British Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves remained under pressure on Friday even after her realtor took the rap for a breach of the housing code after she rented out the family home in South London without a permit. File photo by Andy Rain/EPA-EFE
Oct. 31 (UPI) — An upscale London real estate firm has apologized for failing to apply for local authority approval for Chancellor Rachel Reeves to rent out her familiy home in South London after offering to take care of it.
Gareth Martin, owner of Harvey & Wheeler, based in South London’s exclusive Dulwich Village, said Thursday that the firm’s then-property manager had promised to obtain the $1,250 “selective” permit required from Southwark Council, but the application was never submitted.
“We deeply regret the issue caused to our clients as they would have been under the impression that a license had been applied for,” said Martin.
Martin said the manager unexpectedly quit the firm just days before the house was leased and nobody else in the office picked up on the fact the application to register the property as a rental remained outstanding.
He stressed the firm did not normally deal with the permits as compliance with housing codes was the responsibility of homeowners but the offer was made in this case in order to be helpful.
The mix-up led to Reeves having to issue a written apology to Prime Minister Keir Starmer amid calls from opposition lawmakers for her to be investigated or fired over the infringement for which the borough could impose an unlimited fine on Reeves or Harvey & Wheeler.
Southwark Council said it would not be taking action against either party, explaining that it usually sent a notice to landlords reminding them they are required to apply for a change of use and that it only resorted to prosecution as a last resort.
However, Reeves was still facing questions over the issue Friday because in her apology letter to Starmer she said had not been aware a permit was necessary.
Hours later, she was forced to issue a clarification, writing in a second letter to Starmer, that Harvey & Wheeler had informed her husband a license would be required, but that they would deal with the application. Reeves said she took full responsibility for the oversight.
Starmer has staunchly backed Reeves, saying Sir Laurie Magnus, his independent adviser on ethics, had ruled that it was an inadvertent oversight and that she had not broken the ministerial code.
Presented with the emails between Harvey & Wheeler and Reeves’ husband when consulted for a second time late Thursday, Magnus’ advice remained that he found “no evidence of bad faith.”
Magnus was appointed to the role by the previous Conservative administration of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.
Starmer offered only a mild rebuke of Reeves, who is set to deliver a watershed budget for the government in less than a month, in which she will lay out how she plans to plug a fiscal hole of as much as $40 billion and boost lackluster economic growth.
“Clearly it would have been better if you and your husband had conducted a full trawl through all email correspondence with the estate agency before writing to me yesterday,” he wrote, but said he accepted it was a mistake and that no further action was necessary.
However, Reeves’ defense that she did not know she needed to get a permit has also come under scrutiny because in recent days she posted on social media praising the regulations and saying they should be adopted more widely.
In a series of posts on X on Oct. 20, she hailed a city hall decision in the district in northern England she represents to extend the licensing scheme for private landlords to more areas.
“I welcome Leeds City Council’s decision to expand their selective landlord licencing policy to include the Armley area. While many private landlords operate in the right way, we know that lots of private tenants in Armley face problems with poorly maintained housing,” she wrote.
Opposition Conservative Party Leader Kemi Badenoch said Labour had been mired in a series of scandals but there should now be a formal investigation by the ethics adviser, saying she would accept the outcome whatever was conclude
“She is the Chancellor,” she told the House of Commons on Thursday.
“This is an offense that she is supposed to have committed as Chancellor, a criminal offense, and maybe it is the letting agent’s fault. But isn’t it funny with Labour, it’s always somebody else’s fault. Always. It’s never their own fault,” said Badenoch.
Reeves put the family home on the market for $4,265 a month in July 2024 after becoming Chancellor of the Exchequer when Labour won a landlside general election victory.
The position comes with a residence in Downing Street, at no. 11, next to the prime minister’s.
The government’s independent ethics adviser suggested a formal investigation was not necessary
The letting agent which rented out Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ family home has apologised for an “oversight” which led to a failure to obtain the correct licence.
Gareth Martin, owner of Harvey & Wheeler, said the company’s previous property manager had offered to apply for a “selective” rental licence on behalf of their client – but this never happened as the individual resigned before the tenancy began.
