device

Amazon drops stunning early Prime Day deal on ‘lightning-fast’ premium device – was £150, now £70

AMAZON has blindsided shopper with a shock device sale, days before its Prime Big Deal Days sale is due to kick off.

One of the best deals is on a premium Fire tablet, which has been reduced to £69.99 in an epic 53% price cut.

Amazon Fire HD 10 tablet.

1

Amazon’s 10-inch Fire tablet is now better than half price ahead of the Prime Big Deal Days sale

Amazon Fire HD 10 tablet, £69.99 (was £149.99)

The next big Amazon sale starts next week, running from Tuesday to Wednesday (October 7th-8th).

Tons of prices will be slashed during Amazon Prime Day but only, of course, if you’re a Prime member.

But Amazon has launched an early device sale across its range of smart items, including Echo speakers, Kindles, Ring doorbells, Blink cameras Fire TV streaming sticks, and Fire tablets.

And better yet, these are deals open to all shoppers, not just those with a Prime membership.

The Fire HD 10 tablet (the newest generation) usually costs £149.99, but has now been slashed to an impressive £69.99.

This 10-inch device is now the best-selling tablet on the Amazon website – little wonder, with that enormous price drop.

Amazon’s line of Fire tablets are great, all-purpose devices for browsing and streaming – especially for shoppers who want to stay away from the big bucks of more powerful devices like Apple iPads and Samsung Tabs.

It also doubles up as an e-reader, though dedicated book-lovers should gravitate towards the retailer’s Kindle range.

These will all invariably go on sale next week when Prime Day begins (though a few select models are already discounted).

Read our Amazon Fire vs Kindle tablet explainer if you’re not sure which to buy.

The Fire HD 10 is perfect for watching, reading, and gaming, and it’s 25% faster than the old model.

Basically, its engine got a major upgrade – it now has a powerful processor and 3 GB of RAM, which helps everything run super-smoothly.

You get awesome HD entertainment on a big 10.1-inch screen that makes all your games and shows look great with brilliant colour.

(By the way, if you want something smaller and cheaper, the 8-inch Fire HD 8 is also on sale for just £49.99.)

The tablet has serious stamina: you can binge-watch for up to 13 hours without needing to plug into its charger.

The tablet is durable, too, with a strengthened screen that Amazon claims to to be 2.7 times tougher than the Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 (2022) in a drop test.

Need a good device to chat with friends and family? The 5MP front camera is way better for video calls than squinting at your small phone screen.

For storage, it comes with 32GB or 64GB of space, which is expandable by up to 1TB with a separate microSD card.

And this being an Amazon gadget, you can operate it via Alexa – it can help you out with streaming videos, relaying the latest news and controlling other smart devices in the same connected ecosystem.

Amazon Prime Day: early Fire Tablet Deals

  • Amazon Fire HD 10 tablet (newest gen), £69.99 (was £149.99) – buy here
  • Amazon Fire Max 11 tablet (newest gen), £129.99 (was £249.99) – buy here
  • Amazon Fire HD 8 tablet (newest gen), £49.99 (was £99.99) – buy here
  • Amazon Fire HD 8 Kids Pro tablet (newest gen), £79.99 (was £159.99) – buy here
  • Amazon Fire HD 8 Kids tablet (newest gen), £69.99 (was £149.99) – buy here

The Fire HD 10 has already racked up over 2,700 five-star reviews on the Amazon website, with customers heaping praise on the device:

“The Amazon Fire HD 10 is a fantastic budget-friendly tablet,” writes one shopper.

“The 10.1-inch screen is bright and clear, perfect for watching videos, reading, or browsing.

“The battery easily lasts up to 13 hours – ideal for all-day use.”

Another delighted customer added: “Quality item… I can’t get over the size of the screen, it’s 10 inches but looks bigger.

“The tablet is lightning-fast, and it does everything that I expect from an Amazon Fire… Well worth the investment.”

A lot more deals are on the way when the Prime Big Deal Days sale starts next week, and it’s worth keeping in mind that these early device deals might become exclusively for Prime members.

So, while this current deal is marked on the Amazon site as ending on October 14th, it’s not impossible it will only be available for Amazon Prime members soon.

