fined

Chelsea have been fined £10m and given a suspended two-window registration ban by the Football Association for breaching rules relating to payments to agents between 2009 and 2022.

Owners Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital self-reported 74 breaches of FA rules when they purchased the club in 2022.

An independent regulatory commission initially imposed a six-point deduction, which was to be suspended until 30 June 2027, but that has been “set aside” on appeal.

The £10m Chelsea have been fined will be invested into grassroots football.

More to follow.

A French teenager has been fined about $465 after pleading guilty to a public nuisance charge in Singapore for licking a straw. Didier Gaspard Owen Maximilien went viral when he posted a video of himself licking the straw and placing it back in a juice vending machine.

July 22 (Asia Today) — Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon was fined 10 million won ($6,600) Wednesday after a court found him guilty of having a political supporter pay for opinion polls he commissioned before the 2021 mayoral by-election.

Oh would lose his position as mayor if the sentence is upheld by the Supreme Court. He rejected the ruling and said he would appeal immediately.

The Seoul Central District Court also ordered Oh to forfeit 21 million won ($13,900).

Former Seoul Vice Mayor for Political Affairs Kang Chul-won, who was indicted with Oh, was fined 3 million won ($2,000). Businessman and political supporter Kim Han-jung was fined 5 million won ($3,300).

Prosecutors accused Oh of receiving the results of 10 private opinion polls from political broker Myung Tae-kyun before the April 7, 2021, Seoul mayoral by-election.

They alleged that Oh instructed Kang, then his chief of staff, to have Kim pay about 33 million won ($21,900) in polling costs.

The court found Oh guilty of arranging payment of 21 million won for five polls, including three that were not intended for publication and two that were released publicly.

The court said Oh complained when poll results were unfavorable and sought to delay their release to minimize their negative effect.

“The commissioning and payment of the polls were also connected to an effort to publish and report candidate-commissioned opinion polls prohibited under the Public Official Election Act,” the court said. “The nature of the offense is serious.”

The court said Oh had previously served as Seoul mayor and should have been familiar with the purpose and requirements of the Political Funds Act.

It also said he led the offense but repeatedly attempted to avoid responsibility during the trial by presenting arguments the court found difficult to accept.

Oh disputed the ruling after leaving the courthouse.

“The court found five opinion polls unlawful today, but I cannot accept that conclusion,” Oh told reporters. “The correct decision would have been to find me not guilty on every count.”

Oh said the conviction was based on Myung’s statements and circumstantial evidence rather than direct evidence.

His legal team said in a statement that it regretted the court’s decision to convict Oh without objective evidence.

“It is difficult to accept a conclusion reached by piecing together some of Myung’s exaggerated statements and various circumstances,” the statement said.

The defense said it would file an immediate appeal.

The case is governed by an expedited trial provision requiring a first-trial ruling within six months of indictment and appellate and Supreme Court rulings within three months of the preceding decision.

A final Supreme Court ruling is expected by January at the latest.

— Reported by Asia Today; translated by UPI

© Asia Today. Unauthorized reproduction or redistribution prohibited.

Original Korean report: https://www.asiatoday.co.kr/kn/view.php?key=20260722010008156

Russian authorities have continued to clamp down on what little domestic opposition remains in the country by detaining a well-known blogger and moving to prevent a local politician from running for parliament.

Blogger Ilya Remeslo was a staunch supporter of Vladimir Putin until he staged a dramatic about-turn last March, calling the president a “war criminal and thief” and saying he should resign.

He has now been remanded in custody for two months on suspicion of spreading false information against the military.

Separately, Boris Nadezhdin has been convicted of “displaying extremist symbols”, a ruling that bars him from collecting signatures for parliamentary elections in September.

Nadezhdin, 63, came to prominence two years ago, when he tried to stand for the presidency on an anti-war platform, but was eventually barred because electoral authorities ruled that signatures he had submitted were flawed.

Few genuine opposition politicians are left in Russia, and former MP Nadezhdin has styled himself more as a pro-peace politician.

Most have gone into exile abroad, while the most prominent figure, Alexei Navalny, died suddenly in a penal colony in the Arctic in February 2024. Russia said he died of natural causes but the UK and four European countries , externalhave said they are confident he was “poisoned with a lethal toxin”.

