shown

Rooney’s former club are also enjoying a resurgence, with a 4-2 win over Brighton making it three on the trot and lifting them up to sixth place – level on points with Manchester City and one clear of Liverpool.

Part of that success has been down to the form of forward Bryan Mbeumo, who has scored three of his five goals in the last two games.

Rooney admitted he was not convinced when United brought him to the club in the summer for £65m from Brentford, but said the 26-year-old Cameroon international is now living up to expectations.

“His energy, his work-rate, his desire, is what you need to be a United player. I did say that I was a little bit unsure, but I think what he’s shown is he belongs there,” added Rooney.

“He’s been consistent with his performances, I think that’s the main thing. If you’re consistently getting into the right positions, and getting chances, you will score 20 goals a season.”

WASHINGTON — President Trump is showing little urgency to broker a compromise that would end the government shutdown, even as Democrats insist no breakthrough is possible without his direct involvement.

Three weeks in, Congress is at a standstill. The House hasn’t been in session for a month, and senators left Washington on Thursday frustrated by the lack of progress. Republican leaders are refusing to negotiate until a short-term funding bill to reopen the government is passed, while Democrats say they won’t agree without guarantees on extending health insurance subsidies.

For now, Trump appears content to stay on the sidelines.

He spent the week celebrating an Israel-Hamas ceasefire deal he led, hosted a remembrance event for conservative activist Charlie Kirk and refocused attention on the Russia-Ukraine war. Meanwhile, his administration has been managing the shutdown in unconventional ways, continuing to pay the troops while laying off other federal employees.

Asked Thursday whether he was willing to deploy his dealmaking background on the shutdown, Trump seemed uninterested.

“Well, look, I mean, all we want to do is just extend. We don’t want anything, we just want to extend, live with the deal they had,” he said in an exchange with reporters in the Oval Office. Later Thursday, he criticized Democratic health care demands as “crazy,” adding, “We’re just not going to do it.”

Spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told Fox News that Democrats must first vote to reopen the government, “then we can have serious conversations about health care.”

Senate Majority Leader John Thune echoed that approach before leaving for the weekend, saying Trump is “ready to weigh in and sit down with the Democrats or whomever, once the government opens up.”

Thune said he’d also be willing to talk, but only after the shutdown ends.

“I am willing to sit down with Democrats,” Thune posted on social media Friday.

“But there’s one condition: End the Schumer Shutdown. I will not negotiate under hostage conditions, nor will I pay a ransom,” he added.

Frustration is beginning to surface among rank-and-file Republicans, with bipartisan conversations breaking out on the Senate floor as members look for ways to move things forward. Still, even those Republicans admit little happens in Congress without Trump’s direction.

Leaving the Capitol on Thursday, GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski said, “We’re not making much headway this week.” For things to progress, Murkowski acknowledged Trump may need to get more involved: “I think he’s an important part of it.”

“I think there are some folks in his administration that are kind of liking the fact that Congress really has no role right now,” she added. “I don’t like that. I don’t like that at all.”

Trump has not been slowed by the shutdown

While Congress has been paralyzed by the shutdown, Trump has moved rapidly to enact his vision of the federal government.

He has called budget chief Russ Vought the “grim reaper,” and Vought has taken the opportunity to withhold billions of dollars for infrastructure projects and lay off thousands of federal workers, signaling that workforce reductions could become even more drastic.

At the same time, the administration has acted unilaterally to fund Trump’s priorities, including paying the military this week, easing pressure on what could have been one of the main deadlines to end the shutdown.

Some of these moves, particularly the layoffs and funding shifts, have been criticized as illegal and are facing court challenges. A federal judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked the administration from firing workers during the shutdown, ruling that the cuts appeared politically motivated and were carried out without sufficient justification.

And with Congress focused on the funding fight, lawmakers have had little time to debate other issues.

In the House, Johnson has said the House won’t return until Democrats approve the funding bill and has refused to swear in Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva. Democrats say the move is to prevent her from becoming the 218th signature on a discharge petition aimed at forcing a vote on releasing documents related to the sex trafficking investigation into Jeffrey Epstein.

