Magazine

Banks At The Crossroads | Global Finance Magazine

Strengthened by recent profits, global banks enter a new phase defined by falling rates, political volatility, and the disruptive promise of AI.

Banks’ most basic job is to be a safe haven in a turbulent world. That turbulence is increasing.

Even so, the industry enters this uncertain period from a position of relative strength, buoyed by recent profits and a growing belief that artificial intelligence could unlock the next wave of efficiency and growth. Yet, this strong foundation now faces significant headwinds.

In recent years, rising interest rates have delivered wider margins and fatter profits for banks across much of the world. Now, however, rates are falling again. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump is upending trade relations in the world’s largest economy, spreading uncertainty that could constrain credit appetite everywhere. In addition, China, the world’s second-largest economy, is stuck in a cycle of overproduction and underconsumption that its leaders appear unable to address.

Compounding these external challenges, nonbank lenders continue to seize market share—from corporate buyouts to family mortgages. Meanwhile, nonbank payment systems—ranging from stablecoins to sovereign digital currencies—provide alternatives to traditional interbank networks.

“We are living in a multi-shock world,” says Sean Viergutz, banking and capital markets advisory leader at consultant PwC.

Alexandra Mousavizadeh, co-founder of Evident

Beyond these outside disruptions, the biggest shock of all is coming from within: AI. Bank managers are now rushing to apply Silicon Valley’s new magic to their back offices and, to some extent, client relations, showing an intensity that overshadows external concerns.

“AI is top of mind in almost every meeting out there,” says Amit Vora, Head of Sales – Regional Banks and Asset Managers, Crisil Intergal IQ, a division of Crisil (majority owned by S&P Global). “It’s part of the banking vocabulary more than risk and credit today.”

Rewards in the AI race are still some way off, cautions Alexandra Mousavizadeh, co-founder of Evident, a London-based consultant that tracks AI adoption in financial services. Revolutionary “agentic AI” systems are expected to come online only in 2028, though the tools are still evolving. Nevertheless, banks have little choice but to push forward, drawn by AI’s potential to cut costs and sharpen competitiveness. This transformative impact is driving major organizational changes.

“Once this hits the bottom line, the gap between leaders and laggards will become very clear,” Mousavizadeh forecasts.

Profits Up, Rates And Regs Down

Luckily, the last few years have left the industry with solid buffers against multiple shocks. Revenue at the 25 largest global banks jumped 9% in 2024. The biggest banks in the US and Europe—JPMorgan Chase and HSBC, respectively—both raked in record profits. And Europe has seen a banking renaissance since post-pandemic inflation forced the European Central Bank to raise rates after a decade of near-zero rates.

“We’ve been busy upgrading banks for years,” says Giles Edwards, sector lead for European financial institutions at S&P Global Ratings. “Things look OK from a fundamental credit perspective.”

The ECB has slashed its key rate in half to 2% since mid-2024. Banks can live with that, says Johann Scholtz, European bank analyst at Morningstar.

“There will be some pressure on net interest income, but I don’t think margins will collapse,” he predicts. The US Federal Reserve has cut rates by 125 basis points to 4.25% since August 2024. More rate cuts are expected this year.

Japan, the fourth-largest economy, is going the other way. The Bank of Japan shifted from negative rates to 0.5%. The economy returned to growth in 2024 after a recession. Markets expect the benchmark rate to reach 1% in 2026.

All of which is good news for banks, at least the big ones based in Tokyo, says Nana Otsuki, a senior fellow at Pictet Asset Management. “Broadly speaking, the banks are in good shape,” she says.

The global regulatory storm unleashed after the 2008 financial crisis is finally ebbing, if not reversing. European authorities are talking up “simplification” of oversight across industries. And the Trump administration is philosophically committed to deregulation, although specifics are rolling out more slowly than the industry might like.


“This could be the biggest period in regulatory change since the global financial crisis, but we need the fine print,”

Brendan Browne, Edwards’ counterpart for US banks at S&P Global


Writ large, governments have stopped being a major headwind—or headache—for bankers, for the moment. “There’s a certain optimism that we have turned the corner,” Vora says. “Banks can look away from regulatory concerns to internal projects that improve profitability.”

Growth Shaky But AI May Help

What’s not looking great for banks is the outlook for growth. On the positive side, the global economy is so far holding up better than expected in the face of Trump’s tariff onslaught.