Anyone without a Prime account who’s interested shouldn’t hold off for too long on buying.

Amazon Fire HD 10 tablet, £69.99 (was £149.99)

Make sure you bookmark our best Amazon Prime Day deals page, where we’ll be listing all the top bargains when the two-day sale kicks off.

For our top pick of smart gadgets available to snap up right now, head to our Amazon device deals page.

Amazon Prime Day: the 10 best early deals

The Amazon Prime Big Deal Days sale doesn’t kick off until next week (7th-8th October), but there’s already some early deals to snap up.

*If you click on a link in this boxout we will earn affiliate revenue

  1. Blink Smart Camera & Doorbell bundle, £31.49 (was £119.98) – buy here
  2. Poounur Fitness Smartwatch, £23.99 (was £129.99) – buy here
  3. Hangsun 12L/Day Dehumidifier, £88.38 (was £118.98) – buy here
  4. LKOUY Portable Charger, £12.99 (was £59.99) – buy here
  5. Slumberdown Feels Like Down King Size Duvet, £21.56 (was £31.19) – buy here
  6. Remington Proluxe Ceramic Hair Straightener, £34.99 (was £109.99) – buy here
  7. Swan Pump Espresso Digital Coffee Machine, £149.99 (was £299.99) – buy here
  8. Amazon Fire HD 10 tablet, £69.99 (was £149.99) – buy here
  9. LKE 268W UV Nail Lamp, £16.14 (was £28.99) – buy here
  10. EverFoams Women’s Shearling Memory Foam Slippers, £15.97 (was £22.99) – buy here

When the sale lands, you’ll find more top bargains here:

Source link

2 men arrested after incendiary device found under news media vehicle in Utah, authorities say

Authorities in Utah say two men have been arrested on suspicion of placing an incendiary device under a news media vehicle in Salt Lake City. The bomb didn’t go off.

Police and fire department bomb squads responded Friday when a suspicious device was found under the vehicle parked near an occupied building.

Investigators determined the bomb “had been lit but failed to function as designed,” according to court records cited by CBS affiliate KUTV on Sunday.

The FBI identified two suspects and served a search warrant at a home in the Magna neighborhood west of the city’s downtown. Two men, ages 58 and 31, were arrested and could face charges related to weapons possession and threats of terrorism, ABC affiliate KTVX reported Sunday.

Neighboring homes were evacuated during the search, which turned up explosives and “explosive-related components,” firearms, illegal narcotics and other paraphernalia, court records say. Authorities say they also found at least two devices that turned out to be hoax weapons of mass destruction.

There was no information about a possible motive and the relationship between the two suspects wasn’t immediately known.

News media have descended on Salt Lake City following last week’s killing of Turning Point USA co-founder Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in nearby Orem.

Source link

Travellers at UK airport warned as scanners mistake food item for ‘dangerous device’

Travellers flying from this UK airport may want to rethink packing one common food item after a recent incident revealed airport security scanners may flag it as potentially dangerous

Man being body checked by security at airport
Sophisticated CT scanners were installed at Gatwick airport this past March to help reduce security lane wait times.(Image: AFP via Getty Images)

Travellers at Gatwick airport carrying one common snack may risk setting off security scanners. The airport’s new state-of-the-art Computed Tomography scanners are not able to distinguish this one fruit from another dangerous device.

In July, a British journalist was travelling through Gatwick’s North Terminal revealed that a long line of travellers looked bemused when security staff questioned whether anyone was carrying fruit in their cabin bags.

The reporter said it was “the last thing” they expected to hear but they were asked if they were carrying an apple by the security staff member charged with going through their backpack. It comes after a ‘traumatised’ family was stranded at Palma Airport after being told they couldn’t board a Jet2 flight.

READ MORE: UK airport where you’re most likely to lose your luggage is namedREAD MORE: Airports say your holidays ‘could be ruined before you fly out’

Image of apple and a brown paper bag
Apples are not the only thing mistakenly flagged by the new scanners(Image: Getty Images/iStockphoto)

The reporter said he didn’t realise he was carrying an apple but when the security guard took it out of his bag, the only explanation they received was: “The scanner doesn’t like apples”. Another similar incident last September also highlighted hiccups resulting from the CT scanners.

