, he is referring to a potential attack on Kharg Island or other Iranian islands in the Strait of Hormuz. As we previously noted, the U.S. is sending additional troops to the region for such a possibility. Last week, former CENTCOM commander Joseph Votel offered his candid views about the difficulty of taking Kharg Island. You can read our exclusive interview with Votel here.

براساس برخی داده‌ها، دشمنان ایران با پشتیبانی یکی از کشورهای منطقه، در حال تدارک عملیات اشغال یکی از جزایر ایرانی هستند.
تمام تحرکات دشمن تحت اشراف نیروهای مسلح ماست. اگر قدم از قدم بردارند، تمام زیرساخت‌های حیاتی آن کشور منطقه‌ای بدون محدودیت، هدف حملات بی‌امان قرار خواهد گرفت.

— محمدباقر قالیباف | MB Ghalibaf (@mb_ghalibaf) March 25, 2026

Meanwhile, the Iranians are beefing defenses on Kharg Island, CNN reported.

Amid the halting diplomacy, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) commander Adm. Brad Cooper released his fifth video update on Epic Fury, saying that the U.S. has hit more than 10,000 Iranian targets and just reached the 10,000 mark “just hours ago.”

Earlier today, CENTCOM released video showing strikes against Iran’s military infrastructure.

U.S. forces are striking targets to degrade the Iranian regime’s military infrastructure and capabilities that have threatened American troops and regional partners for decades. pic.twitter.com/wPIR1c6kA0

— U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) March 25, 2026

The IDF claimed it struck two naval cruise missile production sites in Tehran.

Iran continued firing missiles at Israel. The following video shows an intermediate-range ballistic missile with a cluster muntion warhead that is difficult to intercept in the terminal phase.

Iran said Wednesday it had fired cruise missiles in the direction of the the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier.

FARS, which has close ties with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), claimed that the missile attack had “forc[ed] the American naval fleet to change position.”

CENTCOM did not immediately respond to our request for comment.

The Iranian claim about the Lincoln came a day after Trump told reporters that Iran has unsuccessfully launched 100 missiles at the carrier.

CENTCOM on Wednesday shot down Tehran’s claim that a U.S. Navy F/A-18E/F Super Hornet was downed by Iranian air defenses.

🚫FALSE: The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps announced a U.S. F/A-18 fighter was struck over Chabahar using new advanced air defense systems.

✅TRUE: No U.S. fighter aircraft have been shot down by Iran. pic.twitter.com/I25QFjYo0l

— U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) March 25, 2026

That claim was made by the official Iranian Press TV news outlet in a post on X.

Two U.S. Air Force C-5M Super Galaxy heavy transports flew into Diego Garcia, in the past 48 hours, according to open source flight trackers. One was from Okinawa, Japan and the other from South Korea. Some believe this indicates the shipment of air defense systems and interceptors in the wake of claimed Iranian attempts to strike the island, about 2,500 miles away, with ballistic missiles. It remains unclear what the flights were actually about.

In the past 48 hours, two U.S. Air Force C-5M Super Galaxy heavy transports flew into Diego Garcia, one from Okinawa, Japan and another from South Korea.

They’re likely hauling interceptors, so the threat of Iranian strikes on the base is HIGH. https://t.co/16RpTWf2dk pic.twitter.com/7HTBVnQZvn

— Egypt’s Intel Observer (@EGYOSINT) March 25, 2026

Yesterday, we noted that open-source satellite imagery captured over the Indian Ocean yesterday indicates that the USS Tripoli is now docked at Diego Garcia. However, imagery posted today by open-source investigator MT Anderson shows that the Tripoli Amphibious Readiness Group (ARG) has pushed on toward the Middle East, while a lone Arleigh Burke class guided missile destroyer is now docked there.

That was a quick pit stop. 👇

NSF DIEGO GARCIA UPDATE: ARG Departs, DDG Arrives
Mar 25 imagery shows a fast turnover at the logistics hub.
➡️ Tripoli ARG has already pushed off to continue their transit. In their place, a lone Arleigh Burke-class destroyer is now alongside.… https://t.co/QoJhvvJvY0 pic.twitter.com/pgsewaBc80

— MT Anderson (@MT_Anderson) March 25, 2026

CENTCOM released images of A-10 Thunderbolt II close air support jets taking part in attacks on Iranian ships.

