chances

Women’s Cricket World Cup 2025: Rating England’s chances

As well as bearing the pressure of her first tournament in charge, Sciver-Brunt’s all-round performances will also go a long way to deciding England’s fortunes.

So often, she is their sole saviour with the bat but she will at least have the comfort of Knight’s return from injury, providing extra stability and maturity in the middle order which they lacked against India this summer.

Edwards wasted no time in changing England’s opening partnership, reinstating Amy Jones with Tammy Beaumont, but again it was difficult to take too much from their back-to-back stands of more than 200 against West Indies considering the weakness of the bowling attack.

They were far less convincing against a superior India, with a stand of 54 sandwiched between partnerships of eight and seven.

England are also very inexperienced in India as only Knight, Beaumont and Danni Wyatt-Hodge have 10 or more ODIs to their name here – though they are more familiar with the conditions from the Women’s Premier League, a T20 franchise tournament.

In terms of the bowling, much will also depend on how many overs Sciver-Brunt can deliver, having not bowled since the Ashes because of an Achilles problem.

Edwards made the bold call to omit the experienced Kate Cross from the squad, which leaves Lauren Bell, Lauren Filer and Em Arlott as the quicks and Sarah Glenn, Charlie Dean and world number one Sophie Ecclestone as the spinners.

Bell has quickly become one of the first names on the England team sheet over the past two years, but there are still a lot of unknowns about the surfaces in India and Sri Lanka, with their group games due to be played at four different venues.

If the surfaces do not offer much spin, especially in the early stages, England could find themselves a seamer light or lacking Cross’ experience, with Arlott and Filer still searching for consistency in international cricket.

Arlott is also the only new addition to the squad since the Ashes, another indication that England’s depth is yet to materialise in order to challenge the mainstays, though it was always unlikely the team would see wholesale changes from the summer considering the enormity of the challenge of this tournament and the need for experience.

Source link

Asia Cup: Bangladesh beat Afghanistan to keep Super Four chances alive | Cricket News

Eight-run cricket win keeps Bangladesh in the running for the next phase, while Afghanistan must beat Sri Lanka to make it.

Bangladesh have kept themselves in contention for the next round of cricket’s Asia Cup 2025 by defeating Afghanistan by eight runs in their Group B encounter in Abu Dhabi, the United Arab Emirates.

Afghanistan came close to securing their place in the Super Four stage and knocking out Bangladesh, but fell short in their chase of 155 on Tuesday.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The Bangladeshi pacers kept Afghanistan’s batters in check with regular wickets as Mustafizur Rahman (3-28 in four overs), Nasum Ahmed (2-11 in four overs) and Taskin Ahmed (2-34 in four overs) applied the brakes on Afghanistan’s innings.

Apart from Rahmanullah Gurbaz 35 (31) and Azmatullah Omarzai 30 (16), none of the Afghan batters could move into the 30s.

Captain Rashid Khan’s flurry at the end of the innings – 20 (11) – did look threatening for Bangladesh at one point, but once he was dismissed, Afghanistan’s chances were all but gone.

Despite a couple of late sixes from spinner Noor Ahmad, Afghanistan fell short and were dismissed for 145 in their 20 overs.

Earlier, Tanzid Hasan top-scored for Bangladesh with a half-century (52 off 31) to help set up a challenging target of 154-5 in 20 overs.

Rashid and Noor took two wickets apiece for Afghanistan.

Bangladesh have now played all three of their group games and will await the result of Afghanistan’s all-important match against Sri Lanka on Thursday.

Sri Lanka are at top spot with four points, and Bangladesh move to second place with four points.

The Tigers will hope that Sri Lanka beat Afghanistan to open their path to the Super Fours.

Should Afghanistan win, the net run rate could come into play as a deciding factor.

Source link

Trump’s nod to Europe on a future peace force for Ukraine vastly improves its chances of success

The greenlight given by President Trump on U.S. backup for a European-led force to police any future peace agreement in Ukraine vastly improves the likelihood it might succeed.

European leaders said Trump offered his backing during a call they held ahead of his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday.

The effectiveness of the operation, drawn up by the so-called coalition of the willing of around 30 countries supporting Ukraine, hinges on U.S. backup with airpower or other military equipment that European armed forces do not have, or only in short supply.

EU leaders regularly have underlined how the United States is “crucial” to the success of the security operation dubbed Multinational Force Ukraine. But the Trump administration has long refused to commit, perhaps keeping its participation on hold as leverage in talks with Russia.

After a meeting Wednesday between Trump and European leaders, European Council President Antonio Costa welcomed “the readiness of the United States to share with Europe the efforts to reinforce security conditions once we obtain a durable and just peace for Ukraine.”

French President Emmanuel Macron said Trump had insisted NATO must not be part of these security guarantees, but the U.S. leader agreed “the United States and all the (other) parties involved should take part.”

“It’s a very important clarification,” Macron said.

Trump did not publicly confirm he would allow U.S. backup, and no details of possible U.S. support were made public, but U.S. Vice President JD Vance sat in on the coalition meeting for the first time.

The Multinational Force Ukraine

More than 200 military planners have worked for months on ways to ensure a future peace should the war, now in its fourth year, finally halt. Ukraine’s armed forces also have been involved, and British personnel have led reconnaissance work inside Ukraine.