Nadezhdin was initially declared a “foreign agent” last week before being detained on Monday over a video he reposted in 2023 that briefly showed an image of Navalny. He has also been barred from leaving Russia.

Being declared a foreign agent would most likely have barred him from running for office, but until he was convicted for “extremist symbols” a legal loophole meant he could still have gathered signatures to register as a candidate.

He can still appeal against the ruling, which fined him 1,000 roubles (£9.50; $13).

Nadezhdin suffers from high blood pressure and diabetes, and briefly fell when he appeared in court in his hometown of Dolgoprudny just to the north of Moscow.

Denying the charges against him, he said their real aim was to shut him up and stop him running for the Duma (Russian parliament). He also told the court he would not be able to pay any fine because all his accounts had been frozen.

Later on Friday, blogger Remeslo also appeared in court and was remanded in pre-trial detention for two months. His lawyer said he had been taken to Moscow after being detained hours earlier in his home city of St Petersburg.

SUNLOUNGER hogging is on the rise – but one spot in Spain is cracking down on it by fining holidaymakers.

These rules are being enforced by the Calpe Town Council, which affects the Costa Blanca.

Local authorities in the Spanish resort have the right to remove sunbeds, towels and parasols put on beaches before 9.30am.

Anyone who faces having their belongings taken away – they will have to pay to get them back and could face a fine of up to €250 (£216).

And it’s not just a warning about early morning starts either.

Items left unattended for more than three hours could also be taken away.

ISLE GO

Why Maldives holidays are cheaper than EVER – with crazy bargains from £1,437pp

COAST EFFECTIVE

Best UK family theme & waterparks with cheap stays from just £3pp a night

The measures are there to improve safety, cleanliness and access during peak season when beaches are at their busiest.

The rules aren’t new, having come into play two years ago.

At the time, a spokesman said in a statement on X: “This measure prohibits the indiscriminate occupation of the public domain, especially the beach, with items such as chairs, hammocks and parasols at the start of the day.

“These bad habits make it difficult to clean the beaches.

“The by-law establishes that all these items and others installed on the beaches before 9.30am can be removed and the owners reported.

“It also states that those umbrellas, chairs or hammocks that are left for more than three hours without the presence of their owners throughout the day may be removed and transferred to a municipal depot.”

Calpe is a popular spot in Alicante with sweeping beaches that have golden sand and bright blue Mediterranean waters.

Some of the most popular beaches are Playa de Levante, also known as La Fossa, and Playa Arenal-Bol.

Breaking a little-known beach rule may carry a hefty financial penalty

Taking a dip in the sea is one of the highlights of any beach holiday. With the sun beating down, temperatures soaring and swimwear at the ready, millions of holidaymakers head into the water each year to cool off and enjoy time with family and friends.

Anyone travelling to Portugal hoping to do the same may want to brush up on local rules first, as breaking one little-known sanitation regulation could reportedly lead to fines of up to €750 (around £630). Knowing the law before you head to the beach could help you avoid an unexpected and potentially costly mistake.

It relates to urinating in the ocean, something many people – particularly children – have probably done at some point without giving it a second thought. While some may assume the sea would quickly dilute human waste, some travel experts say Portuguese rules are intended to protect marine ecosystems and coastal hygiene.

According to travel website Islands, beach sanitation rules allow authorities to issue fines of up to €750 for people caught urinating in the sea. It does mention, however, that there is no practical way for authorities to monitor the behaviour beneath the waves, and that enforcement is considered rare.

The law exists to reduce pollution in coastal waters, particularly in areas that attract large numbers of visitors during the summer months. Portugal’s beaches are among Europe’s most popular, drawing millions of holidaymakers each year to destinations including the Algarve, Lisbon Coast and Madeira.

Fortunately, most public beaches in Portugal provide public toilets or nearby facilities, making it easy for visitors to avoid any potential issues. Using designated toilets also helps protect water quality and the wider coastal environment.

Portugal is not the only European destination with strict rules covering beach behaviour. In parts of Spain, including Vigo and Marbella, local authorities have introduced similar bans on what they describe as “physiological evacuation” in the sea, with fines also reaching €750, according to local municipal regulations.