U.S. Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt II attack aircraft have been used to strike Iranian naval vessels during Operation Epic Fury. pic.twitter.com/VasnOrehax

— U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) March 25, 2026

As the Middle East energy war rages on, an Iranian missile struck near the Orott Rabin power plant in Hadera, Israel, with no reports of direct impact on the facility.

An Iranian missile struck near the Orot Rabin power plant in Hadera, Israel, with no direct impact reported on the facility, according to initial reports. pic.twitter.com/IZOrzEcIsN

— Faytuks Network (@FaytuksNetwork) March 25, 2026

Though Trump derided new Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez sees him as a threat.

Spanish PM Pedro Sánchez on Mojtaba Khamenei:

Mojtaba Khamenei is just as dictatorial and even more bloodthirsty than his father.

And on top of that, he supports Iran developing nuclear weapons.pic.twitter.com/XXUaArApf2

— Clash Report (@clashreport) March 25, 2026

The “present” that Trump said Tuesday that Iran had given Washington “was allowing the safe passage of a number of fuel tankers through the Strait of Hormuz in recent days,” the Times of Israel reported on X, citing a senior Arab diplomat and a U.S. official.

The “present” that US President Donald Trump said Tuesday that Iran had given Washington was allowing the safe passage of a number of fuel tankers through the Strait of Hormuz in recent days, a senior Arab diplomat and a US official tell @TimesofIsrael (1/7)

— Jacob Magid (@JacobMagid) March 25, 2026

France may be organizing its own coalition to re-open the Strait, Reuters reported on X.

BREAKING – Looks like the French are organizing their own coalition! See these alerts:

* FRANCE TO HOLD VIDEOCONFERENCE SOON WITH ARMY CHIEFS KEEN TO PLAY ROLE IN RESTORING MARITIME NAVIGATION IN HORMUZ – FRENCH MILITARY

* FRENCH MILITARY: MEETING WOULD BE COMPLETELY…

— Phil Stewart (@phildstewart) March 25, 2026

However, several European leaders are pushing back against comments made by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte that European allies would eventually ‘come together’ to heed Trump’’s call to deploy naval assets in the Strait of Hormuz, Financial Times reported.

Vessels seeking to gain Iranian protection while transiting the Strait of Hormuz are being asked to provide detailed information to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Bloomberg reported. The demand includes lists of crew and cargo, along with voyage details and bills of ladings.The publication also noted that the IRGC is exacting tolls on shipping, charging some vessels $2 million to transit.

Vessels seeking to transit the Strait of Hormuz under Iranian protection are being asked to provide lists of crew, cargo and voyage details to secure a green light from the IRGC https://t.co/EHYbSHxU4W

— Bloomberg (@business) March 25, 2026

With the Strait of Hormuz still largely closed for most shipping, China’s foreign ministry, asked whether Chinese ships are passing through, said Beijing has been in communication with all parties.

BREAKING: China’s foreign ministry, asked whether Chinese ships are passing through the Strait of Hormuz, said Beijing has been in communication with all parties. pic.twitter.com/5EJzeqjQC1

— Al Jazeera Breaking News (@AJENews) March 25, 2026

The Iraqi Ministry of Defense condemned a deadly U.S. airstrike on its medical and logistical facilities in Habbaniya on Wednesday. The incident is the latest in an ongoing series of attacks by Iranian-backed militias on U.S. and allied forces in Iraq, and resulting retaliation strikes that have seen a dramatic uptick since the launch of Epic Fury.

“At approximately 9:00 AM, the Habbaniya Military Clinic and the local Works Department came under a direct airstrike, which was immediately followed by concentrated cannon fire from the attacking aircraft,” The Iraqi Defense Ministry stated. Saying that seven soldiers were killed and 13 others wounded “while performing their national and humanitarian duties.”

The Ministry described the strike as “a flagrant violation of international law and a heinous crime, specifically citing global conventions that prohibit the targeting of medical facilities and personnel.”

In addition to Iraqi soldiers, the base is also shared by PMF/Hashd al-Shaabi, one of the Iranian-backed militias striking U.S. and allied forces.

The War Zone cannot independently verify this claim.

7 Iraqi Army soldiers were killed and 13 wounded after a U.S. airstrike hit the clinic and engineering department at the Habbaniyah base in Anbar.