The exact size of the force has not been made public, although Britain has said it could number 10,000 to 30,000 troops. It must be enough to deter Russian forces, but also of a realistic size for nations that shrank their militaries after the Cold War and are now rearming.

The “reassurance” force’s mission “will be to strengthen Ukraine’s defenses on the land, at sea, and in the air because the Ukrainian Armed Forces are the best deterrent against future Russian aggression,” U.K. Defence Secretary John Healey told lawmakers last month.

“It will secure Ukraine’s skies by using aircraft,” Healey said, “and it will support safer seas by bolstering the Black Sea Task Force with additional specialist teams.”

Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey launched that naval force a year ago to deal with mines in Black Sea waters.

The force initially will have its headquarters in Paris before moving to London next year. A coordination headquarters in Kyiv will be involved once hostilities cease and it deploys.

The impact of US participation

European efforts to set up the force have been seen as a first test of the continent’s willingness to defend itself and its interests, given Trump administration warnings that Europe must take care of its own security and that of Ukraine in future.

Still, U.S. forces clearly provide a deterrent that the Europeans cannot muster.

Details of what the U.S. might contribute were unknown, and Trump has changed his mind in the past, so it remains to be seen whether this signal will be enough to persuade more countries within the coalition to provide troops.

Greece has publicly rejected doing so. Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis said last month that those discussions were “somewhat divisive” and distracted from the goal of ending the war as soon as possible.

Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has said Rome won’t contribute troops, but she previously has underlined the importance of working with the U.S. on ending the conflict and called for the participation of an American delegation in force coordination meetings.

Cook writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Emma Burrows in London contributed to this report.

Source link

How to boost your chances of winning a £2million scratchcard jackpot and the ones to NEVER buy

GRABBING your lucky penny to see if you have won tens of thousands of pounds in an instant is all part of the thrill for scratchcard players.

But there are ways you can boost your chances of winning with a few crucial steps, thanks to scratchcard expert Patrick Wareing’s tips.

National Lottery scratchcards displayed in a newsagent.

4

With loads of scratchcards available to buy, we reveal which ones are best to buy – and which ones you should avoidCredit: Getty
A joyful young man celebrates on his phone against a yellow background.

4

Look on the National Lottery website before you buy your scratchcard – it lists the odds of winning each oneCredit: Getty

Patrick runs the website scratchcard-winners.co.uk and has been dishing out top tips on how to bag a big prize since 2015.

He also helps players work out which online scratchcards are best to play.

Scratchcards offer life changing wins of up to £2million for punters and are sold at supermarkets, as well as garages and other convenience shops.

National Lottery scratchcards cost between £1 to £5, depending on which one you choose.

You can also buy online through the National Lottery website.

Anyone 18-years or over can buy a scratchcard and play.

Here’s what you need to know before playing.

Make sure you gamble responsibly.

Track down the odds

Scratchcard options with prizes, odds, and play costs.

4

Here’s where you will find the odds listed for each scratchcard on the National Lottery websiteCredit: National Lottery

Scratchcard odds can be found on the back of the slip, on the game procedures document or the National Lottery website.

They can also be found on in-store screens at the till in shops.

From reviving ‘dead’ pets to Ibiza benders and living in a caravan – how Lotto winners who scooped £194m splashed cash

Typically, the more expensive the scratchcard, the better the odds – but this isn’t always the case.

The odds of winning on the Sapphire 7s Doubler scratchcard, which costs £2, is one in 3.37, whereas the odds of winning the Diamond Maze scratchcard, which is £5, is one in 3.58.

Odds show how likely you are to win any particular prize – the lower the number, the better the odds.

This means you have a better chance of winning with the £2 game compared to the more expensive £5 game.

Of course, there’s no guarantee you will win on your scratchcard, even if you buy many to increase your odds of winning.

Two men holding a £500,000 winning lottery scratchcard.

4

Matt Harding and partner John Drabble won £500K on a lucky scratchcardCredit: National Lottery

Patrick said: “If you buy a scratchcard with odds of one in four, and you buy four scratchcards, you’d assume you get a winner.

“Yet the odds are calculated on all scratchcards in circulation, which means that you aren’t guaranteed a winner in this scenario.

“It can work in your favour though, as you could equally win on all four scratchcards.”

A better method of calculating the likelihood of winning can be to take a look at what “return to player” rate is.

This is what gambling experts define as the percentage of money that will be paid back to players from total scratchcard sales. It’s essentially the pay out rate on scratchcards.

National Lottery scratchcards usually pay out at a rate of between 60-70%.

So say, for example, that the total of all the scratchcards sold was £1 million. 

A 65% pay out rate would mean that £650,000 would be paid out to players, with the remaining £350,000 going to National Lottery.

The £100,000 A Month For A Year scratchcard has pay out rate of 70.02%.

The £100,000 Multiplier Yellow scratchcard has an pay out rate of 61.75%.

That’s a difference of nearly 10% and can make a big difference to your chance of getting winnings.

You can find information on prize rates on the game procedure documents, which are on the National Lottery website for each scratchcard.

Top 10 prize rate scratchcards

HERE are the National Lottery scratchcards with the top pay out rates that are currently on sale.