Holidaymakers should also be aware of other rules in Portugal. Several beaches prohibit loud music from portable speakers, while Albufeira has introduced regulations that could see people fined for wearing swimwear away from designated beach areas as part of efforts to tackle anti-social behaviour.

The UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office advises British travellers to familiarise themselves with local laws and customs before travelling abroad. Checking the rules before heading to the beach could help visitors avoid unexpected penalties and ensure they enjoy a stress-free holiday.

As parts of the UK are set to get warmer again this weekend, Brits should be aware of little-known beach rules

England’s south-west coastline is famed for boasting an abundance of beautiful beaches to discover. From breathtaking coves that can hold their own against Greece’s white sand shores, to Blue Flag-awarded stretches, the UK’s magnificent coast is difficult to surpass.

Blue Flag beaches are acknowledged for their exceptional levels of cleanliness and dedication to safeguarding the natural environment, but this is no simple achievement. Keeping the coastline in immaculate condition can prove quite demanding, particularly during the busy summer months when parts of the UK welcome a great number of visitors to its shores.

While some regulations are relatively straightforward to observe, and anticipated of those visiting the beach, particularly regarding staying safe on the shore, other regulations are enforced more rigorously.

Standard beach etiquette involves noting which flags are flying and refraining from entering the water in hazardous conditions, as well as not disturbing local wildlife during your visit.

It can also involve being considerate of fellow beachgoers by keeping music at a reasonable volume and remembering to collect your litter, but some regulations are, in reality, legally enforceable and could get you into trouble if breached, reports Devon Live.

For those with dogs, the Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) enables numerous local councils to implement seasonal limitations on dogs on beaches during peak periods, but other laws may take you by surprise.

Understanding the laws can prevent a relaxing day at the seaside from becoming a stressful, and expensive, outing. One seemingly innocent activity is in fact prohibited on British beaches and could result in a penalty of up to £1,000.

With the warmer weather this weekend and holiday season rapidly approaching, ecology specialists at Arbtech are urging beachgoers to bear in mind that taking pebbles, seashells or sand from British beaches is actually against the law.

Many visitors to the seaside might be tempted to slip a pebble into their pocket as a keepsake after a glorious day by the sea, yet what most people don’t realise is that this is illegal under the Coast Protection Act 1949.

Stones, shells and even items such as driftwood all play a vital role in maintaining coastal ecosystems, and removing them risks causing serious damage to these environments.

Arbtech’s Andrew Ward commented: “One person taking a pebble or shell may not seem like much, but when thousands of visitors are doing the same, it can have drastic impacts on the coastal environment. Over time, we could start to see increased erosion, the loss of natural sea defences, and disruption to habitats that many species rely on.”

Local councils are responsible for enforcing this rule, particularly at popular tourist destinations where the problem has previously occurred.

Andrew added: “The law is clear and it’s not just there to spoil any fun. It’s a reminder that beaches are protected for a reason. We all have a role to play in preserving the environment so that it can continue to thrive for generations to come.”

While gathering seashells may bring back fond childhood memories and look charming on a windowsill, these natural treasures are essential for providing microhabitats to a wealth of local wildlife. Capturing a photo of the beach on your phone or camera is a far safer, and most likely more affordable, way to preserve the memory of the UK’s stunning coastline.

WHEN it comes to beautiful hiking destinations, not many places beat Italy – but there is one top spot with some strict rules.

The Cinque Terre National Park in Italy spans 15sqm in the north of the country.

Home to over 75 miles of hiking trails, it is a popular spot due to its breathtaking landscapes and coastal location.

And while it is open to the public to explore, there is a major rule you need to be aware of.

Nowhere on the park’s marked hiking trails are you allowed to wear flip flops.

This includes backless sandals and shoes with smooth soles.

Read more on travel inspo

LUXE FOR LESS

Our experts’ favourite holidays that feel 5 star – but for half the price

ALL IN

I found the best value all inclusive London hotel… just £55pp with free food & booze

In fact, any shoes deemed unsuitable for the trails – along with flip flop and sandals – could score you a fine of between €50 (£43.15) to €2,500 (£2,157.31).