He added: “We deeply regret the issue caused to our clients as they would have been under the impression that a licence had been applied for.”
Reeves has apologised for the “inadvertent mistake” but said she accepts “full responsibility”.
Downing Street has spent the day defending the chancellor, with a spokesman insisting the prime minister has “full confidence” in her.
Reeves put her four-bedroom south London home up for rent in July 2024, when Labour won the general election and she moved into 11 Downing Street.
The house falls in area where Southwark Council requires private landlords to obtain a selective licence at a cost of £945.
The chancellor said she first became aware that her property did not have the correct licence on Wednesday when the Daily Mail, who first reported the story, contacted her.
Reeves or her letting agent could face an unlimited fine if Southwark Council takes the matter to court.
The revelations come at a politically awkward time for Reeves, who is preparing for a Budget at the end of the month amidst speculation the government is planning to break a manifesto commitment not to raise income tax.
Reeves’ economic responsibility was a hallmark of Labour’s pre-election argument that they could be trusted with the nation’s finances.
But since then, questions about her personal judgement were raised after she accepted free concert tickets as well as thousands of pounds in donations for clothing.
Her political judgement was criticised after she imposed – and then reversed – cuts to the winter fuel allowance.
Errors in her CV further undermined her standing.
Now this adds to a growing list of charges at the chancellor’s door, and it is yet another day when the government completely lost control of the news agenda.
While the letting agent has taken responsibility, Sir Laurie Magnus, the ethics adviser whose findings have felled two previous Labour ministers, is now re-examining her case.
Sir Laurie was said to have been satisfied with Reeves’ explanation, but Downing Street has refused to say whether Magnus believed the chancellor broke the ministerial code.
He is now reviewing emails about the rental arrangements that were sent and received by the chancellor’s husband.
No 10 will be hoping the latest developments – and the apology from the letting agency used by Reeves and her husband – will bring this saga to an end.
Downing Street will still be worried this evening about how this all looks to voters.
In a letter to Sir Keir Starmer on Wednesday evening, she said “we were not aware that a licence was necessary”.
“As soon as it was brought to my attention, we took immediate action and have applied for the licence,” she wrote.
However, in a second letter to the PM on Thursday, Reeves said she had found correspondence confirming that the letting agent had told her husband a licence would be required and that the agency would apply for this on their behalf.
“They have also confirmed today they did not take the application forward, in part due to a member of staff leaving the organisation,” she wrote.
“Nevertheless, as I said yesterday, I accept it was our responsibility to secure the licence. I also take responsibility for not finding this information yesterday and bringing it to your attention.
“As I said to you today, I am sorry about this matter and accept full responsibility for it.”
Reeves has published the emails, which confirm the letting agent agreed to apply for the licence once the new tenant moved in.
In a statement, Mr Martin, the agency’s owner, said: “We alert all our clients to the need for a licence.
“In an effort to be helpful our previous property manager offered to apply for a licence on these clients’ behalf, as shown in the correspondence.
“That property manager suddenly resigned on the Friday before the tenancy began on the following Monday.
“Unfortunately, the lack of application was not picked up by us as we do not normally apply for licences on behalf of our clients; the onus is on them to apply. We have apologised to the owners for this oversight.
“At the time the tenancy began, all the relevant certificates were in place and if the licence had been applied for, we have no doubt it would have been granted.”
The Conservatives have said the prime minister needs to “grow a backbone and start a proper investigation”.
Speaking on LBC, party leader Kemi Badenoch said “maybe it is the letting agents’ fault but it’s this the funny thing with Labour, it’s always somebody else’s fault.”
“Keir Starmer said law makers shouldn’t be lawbreakers, and he was very happy to chase every fixed penalty notice that occurred under the Conservatives,” she said.
“What Rachel Reeves looks like she has done is a criminal offence.
“They didn’t say it was about the seriousness of the offence. They said if the law has been broken, the law has been broken. I’m only holding them to their standards.”
“They spent five years pretending they were the most perfect people and now they had resignation after scandal after resignation, so let the ethics advisor investigate.”
Sir Keir Starmer has dismissed calls for an investigation into Chancellor Rachel Reeves after she apologised for breaking housing rules when renting out her family home.