  • £2 Million Red – 71%
  • Black Pearl Deluxe – 70.98%
  • Cash Vault – 70.91%
  • Black Pearl – 70.85%
  • Run For Your Money – 70.12%
  • Mega Cashword (Purple) – 70.04%
  • £500 Loaded – 70.03%
  • Mega Cashword (Yellow) – 70.03%
  • Millionaire Maker – 70.03%
  • Silver & Gold – 70.03%

The scratchcards you can NEVER win the jackpot

Before you buy your scratchcard, check whether the top jackpot prizes have already been won.

The number of jackpot prizes available varies depending on what type of scratchcard you pick.

Many people don’t realise you can still buy National Lottery scratchcards even after all the top prizes have been won.

For cards with a jackpot above £121,000, no new packs of scratchcards will be put on sale when the last top prize has been won.

However, scratchcards that are already on display can continue to be sold.

Information about remaining prizes is available on in-store National Lottery scratchcard terminals, but these can be easy to miss so make sure you visit the National Lottery website too.

There won’t be a breakdown of other winnings still up for grabs.

Jackpot information is only every weekday, so there could be a delay if prizes are claimed on the weekend or on bank holidays.

The National Lottery site currently shows that five out of around 50 scratchcard games on sale have already had the top prizes claimed.

Use this nifty site

If you’re not sure which scratchcard to choose with the best chance of winning, this handy website could help.

Smartscratchcard.co.uk ranks which scratchcards are best to buy based on the chances of scoring the top prize.

It uses an algorithm to give a rating out of 100 on popular scratchcards.

It takes into account factors such as the price of the card, whether the top prize is still available to be won, how many cards are still available to buy, and the odds of winning.

It also lists how much you might have to spend to win the jackpot statistically.

The scratchcard rated the top buy on the site is currently Run For Your Money.

It costs £5 and the jackpot is £1 million.

The return to player rate is 70.12%, and two out of three jackpots have been won.

Shockingly, statistically speaking, you could have to spend £4,990,920 on cards to win.

Don’t throw away a loser

You may not believe it, but it’s easier to lose track of a winning scratchcard then you might think.

More than £57.6m worth of prizes went unclaimed by Lotto, EuroMillions and scratchcard players in the ten months to the end of January 2024.

The National Lottery recommends you always sign a scratchcard and keep it safe if you have a winner.

It sounds obvious, but make sure your card is definitely not a winner before chucking.

This is more likely to happen with scratchcards featuring letters and numbers, such as the Bingo and Crossword styles.

Patrick adds: “The National Lottery often changes the rules between new releases – even if they look similar to the ones before them.”

Even if you think you have a loser, it’s a good idea to take it to a shop where they can check.

Then you can be completely sure you don’t throw away any winners.

Don’t leave it too late

It’s really important to know that all scratchcards have an expiry date.

Even if you have a winner, you won’t be able to claim your prize if the card is out of date.

Prizes must be claimed before the end of the 180th day after the closing date of the game.

This gives you roughly six months after the game has closed.

All current game closures on the website national-lottery.co.uk/games/gamestore/scratchcards/closures

But here’s the catch, the closure dates are influenced by how many prizes are left.

So to avoid missing out, cash in your prize as soon as you realise you have a winner.

Remember, only gamble with money you can afford to lose, and set a spending limit before you play.

Visit gamcare.org.uk or GambleAware.org if you need help.

‘I won £500,000 scratchcard jackpot – here’s my tactic to winning’

SCRATCHCARD winner Matthew Harding won a £500,000 jackpot, and revealed his secret to scooping the mega win.

Shop assistant Matthew, from Nottingham, won big on the Pink Multiplier National Scratchcard in 2023.

He said he always bought two scratchcards in a row because he heard that this makes you more likely to win.

His tactic paid off, and he scooped the top jackpot.

Matthew said at the time of winning: “I treat myself to a scratchcard or two every month after payday and scratch them on my way home.

“I have seen a few customers in the shop winning £20 or £40 here and there so I thought I would give this particular one a go.

“I have always been told to buy two in a row as you are more likely to win.

“There may be no real logic in that but that’s exactly what I do – I always buy them in a set.

Matthew stuffed the card in his sock to keep it safe.

He bought it from Greasley General Stores, Eastwood – the store he worked at the time.

He made sure to sign the back of the card and didn’t fold it so he could keep the card safe.

Source link

Premier League relegation: The stats behind Leeds, Burnley and Sunderland’s chances in the top flight

For as long as there’s been relegation, supporters have been trying to predict the minimum number of points needed to avoid it.

So what should Burnley, Leeds, Sunderland and others be aiming for?

Traditionally, 40 points are said to be enough for Premier League survival.

That’s because only three teams have ever reached the 40-point mark in a 38-game season and gone down.

They are: West Ham with 42 in 2002-03, Sunderland with 40 points in 1996-97 and Bolton with 40 points the following year.

But, given all three of those seasons were well over 20 years ago, is it time to set a lower benchmark?

Over the past 10 seasons, the average points collected by the team in 18th – a total you’d need to better in order to stay up – has been exactly 32.

Tottenham finished 17th last term with 38 points but, because of the weaknesses of the promoted trio, they would still have beaten the drop with just 26.

The season before, 17th-placed Nottingham Forest managed 32 points – a tally which included a four points deduction – but actually only needed 27 to stay up.

Source link

Arsenal: Is creating chances an issue for Gunners?