Staff across the park, as well as guards, can carry out checks including stopping visitors to check they have the right footwear.

If you don’t have the right footwear, you could get fined on the spot or not be allowed to use the trails.

One trail where flip flops are banned is the famous Blue Path, which connects all five villages in the park.

The path takes between five and eight hours to walk from end-to-end, or longer if you want to explore the villages.

To do the Blue Path, you will usually need a Cinque Terre Card, which gives you access to the trails as well as local shuttle buses and museum discounts.

Flip flops are allowed in some areas though, including the villages in the park – Monterosso al Mare, Vernazza, Corniglia, Manarola and Riomaggiore.

The park isn’t the only spot in Italy where you can’t wear flip flops though.

In Capri, a law that was created back in the 1960s bans people from wearing noisy shoes.

This includes flip flops, as well as squeaky sandals and even wooden clogs.

The Foreign Office has issued travel advice warning UK holidaymakers

British holidaymakers are being warned that they risk being slapped with a 500 euro fine when visiting one of the most sought-after destinations in Europe.

Millions of Brits are set to head overseas during the summer months, desperate for some sun, a change of scenery, as well as a well-deserved rest. The Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO), the Government’s foreign affairs department, plays a key role in keeping UK citizens informed when travelling abroad – offering travel guidance covering more than 220 countries and territories across the globe.

In its travel advice for Italy, the FCDO cautions that “some Italian towns and cities have specific laws, and you could be fined for breaking them”. This, the FCDO noted, can include activities such as eating and drinking near major churches, historic monuments and public buildings.

It is also against the law to enter or bathe in public fountains across numerous towns and cities, including Florence and Rome, or to swim in the canals of Venice. The island of Capri is enormously popular with tourists and can be accessed by ferry from both Naples and Sorrento.

The stunning island nestled off Italy’s Amalfi Coast is celebrated for its Mediterranean charm and rich ancient heritage. However, visitors are being made aware that bringing any disposable plastic items onto the island – such as bags, cutlery, plates, cups, food packaging, trays and straws – is strictly prohibited.

Should you be caught doing so, you could face a penalty of up to 500 euros. Additional FCDO guidance regarding Italy adds: “Illegal traders operate on the streets of all major Italian cities. It is illegal to buy items from unlicensed street traders. If you do, you could be stopped by the local police and fined.

“It’s illegal to remove sand, shells or pebbles from coastal areas in Italy. You could face a large fine for doing so. It’s also illegal to collect various species of flowers, plants and herbs from mountain and wooded areas. For more information, check with the regional authorities of the area you’re visiting.”

A judge at the Old Bailey has fined UK Athletics £350,000 with £44,000 in costs after hearing how a paralympic athlete died when equipment fell on him at a training ground in east London.

Shot-putter Abdullah Hayayei was killed when a metal cage collapsed as he prepared for the World Para-athletics Championships in 2017.

He had previously represented the United Arab Emirates at the Rio Paralympics when he competed in the javelin and shot put.

Judge Richard Marks KC described Mr Hayayei’s death as “tragic, untimely and wholly avoidable.”

He also handed UKA’s former head of sport, 79-year-old Keith Davies, a 175-hour community service order after hearing how he was in charge of the equipment, which had been assembled with vital base plates missing.

The court heard how a strong gust of wind had collapsed the cage and Mr Hayayei had died of head injuries after being hit by a heavy metal bar.

The athlete was a 36-year-old wheelchair user who lived with cerebral palsy.

The court heard from his widow Badriah, who said his death had left her coping alone with five young children.

UK Athletics had pleaded guilty to a charge of corporate manslaughter at an earlier hearing in February. Mr Davies pleaded guilty to a breach of health and safety law at the same hearing.

The investigation and legal process following Mr Hayayei’s death has taken nearly a decade to complete.

Police said their investigation had involved years of meticulous work by detectives which uncovered photos from around a dozen athletics events where the same cage had been used by the UK Athletics officials. They showed the restraints were not being used to secure the equipment.

Sentencing, Judge Marks said Mr Hayayei’s death was an accident which sooner or later was “waiting to happen”.

