flaw

A brand new series of Channel 4’s The Jury started this week

The Jury viewers were left slamming the show after pointing out a major problem.

The Channel 4 programme returned for a new episode on Wednesday (September 2) following a group of ordinary people in a specially constructed jury room in a recreated murder trial.

This time, the jury is considering the case of two brothers who are accused of killing their stepfather. The brothers admit stabbing the man more than 69 times while he was asleep, with the jury having to decide whether the killing was an act of desperation or a calculated murder.

In the latest instalment, 14-year-old defendant Daniel took the stand and described the abusive home he grew up in. Meanwhile, CCTV and other evidence challenged key parts of the boys’ evidence, unsettling even the sympathetic jurors.

However, fans watching at home were left feeling disgruntled by one aspect of the show. They slammed how the jurors were able to break and talk about the case throughout the trial.

In real life though, jurors are not allowed to discuss the case this early in proceedings and can only share their thoughts once all the evidence has been presented from both prosecution and defence.

“I get that it’s a simulation but in my experience juries do not discuss the trial until the deliberation,” said one person on X. Someone else added: “This programme is utter rubbish!! It’s meant to be realistic, but you are not meant to discuss the case until the end.

“Certainly no talking while in court and the judge would have been right on to the juror talking.” A third chimed in: “Quite. It’s ridiculous and so annoying and I just can’t watch it.”

It comes after The Jury viewers were surprised to see such strong opinions emerging early on during the first episode this week. One viewer wrote on X: “Not seen any evidence yet and they already arguing #TheJuryC4.”

Another said: “Making up your mind before you’ve heard even a lick of evidence is insane but go off I guess.” A third questioned the make-up of the jury, asking: “Do they actually have level-headed people on the series this time? #TheJury.”

However, not everyone watching was critical of the programme. One viewer praised the return, writing: “I’m watching, it’s one of the best programmes on TV and with all the debate over jury trials, a fitting watch. #TheJury.”

The Jury airs at 9pm on Channel 4.

ANOTHER problem has arisen with the new EES entry rules for Europe and it could affect thousands of people.

In a recent case, one woman was questioned about her travels when she was confused for her sister.

EES has been introduced to use biometrics and fingerprinting to stop the need for manual checks at the border.

But it appeared that the system failed to correctly identify one woman from her twin sister.

As reported by Politico, the case involved one Brit who was accused of being illegally in the Schengen zone.

She was questioned by police while trying to fly back to the UK from Cluj-Napoca in Romania in May.

DIVE IN

Inside the £9.50 holiday park with a £10m upgrade – with a NEW waterpark and lido

COAST EFFECTIVE

Best UK family theme & waterparks with cheap stays from just £3pp a night

Romanian authorities at the airport said that the woman’s departure hadn’t been properly recorded after a visit to Amsterdam in April 2026.

The problem was that she hadn’t been to Amsterdam – but her identical twin sister had.

EES appeared to have confused the twins despite taking biometrics.

The woman was questioned for about 15-minutes but was ultimately allowed to fly home.

Around 12,000 sets of twins are born in the UK every year, so this could cause problems for thousands of people.

Asking experts what could have caused the flaw in the system, Niovi Vavoula, chair in cyber policy at the University of Luxembourg, gave two possible explanations.

The first suggestion is that there may have been an improperly registered exit for the twin in Amsterdam.

The second they explained could have been down to the Romanian authorities in Cluj.

Niovi Vavoula told Politico, “It appears that the authorities are not well trained to distinguish between different processes and rely on facial images as the sole identification method.

“The fact they didn’t check the passport details in the EES, nor take into account that the EES is still fresh and there are various problems, shows what is called anchoring bias — when you rely on the first piece of evidence and disregard everything else.”

Romanian Border Police responded in a statement that said that EES had functioned properly at the time.

But that data in the system had to be “corrected” by border staff, who it added had not followed “applicable operational procedures.”

They added “we emphasise that this is an isolated incident and should not be considered representative of the overall performance of the [EES] system.”