An electronic billboard saying "Welcome Gyokeres"Image source, Getty Images

It seemed last season like Arsenal were crying out for a goalscoring striker and they will feel they have got just that in the signing of Viktor Gyokeres.

While the Gunners conceded fewer goals than Liverpool in 2024-25, Arne Slot’s side scored 17 more – arguably the key difference in the Premier League title race.

That is a problem Gyokeres has obviously been brought in to address, although it may be a bit more complicated than that.

When we look at the reasons why Arsenal scored just 69 goals to the champions’ 86, it’s clear that their problem wasn’t finishing chances but creating them…

Arsenal won seven fewer penalties

Liverpool (13.3%) had a better shot conversion rate than Arsenal (12.6%) last season, but that’s a misleading stat for one key reason – penalties.

Liverpool won and scored a league-high nine penalties, while Arsenal won and scored a paltry two.

Given that penalties were scored at a rate of 83% and non-penalty shots at just 11% in the Premier League in 2024-25, every spot-kick that a team won significantly distorted their shot conversion rate as a reflection of their finishing ability.

When we look at how ruthless the two teams were away from the penalty spot, it’s actually Arsenal who were the (slightly) better finishers…

While Liverpool winning nine penalties was a lot, 14 teams have been awarded more in a season over the past decade – including Manchester United being awarded a whopping 14 penalties in 38 games in 2019-20.

However, for a team that finished as high in the table as Arsenal to win just two penalties is unusual. In the past 10 campaigns, a side ending up with a points tally in the 70s has won an average of five penalties, while champions have won an average of eight.

In fact, the last team to win so many points and so few penalties was Arsenal themselves back in 2015-16 when they also finished runners-up, winning just two penalties. Champions Leicester were awarded 13.

Those seven extra penalties last season had a significant impact on the title race, too, as Liverpool’s nine spot-kicks won them an extra 11 points over the course of the campaign.

Since Arsenal’s two penalties both came in a 5-2 win at West Ham in November, they earned the Gunners no points whatsoever.

Arsenal took far fewer shots

Putting penalties aside, we come to the major reason why Arsenal scored so few goals compared to Liverpool – they just didn’t create enough chances!

Over the course of 38 games, Liverpool took 95 more non-penalty shots than the Gunners… exactly 2.5 more every game.

If Mikel Arteta’s side had taken the same number of non-penalty shots as the champions and continued scoring at the rate that they did (12.3%) then they would’ve scored an additional 12 goals, showing Arsenal’s main problem last season was that you can’t score the chances you don’t make.

Arsenal took worse-quality shots

Liverpool didn’t just create more shots than Arsenal last season but better ones, too, as only Brentford created higher-quality chances on average in terms of expected goals per shot (excluding penalties).

What that means is Liverpool created chances last season that have historically been scored in the Premier League 12% of the time, while Arsenal’s have been converted at a rate of 11%.

Now, a 1% difference might not sound like much but, given that Arsenal took 544 non-penalty shots over the course of last season, if they had created chances as good as the champions they would have scored an additional five goals (1% of 544).

So… Arsenal were actually pretty ruthless?

Eagle-eyed readers will have noticed that the goals Arsenal ‘didn’t score’ thanks to the reasons above add up to 24, while in reality they scored 17 goals fewer than Liverpool.

That’s because when you take shot quality into account, Arsenal weren’t just slightly better finishers than the champions last season but much better finishers, as they overperformed their non-penalty xG by seven goals to Liverpool’s measly 0.5.

In fact, despite the narrative around Arsenal’s finishing last season, only Nottingham Forest and Wolves were more ruthless in front of goal than the Gunners.

The problem for Arteta’s side was that Liverpool created so many more, and higher-quality, chances that they didn’t need to be clinical to win the league.

So, in a nutshell, here are the reasons why Arsenal scored 17 goals fewer than Liverpool last season…

Now the good news: Gyokeres brings more than just finishing

While obviously the more Gyokeres can help Arsenal finish their chances the better, he should also help solve the Gunners’ main problem of creating enough chances in the first place.

Last season he attempted 4.5 shots per 90 minutes on average in the Primeira Liga, far more than Gabriel Jesus (3.0) and Kai Havertz (2.6) averaged for Arsenal in the Premier League.

Although clearly the number of shots a striker takes is in part down to the service he gets from his team-mates, it’s also a result of the options he gives his team-mates with his movement and anticipation in and around the box.

Given that Gyokeres also ranked second for chances created from open play in the league (60) and won the most penalties (4), he should play a major role in providing the ammunition the Gunners need to make a challenge for the Premier League title this season.

Source link

Five things you should never wear on a plane to improve chances of survival

Many experts have shared their advice and tips on what we should wear for a flight, whether it’s a long or short-haul journey, and there are some items they say to avoid

Woman on plane
People are advised to avoid one item of clothing when boarding a plane(Image: Getty Images)

When preparing to board a flight, we often think about comfort, but experts have revealed there are some clothing items we should avoid wearing altogether.

While they’re not explicitly banned, it can improve our chances of survival if the worst were to happen.

Many people opt for synthetic materials during flights, such as stretchy leggings, but they aren’t always on the recommended attire list, according to aviation safety experts.

The main concern is that in emergency situations, such as fires, leggings made of synthetic materials could melt onto the skin, worsening burn injuries.