So far, the shutdown has shown little impact on public opinion.

An AP-NORC poll released Thursday found that 3 in 10 U.S. adults have a “somewhat” or “very” favorable view of the Democratic Party, similar to an AP-NORC poll from September. Four in 10 have a “somewhat” or “very” favorable view of the Republican Party, largely unchanged from last month.

Democrats want Trump at the table. Republicans would rather he stay out

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries have said Republicans have shown little seriousness in negotiating an end to the shutdown.

“Leader Thune has not come to me with any proposal at this point,” Schumer said Thursday.

Frustrated with congressional leaders, Democrats are increasingly looking to Trump.

At a CNN town hall Wednesday night featuring Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders, both repeatedly called for the president’s involvement when asked why negotiations had stalled.

“President Trump is not talking. That is the problem,” Sanders said.

Ocasio-Cortez added that Trump should more regularly “be having congressional leaders in the White House.”

Democrats’ focus on Trump reflects both his leadership style — which allows little to happen in Congress without his approval — and the reality that any funding bill needs the president’s signature to become law.

This time, however, Republican leaders who control the House and Senate are resisting any push for Trump to intervene.

“You can’t negotiate when somebody’s got a hostage,” said South Dakota Sen. Mike Rounds, who added that Trump getting involved would allow Democrats to try the same tactic in future legislative fights.

Trump has largely followed that guidance. After previously saying he would be open to negotiating with Democrats on health insurance subsidies, he walked it back after Republican leaders suggested he misspoke.

And that’s unlikely to change for now. Trump has no plans to personally intervene to broker a deal with Democrats, according to a senior White House official granted anonymity to discuss private conversations. The official added that the only stopgap funding bill that Democrats can expect is the one already on the table.

“The President is happy to have a conversation about health care policy, but he will not do so while the Democrats are holding the American people hostage,” White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said Thursday.

A product of the Congress Trump has molded

In his second term, Trump has taken a top-down approach, leaving little in Congress to move without his approval.

“What’s obvious to me is that Mike Johnson and John Thune don’t do much without Donald Trump telling them what to do,” said Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona.

His hold is particularly strong in the GOP-led House, where Speaker Mike Johnson effectivelyowes his job to Trump, and relies on his influence to power through difficult legislative fights.

When Republicans have withheld votes on Trump’s priorities in Congress, he’s called them on the phone or summoned them to his office to directly sway them. When that doesn’t work, he has vowed to unseat them in the next election. It’s led many Democrats to believe the only path to an agreement runs through the White House and not through the speaker’s office.

Democrats also want assurances from the White House that they won’t backtrack on an agreement. The White House earlier this year cut out the legislative branch entirely with a $4.9 billion cut to foreign aid in August through a legally dubious process known as a “pocket rescission.” And before he even took office late last year, Trump and ally Elon Musk blew up a bipartisan funding agreement that both parties had negotiated.

“I think we need to see ink on paper. I think we need to see legislation. I think we need to see votes,” said Ocasio-Cortez. “I don’t accept pinky promises. That’s not the business that I’m in.”

Both parties also see little reason to fold under public pressure, believing they are winning the messaging battle.

“Everybody thinks they’re winning,” Murkowski said. “Nobody is winning when everybody’s losing. And that’s what’s happening right now. The American public is losing.”

Cappelletti and Kim write for the Associated Press. AP writer Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.

A Colorado company displayed at the Air & Space Force Association’s annual conference this week a model of a new very heavy lift cargo jet it is designing. Though still in its aspirational phase, Radia’s WindRunner concept comes at a time when the future of heavy lift cargo capabilities is in question, including within the U.S. military as it looks to eventually replace its fleet of aging C-5M Galaxy and C-17A Globemaster III transports. Globally, the ability to move very large, outsized loads over long distances by air also has something of an expiration date, without any clear replacement for existing aircraft waiting in the wings. So, while by all accounts Radia’s dream may be a big long shot, it’s certainly worth examining.