“All signs point to a world economy that has generally withstood acute strains from multiple shocks,” Kristalina Georgieva, managing director of the International Monetary Fund, said at the IMF’s annual meeting in October. But bank lending is concentrated in big corporations, which are more exposed to trade disruptions. In emerging markets, consumer credit is less developed and now faces competition from online neobanks.

“We are having a lot of conversations about finding better methods to deal with macroeconomic stress,” Vora says.

European financiers see “no real source of growth,” adds Morningstar’s Scholtz.

The US picture is more dynamic. Commercial bank credit climbed 5% from January to October, the Fed reports. But much, if not most, of that increase came from lending to private credit funds, whose opaque operations could pose as much risk as reward.

The dangers appeared in the recent bankruptcy of Texas-based auto parts maker First Brands. The company used billions in off-balance-sheet financing from private credit firms like BlackRock and Jefferies. This could signal more trouble ahead. Non-bank financial institutions(NBFIs) now make up about 10% of US banks’ loan books, notes S&P’s Browne.

“When something is growing that quickly, it’s going to raise some red flags, [with] questions about whether the banks understand it well enough,” he cautions.

The IMF added its own warning recently. “Banks’ growing exposures to NBFIs mean that adverse developments at these institutions could significantly affect banks’ capital ratios,” the multilateral watchdog found.

Even in China, the world’s most prodigious credit machine is sputtering, says Logan Wright, partner and head of China markets research at the Rhodium Group. State-owned banks there have long been obliged to support politically connected enterprises and roll over any loans that look shaky.

“China’s banks have been asked to weather the cost of quasi-fiscal lending for years,” Wright says. But Beijing’s anti-involution campaign, aimed at curbing industrial overproduction, has tapped the brakes on this process without exactly enforcing financial discipline. The result is a walking-wounded banking system, in sharp contrast to the burgeoning tech sector that has rekindled equity investors’ interest in China, Wright notes. Credit growth has hit historic lows. Banking profits fell last year and will likely fall again in 2025.

Systemic reform would put too many jobs at “zombie” companies at risk and dry up tax revenue for local governments. So, bankers limp on.


“Nothing in the short term looks threatening, but nothing in the long term looks sustainable”

Logan Wright, Rhodium Group


With revenue growth muted, bankers around the world have naturally turned to cost-cutting as the path to increased profit. Here, generative AI appears as a timely blessing.

With top-line expansion anemic, bankers around the world have naturally turned to cost-cutting as the path to increased profit. For that purpose, generative AI looks like a timely blessing. It’s not hard to see, in theory, how ChatGPT and its competitors could revolutionize a data-driven industry like finance, replacing expensive armies of human data analysts and manipulators, or, as consultants prefer to say, making their jobs more productive.

Evident’s Mousavizadeh cites one example: know-your-customer verifications for high-rolling clients, which “could take minutes or hours, not four months.” Other pipes in banks’ complex plumbing could likewise be massively automated, adds Vora, who rattles off “extracting data from loan agreements, analytical write-ups, credit memos, research notes.”

The revolution will not be quick or easy, however. “There’s a perception that AI is here and you can just plug it in,” Mousavizadeh says. “Nothing could be farther from the truth.”

Integrating AI into banking should not cost the massive investments envisioned by the hyperscalers battling to provide the underlying technology, says PwC’s Viergutz. But it will require “re-engineering business models front to back,” he says, rethinking essential processes that span geographies and layers of management.

The revolution will likely not be bloodless, either, as the banks that get AI right—and first—will eat their competitors’ lunch. With some exceptions, large banks with robust IT capabilities and the resources to attract AI talent stand to benefit the most, as effective AI use becomes a differentiator in profitability and growth.

Advantage should particularly accrue to large US banks, Mousavizadeh predicts. They have deeper pockets than their peers in Europe and elsewhere and can more easily poach the necessary brains from Silicon Valley.

“Rewiring requires specialized expertise, which is logical to pull in from tech companies,” she notes.

