scheme

Andrew was paid millions by oligarch with funds from firm linked to bribery scheme

James Oliver,BBC Panorama,

Will Dahlgreenand

Andy Verity,BBC News Investigations

Getty Images/BBC A graphic featuring a close-up black-and-white image of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor looking concerned superimposed on an image of Sunninghill Park mansion, a large two-story brick house.Getty Images/BBC

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor sold his former mansion for £15m in 2007

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor received millions of pounds from an oligarch using funds from a firm implicated in criminal corruption, a BBC investigation has found.

Kazakh billionaire Timur Kulibayev has told the BBC through his lawyers that he used a loan from a company called Enviro Pacific Investments to help him buy Andrew’s former mansion.

Prosecutors in Italy concluded that the firm had received cash from a bribery scheme in 2007.

Weeks after the last of these payments was made, the oligarch bought Sunninghill Park in Berkshire from the then prince for £15m – with the help of funds from Enviro Pacific.

Kulibayev is the son-in-law of Kazakhstan’s then-president and was one of the most influential officials in the central Asian country’s oil and gas industry. The BBC has also learned that, in another case, an Italian businessman pleaded guilty to bribing the oligarch.

Kulibayev’s lawyers told us he has never engaged in bribery or corruption, and the funds used to acquire Sunninghill Park were entirely legitimate.

The revelations raise questions about whether the then-prince may have inadvertently benefited from the proceeds of crime and whether he and his advisers conducted the proper checks required by law to avoid this.

Money laundering expert Tom Keatinge, director of the Centre for Finance and Security, said the deal had “blatant red flags” which should have prompted detailed checks to ensure it was not “helping to launder the proceeds of corruption”.

Kulibayev reportedly paid £3m more than the asking price and an estimated £7m more than the property’s market value.

The former prince did not respond to the BBC’s requests for comment. He told the Daily Telegraph in 2009, after criticism of the deal: “It’s not my business, the second the price is paid. If that is the offer, I’m not going to look a gift horse in the mouth and suggest they have overpaid me.”

On the market

Sunninghill Park was given to Andrew by the Queen as a wedding gift in 1986. A modern two-storey red-brick mansion, the 12-bedroom house, with 12 matching bathrooms and six reception rooms, was mocked for its resemblance to a Tesco superstore.

After it was first put on the market in 2001 and failed to attract offers, Andrew became personally involved. The former prince used the opportunity of an official visit to Bahrain as the UK’s trade envoy in 2003 to personally try to sell the property to Gulf royals, according to Simon Wilson, who was deputy ambassador at the time.

But a buyer eventually emerged through the then prince’s connections to a different country: Kazakhstan. In 2002, Andrew had become patron of the British-Kazakh Society jointly with the country’s autocratic president Nursultan Nazarbayev. Andrew visited the country in 2006 and, later that year, Nazarbayev met the then Queen at Buckingham Palace.

In 2007, an offer for Sunninghill Park came from Timur Kulibayev, Nazarbayev’s son-in-law.

AP Photo/Nikita Bassov Timur Kulibayev, pictured in 2011 voting in Kazakhstan's elections. He is wearing a dark suit and a white shirt with no tie and has short dark hair. Behind him are curtains in blue with gold trim - the colours of Kazakhstan's flag.AP Photo/Nikita Bassov

Timur Kulibayev, pictured in 2011, had a key role in Kazakhstan’s oil and gas industry

At the time, he had a fortune estimated at more than £1bn and a key role running the country’s sovereign wealth fund, Samruk-Kaznya, which owns much of the state’s oil and gas industry.

Andrew had reportedly been introduced to Kulibayev by Kazakh businesswoman and socialite Goga Ashkenazi, who has two children from an affair with the oligarch. She later described the prince as a close friend, but now says she has not had any dealings with him for about 15 years.