The base, which is shared by the Iraqi Army and PMF/Hashd al-Shaabi, was struck in two consecutive U.S. attacks on March 24–25.… pic.twitter.com/FF9sFWHdst

— Clash Report (@clashreport) March 25, 2026

The reported attack came after Iraq gave permission to a quarter of a million paramilitary troops under the Popular Mobilization Forces umbrella to retaliate against strikes by the U.S., according to the Middle East Broadcasting Networks.

With no end to the fighting in sight, we will continue to provide updates on the status of Epic Fury and efforts to end the war.

Contact the author: howard@thewarzone.com

Howard is a Senior Staff Writer for The War Zone, and a former Senior Managing Editor for Military Times. Prior to this, he covered military affairs for the Tampa Bay Times as a Senior Writer. Howard’s work has appeared in various publications including Yahoo News, RealClearDefense, and Air Force Times.




Source link

Iran’s president sets terms to end the war: Is an off-ramp in sight? | US-Israel war on Iran News

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has laid out terms for ending the war with the United States and Israel in what analysts say is a possible sign of de-escalation from Tehran as the US-Israel war on Iran entered its 13th day on Thursday.

In a post on Wednesday on social site X, Pezeshkian said he had spoken to his counterparts in Russia and Pakistan, and that he had confirmed “Iran’s commitment to peace”.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

“The only way to end this war – ignited by the Zionist regime & US – is recognizing Iran’s legitimate rights, payment of reparations, and firm int’l guarantees against future aggression,” Pezeshkian wrote.

This is a rare posture from Tehran, which has maintained a defiant stance and initially rejected any possibility of negotiations or a ceasefire when war broke out nearly two weeks ago.

Pezeshkian’s statement comes as pressure mounts on the US to halt what has become a very costly mission. Analysts say speculation from Washington that Iran would quickly submit after the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei were misguided.

Tehran is likely going to determine the end of this war, not the US or Israel, because of its ability to inflict economic pain broadly, they say.

Amid a military pummelling by the US and Israel, Iran has launched heavy retaliatory strikes at US assets and other critical infrastructure in Gulf countries, upsetting global supplies. It has also adopted what analysts call “asymmetric” tactics – such as disrupting the critical Strait of Hormuz and threatening US banking-linked entities – to inflict as much economic pain on the region and wider world as it can.

This is what we know about Pezeshkian’s stance and what the pressures are on both sides to draw the conflict to a close, quickly.

Emergency personnel work at the site of a strike
A building lies in ruins after a strike, amid the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, on March 12, 2026 [Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters]

What has the war cost so far?

Economically, both sides have weaponised energy. Israel first targeted Iran’s oil facilities in Tehran on March 8, prompting an outcry from global health experts over the potential risk of air and water pollution.

Iran has, meanwhile, tightened its chokehold on the Strait of Hormuz shipping route – the only route to open sea for oil producers in the Gulf – with its military promising on Wednesday that it has the capabilities to wage a long war that could “destroy” the world economy.

Attacks on ships in the strait, through which about 20 percent of global oil and gas traffic normally passes, have effectively closed the route.

Oil prices rocketed above $100 per barrel late last week, up from around $65 before the war, with ordinary buyers feeling the increases at pumps in the US, Europe and parts of Africa.

On Wednesday, Iran upped the ante, saying it would not allow “a litre of oil” to pass through the strait and warned the world to expect a $200-per-barrel price tag.

“We don’t know how quickly it’ll revert back,” Freya Beamish, chief economist at GlobalData TS Lombard, told Al Jazeera. “We do think it’ll revert back to $80 in due course, but the ball is to some degree in Iran’s court,” she said, adding that because Iran needs oil revenue, the price hikes are expected to be time-limited.

The International Energy Agency agreed on Wednesday to release 400 million barrels from the emergency reserves of several member states but it is not yet clear what impact that will have, nor how quickly this quantity of oil can be released.

Tehran has also been accused of directly attacking oil facilities in neighbouring countries this week. Iraq shut all its oil port operations on Thursday after explosive-laden Iranian “drone” boats appeared to have attacked two fuel tankers in Iraqi waters, setting them ablaze and killing one crew member.

A drone was filmed striking Oman’s Salalah oil port on Wednesday, although Tehran has denied involvement.

What are Iranian officials saying about ending the war?

There has been conflicting messaging from the Iranian leadership.

Iran’s elite army unit and parallel armed force, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), continues to show defiance, issuing threats and launching attacks on Israel and US military assets and infrastructure in neighbouring Gulf countries.