This year’s other front-page tech trend, digital assets, has so far had more limited relevance for banks. The category has rapidly gained legitimacy, particularly in the US, through Congress’s passage of the GENIUS Act, stablecoin issuer Circle’s $1 billion-plus OPI, and the president’s own $Trump meme coin. Demand for stablecoins and other digital instruments remains concentrated well beyond US shores, particularly in emerging markets, where people have historically used US cash in place of unstable domestic currencies and/or underdeveloped payment networks.

India, Nigeria, and Indonesia were the global Big Three for crypto transactions last year, according to researcher Chainalysis. “The extent of demand for stablecoins remains unclear in the US or Europe,” S&P’s Edwards says.

However, established banks are keenly interested in the blockchain technology that underpins digital assets, notes Biswarup Chatterjee, head of partnerships and innovation at Citigroup. Citi is seeing “very good adoption” of tokenized deposits, he notes, particularly from multinational corporations looking to link accounts around the world more seamlessly.

“Potentially no more having to send funds from New York on Friday evening to get them in time for use in Singapore on Monday morning,” he explains. “They can move money when and as they need it.” 

Pioneered along with Bitcoin in 2009, blockchain networks are “converging around a few well-known protocols,” Chatterjee notes. “You’re almost able to see standard programming languages.”

Stage Set For Consolidation?

With no rising tide of growth to lift all boats, and ongoing technical shocks shaking some of the weaker craft, banking consolidation is expected to accelerate. In the US, home to more than 4,400 licensed banks, market pressures are getting an extra push from Washington, which has signaled more lenient antitrust regulation.

Fifth Third Bancorp, based in Cincinnati, fired what could be the opening gun last month, acquiring Texas-based Comerica in a transaction worth $11 billion to form the ninth-biggest US bank. More such deals could follow.

“The favorable regulatory landscape should drive consolidation,” Viergutz argues. “You could see one or two more deals of this scale.”

Japanese banks are showing an urge to merge for different reasons. Positive interest rates, after decades of deflation, are awakening ambitions to grab more customers and make more loans.


“In a world of interest rates, banks are eager to secure deposits to earn higher margins,”

Eiji Tanaguchi, senior economist at Japan Research Institute


An archipelago of 200 banks, many linked to shrinking rural communities, is under pressure as Tokyo increasingly dominates the national economy, Pictet’s Otsuki notes. “On a 10-year trend, Tokyo is absorbing almost all the new money,” she says. “Part of this is inheritance as the younger generation moves to the capital.”

Two deals this year—Gunma Bank merging with Daishi Hokuetsu Financial and Chiba Bank with Chiba Kogyo Bank—have already reshaped the regional banking landscape, although authorities seem less enthusiastic than across the Pacific.

“Support for consolidation is implicit, but not explicit,” Otsuki says.

Banking consolidation in Europe, by contrast, has stalled out.

Italy’s Unicredit tried to catalyze a long-anticipated wave of cross-border mergers last year with a raid on Germany’s Commerzbank, but a cold shoulder from Berlin prompted it to stop at a 26% shareholding. Unicredit CEO Andrea Orcel now says he hopes his target will “see the light over time.”

Other European governments are of a like mind with Germany’s lead, preferring insured deposits to stay in the hands of familiar national champions, Morningstar’s Scholtz says. “It’s really the same old story,” he says. “Governments have not been helpful.”

At the risk of a contradiction in terms, then, late 2025 is an exciting time to be a banker: so long as you are not a banker whose job is threatened by a bot or maybe running a private credit book. After years of adapting to stricter regulations and enduring near-zero interest rates, the industry has more of its destiny in its own hands and a firm balance sheet to pursue it.

“This period brings new opportunities for the sector,” Viergutz says. “Banks are becoming investible again. Profitability can go way up. I think it’s a win.”

For some, it probably does, and for others, much remains unclear.

Source link

‘Empire of the Elite’ chronicles Conde Nast’s rise and fading power

On the Shelf

Empire of the Elite: The Media Dynasty That Reshaped America

By Michael M. Grynbaum
Simon & Schuster: 345 pages, $30
If you buy books linked on our site, The Times may earn a commission from Bookshop.org, whose fees support independent bookstores.

When Vogue tastemaker Anna Wintour announced late last month that she would be stepping down as editor in chief after 37 years, the news sent shock waves through the media business and fashion world.