In a letter to the prime minister, Reeves admitted she did not obtain a “selective” rental licence required to rent out her London home and “sincerely” apologised for her “inadvertent error”.
In reply, the prime minister said he was happy the “matter can be drawn to a close” after consulting his independent ethics adviser, who has decided not to launch an investigation.
The Conservatives have called for an investigation and for Reeves to be sacked.
The exchange of letters between the PM and Reeves revealed they had met on Wednesday evening to discuss the matter, which was first reported in the Daily Mail.
Reeves told Sir Keir that “regrettably” she was not aware a licence was needed to rent out her Southwark home after moving into Downing Street last year.
Reeves wrote: “This was an inadvertent mistake. As soon as it was brought to my attention, we took immediate action and have applied for the licence.
“I sincerely apologise for this error and I would be happy to answer any questions you may have.”
In his response, the prime minister said the public expected “the highest standards” and confirmed he had consulted with Sir Laurie Magnus, the ethics adviser whose findings have previously felled two ministers.
Sir Laurie had judged that further investigation was not necessary given Reeves’ swift action and apology, Sir Keir said.
Reeves’ family home in London was put up for rent after Labour won the election in July 2024 for £3,200 a month.
It is in an area where Southwark Council requires private landlords to hold a selective licence.
Selective licences ensure landlords meet set standards, normally aimed at raising housing quality, fighting crime and boosting housing demand.
Reeves’ allies admit she should have obtained a licence, but claim she was specifically told by the estate agents at the time that they would advise if she needed one.
The council’s website states: “You can be prosecuted or fined if you’re a landlord or managing agent for a property that needs a licence and do not get one.”
Reeves or her letting agent now face an unlimited fine if Southwark Council takes the matter to court.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch earlier wrote on social media that Sir Keir “once said ‘lawmakers can’t be lawbreakers'”, adding: “If, as it appears, the chancellor has broken the law, then he will have to show he has the backbone to act.”
Shadow Chancellor Sir Mel Stride told BBC Breakfast on Thursday that he also believed the prime minister “needs to show some backbone”.
“We need a proper investigation into exactly what has happened,” he said. “This seems to be an attempt to put the whole thing to bed with a quick exchange of letters last night.
“This is a prime minister who, when he came into office, on the steps of Downing Street talked about restoring the dignity and integrity of government.
“We have seen a whole litany of these instances – Angela Rayner, Louise Haigh and others – who have fallen well short of that standard. If he is to stand by his word I think he should be concluding her position is untenable.”
The Liberal Democrats’ deputy leader Daisy Cooper said: “The chancellor is meant to be delivering growth but the only thing she appears to be growing is the government’s list of scandals.
“Just weeks before the Budget, this risks seriously undermining confidence in this government and its ability to focus on the urgent tasks at hand.”
At one point, I owned seven rental properties. Today, I’m down to just one (and I’m getting ready to sell it soon).
No more tenants, no more maintenance calls, and no more juggling spreadsheets and 5,000 receipts at tax time… I’m moving all my money into one low-cost index fund strategy that’s easier to manage and way less stressful.
I’m not saying real estate isn’t a good wealth-building tool. It’s worked out well for me.
But I learned (the hard way) that passive income isn’t always passive. Here’s the backstory and my plans moving forward.
What drew me to real estate in the first place
Fresh out of high school, I was eager to build a real estate empire.
My original plan was to buy 10 solid rental properties, each cash flowing around $1,000 per month. That would give me a cool $10,000 per month in income — enough to retire early and live life on my terms.
And honestly, as vague as that plan was, it made a lot of sense at the time.
I worked hard to save up down payments, slowly bought properties, and actually enjoyed the process (mostly).
Not every property I bought was a slam dunk. But I definitely found and experienced many of the benefits I was chasing. I built equity, earned decent cashflow, and took advantage of real estate tax perks.
But eventually, the cracks started to show.
The downside nobody warns you about
If you’ve ever owned rentals, you know: the spreadsheets don’t tell the full ownership story.
They don’t show leaks under the kitchen sink. Or the three-month turnover delay because your contractors ghosted you. Or the multiple tenants who stopped paying right after moving in.