Andrew and Ashkenazi were photographed in June 2007 attending Ladies Day at Ascot with the Queen. In the same month, contracts were exchanged for the purchase of Sunninghill. Kulibayev used an offshore company he owned, Unity Assets Corporation, to buy the mansion. The Royal Family’s solicitors, Farrer & Co, acted for the seller.

The transaction was completed in September that year. The same month, royal records show, British taxpayers picked up a bill for £57,000 for a chartered flight for the former prince to visit Kazakhstan on official business as trade envoy.

Getty Images Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, wearing a black morning coat and a taupe waistcoat with a pale blue tie, looks in the distance with his hands in his pockets at Royal Ascot, while beside him Goga Ashkenazi, who wears a large red hat and a white dress with red spots, appears to laugh uproariouslyGetty Images

Andrew was pictured with Goga Ashkenazi, who has two children by Kulibayev, at Royal Ascot

At the time of the sale, the UK government was raising concerns about Kazakhstan. Then-Europe Minister Geoff Hoon told MPs in April 2007 that “allegations of systematic corruption” in the country were “rife”.

Despite these concerns – as well as Andrew’s official role as trade envoy and his position then as fourth-in-line to the throne – the identity of the buyer was not disclosed by either of the parties, or by Buckingham Palace.

In 2007, there was no requirement to identify the owners of offshore companies which bought UK property, and Kulibayev was only named by the media three years later.

Links to corruption

Questions were raised about the deal’s links to corruption in 2012, when media reports said Italian prosecutors were investigating allegations involving Kulibayev.

The allegations included the possibility that bribes might have been used to fund the purchase of Sunninghill Park through Enviro Pacific Investments – the company which has now been confirmed as partly funding the deal. These investigations did not lead to any charges against Kulibayev.

However, the BBC has seen documents from a series of court cases in 2016 and 2017 which together show how Italian prosecutors concluded that Enviro Pacific Investments had received cash from a bribery scheme.

These documents were first obtained by L’Espresso magazine during the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists’ Caspian Cabals project.

They suggest that Enviro Pacific Investments’ link to corruption was through another company called Aventall. In a case in Monza, Italian oil executive Agostino Bianchi pleaded guilty to paying bribes to Kulibayev and other Kazakh officials over lucrative oil contracts, and Aventall was named as one of the companies used to channel bribes. Kulibayev was not charged.

Shutterstock An aerial view of Sunninghill Park, showing a large two-storey red-brick mansion with dormer windows and a long wing extending on the right-hand-side of the image. Shutterstock

Sunninghill Park, built in the 1980s, was mocked for its resemblance to a Tesco superstore

According to Bianchi’s plea agreement, Aventall was run by Massimo Guidotti, who was described as the “mediator” of corruption.

He had created a rating system measuring the influence of Kazakh oligarchs, according to court documents in a related case. In an email from 2009, he gave Kulibayev the maximum five stars. Questioned by prosecutors, Guidotti denied distributing bribes.

In a second case in Milan, prosecutors said Aventall had made payments “of an allegedly corrupt nature” to Enviro Pacific Investments – the company which lent the money for the Sunninghill purchase.

They said $6.5m (£3.27m) had been promised, but they could only find evidence of $1.5m (£755,000) of payments. The last was in April 2007, less than two months before contracts were exchanged for Sunninghill.

The prosecutors said “open sources” showed that Enviro Pacific was linked to Kulibayev. But the Milan proceedings were dismissed in January 2017 – in part because prosecutors could not link the payments to specific contracts or definitively identify the public officials who received the funds.

Flowchart graphic showing how corrupt money may have flowed to Andrew. At the top of the diagram is a red box marked Aventall and at the bottom is another red box labelled Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. An arrow goes from Aventall to Enviro Pacific Investments, with a label on the arrow saying "Alleged bribes". A footnote explains that the allegation of corrupt payments comes from court documents. Another arrow leads from Enviro Pacific Investments to Unity Assets Corporation, which is owned by Timur Kulibayev - this is labelled as a loan. Finally, an arrow goes from Unity Assets Corporation to Andrew, with the label "Paid £15m for mansion".