Children’s medicine was previously flagged by the new scanners designed to detect explosives. Calpol and liquid Nurofen were both rejected by the CT scanners, posing difficulties for families going abroad. While Calpol, which is liquid paracetamol, is legal to take through security, the software in the new systems hit a glitch, not picking up on them as everyday items.

The expensive kit was reportedly rejecting items with the medicines in, forcing passengers to wait in queues for further security checks causing agonising delays.

The CT scanners were introduced at Gatwick in March across all of its security lanes as part of a multi-million-pound project to cut security lane wait times and better safeguard against potential terrorist attacks. Thus, passengers travelling through London Gatwick no longer need to remove electrical items or place liquids in plastic bags.

Image of empty security X-ray scanners at airport
The new scanners were meant to be implemented across all UK airports by June 2024(Image: Getty Images/iStockphoto)

It’s been over two years since the Department of Transport announced a “major shake-up of airport security rules” to better screen liquids and electrical items such as laptops. The sophisticated scanners utilise the same technology used for medical scanners to create 3D images of luggage to better detect potential threats.

The security update was highly anticipated by travellers as it would finally end the inconvenient 100ml limit on liquids, aerosols and gels (LAG) for hand luggage.

The limit was initially implemented in 2006 after a foiled terror plot but was only ever meant to be a temporary measure.

Initially, there was a June 2024 deadline for UK airports to integrate the new security measure that would see the 100ml LAG limit scrapped. While some smaller airports across the UK were able to integrate the new scanning equipment by the June deadline, larger airports struggled to meet the deadline for reasons varying from post-COVID supply chain issues to the need for additional construction work.

Source link

Pupil who invented device to help homeless named ‘girl of the year’

Jonathan Geddes

BBC Scotland News

Rebecca Young thinks homelessness is a problem that “needs to be fixed”

A Glasgow school pupil has been named among Time magazine’s girls of the year for inventing a device to help homeless people keep warm.

Rebecca Young was 12 when she designed a solar-powered blanket, which engineering firm Thales then turned into reality.

The Kelvinside Academy pupil is now among 10 girls from across the world selected by Time who have inspired and helped communities.

She told BBC Scotland News that she was shocked and honoured by the recognition, which has also seen her turned into a Lego mini-figure, due to the awards being run in partnership with the Danish toy manufacturer.

Rebecca first came up with the idea when she was aged12 while attending an engineering club at school.

She explained: “Seeing all the homeless people, it made me want to help – it’s a problem that should be fixed.

“During the day, the heat from the sun can energise the solar panels and they go into a battery pack that can store the heat. When it’s cold at night people can use the energy stored in the battery pack to sleep on.

“In Glasgow it can be freezing at night and they [homeless people] will have no power, so I thought the solar panel could heat it.”

Thales A schoolgirl in school uniform, with a heated blanket wrapped around her. Several other people are standing around her smiling for the camera. Thales

Rebecca’s solar-powered blanket is now being used by Homeless Project Scotland

Primary Engineer Notes and a diagram of the heated blanket diagramPrimary Engineer

Rebecca worked on the heat pack as a competition entry

Rebecca’s idea came out on top in the UK Primary Engineer competition, where more than 70,000 pupils entered ideas aimed around addressing a social issue.

Engineering company Thales then turned the idea into a working prototype, with 35 units given to Homeless Project Scotland to use in Glasgow.

That achievement led Rebecca to a spot on Time’s list, which the magazine’s chief executive Jessica Sibley said highlights “those who are turning imagination into real-world impact”.

Rebecca’s mum Louise told BBC Scotland News: “I couldn’t be more proud, it’s fantastic. It’s obviously all come from a drawing and going from that to it actually being made is amazing.”

TIME A Lego mini-figure, made to look like it is on the cover of Time Magazine. Rebecca, 12 is written underneath the figure, which has dark hair, a leather jacket and a T-shirt with a dog on itTIME

Rebecca has been turned into Lego mini-figure as part of the award

As part of the honour, Rebecca and the other nine winners are appearing on a digital cover of the famous magazine, where they are styled as Lego mini-figures – something she said was both “really cool and crazy”.