The four-engined WindRunner, far bigger in size than either of the two U.S. Air Force airlifters, was originally designed to carry 300-foot-long wind turbine blades. In other words, it originated with the goal of offering a transport solution to commercial customers. However, Radia claims that when it’s built, it could be an attractive airframe for moving tanks, helicopters, collaborative combat aircraft (CCAs) and other large war materiel to austere locations, as well as rocket boosters and other outsized loads.

“As interest grew and development progressed, WindRunner’s unprecedented volume similarly appealed to the defense, aerospace and commercial cargo sectors,” company spokesperson Grace O’Connor told The War Zone.

The C-17A, which first entered service in 1995, has a maximum payload capacity of some 82 tons, according to the official Air Force fact sheet.

The much larger C-5, which has been around since the 1970s, and is now in its enhanced C-5M configuration, can carry up to 140 tons. What’s arguably more important than just the raw weight it can lift, the C-5 can carry far larger items than the C-17.

Capable of being refueled in flight to extend their range, neither this aircraft nor the C-17 is currently in production.

By comparison, Radia states that the 356-foot-long WindRunner, first conceived of in 2016, will be able to deliver 72.6 tons of cargo. However, payload weight only tells a small part of the story, the company suggests.

“Current defense cargo aircraft run out of room before they run out of lift capability,” O’Connor posited. “In other words, military operations cube out on missions before they gross out, making volume the limiting factor. The massive dimensions of today’s military aircraft, modern satellites, missile systems, and mobile hospitals make it challenging to transport mission-ready.“

Instead, many weapons systems have to be disassembled to fit aboard a Galaxy or Globemaster.

Radia claims that WindRunner, with some 270,000 cubic feet of cargo space, delivers seven times the volume of a C-5 and 12 times the volume of a C-17. Among other cargo, Radia says WindRunner can carry six ready-to-fly Chinook C-47 helicopters. The placement of the cockpit in a bulge above the cargo hold offers more vertical space to roll items into its very long hold.

The WindRunner is also claimed to be able to take off and land on 6,000 feet of runway, which is pretty short for such a large plane. One limiting factor, however, may be range. While the C-17 can fly about 2,400 miles with a heavy load without refueling and the C-5 can fly over double that distance with cargo packed in its belly. The WindRunner has a loaded range of just 1,200 miles, according to Radia. So, aerial refueling capability would be a prerequisite for U.S. military service. Still, this may be a worthwhile trade for the ability to easily move very large cargoes while keeping the cheapest aircraft acquisition price possible and tankers already service the C-5M and C-17A fleets heavily for long-distance missions. It may also be possible to extend the giant aircraft’s 261-foot wingspan to increase its range, among other concepts commonly employed to increase an aircraft’s range, such as auxiliary fuel tanks. Radia told us aerial refueling capability would be added for military contracts, but not for the initial tranche of commercial jets

As a scale-model mockup of the WaveRunner was on display on the conference showroom located at the sprawling Gaylord Conference Center at National Harbor, a top Air Force general was in a small meeting room two stories above, talking about the future of the service’s heavy lift.

The U.S. Air Force is still in the early stages of figuring out what it needs for a Next Generation Airlift (NGAL) platform that will replace the C-5s and C-17s. However, the flying branch said it will emphasize greater speed and operational flexibility, as well as the ability to better defend against growing threats when on the ground and in the air.

The commander of AMC, Air Force Gen. John Lamontagne, told reporters, including from The War Zone, that the service currently seeks one aircraft to replace both the Galaxy and Globemaster. Given various budgetary and functional considerations, it is unlikely that a future NGAL would have the same cargo capacity as the Galaxy. You can read more about the tough choices the Air Force faces over its NGAL program in our story here.

Among the NGAL options is an aircraft with a blended wing body, or BWB, configuration. The design could provide increased lifting abilities with large amounts of internal volume, among other advantages. In 2023, the Air Force selected aviation startup JetZero to design and build a full-size demonstrator.