Earlier in the hearing, Prosecutor John Price KC told the court that in the years following the incident, UKA attempted to blame the athlete’s death on Mr Davies, and even “tried to point the finger” at the Newham venue.

He described a statement later submitted by UKA as “a deeply unworthy document by a national sporting body and one of which it should be ashamed”.

Fining UKA, the judge agreed that it had been “most unattractive” but it was “a stance” that was adopted by their previous team of managers.

It had been disavowed by the current leaders of the organisation who had expressed “sincere regret”.

UKA, he said, is essentially “a club of passionate members” and was aimed at developing elite athletes and sport at a grassroots level.

He noted that the organisation had a turnover of £13.8m in 2025 with a projected loss of £400,000. He granted UKA six years to pay the fine in instalments.

In a statement, UK Athletics said it was “deeply sorry” and that “substantial changes” have been made around safety and governance.

“While nothing can undo what happened, there has been a determined focus on learning from these events and ensuring stronger standards and safeguards are in place throughout athletics,” UK Athletics said.

“We respectfully accept the court’s decision today and remain committed to continuing that work with the seriousness and responsibility this case demands.”

Several cruise lines have introduced new passenger rules in 2026 – and if these are broken, passengers could be fined, removed or even handed a lifetime ban from the ship

Several cruise companies have introduced a raft of new rules in 2026 to ensure the safety of passengers travelling on board — but those who break them could find themselves thrown off the ship. As technology continues to advance and people snap up the latest gadgets, cruise operators are keeping their policies up to date to safeguard holidaymakers and protect their privacy while travelling at sea.

There is a comprehensive list of regulations that passengers must adhere to when sailing with cruise operators including Disney, Virgin, P&O and Fred. Olsen. Should any of these rules be breached, travellers could face a formal warning, a financial penalty, or even be removed from the vessel and handed a lifetime ban.

Don and Heidi, a couple who have clocked up 100 cruises between them, regularly share updates and handy tips on TikTok, and have been keeping a close watch on shifting cruise policies over recent months.

Don said: “Cruise lines are instituting new policies and in 2026, these behaviours will get you fined, banned, or removed from the ship entirely.

“One, recording other passengers without their consent using technology like Meta Glasses is a serious violation of privacy policies and fellow cruisers are reporting it.

“Two, flying a drone from the ship is banned on nearly every cruise line. Get caught launching one and you’ll be escorted off at the next port.

“Three, fights on cruise ships are all over the news and lines are done looking the other way. Passengers involved in physical altercations are now being banned from certain cruise lines for life.”

The couple behind the video also used the chance to explain what happens when passengers break three longstanding cruise ship regulations – smoking violations, missing the muster drill, and attempting to smuggle prohibited items aboard.

Don said: “Four, getting caught with prohibited items in checked luggage and you get escorted to a security meeting. Try to bring something more serious on board and you could be handed over to authorities at the next port.

“Five, this isn’t optional. It’s international maritime law. Skip the muster drill and crew will track you down to complete it. Refuse entirely and you’ll be removed from the ship before a set sail.

“Six, lighting up on your balcony, in your cabin, or anywhere else outside the designated smoking areas can get you fined and repeat violations can get you escorted off the ship.

“This includes vaping. Don’t forget to share this one with your cruise mates for your next sailing.”

NEW YORK — The NHL docked the Vegas Golden Knights a second-round pick in next month’s draft and fined coach John Tortorella $100,000 on Friday for violating media access rules after their series-clinching Game 6 victory over the Ducks on Thursday night.

Tortorella refused to speak to reporters after Vegas routed the Ducks 5-1 to move on to face Colorado in the Western Conference final. The Golden Knights also did not open their locker room in accordance with league and NHL Players’ Assn.-negotiated regulations.

The NHL in a statement announcing the punishment said the penalties for these “flagrant violations” come after previous warnings were issued to the Golden Knights. The team has been offered the opportunity to appeal to Commissioner Gary Bettman’s office in person at the league’s New York headquarters next week.

“The Golden Knights are aware of today’s announcement from the NHL regarding the postgame media availability following Game 6 in Anaheim,” the team said in a statement posted to social media. “The organization will have no further comment.”