Leggings

In an Instagram video shared by Pollyann, known as travelwithpalma, she told her over 11K followers about an important tip regarding leggings. She revealed: “I know – leggings feel like a second skin on a flight. But here’s why you really shouldn’t wear them on a plane.

“According to experts, in the rare event of an emergency evacuation (think: fire, sudden landing, etc), synthetic fabrics like polyester and spandex – aka what most leggings are made of – can actually melt when exposed to high heat.

READ MORE: Remote UK island dubbed ‘Hawaii of the North’ has beautiful beaches and warm weather

São Paulo, Brazil - January 17, 2018: People waiting to board the plane.
Travellers are advised not to wear synthetic fabrics during a flight(Image: Erlon Silva – TRI Digital via Getty Images)

“That means they could fuse to your skin, making injuries way worse. The Federal Aviation Administration and safety experts recommend wearing loose-fitting natural fibres like cotton, wool or denim when flying.

“They’re more fire-resistant and safer in worst-case scenarios. So yes, wear something cosy – but make it cotton cosy, not plastic cosy – just to be safe.”

One user added their input and said: “It’s not just leggings. Anything with polyester contains petroleum and is considered flammable. So someone with synthetic trousers, shorts, dresses would be in the same situation. It has nothing to do with leggings – that’s personal preference.”

Synthetic fibres

Fabric UK has also cautioned about the potential risk of donning synthetic fibres. It stated: “Some synthetics will not ignite into a flame easily, but when they do catch fire they can be unsafe because many synthetic fibres are thermoplastic, meaning that they become mouldable under high heat.

“Therefore the fabric will melt, which can cause serious burns to the skin making non fire retardant synthetic fabrics unsuitable for protective clothing.”

It explains that more tightly woven fabrics will be “harder to ignite in comparison to lighter-weight fabrics, which will burn easier.” The fabric-selling website considers wool to be “one of the safest fabrics” out of both synthetic and natural fibres as it “does not easily ignite, and if it does ignite, then the flame will often diminish and the fabric will not melt.”

It’s uncommon to be on a plane that catches fire or crashes, but wearing the right material could assist you in such a situation. You can ascertain the fabric composition of your clothes by inspecting the labels.

She said it was a really peaceful experience
Jeans are advised to be avoided when flying(Image: Getty Images/iStockphoto)

Jeans

Jeans are also best to avoid on a flight due to potential restrictions on circulation. Dr. Hugh Pabarue, leading physician and vein specialist with Metro Vein Centres, explained to Huffington Post: “The clothing we wear when we fly can significantly impact our circulation. For example, tight clothing is not recommended.

“Wearing leggings and other restrictive garments, such as skinny jeans that are too tight, reduces blood’s ability to flow into and out of the legs.

“Sitting for extended periods of time, especially on planes, can lead to blood pooling in the legs, increasing the risk for deep vein thrombosis – a serious medical condition where a blood clot forms in a deep vein of the leg.”

Shoes

Experts have also recommended wearing flat and secure shoes, despite the temptation to arrive at the airport in flip-flops or sandals. This is so that if an emergency exit is required, you can evacuate with ease.

Air safety specialist Christine Negroni said: “No high heels, you want to be able to flee.” She added: “You could see glass on the runway, ice on the runway, see fuel on the runway, and you might see fire on the runway, and that’s when you need to run.”

She also mentioned that you’ll want your shoes on for that so, “sensible shoes, easy on, easy off with a thick sole.”

What to wear

While airlines’ dress codes might dictate what passengers can wear to maintain decorum and avoid offensive outfits, the Federal Aviation Administration also provides tips on how to dress wisely to ensure one’s safety in the air. Their recommendation insists: “Passengers who wear sensible clothing can reduce their chances of serious injury in the unlikely event of an emergency.

“Dress to cover as much skin as possible. Wear clothes made of natural fabrics such as cotton, wool, denim or leather. Synthetics may melt when heated. Wear clothing that is roomy, avoiding restrictive clothing. Wear low-heeled, leather or canvas shoes.”

READ MORE: Zara McDermott says this spray ‘saved her rosacea-inflamed skin’ while she was at Glastonbury

Source link

Angels fail to capitalize on chances in loss to Nationals

Game 81. The halfway point of the season arrived at Angel Stadium — and the Angels, albeit squarely in contention at .500, were dealing with a bit of organizational uncertainty.

Angels general manager Perry Minasian announced before Friday’s game that manager Ron Washington would remain on medical leave for the rest of the season because of an undisclosed health issue.

Bench coach Ray Montgomery took over on June 20 as the acting — now interim — manager as the Angels entered Friday winners in seven of their last 10 games.

The Angels are in a much better spot than 2024. This time last season, after game 81, they were 11 games under .500 — squarely out of the postseason hunt.

Friday, however, even after losing 15-9 in a three-hour, 11-minute slog of a series opener against the Washington Nationals (34-48), the Angels (40-41) still are just two games out of the third American League wild-card spot.

In a game where the Angels and Nationals combined for 24 runs and 30 hits — with the 19 hits and 15 runs given up by the Angels’ pitching staff representing season-worst marks — what ultimately separated the teams was the Angels’ inability to come through with runners on base.