However, the political leadership has appeared more inclined towards diplomacy, analysts say. On Wednesday, President Pezeshkian said that ending the war would take the US and Israel recognising Iran’s rights, paying Iran reparations – although it’s unclear how much is being asked for – and providing strong guarantees that a future war will not be waged.

In a video recording last week, he also apologised to neighbouring countries for the strikes and promised that Iran would stop hitting its neighbours as long as they do not allow the US to launch attacks from their territory.

“I personally apologise to the neighbouring countries that were affected by Iran’s actions,” the president said, adding that Tehran was not looking for confrontations with its neighbours.

However, it is not known how much sway the political leadership has over the IRGC. Hours after the president’s apology last week, air defence sirens went off in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE and Bahrain, as strikes continued on the Gulf.

So, what is Iran’s actual position?

“Iran wants to go to the end to make sure that the United States and Israel never attack Iran again … so this has to be the final battle,” Al Jazeera’s Resul Serdar Atas explained.

Indeed, the IRGC sees this as an existential war, but the timing of Pezeshkian’s statement about ending the conflict also shows Tehran is pressured economically, politically and militarily, Zeidon Alkinani of Qatar’s Georgetown University told Al Jazeera.

“These differences and divisions [between IRGC and political leaders] always existed even prior to this war but we may notice it now more, given the fact that the IRGC believes that it has the right to take the front seat in leading this regional war, which is why a lot of the statements and positions are contradicting with the official ones from Pezeshkian,” he said.

The IRGC reports directly to Iran’s Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) and not to the country’s political leadership. That council is led by Ali Larijani, a top politician and close aide to the late supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, who analysts describe as a “hardliner”.

In a post on X on Tuesday, Larijani responded to threats from Trump about attacks on the Strait of Hormuz, saying: “Iranian people do not fear your hollow threats; for those greater than you have failed to erase it … So beware lest you be the ones to vanish.”

The newly elected supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, was once in the IRGC and was put forward by the unit as the next ayatollah after his father was killed on the first day of the war, analysts say. He is thus not expected to follow the reformist, diplomatic ideals of President Pezeshkian and other political leaders which his father managed to marry with the IRGC militarised stance, they say.

Mojtaba Khamenei, son of Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, attends a gathering.
Mojtaba Khamenei, son of Iran’s late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, attends a gathering in Tehran on March 2, 2016. Iran marked the appointment of Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei to replace his father as its supreme leader with a barrage of missiles against Israel and the Gulf states [File: Rouhollah Vahdati/ISNA via AFP]

What do the US and Israel say about ending the war?

There have also been conflicting messages from the Trump administration and Israel regarding when the war mission on Iran, codenamed Operation Epic Fury, is likely to end.

Trump told US publication Axios on Wednesday that the war on Iran would end “soon” because there’s “practically nothing left to target”.

“Anytime I want it to end, it will end,” he added. He had said earlier on Monday that “we’re way ahead of our schedule” and that the US had achieved its goals, even as speculation mounts about a possible US ground mission.

On the other hand, Israel’s Defence Minister Israel Katz said on Wednesday that the war would go on “without any time limit, for as long as necessary, until we achieve all the objectives and decisively win the campaign”.

Analysts say Trump’s stance that the conflict will be quick reflects increasing pressure on his administration ahead of upcoming mid-term elections in November.

Trump’s advisers privately told him this week to find a quick end to the war and avoid political backlash, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal. That came as polls from Quinnipiac University and The Washington Post suggested that most Americans are opposed to the war in Iran.

In his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump promised to lower prices, and inflation had stabilised at 2.4 percent ahead of the war, according to government data released on Wednesday. Analysts speculate the conflict will likely push it back up.

The US spent more than $11.3bn in the first six days of the war, Pentagon officials told lawmakers in a classified briefing on Tuesday, Reuters reported this week – nearly $2bn a day.

The Washington-based think tank, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), estimated that the war cost Washington $3.7bn in its first 100 hours alone, or nearly $900m a day, largely due to its expenditure on costly munitions.

“It’s quite ironic that [Trump] chose a war that would make affordability worse, not better,” Rebecca Christie, a senior fellow at the Bruegel think tank, told Al Jazeera’s Counting the Cost.

“Every time the US loses even one object, air defence or a plane or something like that, that represents an awful lot of money that could have been used on some of these issues that have an impact on people’s day-to-day lives in the United States.”

Source link