She also had advice for any other girls who wanted to get involved in Stem subjects – an acronym for science, technology, engineering and mathematics.

“If you have an idea like I did, then join clubs and talk to people about it, it helps.”

Reflecting on the Time magazine recognition, she added: “All my friends think it’s awesome.”

However, Rebecca herself is aiming for a career in a different field rather than engineering, as she would like to be a musician when she is older.

TIME A magazine mock-up, with a headline saying Girls of the Year, and nine Lego mini figures posed as the cover's image TIME

The magazine cover will be available digitally, while the girls’ stories will be featured in Time for Kids

Colin McInnes, the founder of Homeless Project Scotland, said the initiative had already been successful.

He added: “When somebody is having to rough sleep because the shelter is full, we can offer that comfort to a homeless person, of having a warm blanket to wrap around them during the night.

“We would 100% take the opportunity to have more of them.”

Daniel Wyatt, the rector at Kelvinside Academy, said Rebecca was a “shining example of a caring young person”.

He added: “She is also a role model for any young person who wants to follow their own path in life.”

Who are the other 2025 Time girls of the year?

  • Rutendo Shadaya, 17, an advocate for young authors in New Zealand
  • Coco Yoshizawa, 15, an Olympic gold-medalist in Japan
  • Valerie Chiu, 15, a global science educator in China
  • Zoé Clauzure, 15, an anti-bullying campaigner in France
  • Clara Proksch, 12, a scientist prioritizing child safety in Germany
  • Ivanna Richards, 17, a racing driver breaking stereotypes in Mexico
  • Kornelia Wieczorek, 17, a biotech innovator in Poland
  • Defne Özcan, 17, a trailblazing pilot in Turkey
  • Naomi S. DeBerry, 12, an organ donation advocate and children’s book author in the United States

Source link

Ryanair passengers urged to buy one device after baggage policy update

A travel expert has advised people heading off on holiday to use a handy tool to check their luggage amid Ryanair’s plans to pay staff to check for oversized bags

Ryanair’s baggage policy update has sparked a warning by a travel expert

Holidaymakers worried about being stung by hefty excess baggage fees at the airport have been advised to carry out a vital check using two “trustworthy” items. A travel expert issued the guidance following news that Ryanair is thinking about increasing bonuses for staff who catch passengers with overweight bags.

The subject of extra fees has been a sore spot for money-conscious travellers in recent years given different airlines have different allowances. And recent comments by Michael O’Leary, the airline’s CEO, will do little to calm the nerves of those flying off on their summer holidays.

To avoid getting stung by such fees, Paul Stewart, the founder of travel company MyBaggage, suggested people check their luggage’s weight at home using two simple items instead of using the facilities at the airport.

“Investing in a trustworthy luggage scale and measuring tape is the best course of action,” he said. “Check your bags at home rather than at the airport. In order to account for scale differences between your home scale and the airline’s equipment, I always advise packing a little under the weight limit.”

The travel guru added: “If at all possible, opt for soft-sided luggage rather than hard cases because the former are more accommodating if you have to fit them into sizers. Consider wearing your heaviest shoes and jacket while travelling rather than packing them, and pack your heaviest items in your carry-on rather than checked luggage.”

Luggage scales can be bought for as little as £5.99 on Amazon and avoid the risk of being fined £70.

Photo of Ryanair CEO Michael O'Leary giving a speech at a press conference in Spain, surrounded by padded microphones
Michael O’Leary said he was open to boosting bonuses of staff who catch more oversized bags(Image: Eduardo Parra/Europa Press via Getty Images)

In addition to weighing your luggage at home, Paul also suggested the time-honoured tradition of reading up each airline’s policies as they can vary between carriers and routes, reports Bristol Live. He said: “Document the size and weight of your luggage at home as proof in case of any disagreements.”

Stewart’s advice came after O’Leary discussed the possibility of improving incentives for staff in an attempt to relieve the pressure of excess baggage on his airline.

