letting

Letting agent apologises for ‘oversight’ on Reeves rental licence

Becky Morton,Political reporter,

Jack Fenwick,Political correspondent and

Harry Farley,Political correspondent

PA Media An image of Rachel Reeves on the left in a grey suit, and Keir Starmer on the right in a black suit, stood in front of windows with closed blinds, during a visit to Horiba Mira in Nuneaton in June 2025.PA Media

The government’s independent ethics adviser suggested a formal investigation was not necessary

The letting agent which rented out Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ family home has apologised for an “oversight” which led to a failure to obtain the correct licence.

Gareth Martin, owner of Harvey & Wheeler, said the company’s previous property manager had offered to apply for a “selective” rental licence on behalf of their client – but this never happened as the individual resigned before the tenancy began.

He added: “We deeply regret the issue caused to our clients as they would have been under the impression that a licence had been applied for.”

Reeves has apologised for the “inadvertent mistake” but said she accepts “full responsibility”.

Downing Street has spent the day defending the chancellor, with a spokesman insisting the prime minister has “full confidence” in her.

Reeves put her four-bedroom south London home up for rent in July 2024, when Labour won the general election and she moved into 11 Downing Street.

The house falls in area where Southwark Council requires private landlords to obtain a selective licence at a cost of £945.

The chancellor said she first became aware that her property did not have the correct licence on Wednesday when the Daily Mail, who first reported the story, contacted her.

Reeves or her letting agent could face an unlimited fine if Southwark Council takes the matter to court.

The revelations come at a politically awkward time for Reeves, who is preparing for a Budget at the end of the month amidst speculation the government is planning to break a manifesto commitment not to raise income tax.

Reeves’ economic responsibility was a hallmark of Labour’s pre-election argument that they could be trusted with the nation’s finances.

But since then, questions about her personal judgement were raised after she accepted free concert tickets as well as thousands of pounds in donations for clothing.

Her political judgement was criticised after she imposed – and then reversed – cuts to the winter fuel allowance.

Errors in her CV further undermined her standing.

Now this adds to a growing list of charges at the chancellor’s door, and it is yet another day when the government completely lost control of the news agenda.

While the letting agent has taken responsibility, Sir Laurie Magnus, the ethics adviser whose findings have felled two previous Labour ministers, is now re-examining her case.

Sir Laurie was said to have been satisfied with Reeves’ explanation, but Downing Street has refused to say whether Magnus believed the chancellor broke the ministerial code.

He is now reviewing emails about the rental arrangements that were sent and received by the chancellor’s husband.

No 10 will be hoping the latest developments – and the apology from the letting agency used by Reeves and her husband – will bring this saga to an end.

Downing Street will still be worried this evening about how this all looks to voters.

In a letter to Sir Keir Starmer on Wednesday evening, she said “we were not aware that a licence was necessary”.

“As soon as it was brought to my attention, we took immediate action and have applied for the licence,” she wrote.

However, in a second letter to the PM on Thursday, Reeves said she had found correspondence confirming that the letting agent had told her husband a licence would be required and that the agency would apply for this on their behalf.

“They have also confirmed today they did not take the application forward, in part due to a member of staff leaving the organisation,” she wrote.

“Nevertheless, as I said yesterday, I accept it was our responsibility to secure the licence. I also take responsibility for not finding this information yesterday and bringing it to your attention.

“As I said to you today, I am sorry about this matter and accept full responsibility for it.”

Reeves has published the emails, which confirm the letting agent agreed to apply for the licence once the new tenant moved in.

In a statement, Mr Martin, the agency’s owner, said: “We alert all our clients to the need for a licence.

“In an effort to be helpful our previous property manager offered to apply for a licence on these clients’ behalf, as shown in the correspondence.

“That property manager suddenly resigned on the Friday before the tenancy began on the following Monday.

“Unfortunately, the lack of application was not picked up by us as we do not normally apply for licences on behalf of our clients; the onus is on them to apply. We have apologised to the owners for this oversight.

“At the time the tenancy began, all the relevant certificates were in place and if the licence had been applied for, we have no doubt it would have been granted.”

The Conservatives have said the prime minister needs to “grow a backbone and start a proper investigation”.