There likely won’t be a replacement aircraft that can match the size of the Galaxy, meaning the Air Force will have to look externally to move its largest cargo. However, there are limited options right now. There are a small number of commercially chartable An-124 Condors, which have roughly similar roll-on, roll-off heavy lift capabilities as the C-5, available today. The existing Soviet-designed Condors won’t last forever. It’s possible that Ukraine could put the Condor back into production in modernized form, but this would be a very large undertaking and it won’t solve the U.S. military’s issue of losing its organic ability to move outsized loads if the single aircraft that will replace the C-17 and C-5 won’t be capable of meeting the latter’s ability to swallow massive cargoes, which seem very unlikely.

It’s worth noting that the world’s largest operational cargo hauling aircraft at the time, the An-225 Mriya, which is an outgrowth of the An-124, was destroyed by Russia at the beginning of its all-out invasion of Ukraine. It served for decades as the heaviest-lifting charter aircraft available, supporting everything from wars to disaster relief operations to moving rail cars and aircraft.

With all this in mind, Radia’s giant cargo hauler could offer the U.S. military a new option to move big loads, if it actually becomes a real aircraft. While this may be more of a niche capability, even if it was offered just on a contracting basis, it would likely be an attractive option for some missions. A militarized version of this aircraft is a far bigger reach, but a small fleet could help fill the gap left by a ‘compromise’ C-5 and C-17 replacement design. The Pentagon has certainly been intrigued with far more exotic heavy lift concepts than this.

Radia claims it is shooting for the first flight of its WindRunner by 2030.

“Radia has raised over $150 million to date and is in discussions to raise additional billions through government support, commercial partnerships, and private capital to complete WindRunner development and production,” O’Connor said when asked how much it will cost to turn the clean sheet design into reality. “Radia has completed concept development and wind tunnel testing and is now preparing for system integration and manufacturing. WindRunner uses largely proven, off-the-shelf systems that are currently certified and flying today. We’ve focused on digital design and analysis, and we are now progressing toward building the full-scale aircraft for certification.”

Radia “has received Letters of Intent (LOIs) from major global customers across wind energy, defense, aerospace, and cargo sectors,” O’Connor added. However, an LOI is not a contract for delivery.

At this point, it is not publicly known where Radia intends to build these jets, if it actually gets the opportunity to do so.

“We are getting closer to publicly announcing our final assembly line location and production capacity,” O’Connor explained.

Radia may not ultimately produce any jets that wear USAF insignias — or any jet at all. However, there appears to be a heavy airlift gap that may form in the coming decades and it may take a mixture of assets, commercial and military, to fill it.

Contact the author: [email protected]

Some of the relationship journeys are never shown

A Love Is Blind UK couple have shared their “epic” love story that was not shown on TV, and how it very nearly all fell apart.

Love Is Blind UK has returned for a second season, with five newly engaged couples navigating their lives together after an extensive dating period on their pods. The latest batch of episodes (August 20) have seen the couples move on to the next phase of their journey.

But of course, not every love story has been shown on screens. Stars Amy and James found their way to one another, despite not being seen on screens.

Primary school teacher Amy, from Wales had been single for two years after her last relationship broke down when she suggested they started a family. Despite living in Dubai for the last few years, now back on home soil, she was ready to find her life partner.

Similarly, real estate manager James had been married before and has two daughters. The 33-year-old used to divide his time between the UK and Thailand where his mum is from.

According to Netflix’s Tudum, Amy initially said yes to another proposal but a twist of fate soon found her back to James. She said: “I’m a big believer in the universe, everything unfolds exactly how it’s meant to unfold.”

It has been revealed that during their dating period, Amy and James had actually found a lot in common, including the fact she recently returned from a trip to Thailand, where James had been living.

However, despite getting on in the pods, they were also forming other relationships. Amy admitted: “That day we missed was key because by day three, I had a strong bond with somebody else.”

Amy had started to build a connection with Ross M, whilst James was dating both Holly and Laurie. However, James admitted they were both “playing it safe” as he told Tudum: “In hindsight, I should’ve laid it on a bit thicker with Amy, but I didn’t want to propose and then have her say no.”

When it came to making a decision, Amy was left “crying”, unable to decide, until she said yes when Ross M had proposed. However, it was James who could not bring himself to propose to another woman.

After their first night out together, Amy and Ross soon called their relationship off, but a few days later she found herself chatting to James on Instagram. At the time, she was in Spain, and so James drove six hours to the airport to pick her up upon her UK return.