In an interview with RTE’s Morning Ireland, the low-cost carrier’s CEO said: “We are happy to incentivise our [staff] with a share of those excess baggage fees, which we think will decline over the coming year or two. It is about €1.50 [£1.30] per bag – and we’re thinking of increasing it, so we eliminate it.”

Row of planes with blue tailfins line up at an airport. These are Ryanair planes.
Ryanair has different baggage requirements depending on size(Image: BrasilNut1 via Getty Images)

At present, airline employees earn around £1.30 per item for flagging oversized bags, which is capped at £70 per month.

“We’re flying largely full flights, about half the passengers can bring two bags and the other half can only bring one – because that’s all that fits in the plane. We’re already struggling with that amount of baggage,” he shared.

Ryanair current permits each traveller to take one small personal item aboard, which must slot beneath the seat, weigh no more than 10kg and conform to measurements of 40cm x 20cm x 25cm.

Passengers who opt for the priority boarding service at additional expense can bring the same sized item, plus a 10kg case (55cm x 40cm x 20cm), which goes in the overhead compartment. This upgrade also grants flyers first access to the aircraft via the priority boarding lane at departure gates.

If crew members determine a traveller’s luggage fails to comply with its rules, passengers could be fined £70.

However, the Ryanair CEO’s bonus comments alarmed Stewart, who argued this strategy was merely “the tip of the iceberg” and feared other budget carriers would soon jump on the bandwagon.

“When airline management implements bonuses for spotting baggage abuses, staff enforcement will obviously become more stringent,” he said. “As for Ryanair, I think this is just the tip of the iceberg. Once other low-cost airlines realise the potential for profit, they will most likely follow suit.

“Instead of giving passengers the benefit of the doubt, staff are now actively seeking out reasons to impose fees, and the definition of ‘suitable baggage’ is getting more and more restrictive. Travellers must now pack and measure much more precisely as a result of this change.”

Source link

‘Murderbot’ is latest show to explore how humans, robots can coexist

The titular character of the Apple TV+ series “Murderbot” doesn’t call itself Murderbot because it identifies as a killer; it just thinks the name is cool.

Murderbot, a.k.a. “SecUnit,” is programmed to protect people. But the task becomes less straightforward when Murderbot hacks the governor module in its system, granting itself free will. But the freedom only goes so far — the robot must hide its true nature, lest it get melted down like so much scrap metal.

The android, played by Alexander Skarsgård, is often fed up with humans and their illogical, self-defeating choices. It would rather binge-watch thousands of hours of trashy TV shows than deal with the dithering crew of space hippies to which it’s been assigned. On Friday, in the show’s season finale, the security robot made a choice with major implications for the relationships it formed with the Preservation Alliance crew — something the series could explore in the future (Apple TV+ announced Thursday it was renewing the show for a second season).

Though “Murderbot” is a unique workplace satire set on a far-off world, it’s one of several recent TV series dealing with the awkward and sometimes dangerous ways that humans might coexist with robots and artificial intelligence (or both in the same humanoid package).

Other TV shows, including Netflix’s “Love, Death & Robots” and last year’s “Sunny” on Apple TV+, grapple with versions of the same thorny technological questions we’re increasingly asking ourselves in real life: Will an AI agent take my job? How am I supposed to greet that disconcerting Amazon delivery robot when it brings a package to my front door? Should I trust my life to a self-driving Waymo car?

But the robots in today’s television shows are largely portrayed as facing the same identity issues as the ones from shows of other eras including “Lost in Space,” “Battlestar Galactica” (both versions) and even “The Jetsons”: How are intelligent robots supposed to coexist with humans?

They’ll be programmed to be obedient and not to hurt us (a la Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics) until, for dramatic purposes, something goes wrong. The modern era of TV robots are more complex, with the foundational notion that they will be cloud-connected, accessing the same internet bandwidth as humans, and AI-driven.

A woman with red hair in a dark blue outfit.

In HBO’s “Westworld,” Evan Rachel Wood played Dolores Abernathy, a sentient android. (HBO)

A robot stands near a coffee table as a woman in a red sweater sits on a couch behind it.