In the sixth and seventh innings — down one and two runs, respectively — the Angels had opportunities to take the lead or tie the score with runners in scoring position, but failed to capitalize. From there, the Nationals’ lead grew, with Hunter Strickland giving up four runs in the ninth as part of a 10-run barrage against the bullpen.

“It kind of just felt like an off-night tonight all the way up and down,” Montgomery said. “Those guys have been asked to do a lot over the last few weeks, and they’ve responded. So tonight wasn’t the night.”

Angels interim manager Ray Montgomery, second from left, waits on the mound with catcher Logan O'Hoppe.

Angels interim manager Ray Montgomery, second from left, waits on the mound with catcher Logan O’Hoppe during a pitching change in the fifth inning Friday.

(Jayne Kamin-Oncea / Associated Press)

In the early innings, the Angels had plenty of opportunities against Nationals starting pitcher Jake Irvin, who struggled against the heart of the lineup.

Jo Adell struck a 92-mph fastball high and away to right field for a solo home run — his 18th overall and 11th in June — in the second. An inning later, Nolan Schanuel and Taylor Ward received hanging breaking balls — a high curveball and slider, respectively — and pulled the ball for short-porch home runs.

“The idea is that if we’re hunting the pitches that we want to do damage with pitcher to pitcher, we’ll avoid the chase and kind of be able to get better pitches to hit,” Adell said, who has helped the Angels post four or more walks in the last four games. “You know, our thing is, you’re only as good of a hitter as the pitches that you get.”

Three home runs in three innings helped the Angels build a three-run lead. Across 4 ⅓ innings of work against Irvin, the Angels’ lineup continued to click. They tallied nine runs (eight earned to Irvin) on nine hits — just enough for an early lead as José Soriano trudged through his worst outing of the season.

Soriano couldn’t get out of the fifth against the Nationals. The shutdown pitching he had featured in his last three starts — giving up just two runs across 20 ⅔ innings — looked like a distant memory. The right-hander struck out four and walked two, while giving up eight earned runs and nine hits.

“I mean, that’s not what we would have expected, given what he did in his last three outings and what we talked about a little bit yesterday,” Montgomery said. “Just wasn’t sharp, didn’t feel crisp from the get go.”

Added Soriano in Spanish through team interpreter Manny Del Campo: “I feel a little bit upset because of my performance tonight. … I feel upset because I wasn’t able to help win tonight.”

Angels shortstop Zach Neto (shoulder) returned to action, striking out in the seventh inning as a pinch hitter.

Before the game, Neto said that he’d likely be able to hit before throwing — something he’s yet to do — after jamming his shoulder on a stolen base attempt Tuesday.

“He proved to me, proved to the medical staff, proved to everybody else he was capable of coming in,” Montgomery said. “We thought it was a good time to give it a shot right there.”

The Angels will try to even the series Saturday with right-hander Kyle Hendricks (5-6, 4.83 earned-run average) on the mound.

Source link

Rams’ chances of trading for Dolphins’ Jalen Ramsey may be fading

A RamsJalen Ramsey reunion might not be in the offing.

Coach Sean McVay on Tuesday reiterated his respect for the star cornerback who helped the Rams win Super Bowl LVI, but for the first time he indicated that there might be too many “obstacles” to making a trade with the Miami Dolphins for the three-time All-Pro.

Ramsey is due to earn $24.3 million this season, and his salary-cap number will increase substantially over the next few seasons, according to Overthecap.com.

“Usually, those are scenarios and situations that you have to have plans in place prior to executing some of the decisions that have occurred,” McVay said, perhaps referencing the contract adjustment quarterback Matthew Stafford received and the signing of free-agent receiver Davante Adams. “Definitely don’t want to rule anything out… but there would be some obstacles that are real that are in the place of maybe preventing that from occurring.”

The Rams are set to open the season with a cornerback group that includes returning starters Darious Williams and Ahkello Witherspoon, with Cobie Durant, Emmanuel Forbes Jr., Josh Wallace and Derion Kendrick also competing for playing time.

The Rams recently waived Kendrick, who was due to earn $3.4 million in the final year of his rookie contract, but re-signed him Tuesday, probably for a one-year veteran minimum contract.

Kendrick is in Maui for the Rams minicamp, which featured a 30-minute jog through Tuesday.

“It was really just kind of a financial business deal,” McVay said, adding that he, general manager Les Snead and defensive backs coach Aubrey Pleasant had communicated with Kendrick their desire to keep him in the fold before he was waived.

McVay did indicate that talks with running back Kyren Williams’ agent regarding a possible extension were progressing.

“We’re getting closer to hopefully finding a conclusion to this,” McVay said. “Now, until that’s actually agreed upon from both sides, we’re really in the same boat. … So, we’re trying to be able to solve that, and if we’re able to land that we’ll be excited about that.”

Neither left tackle Alaric Jackson nor newly signed tackle D.J. Humphries are with the team in Maui.

The Rams signed Humphries last week because Jackson is dealing with blood-clot issues for the second time in his pro career. In March, Jackson signed a three-year contract that includes $35 million in guarantees.

“He was able to communicate that he was feeling some things in his lower leg, and he ends up going and getting a scan and it revealed that was the case,” McVay said. “You pray for him to be able to have a healthy, safe recovery, and we’re really just taking it a day at a time with him.

