concerned

Three top-20 sides faced by Thomas Tuchel’s England – and still no wins.

The Three Lions breezed through qualification for the World Cup winning all of their eight games without conceding a goal.

But after losing 1-0 to Japan, the world’s 18th-ranked side, at Wembley in England’s last match before Tuchel names his World Cup squad, questions about whether the Three Lions struggle when they come up against elite nations are being asked.

After their loss at Wembley, which saw Japan become the first Asian side to beat England, the Three Lions end the March international break without a win.

There is an argument that Tuchel experiemented with his line-ups in last June’s 3-1 loss to 14th-ranked Senegal, the 1-1 draw with 17th-ranked Uruguay and in the Japan defeat, something he would not do at a major tournament.

But critics will suggest that the England manager should be using these games to find his best XI, and get them ready for the challenge that is coming at this summer’s World Cup, especially as the sides that England did not face the same tests in qualification.

Serbia, England’s toughest oppnent in qualification, are ranked 39th in the world, and were comfortably beaten 5-0 away by England and 2-0 at Wembley in November.

The biggest worry for England and for Tuchel is what they will do without captain and record goalscorer Harry Kane if he is not available.

Kane missed the game against Japan after picking up a knock in training and England, who lacked ideas in attack, do not have a candidate who is ready to be his back-up.

Manchester City midfielder Phil Foden was trialled as a false nine and did not have a good night but Tuchel has said this window has provided him “more clarity” than questions about his side.

“I am disappointed, everyone is.” Tuchel said. “I knew that we had a top exam in this window because our players are heavy in club football and in European football in the most physical toughest league that there is.

“We played against two top-20 teams, well drilled and very good opponents who arrived with their best line-up

“We had big changes in the middle of camp, suddenly after the [Uruguay] match we had seven or eight injuries who had to leave.

“It is not an excuse, it is just an explanation why things are not perfectly smooth and perfectly at the highest level we expect.”

A report on how Olympic organizers will tackle civil rights, homeless and human trafficking ahead and during the 2028 Games has not been made public by the city more than two months after it was filed and no date for its release has been set, leaving human rights advocates fearing the issues will not get the attention and funding they deserve.

Council president Marqueece Harris-Dawson, who chairs the ad-hoc committee on the LA28 Games, has not included the human rights report on the committee’s agenda. His office did not respond to requests for comment and Sharon Tso, the city’s chief legislative analyst, and Matthew Szabo, the city’s administrative officer, both said they have not seen the report and “nothing appears on the council file,” according to Tso.

The delay is limiting discussion on an important topic, said Stephanie Richard, a clinical professor who leads the Sunita Jain Anti-Trafficking Initiative at Loyola Law School, which released its own comprehensive report on human trafficking and the 2026 World Cup and 2028 Olympics in December.

“From an anti-trafficking perspective, this is a historic moment” she said. “Yet the public has no access to the draft.

“Without transparency, Los Angeles cannot responsibly prepare, and advocates cannot provide informed guidance. LA28 is setting a global precedent — one that currently lacks public accountability.”

LA28, the private nonprofit organizing committee for the 2028 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games in Los Angeles, was responsible for developing a human rights strategy around the Games. Its report was due Dec. 31, a deadline it met, according to a spokesperson for the group. LA28 is not allowed to release the report publicly until the city does.

“As per our Games Agreement with the City, LA28 completed the Human Rights Strategy at the end of 2025,” said Jacie Prieto Lopez, the group’s vice-president of communications and public affairs, in LA28’s first public statement on the report. “We are now working closely with city leaders on next steps.”

What those next steps are and when they’ll be taken, no one seems to know.

FIFA is producing its own report on human rights and human trafficking around this summer’s World Cup, which will feature eight games at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood.

“In each host city, human rights teams are working towards tailored FIFA World Cup Human Rights Action Plans in consultation with local human rights stakeholders and in line with FIFA guidance,” a FIFA spokesperson said in a written statement. “Plans will be published ahead of the tournament. This work reflects a sustained and consistent commitment by FIFA to embed human rights considerations throughout the planning and delivery of the tournament.”