Kulibayev’s lawyers told the BBC that he denied being bribed, had no involvement in awarding the contracts and has not been the subject of any investigation in Italy. They said Kulibayev ”was not involved in and had no knowledge of any ‘corrupt scheme’ involving Mr Bianchi or Mr Guidotti”.

His lawyers said he has never owned or controlled Enviro Pacific and that the company never held assets on his behalf. When asked who owned it, they did not answer, citing confidentiality.

However, the oligarch’s lawyers confirmed to the BBC that their client “obtained a loan from Enviro Pacific in 2007 for commercial reasons and on purely commercial terms at a market rate” to help fund the purchase of Sunninghill Park.

It means a company alleged to be part of a corruption scheme was also involved in the deal with Andrew.

The oligarch’s lawyers did not deny the reported £6m value of the loan and said Kulibayev had later repaid it, with interest.

They said the funds used to purchase Sunninghill had been entirely legitimate and that all appropriate due diligence would have been carried out at the time. Kulibayev paid £15m to ensure he was successful in buying the property as there was a competing bidder, his lawyers said.

Red flags

Sunninghill lay empty for years after Kulibayev’s purchase and was eventually demolished in 2016. A new, 14-bedroom mansion was eventually built in its place, but it too has never been occupied.

There is no evidence that the former prince knew the source of funds used by Kulibayev to pay for Sunninghill.

But there were multiple features of the sale or “red flags” that should have raised the alarm with lawyers acting for Andrew that at least some of the money could stem from corruption.

These include:

  • The British government’s concerns about “systematic corruption in Kazakhstan” at the time
  • Kulibayev’s position as a public official and son-in law to the then Kazakh president
  • The use of complex offshore structures involving multiple companies and loan agreements without a clear rationale for them
  • The allegedly inflated price
  • The lack of transparency over the identity of the purchaser

“Regardless of who you are – royal, oligarch or billionaire – those acting for you in any property transaction should be alert to the risks, both legal and reputational, inherent in offshore investments in UK property,” said Keatinge, the money laundering expert from the Centre for Finance and Security.

He said that since 2004, lawyers have been required to conduct strict checks on the source of funds, including identifying the owner of offshore companies buying property.

Margaret Hodge, the government’s anti-corruption champion, said she was “utterly shocked” by the BBC’s revelations, adding that “proceeds of crime” may have been involved “in what has already been a very controversial sales transaction”.

“These allegations need to be properly investigated by both Parliament and the appropriate national agencies. Nobody is above the law.”

Along with the former prince, Buckingham Palace declined to comment.

Shutterstock An aerial view of the new mansion at Sunninghill Park, which shows a building in a modern style with white render and a red tile roof. There are large glass doors leading out onto an expansive terrace and at the side of the house is a large flat-roofed, glass-walled building that looks like it may house a swimming pool.Shutterstock

Kulibayev demolished Sunninghill Park and built a new mansion, but it has never been occupied

The Royal Family’s solicitors, Farrer & Co, also declined to comment, citing client confidentiality. The buyer’s solicitor said that all required procedures were undertaken at that time and that the firm knew Kulibayev was the person buying the property.

Since Nazarbayev stood down as president in 2019, Kazakhstan’s new government has begun pursuing a legal case in Switzerland to try to recover millions from individuals and companies it accuses of corruption. The bribery scheme in Italy alleged to involve Kulibayev is part of that legal case, although the oligarch is not among the defendants.

Media reports in early 2025 suggested Kulibayev was in negotiations to pay the Kazakhstan government $1bn (£741m) in connection with an investigation into wealth accumulated during the presidency of his father-in-law.

The oligarch’s lawyers say that his wealth was accumulated through decades of business activity, that he is not under any investigation and that any suggestion he is negotiating to pay compensation for illegally acquired assets is inaccurate.