He added: “It was pretty epic.” They made their relationship official around two weeks later before James declared his love, and they have gone from strength to strength since, even meeting James’ children.

The two have now spent the last three months living together in Malta. Amy added: “Love Is Blind sets a foundation where you have to be vulnerable and emotional because there’s nothing else you can offer.

“Communication has been a strong point in our relationship, and I think that has genuinely come from starting in the pods.”

Love Is Blind UK season 2 is streaming on Netflix

LOVE Island fans are convinced the Casa Amor boys told Meg about Dejon’s behaviour in unaired scenes.

Despite a couple of wobbles following the arrival of bombshells Malisha and Billykiss, Meg believed Dejon was loyal to her.

4

4

However, seeds doubting his intentions seemed to have been sown in Meg’s mind during a villa game shortly before Casa Amor when Billykiss brought up Dejon’s unwillingness to close things off with her.

Though Meg initially said there was no need to for them to do that and the other girls were just jealous, days later she was reduced to tears thinking about Dejon’s behaviour.

The dramatic emotional switch appeared to come out of the blue as she poured her heart out to Helena.

Now viewers think the new boys have told her how Dejon has really been acting, having seen some of the show before taking part themselves.

One person wrote in a fan forum: “It was a bit odd that it took casa for Meg to finally wake up and realize that Dejon has been playing with her since day 1? Like a lot of the girls warned her. I genuinely believe that the producers or the casa boys let her in on some info. And also, if Helena knew why didn’t she tell her? Lol.”

Another said: “The casa boys definitely got into her head. Ty was telling her that Dejon never tells her the full story or something like that and I’ll bet others have said things.”

A third wrote: “Probably some of the Casa boys said stuff to her about what’s been shown and people’s opinions of him on the outside.”

A fourth said: “I think she’s been told some stuff but she won’t stick to her opinion.”

Meg chose to couple up with Dejon at the very start of the series and they’ve been together ever since.

Though very flirtatious, he has remained loyal to “his Meg,” claiming the “tests” have only made them stronger as a couple.

Though some viewers feel Dejon’s game plan is to stick with Meg so he can coast to the £50k prize.

And Meg is also now doubting his intentions, telling Helena: “I just feel really upset today. I don’t know why.

“I was just talking about things with Em, and I don’t know, we just, like, certain things with me and D, like, it actually makes me realise he really doesn’t mean what he says sometimes.”

In Casa Amor, Dejon admitted he had a spark with new girl Andrada, telling her: “And I feel like the more time we spend with each other, the better things are getting.”

His eyes also lit up after Andrada made a steamy confession.

Clearly determined to turn his head for good, the newcomer opened up about her high sex drive. 

When Dejon asked about her type, Andrada said: “I have to want them three times a day… I have to.” 

Looking impressed, Dejon asked: “So you have a high sex drive?”

She said: “I do… It’s really bad.”

But Dejon remarked: “That’s not bad.”

However, he later backtracked by declining to share a bed with her out of “respect” for Meg.

Will they pick up where they left off in tonight’s recoupling?

Love Island continues tonight at 9pm on ITV2.

4

4

North Korea President Kim Jong Un was shown honouring coffins of soldiers killed while fighting for Russia in Ukraine. The footage released Tuesday aired during a performance marking the one-year anniversary of a military pact signed by the two countries.

SACRAMENTO — The big question in California politics is, “Will Kamala Harris run for governor?” But that’s the wrong question. Far more important is, “Should she?”

And that’s not a question to be answered based strictly on her prospects for winning.

Initially, at least, the former vice president would be the heavy favorite to succeed termed-out Gov. Gavin Newsom — although, eventually, she could find herself in a tough election fight next year.

Rather, the answer should be determined based on what strengths, goals and ideas she would bring to the table — her specific plans for fixing California’s enormous problems, her eagerness to fight even political allies to achieve her objectives and her own desire to lead the state’s comeback.

She shouldn’t view the job as a consolation prize after losing the presidential election to Donald Trump. Voters would smell that and, anyway, Harris would be miserably bored in the state Capitol dealing with budget minutiae and relatively inexperienced legislative leaders.