“What we did want to be able to do in the meantime was be proactive about a contingency plan. … D.J.’s a guy that we’ve got a lot of respect for. Obviously, familiarity with him just playing against him and he’s a veteran. Felt like that was definitely the right move for our team in the meantime.”

Etc.

The Rams conclude their minicamp Wednesday with a public workout at War Memorial Stadium … Rams veterans on Tuesday helped coach in a flag football camp for high school students. Rookies worked with Habitat for Humanity to rebuild homes in Lahaina that were lost to wildfires in 2023.

Source link

Sterling K. Brown’s ‘Paradise’ Emmy chances, by the numbers

The Television Academy first embraced Sterling K. Brown nine years ago and has kept him in a loose side hug ever since. Brown’s a contender for lead actor in a drama for his role as a Secret Service agent in “Paradise,” a Hulu thriller that reunites Brown with “This Is Us” creator Dan Fogelman.

10

Emmy nominations Brown has received across …

6

Different projects, including for narrator (“Lincoln: Divided We Stand”) and character voice-over (“Invincible”).

2

Brown’s first two wins came in back-to-back years — for supporting actor in a limited series in 2016, as prosecutor Christopher Darden in “The People v. O.J. Simpson,” and lead actor in a drama series in 2017 for his performance as Randall in NBC’s big-feelings family saga “This Is Us.”

3 x 2

Brown has received two nominations in a single year three times: 2018, 2020, 2021.

4

The Screen Actors Guild Awards also love Brown, who has won four times from 11 nominations, including …

2019

Twice in one year as part of both the winning film (“Black Panther”) and TV drama (“This Is Us”) ensembles.

1

Brown received his first Oscar nomination in 2024 for his supporting role as the hedonistic, hurting brother of Jeffrey Wright’s novelist in “American Fiction.”

Source link

Dodgers unable to capitalize on chances in shutout loss to Cardinals

The revolving door on the pitcher’s mound continues to spin for the Dodgers, who called Justin Wrobleski up from the minors to start Friday’s game against the St. Louis Cardinals.

There’s a good chance Wrobleski will be on his way back to the minors by the start of Saturday’s game.

In between he pitched six innings in a 5-0 loss to the St. Louis Cardinals, the Dodgers’ fourth loss in six games and their 11th loss in 20 games dating to May 16.

“I wouldn’t say, a problem,” manager Dave Roberts, who has used 13 different starting pitchers through 64 games, said of the revolving door. “It’s certainly not ideal.”

Nor is it unusual for the Dodgers, who used 17 starters and 40 pitchers overall last season when they won the World Series. But that door is certainly spinning faster than it did last year with the Dodgers using 11 different starters before May 1.

The Dodgers’ bullpen leads the majors in innings pitched while their starters have thrown the second-fewest innings because of injuries.

The Dodgers have 15 pitchers on the injured list, among them Blake Snell, Roki Sasaki and Tyler Glasnow. Including bonuses, the Dodgers will pay the three pitchers more than $100 million combined this season. So far, that has bought them 15 starts.

In their absence, Wrobleski, Landon Knack and Jack Dreyer have made a combined 12 starts; none of them will make more than $800,000.

And it’s not just pitchers: The Dodgers have made 18 transactions in June and the month is just a week old, creating a constant shuffle between the majors and triple-A Oklahoma City that could disrupt Dodgers’ locker room chemistry.

Roberts, however, said he’s not worried.

“It’s part of the culture nowadays in the major leagues, as far as kind of having optionable players and kind of having guys in and out of clubhouses,” he said. ”For our particular club, the core is still the core. But certainly on the periphery or the ancillary players that kind of go up and down, they’re kind of in and out, which is not easy for them.”

To combat that, Roberts said his coaches try to make sure the players feel comfortable during their stays, which can sometimes last less than 24 hours.

“It’s still not easy when you’re here for a couple days and then you’re out, then you’re back,” Roberts said.

Wrobleski (1-2), who made his second start of the season, agreed.

“Obviously, it’s a challenge,” he said. “But at the end of the day, I kind of know how this works and I know that my next start is not guaranteed to always be in one place or another. I wouldn’t say it’s an excuse. I haven’t pitched great up here.

“It’s definitely hard. But at the end of the day, you have to be ready to pitch whenever you’re called upon, no matter where you’re at. That’s kind of my mentality and wherever I’m at, I’m just going to continue to try to get better and continue improving.”

In a game delayed 77 minutes by rain, Wrobleski was undone by a pair of two-out pitches. The first was hit into the left-field stands by Pedro Pages for a two-run home run in the second inning. Brendan Donovan lined the other up the middle in the fifth to score two runners, both of whom reached on walks.

Willson Contreras accounted for the final run with an eighth-inning solo homer off reliever Chris Stratton.

But if injuries have crippled the Dodgers’ pitching, the offense simply crumbled Friday. They stranded nine runners, were one for 13 with runners in scoring position and struck out nine times. So while they lead the majors in runs, batting average and homer runs, they’re hitting just .228 in June.

All of which makes the absence of infielder Hyeseong Kim from the starting lineup all the more baffling. Kim, who is hitting .404/.436/.558 in 24 games, has just seven at-bats in June.

“I wish every time somebody got on base, we could get a hit and score,” said Mookie Betts, who had three of the Dodgers’ 10 hits. “I really wish every time runners are in scoring position, we could get those timely hits. But that’s not how the game works.