Some properties ran fine for many years. Then in a single 12-month period all of the profits would get wiped out by a perfect storm of emergencies.
True story — I had this one rental that was amazing for three years straight. I always got paid on time, and never heard a peep from the tenant… Then one day out of the blue I got a phone call from a lawyer. Turns out my tenant was a “lady of the night,” using my apartment as a place of business for illegal services.
Property managers helped me manage everything. But they are costly. And at the end of the day, the responsibility always falls on the owner.
With each place I bought, my stress grew. Even when things were going well, there was always a low-grade sense of stress in the background.
My new strategy: Index funds
I made it up to seven rentals, then I decided maybe I was climbing a ladder I didn’t want to be at the top of.
So I’ve been slowly exiting real estate ever since — selling one place at a time. I began with the trouble-maker properties first, keeping the higher performers longer. And now I’m down to just one single property left.
In my early 30s, I stumbled into index investing. It was something I hadn’t taken seriously before. I’d always known what index funds were (wide market exposure, low fees, blah blah blah). But I didn’t realize how freeing they could feel until I actually tried it.
I’ve now moved most of my money into a total stock market index fund. And it’s been one of the best financial decisions I’ve made.
I use Fidelity as my main broker. And I’ve been with them for over a decade now. Between my personal accounts, retirement funds, and custodial accounts for my kid and nephews, I’ve got 11 accounts with Fidelity… and I pay $0 in fees. Read my full gushing review of Fidelity here, all about why I’m a big fan.
Passive income that’s actually passive
I now keep most of my investments in total market index funds like FZROX (Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF).
These funds own thousands of companies across nearly every sector. I don’t pick individual stocks or worry about trying to outperform. Average returns are fine with me.
And the best part is, I don’t have to manage anything. It’s truly passive.
Here’s why I’m a big believer in index funds:
Built in diversification — I’m invested across all industries, and own pieces of all the big and small publicly traded companies out there.
Liquidity when I need it — I can sell just a small slice of my index funds at any time, unlike real estate where I’d have to offload an entire property just to access cash.
Low fees — FZROX literally has a 0.00% expense ratio, so I love that fund. But most index funds have a tiny expense ratio compared to managed funds. Also most brokers have no trade fees when you buy or sell.
Hands-off — The only thing I have to do is not mess with it.
Strong historical returns — Large index funds like the S&P 500 have averaged ~10% annually over their long history.
Mental clarity — I don’t get wrapped up in the headlines or have to think about my investments daily.
Even during the COVID-19 pandemic when my index funds were down 30%-40%, I was actually stressing about my rental properties more than I was about the stock market.
Thankfully, both rebounded after 2020. But that experience reinforced something big:
I’d rather hold an asset that can drop 40% without me having to lift a finger, than one that drops 10% and demands all my attention (or seven that demand attention).
Onwards and upwards
Seven rentals taught me a lot. But once I shifted my mindset away from “owning stuff” and toward growing wealth simply, index funds just made more sense.
I’ve reclaimed my time, simplified my financial life, and stopped managing my investments — and finally started enjoying what they’re doing for me.
It’s not too late to switch strategies, simplify your approach, or start fresh. Index funds are a great place to begin.
After living in her two-bedroom apartment in Los Feliz for more than a decade, Debra Weiss encountered a problem experienced by many renters in Los Angeles: She was evicted.
“I moved into the apartment in 2014, and four years later, my landlord sold it to a wealthy family who bought it at a loss,” said Weiss, 69, who works as a textile artist. “They knew they couldn’t evict us due to rent control.”
In this series, we spotlight L.A. rentals with style. From perfect gallery walls to temporary decor hacks, these renters get creative, even in small spaces. And Angelenos need the inspiration: Most are renters.
When the landlords put the three-unit complex on the market in 2022, however, they offered Weiss $50,000 to move out — far more than the amount required by law — to make the building easier for them to sell. She declined, concerned it would affect her Social Security benefits, as there is a limit to how much one can earn and still receive full benefits.
Then, last February, the three tenants received eviction notices under the Ellis Act, which allows landlords to evict renters from rent-controlled apartments if the building is being torn down or removed from the rental market. It’s currently for sale for $3.2 million.