Source link

Australia announced gun buyback scheme in wake of Bondi attack

The Australian government has announced a gun buyback scheme in the wake of the Bondi Beach attack – its deadliest mass shooting in decades.

The scheme is the largest since the Port Arthur massacre in 1996, which left 35 people dead and prompted Australia to introduce world-leading gun control measures.

Fifteen people were killed and dozens injured on Sunday when two gunmen, believed to have been motivated by “Islamic State ideology”, opened fire on a Jewish festival at the country’s most iconic beach.

On Friday police said a group of men who were arrested in Sydney after travelling from the state of Victoria had “extremist Islamic ideology”.

Police allege Sunday’s attack, which they have declared a terrorist incident, was committed by a father-son duo. Naveed Akram, 24, has been charged with 59 offences, including 15 counts of murder and one of committing a terrorist act. His father Sajid was killed during the attack.

The day after the shooting, national cabinet – which includes representatives from the federal government and leaders from all states and territories – agreed to tighten gun controls.

Speaking to media on Friday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said there are now more than 4 million firearms in Australia – more than at the time of the Port Arthur massacre.

“We know that one of these terrorists held a firearm licence and had six guns, in spite of living in the middle of Sydney’s suburbs… There’s no reason why someone in that situation needed that many guns.

“We need to get more guns off our streets.”

Earlier on Friday, a senior New South Wales police officer told national broadcaster ABC seven men arrested by counter terrorism police in Sydney on Thursday evening may have been on their way to Bondi.

Tactical officers swarmed on the group, who had travelled from Victoria and were known to police there, in dramatic scenes in the suburb of Liverpool.

NSW Police Deputy Commissioner David Hudson said “some indication” that Bondi was one of the locations they were considering visiting, but “with no specific intent in mind or proven at this stage”.

Rarely used national security powers were relied upon to swoop before their plans developed.

“We made the decision that we weren’t going to … take any chances in relation to what they might be doing,” he said.

Officers found a knife, but no guns or other weapons, Mr Hudson added.

Source link

South Africa to deport Kenyans involved in US-Afrikaner refugee scheme | Donald Trump News

Foreign nationals arrested for illegally processing applications under Trump’s contentious programme for white South Africans.

South Africa has arrested and ordered the deportation of seven Kenyan nationals who were illegally working at a centre processing refugee applications for a highly controversial United States resettlement programme aimed at only white Afrikaners.

The arrests on Tuesday in Johannesburg followed intelligence reports that the Kenyans had entered the country on tourist visas and taken up employment despite South Africa’s Home Affairs Department having previously denied work visa applications for the same positions.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The seven individuals will be banned from re-entering South Africa for five years.

The operation has led to a new diplomatic dispute between Pretoria and Washington, adding to tensions that have escalated throughout 2025 over US President Donald Trump’s widely rejected claims that white South Africans face “genocide” and racial persecution.

The US State Department told CNN that “interfering in our refugee operations is unacceptable” and said it would seek immediate clarification.

CNN reported that two US government employees were briefly detained during the raid, though South Africa’s statement said no American officials were arrested.

The Kenyans were working for processing centres run by Amerikaners, a group led by white South Africans, and RSC Africa, a Kenya-based refugee support organisation operated by Church World Service. These organisations handle applications for Trump’s programme, which has brought small numbers of white South Africans to the US this year.

South Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation said the presence of foreign officials coordinating with undocumented workers “raises serious questions about intent and diplomatic protocol” and has initiated formal engagements with both the US and Kenya.

‘If you’re not white, forget about it’

Trump launched the resettlement programme in February through an executive order titled “Addressing Egregious Actions of The Republic of South Africa”, cutting all US aid and prioritising Afrikaner refugees who he claims face government-sponsored discrimination.