The FIFA report for Los Angeles isn’t expected to be released until May, according to sources close to the process not authorized to speak publicly, about a month before the tournament kicks off. Some of the other 11 U.S. host cities, among them Seattle and Houston, have already rolled out their own initiatives addressing the issue.

Richard, who was invited by the city to consult with LA28 on its study, said the release of both the Olympic and World Cup reports is important for Los Angeles because it allows for public comment and oversight.

Richard’s group has called on LA28 and FIFA to allocate between $2.75 and $3.1 million specifically for anti-trafficking implementation; to fund a public-awareness campaign and independent audits to ensure accountability and transparency; and to invest in long-term programs that extend beyond the two sporting events.

“One of the things our report starts from is the only evidence-based data connected to major sporting events is that labor trafficking increases,” Richard said. “Major sporting events requires an influx, a large influx, of workers, a lot of time immigrant workers who are highly vulnerable in the construction industry..

“Presumably a lot of these workers are brought in months ahead of time to do some of this work.”

Richard said the continued presence of federal immigration officers in Los Angeles adds another layer of complexity to the human trafficking mix.

In mid-February, nine state legislators signed a letter calling for LA28, FIFA and local officials to incorporate the recommendations made by Richards’ group into their own plans and to release the report publicly as “a critical step toward accountability.”

But when asked about the letter this month, the signatories contacted refused to comment. A spokesperson for assemblywoman Celeste Rodriguez, who represents the eastern San Fernando Valley, said Rodriguez was “unavailable to talk on this issue.”

Married at First Sight Australia star Steven Danyluk was left worried during his honeymoon

A Married at First Sight Australia star has been left “concerned” after spotting a problem just minutes into their honeymoon.

The 13th series of the popular reality programme returned to E4 this week, with a new batch of singletons joining the renowned matchmaking experiment in the hope of finding their soulmate.

The fresh hopefuls first encounter one another at the altar, where they exchange their vows during picturesque wedding ceremonies. They then take the plunge to discover their happily ever after as they embark on luxurious honeymoons, before moving in together.

Alongside managing a new relationship, the participants also attend dinner parties with other couples and reconvene at commitment ceremonies, where they reveal how they’re feeling about their marriage.

The second pairing arranged by the experts – Mel Schilling, John Aiken and Alessandra Rampolla – were Rachel Gilmore and Steven Danyluk, reports OK!.

35-year-old team leader Rachel hadn’t been in a serious relationship for 14 years, and had never been with a man who made her feel attractive. Marine technician Steven, aged 34, similarly found the dating scene challenging, and has struggled to find his ideal partner.

The duo appeared to connect after meeting at the altar, but Rachel soon identified a concern after her new husband failed to compliment her throughout the day. She later raised her concerns, with Steven promptly apologising and expressing just how attracted he was to his wife.

During Wednesday’s (March 11) episode, Rachel and Steven set off on their honeymoon to a luxury eco-glamping resort in Mudgee, New South Wales. However, Steven quickly spotted a problem after entering their shared accommodation.

“I’ve got a tummy ache, not feeling well. It’s a bit of a concern, it’s really bad timing,” he told the cameras.

After discovering that the toilet didn’t have a door, a worried Steven then said: “I am really concerned about this.”

He added: “The bathroom is not really private. It’s not so much the view, it’s the sound. We’re all human and we make sounds. Look, this early into the relationship, I don’t want Rachel hearing my bowel movements.”

It appears Steven managed to navigate the issue, as the pair were later spotted sharing a kiss whilst admiring the stunning Australian sunset.

Yet it seems the peace isn’t destined to last, as a preview for Thursday’s (March 12) episode shows the couple caught up in a massive row, with Rachel tearfully telling her husband: “You’re putting me down, it’s hurtful.” Will the newlyweds manage to resolve things?

Married at First Sight Australia airs Monday to Thursday on E4 at 7.30pm

For the latest showbiz, TV, movie and streaming news, go to the new Everything Gossip website