As a senior, Weiss was entitled to a full year’s notice because she had lived in her unit for more than a year. Still, she knew she would eventually have to move out of the comfortable 1,200-square-foot duplex, for which she paid $2,670 a month in rent.
Artist Debra Weiss stands in her dining room where she often works as a fiber artist.
When she began looking for another apartment in the area, Weiss quickly learned that she could no longer afford to live in Los Feliz. “The apartments were so much more expensive than what I was used to paying, and they had no parking or a washer and dryer,” she said. (Weiss was paid $24,650 in relocation assistance, which was taxed, due to her age and the length of time she lived in her Los Feliz apartment.)
She also visited some small studios and considered purchasing a TIC, or Tenancy in Common, where buyers purchase a share in a corporation that owns a building. However, to secure a loan, she’d need someone to co-sign. “Even though they are cute, they are tiny and not necessarily in the best neighborhoods,” she said. Another option, a Craftsman apartment near USC, wasn’t in a good walking neighborhood, something that was important to Weiss. It was also dark and hundreds of dollars more a month than her previous apartment. “I’m almost 70 years old and I need light to work,” she added.
Handknitted sculptures, embroidered weavings and a tufted rug adorn the guest room.
When her son-in-law spotted a charming two-bedroom apartment near the Los Angeles County Museum of Art for $2,950 a month on Zillow, Weiss decided to check it out.
“My initial reaction was, ‘I want this,’ ” Weiss said of the fourplex.
The rental had high ceilings, oak floors, ample sunlight, an appealing fireplace, a garage and a washer and dryer. A newly redone modern kitchen felt out of character for the 1930s building, but that didn’t bother Weiss. “The kitchen is a blank canvas,” she said of the all-white cabinets and countertops. “The white background makes all of my stuff stand out,” including ceramics by Mt. Washington Pottery and Altadena artist Linda Hsiao.
Weiss knits a sweater for her granddaughter with yarn she purchased in Japan.
Concerned that the landlord wouldn’t want to rent to her because of her age, she was pleasantly surprised when she got the apartment. “The light is amazing,” Weiss said. “I was initially worried about some of the modern touches like the overhead lighting, but it floods the room with bright light that allows me to work at night.”
Nearly a year after moving in, Weiss has filled the apartment with her stitched collages, quilts and the artworks of others, many of which she described as “trades.” “I like color and pattern and objects,” she said as she pointed out some Japanese ceramics on her buffet and a dress that she crocheted with scraps of fabric, yarn and metal.
In the guest room, a wall hanging composed of three separate weavings in a gingham check pattern is embroidered with a series of characters she based on her 5-year-old granddaughter’s drawings. “It’s about people coming together in chaos and supporting each other,” Weiss said. “I like the pattern; it reminds me of eating together on picnic tables.”
“I like objects,” Weiss said of the many treasures and collections of things that are featured throughout her rental.
On the opposite wall of the guest room above her sewing machine, a series of metal sculptures she knitted with copper and silver hangs alongside cloth dolls and purses. In the corner, a cowl made of macrame, textiles and yarn adorns a mannequin. There’s also a colorful latch hook rug that she made with acrylic yarn that looks more like artwork than a functional accessory.
In her bedroom, a coverlet that Weiss assembled from vintage quilts adorns the bed.
The long hallway ends at the laundry room and is lined with her colorful quilts, some of which are mounted on Homasote board, along with weavings and stitched works, which, like her cooking, are improvisational.
“I work without planning and respond to the materials and see what it becomes,” she said. “I start knitting and see where it goes. I get excited about the material, and then I go for it. “
The hallway in Weiss’s apartment is lined with her artworks.
Much of the wood furniture in her apartment was made by her father, who died 13 years ago.
“I’ve had this since my kids were little, and you can see all the markings,” she said of the hutch in the corner of her dining room. “My dad made it 40 years ago for the Van Nuys house I grew up in.”
It is here, at the dining room table that her father made, that she works, hosts workshops and teaches lessons in fiber art, collage and stitching. Later this year, she hopes to host a sale of her work at a holiday open house in her apartment.