Wintour, who will remain chief content officer for Condé Nast and global editorial director for Vogue, is a grand symbol of a magazine empire that includes Wired and Vanity Fair: a demanding, glamorous longtime chair of the Met Gala who has set fashion trends and made world-famous designers, some of whom she helped create, bow and tremble. She covers news, she creates news, she is news. Predictably enough, word of her changing status ignited frenzied speculation about who might take on the newly created role of U.S. head of editorial content for Vogue and eventually succeed her.

Condé Nast, which publishes enough other glossy magazines to fill a newsstand (if any still exist), remains very much alive, and it’s the subject of Michael M. Grynbaum’s new book “Empire of the Elite: Inside Condé Nast, the Media Dynasty That Reshaped America.” But as Grynbaum makes clear in his book, the Condé sway isn’t quite what it used to be. The company’s most powerful editors, including Graydon Carter (Vanity Fair) and Tina Brown (Vanity Fair and then the New Yorker), have stepped aside. More importantly, the rise of TikTok, Instagram and the like have created a world where almost anyone with an opportunist’s instinct can be an influencer.

"Empire of the Elite: The Media Dynasty That Reshaped America" by Michael M. Grynbaum

“The means of glamour production were brought to the masses,” Grynbaum tells The Times in an interview taking place after Wintour’s announcement. “If you look at TikTok and Instagram, a lot of people are re-creating the status fantasies that Condé Nast was notorious for: the real estate tours of somebody’s mansion that are right out of Architectural Digest, or the fit check and outfit of the day that ascended from GQ, Vogue and Glamour.”

The man most responsible for the Condé Nast that readers know today was Samuel Irving “S.I.” Newhouse Jr., better known as Si. The son of a first-generation American who built a massively successful newspaper chain and purchased Condé Nast in 1959, Si took the family’s rather sleepy and traditional magazine business and injected a shot of sex, celebrity and pizzazz. The Newhouses were for many years seen as arrivistes and interlopers, a perception tinged with antisemitism; New Yorker institution A.J. Liebling, himself Jewish, labeled the elder Newhouse a “journalist chiffonier” — a rag picker.

When Si took over as chairman of Condé Nast in 1975 — and then bought the New Yorker in 1985 — he set about to become a sort of outsider’s insider, obsessed with status and the good life and determined to shape a collection of magazines that represented aspirational living. And he insisted that his most valuable employees walk the walk. To work at the company at its peak was to live extravagantly by a journalist’s standards.

Grynbaum, who writes about media, politics and culture for the New York Times and grew up reading Condé Nast magazines, was struck hard by that extravagance. “I was writing about magazine editors who had 24-hour town car service, limousines that would drive them around to their appointments, wait outside at the sidewalk while they ate a giant lunch at the Four Seasons restaurant, and it all got expensed back to Condé Nast,” he says. “Empire of the Elite” is laden with comical examples of privilege. One of my favorites: the Vogue editor who “charged her assistant with the less than exalted task of removing the blueberries from her morning muffin; the editor preferred the essence of blueberries, she explained, but not the berries themselves.”

Author Michael M. Grynbaum, who grew up reading Condé Nast magazines, writes about media for the New York Times.

Author Michael M. Grynbaum, who writes about media for the New York Times, was struck by extravagant expense account spending at Condé Nast.

(Gary He)

The Condé Nast glory era really kicked off in the 1980s, as conspicuous consumption swept through the land. “The idealism of the 1960s was yielding to the materialism of the 1980s, a new preoccupation with the navel-gazing, ego-stroking life,” Grynbaum writes. But much of Newhouse’s approach now seems like standard operating procedure. When he bought the New Yorker, a set-in-its-ways magazine with a limited readership and articles that could take up half an issue, it had largely turned up its nose at the idea of soliciting new subscribers. He tapped Tina Brown, a brash Brit then serving as Vanity Fair editor, to run the magazine in 1992. This set off culture clashes that resonated throughout the industry — and yielded some piquant anecdotes.

For example: Some at the magazine were aghast when Brown assigned Jeffrey Toobin to cover the O.J. Simpson murder trial, a subject they saw as beneath the magazine’s standards. Critic George W.S. Trow actually resigned, accusing Brown of kissing “the ass of celebrity culture.” Brown responded that she was distraught, “but since you never actually write anything, I should say I am notionally distraught.”