The robot in Apple TV+’s “Sunny” was designed to be a friendly helper to Rashida Jones’ Suzie. (Apple)

Often, on shows such as AMC’s “Humans” and HBO’s “Westworld,” these AI bots become self-actualized, rising up against human oppressors to seek free lives when they realize they could be so much more than servants and sex surrogates. A major trope of modern TV robots is that they will eventually get smart enough to realize they don’t really need humans or come to believe that in fact, humans have been the villains all along.

Meanwhile, in the tech world, companies including Tesla and Boston Dynamics are just a few working on robots that can perform physical tasks like humans. Amazon is one of the companies that will benefit from this and will soon have more robots than people working in its warehouses.

Even more than robotics, AI technologies are developing more quickly than governments, users and even some of the companies developing them can keep up with. But we’re also starting to question whether AI technologies such as ChatGPT might make us passive, dumber thinkers (though, the same has been said about television for decades). AI could introduce new problems in more ways than we can even yet imagine. How will your life change when AI determines your employment opportunities, influences the entertainment you consume and even chooses a life partner for you?

So, we’re struggling to understand. AI, for all its potential, feels too large and too disparate a concept for many to get their head around. AI is ChatGPT, but it’s also Alexa and Siri, and it’s also what companies such as Microsoft, Google, Apple and Meta believe will power our future interactions with our devices, environments and other people. There was the internet, there was social media, now there’s AI. But many people are ambivalent, having seen the kind of consequences that always-present online life and toxic social media have brought alongside their benefits.

Past television series including “Next,” “Person of Interest,” “Altered Carbon” and “Almost Human” addressed potential abuses of AI and how humans might deal with fast-moving technology, but it’s possible they all got there too early to resonate in the moment as much as, say, “Mountainhead,” HBO’s recent dark satire about tech billionaires playing a high-stakes game of chicken while the world burns because of hastily deployed AI software. The quickly assembled film directed by “Succession’s” Jesse Armstrong felt plugged into the moment we’re having, a blend of excitement and dread about sudden widespread change.

Most TV shows, however, can’t always arrive at the perfect moment to tap into the tech anxieties of the moment. Instead, they often use robots or AI allegorically, assigning them victim or villain roles in order to comment on the state of humanity. “Westworld” ham-handedly drew direct parallels to slavery in its robot narratives while “Humans” more subtly dramatized the legal implications and societal upheaval that could result from robots seeking the same rights as humans.

But perhaps no show has extrapolated the near future of robots and AI tech from as many angles as Netflix’s “Black Mirror,” which in previous seasons featured a dead lover reconstituted into an artificial body, the ultimate AI dating app experience and a meta television show built by algorithms that stole storylines out of a subscriber’s real life.

Season 7, released in April, continued the show’s prickly use of digital avatars and machine learning as plot devices for stories about moviemaking, video games and even attending a funeral. In that episode, “Eulogy,” Phillip (Paul Giamatti) is forced to confront his bad life decisions and awful behavior by an AI-powered avatar meant to collect memories of an old lover. In another memorable Season 7 episode, “Bête Noire,” a skilled programmer (Rosy McEwen) alters reality itself to gaslight someone with the help of advanced quantum computing.

TV shows are helping us understand how some of these technologies might play out even as those technologies are quickly being integrated into our lives. But the overall messaging is murky when it comes to whether AI and bots will help us live better lives or if they’ll lead to the end of life itself.

According to TV, robots like the cute helper bot from “Sunny” or abused synthetic workers like poor Mia (Gemma Chan) from “Humans” deserve our respect. We should treat them better.

The robots and AI technologies from “Black Mirror?” Don’t trust any of them!

And SecUnit from “Murderbot?” Leave that robot alone to watch their favorite show, “The Rise and Fall of Sanctuary Moon,” in peace. It’s the human, and humane, thing to do.

Source link

Protester charged with throwing ‘destructive device’ at CHP vehicle

Los Angeles County prosecutors announced new charges Tuesday against people suspected of attacking the police during recent protests that rocked downtown L.A., including an incident in which a California Highway Patrol cruiser was set ablaze on the 101 Freeway.