In September, he set a historic low refugee ceiling of 7,500 for 2026, with most spots reserved for white South Africans.

Scott Lucas, a professor of US and international politics at University College Dublin’s Clinton Institute, previously told Al Jazeera the contrast between how Trump treats white South African refugees, and refugees of colour from other countries, showed a “perverse honesty” about Trump’s conduct and worldview.

“If you’re white and you’ve got connections you get in,” Lucas said. “If you’re not white, forget about it.”

South Africa’s government strongly rejects the persecution allegations.

Foreign Minister Ronald Lamola has said there is no data supporting claims of white persecution, noting that Afrikaners are among the country’s “most economically privileged” citizens.

Major Afrikaner organisations also rejected Trump’s characterisation.

AfriForum and the Solidarity Movement, representing some 600,000 Afrikaner families, declined his refugee offer, saying emigration would mean “sacrificing their descendants’ cultural identity”.

The Afrikaner enclave of Orania said: “Afrikaners do not want to be refugees. We love and are committed to our homeland.”

Deteriorating relations

Trump has repeatedly presented debunked evidence to support his claims, including a choreographed and televised ambush of South African President Cyril Ramaphosa during a White House visit.

Trump played video in May featuring images later verified as being from the Democratic Republic of the Congo and footage of a temporary memorial that Trump falsely claimed showed mass graves.

Relations between the countries have deteriorated sharply this year.

Trump expelled South Africa’s ambassador in March, boycotted Johannesburg’s G20 summit in November, and last month excluded South Africa from participating in the 2026 Miami G20, calling it “not a country worthy of Membership anywhere” in a social media post.

Just one day before the arrests, South Africa condemned its G20 exclusion as an “affront to multilateralism”.

Source link

Erasmus scheme to return for UK students, BBC understands

The UK is set to rejoin the Erasmus scheme, the BBC understands, five years after announcing that it would end its participation as part of the Brexit deal with the European Union.

The EU provides funding through the scheme for people to study, train or volunteer in other European countries for up to a year.

The UK replaced it with its own Turing scheme in 2021, which funds similar placements worldwide.

The government said it would not comment on ongoing talks.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer had suggested in May that a youth mobility scheme could be part of a new deal with the EU.

The BBC understands that UK students will be able to participate in the Erasmus scheme from 2027.

Alex Stanley, from the National Union of Students (NUS), said it was “fantastic that another generation of students will be able to be part of the Erasmus programme”, adding that it would represent “a huge win for the student movement”.

“Students have been campaigning to rejoin Erasmus from the day we left,” he said.

The Erasmus scheme was scrapped in the UK in December 2020, when the government announced its post-Brexit trade deal with the EU.

Boris Johnson, prime minister at the time, said it was a “tough decision”, but the scheme had become “extremely expensive”.

He said it would be replaced by the Turing scheme, which has operated since then.

Both schemes are open not just to university students, but also to people doing vocational courses, as well as apprentices and people training at college or school.

In 2020, the last year in which the UK participated in Erasmus, the scheme received 144m euros (£126m) of EU funding for 55,700 people to take part in Erasmus projects overall.

The UK sent out 9,900 students and trainees to other countries as part of the scheme that year, while 16,100 came the other way.

Glasgow, Bristol and Edinburgh were the three universities to send the most students, and Spain, France and Germany were the most popular countries which UK students went to.

In the 2024/25 academic year, the Turing scheme had £105m of funding, which paid for 43,200 placements, with 24,000 of those being in higher education, 12,100 in further education and 7,000 in schools.

The majority (38,000) were from England, with 2,900 from Scotland, 1,000 from Wales and 1,200 from Northern Ireland.

Ministers who introduced the Turing scheme in 2021 said it was designed to benefit more people from disadvantaged backgrounds and provide greater support for travel costs than the Erasmus scheme did.

It is not yet clear what will happen to the Turing scheme once Erasmus is reintroduced for UK students.

Source link