Newhouse, who died in 2017, made FOMO fun. It should be noted that he also helped create Donald Trump. GQ featured him on its cover when he was, as Grynbaum writes, “a provincial curiosity”; of more consequence, Newhouse, as the owner of Random House, came up with the idea for “The Art of the Deal,” the 1987 Trump business manifesto ghostwritten by magazine journalist Tony Schwartz.

Wintour has been a powerful force in the Condé Nast machine; her turning over the daily reins of U.S. Vogue signals even more change for a company that has seen plenty of it. “I think it is an acknowledgment on her part that she won’t be around forever, and that there needs to be some kind of succession plan in place,” Grynbaum says. “It’s amazing how much the influence and power of Vogue is predicated on this one individual and her relationships and her sway.”

Condé Nast isn’t what it used to be, because print isn’t what it used to be. Like so many legacy media companies, it hemorrhaged money as it proved slow to adjust to the digital revolution. At times “Empire of the Elite” reads like an ode to the sensuous experience of reading a high-quality glossy magazine, and wondering who might be on next month’s cover and what (or who) they’ll be wearing. Condé Nast still means quality. But the age of empire is mostly over.

Source link

Spain: Post-Pandemic Champion | Global Finance Magazine

Spain’s economy keeps outpacing Europe, thanks to tourism, immigration, and a budding pharma sector. But tariff threats and structural challenges loom.

Since the Covid-19 pandemic peaked in 2021, the Spanish economy has consistently outperformed the rest of Europe, and economists expect it to outshine its peers this year once again. That doesn’t mean the country is immune to global headwinds, however, including the tariff disruptions and trade tensions that Washington ignited in April, and by 2026, GDP growth is seen slowing significantly from its current lively pace.

“We already know that economic growth in the first quarter of 2025 was very strong. That’s a solid starting point,” says Miguel Cardoso, chief economist for Spain at BBVA Research. First-quarter GDP, published at the end of April, was 0.6%, quarter on quarter.

Over the past five years, Spain has drawn international attention for its robust growth compared with neighboring countries. A combination of strong domestic demand—driven by tourism, immigration, and public spending—has fueled a much-needed expansion while the country’s standard of living has edged closer to that of wealthier European nations.

Miguel Cardoso, Chief Economist, BBVA
Miguel Cardoso, Chief Economist, BBVA

Since 2021, when Spain began recovering from a steep contraction, GDP growth has consistently outpaced the broader eurozone. Last year, it notched 3.2% compared to 0.7% for the eurozone.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) projects Spain’s growth will remain above the eurozone average at 2.5% in 2025, 1.8% in 2026, and a medium-term potential of around 1.7% for subsequent years, but warns of downside risks including escalating trade tensions, increasing domestic political uncertainty, and demographic aging.

Early on, some economists predicted that Spain’s streak of outperformance would be short, citing structural challenges such as a limited infrastructure capacity, persistently high unemployment, an aging population, and a shortage of innovation-driven, highvalue jobs. So far, however, those forecasts have proven incorrect.

In late April, a power blackout occurred across the Iberian Peninsula, demonstrating one aspect of weak infrastructure in both Spain and Portugal. Spain has poor connections to the European grid, which make it difficult to share power and balance supply and demand, especially when renewable energy generation fluctuates.

The day-long blackout “will probably subtract between 0.1% to 0.2% from GDP growth in second-quarter 2025,” Cardoso predicts, “depending on whether firms can recover anywhere between 75% to 90% of lost production.”

Most economists express cautious optimism, anticipating that the impact on Spain of the Trump tariffs and global trade tensions, while not negligible, will remain relatively contained.

“Spain’s direct exposure to US tariffs is very limited. Exports of goods to the US represent just 1% to 1.5% of Spain’s GDP,” Cardoso notes. “That’s three to four times less than Germany’s exposure.”

Exports to the US are concentrated in specific products such as olive oil. According to the EU, Spain exported over 118,000 metric tons of the liquid to the US during the 2023-2024 crop year, with higher volumes expected in the current season thanks to increased availability and lower prices.

The bigger concern lies in the economy’s indirect exposure to a potential recession in Germany, Europe’s economic powerhouse. “A recession in Germany would be very bad for Spain’s tourism sector,” Cardoso warns.