So far, since returning from Washington to her native state, Harris, 60, has displayed none of the above criteria that California needs in its next governor.

But neither did she previously in any noteworthy way as a U.S. senator or — particularly — state attorney general. As attorney general, Harris refused to take positions on important ballot measures, including those dealing with her role as California’s so-called top cop — propositions to stiffen criminal sentences and both abolish and expedite the death penalty.

Harris has a record of being overly cautious about taking positions that could alienate interests she deems important to her political career.

Sure, Harris isn’t running for anything right now. So, she deserves a pass on issuing 10-point plans to patch up the state.

But, look, you don’t need to be a gubernatorial candidate to express concerns about your state. Any resident who’s conscious should be alarmed.

“Home prices have skyrocketed as supply slumped over the past three decades,” the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California noted in a report last week.

California’s median home price in March was $884,000 — very tough if not impossible for many middle-class families. The housing shortage is largely due to over-regulation, tangled red tape that slows issuance of building permits and abuse of California’s environmental protection laws.

There’s a strong move in the Legislature to ease regulations, but it’s highly controversial. Does Harris have a thought on this?

Homeowner insurance rates are rising fast in the aftermath of wildfires. And in many fire-prone regions, traditional policies are impossible to obtain. The next governor needs to fix this.

California’s poverty rate is the nation’s highest when the cost of living is considered, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Despite our spending many billions of dollars and regardless of ugly finger-pointing at each other by Newsom and local officials, 187,000 Californians are homeless — a 35% increase in 17 years. That’s the highest in the nation — only partly because we’ve got the largest population.

Gasoline prices are roughly $1.60 a gallon higher in California than the U.S. average. And two oil refineries are planning to shut down, invariably hiking pump prices even higher.

We’re a high-tax state, a fact Newsom is in denial about. We lean too heavily on the wealthy for tax revenue and that produces roller-coaster budget deficits and surpluses depending on the stock market. It’s ridiculous. State taxes should be modernized. But no politician has the guts to attempt that.

Then there’s California’s historic problem of not enough water for its thirst.

Does Harris have anything to say about any of this? She hasn’t so far.

Of course, the seven leading announced Democratic candidates have been practically mute themselves on matters that risk aggravating party interest groups.

One exception is former Los Angeles Mayor and state Assembly Speaker Antonio Villaraigosa, who has been bolder than most of his rivals.

Harris has said she’ll decide by the end of summer whether to run for governor in 2026. Maybe she’ll seek the presidency again in 2028 or retire from politics and make a bundle in the private sector.

But Villaraigosa already is taking shots at her — including last week for allegedly helping to cover up former President Biden’s cognitive decline while in the Oval Office. Villaraigosa included in the attack another gubernatorial candidate: former U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra.

Harris is a lot more vulnerable than Becerra on the issue.

But it’s a cheap shot. How many people would publicly accuse their boss of being mentally incompetent? And Harris would have instantly been blasted for being self-serving by plotting to push the president aside so she could grab the Democratic nomination.

Harris could help herself and California’s voters, however, by occasionally voicing some anxiety about her home state.

The little we’ve heard from her this year are attacks on Trump. She also has been lending her name to anti-Trump fundraising appeals by the Democratic National Committee.

But the last thing California Democrats need is another politician — especially a potential governor — telling them that Trump is an evil, ignorant con artist. They’re fully aware of that. They need someone who can tell them how their state can be fixed.

If she ran, Harris would be the initial favorite because of her broad name recognition, past election successes in California and fundraising ability. Some current candidates would probably drop out.

But there doesn’t seem to be a public clamoring for her to run.

Harris needs to start showing people why she should even consider seeking the job. Because, so far, she’s sounding more like a 2028 presidential retread.

What else you should be reading

The must-read: Villaraigosa blasts Harris and Becerra for not speaking out about Biden’s decline
The TK: Trump’s housing cuts could push thousands onto SF streets
The L.A. Times Special: Antonio Villaraigosa is dying to run against Kamala Harris for governor. Here’s why

Until next week,
George Skelton

—
Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here to get it in your inbox.