Weiss is an expert in mixing texture, pattern and color in her Mid-Wilshire apartment.
The mixing of colorful Persian rugs, textiles, natural materials, chunky wood pieces and intricately knitted metal sculptures creates a warm balance throughout her apartment.
Bursting with color and pattern, the rooms offer a sense of calm that Weiss appreciates as a woman who raised three daughters alone and has had to pivot during major life changes. Over the years, she has run a clothing company, Rebe, which closed in 2019 due to economic uncertainty, declared bankruptcy and sold her Woodland Hills house. Most recently, she was forced to weather the eviction process.
“I’ve always been an entrepreneur,” said Weiss, who works six to eight hours a day at home and sells her artwork and sewing patterns on her Specks and Keepings website and at L.A. Homefarm in Glassell Park. “I’ll always figure out a way to make money by selling the things that I make.”
Even though the process of having to move was stressful, Weiss is happy with her new home and neighborhood. “I take the Metro bus everywhere and hardly ever drive,” she said. “I go to the Hollywood Farmer’s Market on Sundays. Kaiser is nearby and I can walk to LACMA. Everything worked out perfectly.”
Weiss pulls out a drawer of her flat files cabinet filled with her artwork.
If you’re looking for a staycation idea, we’ve found a charming two-bedroom apartment near Whitby in North Yorkshire with loads of five star reviews and availability in summer
12:07, 23 May 2025Updated 13:04, 23 May 2025
This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more
We found a charming apartment near Whitby(Image: Getty)
British breaks are always a popular type of holiday, and if you’re considering visiting the Yorkshire coast on your UK staycation this summer, we’ve found a beautiful two-person holiday apartment available to rent that comes highly recommended by previous guests.
Brambles Apartment, available to book via Sykes Cottages, is a cosy and comfy first-floor holiday rental in Sneatonthorpe near Ruswarp in the North York Moors National Park, around 10 minutes from the popular seaside town of Whitby. With light and airy ‘country chic’ decor, it features an open-plan kitchen and living space, a smart TV and a small shared garden, with one previous guest calling it “a great base for exploring Whitby and the surrounding area”.
In fact, Brambles Apartment only has five star reviews on the Sykes website, with visitors praising the hosts, the high standard of the property, and the “excellent views”:
“First class apartment, clean, comfortable lovely views from the windows and in a peaceful location,” one of the reviews is titled. “A very enjoyable week, would definitely recommend Brambles apartment,” the writer adds.
“Lovely stay in a great and comfortable apartment with beautiful views,” another guest agrees.
“So cosy, peaceful, clean and comfy, and a great base for exploring Whitby and the surrounding area,” a third review reads. “One of the nicest we’ve stayed in, and we would not hesitate to book again next time we visit! A definite recommend!”
Guests compliment the lovely hosts and views(Image: Sykes Cottages)
The description on the Sykes website explains that Whitby Abbey, Whitby Harbour and the Captain Cook Memorial Museum are all within easy reach, as are Whitby Beach and Robin’s Hood Bay Beach, as well as the picturesque North York Moors National Park.
If you’re tempted, you’ll be happy to hear that Brambles Apartment still has lots of availability over the coming months, including during the school holidays. According to the Sykes website, a seven-night stay from 18-25 July costs from £677 (down from £981), while a long weekend in August, from 15-18, also costs from £677, down from £1,114).
It’s worth noting that Brambles Apartment doesn’t accept pets, so if you’re looking for somewhere to stay with a dog, you might want to check out other nearby Sykes Cottages properties such as Lythe Cottage or Jet Cottage.
Holiday Cottages is another site to browse for inspiration, which features charming Whitby properties including Sandy Shores, Lavender House and Dean Cottage.
Holidaymakers can stay in Whitby Lighthouse via Rural Retreats(Image: Rural Retreats)
And if you fancy something a little different, how about staying in Whitby Lighthouse? Guests can book one of two rental properties in the lighthouse – Galatea and Vanguard – through Rural Retreats.
Don’t want to drive to your holiday hotspot this summer? Find the cheapest train tickets through Trainline, where customers can save 61% on average when they book them in advance.