“The game is going to go through its ebbs and flows. You have to just kind of ride the wave. You can’t jump off.”

But you can’t get stuck in a revolving door either.

Source link

Chances of resolving US-EU trade dispute over tariffs remain slim, expert says

Published on
02/06/2025 – 13:27 GMT+2

ADVERTISEMENT

Brussels and Washington have little chance of breaking the trade deadlock they have been in since mid-March and the imposition of the first US tariffs on steel and aluminium, Ignacio García Bercero, a former senior EU official and expert of the Bruegel think tank, told Euronews.

“It seems to me very clear that if the US is not ready to take action to substantially mitigate the impact of the tariffs on steel, aluminium and cars. I don’t really see how it is going to be possible to reach any kind of negotiated agreement,” García Bercero said.

“The increase of US tariffs on steel and aluminium from 25% to 50% hardens the position of the US, which is the only country capable of deciding how to end the crisis.”

US President Donald Trump announced last Friday an increase in US tariffs imposed in mid-March on steel and aluminium coming into the country — including EU imports — from 25% to 50%, as of June 4.

Those tariffs come on top of 25% US tariffs on cars and 10% US levies on all EU imports.

However on 28 May, the US Court of International Trade ruled that an emergency law invoked by Trump did not give him unilateral authority to impose the 10% tariffs and ordered an immediate block on them.

The day after, a US court of appeals paused the lower court’s ruling to consider the government’s appeal on 9 June.

But the tariffs of 25% on steel, aluminium and cars were not challenged by the judges as they were grounded on a different law regarding national security.

Several investigations are currently being conducted by the US on the same legal basis into the pharmaceutical, semiconductor and aircraft industries, which could lead to further US tariffs.

“It is very clear that the US has already indicated that it is not ready to do anything on the 10% tariffs, which in any case are being challenged by a US court,” García Bercero said.

“And it now appears that it is not very easy to do anything on the other tariffs which are based on national security – the tariffs targeting steel, aluminium and cars or cars parts,” the former EU official explained.

“Quite frankly, I don’t really see how it is possible to reach any kind of agreement.”

“Therefore the EU need to adopt rebalancing action at least on steel, aluminium, cars and car parts increase,” García Bercero added.

Deadlines coming in fast

The EU has currently suspended until 15 July a first list of US products worth €21 billion to retaliate against US tariffs on steel and aluminium, after Trump decided a 90-day pause in the trade conflict until 9 July.

A second package is under discussion in Brussels until 10 June to target €95 billion worth of US goods in retaliation for the 25% tariff on cars and 10% on EU imports, if negotiations with the US fail.

Further countermeasures on steel and aluminium would need to be adopted by EU member states.

After the negotiation between the EU and the US seemed to kick off 10 days ago, the US president already threatened to impose 50% tariffs on all EU imports.

But a call between Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen eased the pressure with the promise from both sides to “fast-track” the trade talks. 

Brussels stated that it did not alter its offer in the negotiation, which includes zero-to-zero tariffs on all industrial goods and the purchase of certain strategic US products, such as energy, AI, or agricultural products.

“I’m not optimistic. But it doesn’t mean that it’s not the right tactic to continue to discuss and to see whether or not finally there is a willingness of the US to put something on the table,” García Bercero concluded.  

Source link

Walton Goggins’ ‘White Lotus’ Emmy chances, by the numbers

With Prime Video’s “Fallout,” HBO’s “The Righteous Gemstones” and now Season 3 of “The White Lotus” (also HBO), Walton Goggins’ fame has exploded. With his buzzy portrayal of Rick, a man obsessed with avenging his father’s death, in “Lotus,” an Emmy might finally be in the cards for the actor, a veteran of many critically beloved shows.

6

“Lotus” is the sixth Goggins show, after “The Shield,” “Justified,” “Gemstones,” “The Unicorn” and “Fallout,” to receive an …

85%

… or better aggregate Rotten Tomatoes critics’ score. Yet Goggins has never won an Emmy and has received only …

2

… nominations: supporting drama actor (2011) for his charismatic criminal Boyd in “Justified” and drama lead (2024) for bounty hunter the Ghoul on “Fallout.” It could be …

14

… his material that’s the issue. Goggins’ gritty and/or Southern-fried shows are not the kind that inspire Emmy voters’ rapture. Despite its secure place in the TV pantheon, “The Shield” drew three fewer nominations over seven seasons than …

17

… the more awards-friendly “Fallout” — a stylish, thoughtful video game adaptation often helmed by Jonathan Nolan — did in its first season. But love for “Fallout” …

44

… is a trickle compared with the tsunami of nominations for “Lotus” over its first two seasons. The show already has won …

15

… Emmys. Although …

4

… all that attention means Goggins might share this year’s drama supporting category with co-stars Jason Isaacs, Sam Nivola and Sam Rockwell. But …

3

… that does not necessarily mean splitting “Lotus” votes. Murray Bartlett won a limited series supporting Emmy for Season 1 against fellow “Lotus” actors, and Jennifer Coolidge prevailed twice in supporting categories crowded with co-stars. Indeed …

100%

… of nominated “Lotus” performers whose characters, much like Rick, faced extreme challenges have won.

Source link