Former captains Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma have shown a “blueprint” for India’s future Test success, says new skipper Shubman Gill.

Batter Gill, 25, was announced as Rohit’s replacement on Saturday after the 38-year-old and modern great Kohli both retired from the format.

Kohli led India to a record 40 wins in 68 Tests while Rohit, who replaced him in 2022, has the next best win percentage as skipper.

“I have always been inspired by the greats and legends of Indian cricket,” Gill said.

“I have been very fortunate to play with so many of them.

“Both were contrasting in terms of their style but inspiring to see them work towards a common goal.”

Gill was appointed skipper ahead of bowler Jasprit Bumrah, who had served as Rohit’s vice-captain.

His first series in charge will be the highly-anticipated five-Test series in England which starts on 20 June.

“I’m looking forward for this exciting opportunity, and I think the upcoming series in England is going to be a very exciting one,” said Gill, who is captain of Gujarat Titans in the Indian Premier League.

“I believe in leading by example, not just by my performance but, off the field, by my discipline and hard work.

“As a captain, a leader should be able to know when to step in, but also when to give space to the players.

“Because everyone has had a different life and grown up differently, everyone has a different personality.”

India were unbeaten in home series throughout Kohli’s time as captain and had significant success away, including series wins in Australia and a 2-2 draw in England.

Under Rohit they reached the final of the 2023 World Test Championship, although they were beaten by Australia and their unbeaten run at home was ended by New Zealand last year.

“Virat was very aggressive and wanting to lead from the front,” Gill said.

“Rohit was also aggressive but you might not see that on his expression.

“He was someone calm and tactically very present. He was very communicative to the players.

“Rohit, Virat and Ashwin [retired off-spinner Ravichandran Ashwin] have given us a blueprint on how to tour away from home and win matches and series.”

The Chargers’ season opener in Sao Paulo, Brazil, will be the NFL’s first game streamed exclusively on YouTube, the league announced Tuesday, further expanding the NFL’s streaming footprint to include the ubiquitous free video platform.

Despite now having a home team and TV partner for the matchup, the Chargers’ opponent was the only piece of the NFL’s seven-game international slate that was not announced Tuesday. Front Office Sports reported the Chargers will face AFC West rival Kansas City on Sept. 5 at Arena Corinthians. The Chiefs have won seven consecutive games against the Chargers while becoming one of the league’s most popular TV draws.

Kansas City star quarterback Patrick Mahomes and tight end Travis Kelce were at the center of the NFL’s expanded streaming influence last year as the Chiefs played in the league’s Christmas Day takeover of Netflix. The doubleheader that also featured Houston playing Baltimore drew an average of 26.5 million viewers, which made them the most-streamed NFL games in U.S. history. But the ratings lagged slightly behind recent linear broadcasts. In 2023, the NFL boasted its most-watched Christmas Day game since 1989 with the Chiefs and Las Vegas Raiders drawing 29.2 million viewers on CBS.

Last season, the Chargers faced the Arizona Cardinals in a “Monday Night Football” game that was the first ESPN+ exclusive to not be included in the international series.

Played as the second game of a staggered doubleheader that featured a matchup between the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Baltimore Ravens, the Chargers’ loss to the Cardinals attracted less than 2 million viewers, according to NBC’s Pro Football Talk, which made it the least-watched NFL game since 2008.

Putting a star-studded division matchup at a neutral site on Friday of Week 1 would remove a marquee game from the Chargers’ SoFi Stadium slate. While local fans would miss the highly anticipated rivalry game, the Chargers will still host the Super Bowl champion Philadelphia Eagles and NFC rookie of the year Jayden Daniels, the San Bernardino native who led the Washington Commanders to their first NFC championship game appearance since 1991 last season.

The home schedule also features AFC West counterparts Las Vegas and Denver, Houston, Indianapolis, Pittsburgh and Minnesota. On the road, the Chargers will play their three AFC West rivals, Jacksonville, Tennessee, Dallas, the New York Giants and Miami.

The remainder of the schedule will be released Wednesday at 5 p.m. PDT.