Speaking on LBC, party leader Kemi Badenoch said “maybe it is the letting agents’ fault but it’s this the funny thing with Labour, it’s always somebody else’s fault.”

“Keir Starmer said law makers shouldn’t be lawbreakers, and he was very happy to chase every fixed penalty notice that occurred under the Conservatives,” she said.

“What Rachel Reeves looks like she has done is a criminal offence.

“They didn’t say it was about the seriousness of the offence. They said if the law has been broken, the law has been broken. I’m only holding them to their standards.”

“They spent five years pretending they were the most perfect people and now they had resignation after scandal after resignation, so let the ethics advisor investigate.”

Thin, red banner promoting the Politics Essential newsletter with text saying, “Top political analysis in your inbox every day”. There is also an image of the Houses of Parliament.

Source link

Celebrity Traitors star ‘told off’ by bosses after letting slip spoilers

Celebrity Traitors star Jonathan Ross has revealed that show bosses sent out a list of banned topics to cast after contestants began letting slip behind-the-scenes details

Celebrity Traitors star Jonathan Ross has revealed that the show’s cast have received a warning from bosses about leaking behind-the-scenes details on social media. Speaking on his podcast Reel Talk, the TV presenter admitted that he let slip details that he later learnt were banned from being discussed.

Last week, the broadcaster called for the BBC to air footage of Alan Carr that was cut from the series. Speaking about how hilarious the Chatty Man had been on the show, he said: “There are so many funny things he did and said which I know already should have been in the first episode which weren’t, should’ve been in the second episode.

“There’s something that happens later on which should be in, but isn’t in,” Jonathan added. “It’s like there’s this Alan Carr gold waiting out there to be spun into something.”

READ MORE: Channel 4 ‘axes’ bold dating show after only two seriesREAD MORE: Strictly judges’ tribute to Tess Daly and Claudia Winkleman scrapped amid exit

Now, the 64-year-old has revealed that the stars were recently reminded of spoiler rules by show bosses. “It’s nerve-wracking watching it for me,” he said on his podcast, which he hosts with daughter Honey Kinny Ross.

“The round tables of course,” he added. “Because a lot of stuff is edited out and I’m not allowed- I didn’t realise but I’m not allowed to talk about the stuff that’s edited out, which I can understand why.

“When I started talking about it last week, they sent us all a kind of list saying, ‘Just to remind you these are the things in your contracts you’re not allowed to talk about.'”

He continued by saying that he would try to “skirt around it” as much as possible to avoid breaking rules. “There’s a fairly comprehensive list, and most of it I can see is to protect the integrity of the game as a viewing experience for people, so it makes perfect sense.”

At the weekend, body language expert Judi James revealed that Jonathan Ross and fellow Traitor Cat Burns were now ‘enemies’ based on their behaviour. “Their body language was subtle but revealing, proving they, both now recognise they are enemies. Last night’s meet-up was different though because, for Jonathan and Cat, the masks never came off,” she said after Thursday’s episode.

“They surveyed each other without any signals of relief. We saw them ignore Alan to stare at each other, and Jonathan performed a thin ‘smile’ of recognition, which was returned by Cat.

“There was no pretence between them, but no open declarations of war. Jonathan let Cat know he knew what she was doing and she stared him back to let him know she intends to carry on doing it.”

Last week, Celebrity Traitors aired an unprecedented twist when the results of the latest roundtable were tied between actor Mark Bonnar and historian David Olusoga. After the two received the same number of votes to be banished after two rounds of voting, Claudia revealed that the banishment would be left up to fate.

After they were randomly given a Chest of Chance each – with one of them containing an immunity shield – Mark was ultimately banished from the game after opening with chest with nothing in it. Later on, it was revealed that Joe Wilkinson had been murdered by the Traitors, while at the end of the episode, the group banished Stephen Fry.

Celebrity Traitors continues on Wednesday at 9pm on BBC One and BBC iPlayer.

Join The Mirror’s WhatsApp Community or follow us on Google News , Flipboard , Apple News, TikTok , Snapchat , Instagram , Twitter , Facebook , YouTube and Threads – or visit The Mirror homepage.



Source link