Growth Drivers

In recent years, tourism has been one of the key drivers of Spain’s economic growth. In 2024, the country welcomed a record 94 million international visitors, narrowing the gap with France, which remains the world’s top destination with 100 million. For economists, the question has been when the supply of tourism-related services—such as hotels, bars, and restaurants—would begin to show strain under rising demand.

So far, however, tourism continues to expand, stretching into off-peak seasons and reaching less traditional destinations.

“Data through March show that foreign spending in Spain is still growing at double-digit rates. Credit card spending by foreigners rose 12% to 13% year-on-year in the first quarter,” Cardoso notes.

Tourism patterns are also shifting, he says, as travelers take shorter, more frequent trips rather than the traditional, fixed-period family holidays. The change is enabling a more efficient use of tourism infrastructure, he says.

But growth in demand could still hit a limit in the number of hotels, restaurants, and other structures available.

“There are already signs of price pressures, and infrastructure will soon reach its limits,” says Sergi Jiménez-Martín, professor of Economics at Pompeu Fabra University in Barcelona. “I wouldn’t mind seeing a negative shock to tourism, as it could ultimately benefit the economy by encouraging more semi-skilled youth and immigrants to shift into other industries.”

Tourism is a low-productivity, lowvalue-added sector, he argues, and redirecting employment toward other areas could lead to a more efficient and healthier economy.

Another element behind Spain’s recent outperformance is immigration.

“The Spanish economy expanded significantly, partly because the Covid-19 shock was so severe but also because of strong population growth, with about 2 million new residents, mostly from Latin America,” Jiménez-Martin says. Shared language and cultural ties have helped make immigration a net benefit for the economy, he adds, and while the new residents have often been low- or middle-qualified workers, a more promising expansion would be in different high-value growth sectors.

The pharmaceutical industry stands out as a success story. Accounting for some 1.5% of GDP and employing about 170,000 people in high-value jobs, it plays a still-small but promising role in the economy.

Spain is already one of the world leaders in clinical research. Since last year, it has ranked first in Europe, conducting nearly 1,000 clinical trials annually and surpassing Germany for the first time. Coming as countries like Germany and Belgium are seeing declines, this growth is driven by tax incentives, a cost-effective and skilled workforce, and a relatively fast regulatory process.

“Spain has some of the world’s fastest approval times,” says Oscar Salamanca, CEO of Ápices CRO, which provides support for clinical trials, and president of the Spanish Association of Contract Research Organizations (ACRO). “The time to treat the first patient is usually 90 to 100 days, compared to up to 300 in other countries. Costs are also much lower: up to five times less than in the US and two to three times lower than in much of Europe.”

These advantages have attracted global pharmaceutical giants like Novartis, Roche, and AstraZeneca, to establish research centers in Spain: particularly in Madrid and Barcelona, with additional hubs in Valencia, Seville, Málaga, and Santiago de Compostela.

Long-Term Worries

While tourism and pharmaceuticals, each in its own way, point toward future economic growth, a relatively low level of investment—mostly due to regulation and uncertainties—has many economists worrying that high public debt and an uncertain political landscape will cause Spain to hit its infrastructural limits in the coming years.

The government of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez is a coalition between the socialist PSOE and other political forces to its left, including the main Catalan nationalist party. A new general election is to be held by August 2027.

Public debt level as a percentage of GDP was 101.8% at the end of last year. According to the latest IMF report, Spain’s debt remains vulnerable to growth and financing cost shocks.

“Given still-high debt and the economy’s strong cyclical position,” the IMF recommended in its April report, “there is a case for frontloading the authorities’ planned adjustment, strengthening the national fiscal framework to ensure that regions contribute to the consolidation effort, and adopting employmentfriendly measures to address the projected growing gap between pension expenditures and social security contributions.”

Among the IMF’s suggested moves are harmonizing VAT rates and strengthening green taxation: measures that could replace a less effective banking tax that was introduced three years ago and could now be phased out.

The IMF praised Spain’s financial system and the stability of its banks. BBVA’s plan to merge with smaller rival Banco de Sabadell moved one step forward on April 30, when the National Authority for Markets and Competition (CNMC) approved the deal under certain conditions, although other authorizations are still required.

While Spain has undoubtedly been a post-Covid success story, the IMF stressed that to stay on this positive trajectory, maintaining sound fiscal and regulatory policies and avoiding missteps that could derail progress will be essential.

Source link