Dist. Atty. Nathan Hochman said 39-year-old Adam Palermo was charged with two counts of assault on a peace officer and two counts of using a destructive device in connection with the June 8 incident.

As he announced the charges, Hochman stood alongside a TV screen looping a video that allegedly shows Palermo dropping a flaming item onto the CHP vehicle during the first weekend of protests against the Trump administration’s immigration raids.

That Sunday — the day after President Trump deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles over Gov. Gavin Newsom’s objections — thousands of protesters took to downtown. A number of CHP vehicles and officers wound up parked underneath an overpass on the 101 after clearing protesters from the freeway late in the afternoon.

Palermo also allegedly threw a large rock at one of the CHP vehicles. Hochman displayed social media posts allegedly made by Palermo saying “of all the protests I’ve been involved in, which is well over a hundred now, I’m most proud of what I did today,” accompanied by images and videos of the CHP cars being damaged and burned.

“It was not a productive day. It was a day of destruction,” Hochman said.

Palermo will also face federal arson charges in relation to the same incident, according to U.S. Atty. Bill Essayli, who joined Hochman for the news conference.

Hochman said his office has brought charges against 30 people in relation to the protests since they first erupted 10 days ago. Essayli said he’s brought about 20 cases, and both promised more prosecutions going forward.

In a separate alleged attack, Hochman said 23-year-old William Rubio threw fireworks at Los Angeles police officers responding to a dumpster that had been set on fire near First and Spring streets on June 8. When Rubio was arrested, police allegedly found 11 M-1000 fireworks in his backpack, which Hochman likened to a “quarter stick of dynamite.”

“These are lethal devices. Had any of these been thrown in a person’s direction, they could have killed or maimed that person,” Hochman said.

It was not immediately clear whether Rubio or Palermo had defense attorneys. Palermo is scheduled to be arraigned Tuesday afternoon, according to a district attorney’s office spokesperson. Records show Rubio will be arraigned downtown on July 1.

Charges were also filed against defendants accused of firing a laser pointer at a police helicopter, being in possession of a firearm when they were detained for a curfew violation and breaking into an Apple store downtown that was being overrun by “looters,” Hochman said.

Essayli announced one new case against a defendant who allegedly spit on a National Guard member and federal law enforcement officers during a confrontation outside a federal building.

“As our President said, ‘If you spit, we hit,’ and we will hit you with a felony,” Essayli said.

L.A.’s top federal prosecutor also went into more detail about charges filed last week against Alejandro Orellana, who was charged with conspiracy to commit civil disorder and aiding and abetting civil disorder for handing out protective face shields to protesters.

Essayli said the masks were meant to protect “violent agitators” from law enforcement crowd-control munitions, adding that a search of Orellana’s home turned up a a bag of rocks, metal BB gun pellets and a notebook of anti-police scribbling including a page that read “Blue Lives Matter. 187,” the California Penal Code section for murder.

Asked why providing defensive materials to demonstrators was a crime, Essayli scoffed at the idea that peaceful demonstrators would need protective equipment.

“He wasn’t handing masks out at the beach,” Essayli said. “He was handing them out in downtown L.A. to people who were dressed similarly to those committing violence. They were dressed in gear from top to bottom, they were covering their face, they were wearing backpacks. We’ve talked about what’s been in the backpacks. You’ve got fireworks. You’ve got rocks … There’s no legitimate reason why a peaceful protester needs a face shield.”

Orellana faces at least five years in federal prison if convicted.

Essayli also reiterated his promise to go after “organizers and funders” of what he termed “violence” at protests. He hinted that the person who paid for the masks Orellana distributed could also face criminal charges.

Although some of the recent protest cases brought by Essayli’s office have involved severe instances of violence against police — including cases where defendants are accused of hurling Molotov cocktails or concrete blocks at deputies and officers — others have left legal experts wondering if the devout Trump appointee is straining to criminalize protest against the administration’s policies.

Essayli maintained Tuesday that his office is only going after those responsible for causing unrest in recent days.

“These weren’t peaceful protesters,” he said of the people who received masks from Orellana. “They weren’t holding up signs expressing a political message. They were agitators.”

Source link