drone

Russia’s New Geran-5 Long-Range Kamikaze Drone Could Be Air-Launched

The latest iteration of Russia’s Geran long-range one-way attack drone features a jet engine and is apparently being considered for launch from aircraft to boost its range. The new drone, apparently first used at the beginning of this year, underlines Russia’s continued development of these drones, which bear the brunt of its relentless strikes on Ukraine, which ramp up during the winter months. It further points to Russia seeking to field drones that are better able to evade Ukraine’s air defenses, which are increasingly tailored to these kinds of threats.

The wreckage of a Geran-5 drone that was apparently brought down by Ukrainian air defenses. GUR
Another view of the wreckage of a Geran-5 drone. GUR
The new tubular fuselage of the Geran-5 drone is readily apparent in this view. GUR

In addition to the new powerplant, photos showing the wreckage of the Geran-5 reveal a significant change in the design. The previous Geran versions were based on the propeller-driven Iranian Shahed-136, with its cropped delta planform, blended wing/body configuration, and prominent stabilizing fins at the tips. In contrast, the Geran-5 has a more conventional aerodynamic configuration, with a tube-like fuselage with a centrally mounted straight wing, and a straight horizontal tail with finlets on each end. In this sense, the Geran-5 is actually a closer match to the Iranian Karrar drone, rather than the Shahed series.

A video showing the Iranian Karrar drone:

New Iranian long range combat drone “Karrar” HQ video




As for the engine, Ukrainian accounts state that this is a JT80 turbojet from the Chinese Telefly company. This is said to provide greater thrust than the jet engine used in the Geran-3. This earlier jet-powered drone was essentially a Russian analog of the Shahed-238, which shares its configuration with the prop-driven Shahed-136. Using a jet engine means the Geran-5 will be faster than the propeller-driven versions, making it harder to intercept.

According to the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense’s Main Directorate of Intelligence (GUR), the Geran-5 has a length of around 20 feet and a wingspan of approximately 18 feet. Overall, the drone weighs around 200 pounds, and it is thought to have a range of around 620 miles.

A GUR image showing a rendering of the Geran-5. GUR

Despite its very different appearance, the GUR says that, apart from the engine, most of the components found in the Geran-5 are common to those used in previous Geran-series drones.

Key components include a 12-channel Kometa satellite navigation system, a feature widely used in Russian drones and other guided weapons. It also has a tracker based on a Raspberry Pi microcomputer and 3G/4G modems, according to the GUR.

Based on the mix of Iranian design heritage and Russian-introduced improvements, the GUR says that “it is difficult to consider this UAV an in-house development of the Russian Federation.” However, it’s unclear to what degree, if any, Iran provided direct support for the development of the new drone.

The GUR says that Russia is considering adding the option of one or more air-to-air missiles to the Geran-5 for self-defense. The Soviet-era, infrared-guided R-73 (AA-11 Archer) is mentioned specifically, which would presumably be mounted below the wings, in a similar configuration to what has been seen in the past on the Iranian-operated Karrar drone.

An Iranian-made Azarakhsh missile under a Karrar drone, with another of the drones launching in the background. via X

This would continue a line of development that Russia is already working on.

Last week, we reported on how Russia has begun arming its propeller-driven Shahed/Geran with a man-portable air defense system (MANPADS), the Verba. This development followed a previous version of the drone carrying a single R-60 air-to-air missile, which you can read more about here.

Russian forces are mounting Igla MANPADS on Shahed drones to target Ukrainian helicopters that intercept them. The drones carry a camera and radio modem, and the missile is launched remotely by an operator in Russian territory. pic.twitter.com/T5TKPHyhVu

— WarTranslated (@wartranslated) January 4, 2026

Perhaps most intriguing is the claim from the GUR that Russia is also looking at the possibility of adapting the Geran-5 for launch from crewed aircraft. Ukraine has published diagrams, the source of which is unknown, showing the Su-25 Frogfoot ground-attack aircraft carrying one of the drones under each wing.

A diagram showing a Su-25 with a pair of Geran-5 drones underwing. via X
This Su-25 is shown with the earlier Geran-3 drones underwing. via XScreenshot

At the very least, having an air-launched Geran-5 would provide an immediate boost in range for the one-way attack drone.

With internal fuel only, the Su-25 has a range, at low altitude, of around 320 miles. This increases when flying at higher altitudes for at least a part of the mission. The ferry range of the Frogfoot, with external drop tanks, is around 1,450 miles.

As well as increased range, launching the Geran-5 from Su-25s would allow the drones to approach their targets from less-predictable vectors, putting a greater burden on Ukrainian air defenses. This would be especially effective when the drones were launched as part of larger barrages containing conventionally (ground) launched Gerans, cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, and decoys.

Potentially, the air-launched Geran-5 could be used to attack targets of opportunity, although it’s unclear if the drone would be interfaced with the Su-25 in such a way that the pilot would be able to input target coordinates into it while the plane is in flight. However, Russia is certainly working to expand the ability to use the Geran with direct line-of-sight control, at least close to the front lines.

Recently, Shahed/Geran drones have been noted flying with direct line-of-sight antennas, which allow them to hit targets dynamically, much like a first-person-view (FPV) drone, but with a much greater destructive effect and with the ability to loiter for long periods of time. You can read all about this development here. Furthermore, the datalink range for the drone is being extended using airborne signal relays, possibly creating a mesh network with multiple line-of-sight links. Russian drones are also starting to feature Starlink terminals, which could provide a vastly superior beyond-line-of-sight capability.

These developments are increasingly blurring the classification of the Shahed/Geran from its original long-range one-way attack drone to a loitering munition, with an onboard imaging capability.

Taken together, there exists the potential at least to have the Geran-5 launched from a Su-25 relatively close to the front lines, then loiter over the battlefield for significant lengths of time, with at least some degree of control maintained over the drone either by ground troops on or near the battlefield, or even from the Su-25 itself, although this is more questionable.

Russian SU 25 SM ground attack aircraft (ground) and MIG 29 jet fighters (taking off) attend a training session at Primorkso-Akhtarsk, Krasnodar region on March 26, 2015 ahead of the Russian commemoration of the 70th anniversary of the capitulation of Nazi Germany in 1945. AFP PHOTO / SERGEY VENYAVSKY (Photo credit should read SERGEY VENYAVSKY/AFP via Getty Images)
A Russian Su-25SM ground-attack aircraft (ground) and MiG-29 fighters (taking off) attend a training session at Primorkso-Akhtarsk, Krasnodar region, in 2015. SERGEY VENYAVSKY/AFP via Getty Images SERGEY VENYAVSKY

Shahed/Geran one-way attack drones have been at the forefront of Russia’s ongoing campaign against Ukrainian cities and infrastructure, with a particular focus on the country’s energy supply as the winter continues to bite hard.

In an illustration of the scale of the current Russian campaign, in the past week, its forces launched almost 1,100 strike drones against Ukraine, as well as 890 guided aerial bombs and 50 missiles, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said yesterday.

In the wake of extensive attacks on the Ukrainian energy grid last week, Ukraine’s largest private energy company, DTEK, said it was “the most difficult situation with electricity this winter.”

On the other hand, the fact that Russia continues to adapt and enhance its long-range one-way attack drone fleet points to the success of new Ukrainian weapons and tactics introduced to counter these threats.

KYIV REGION, UKRAINE - OCTOBER 29: Mobile fire group with a machine gun and the MANPADS "Stinger" from the air defense of the 1129th Anti-Aircraft Missile Biletskyi Regiment during the defense of Kyiv region against "Shaheds" and cruise missiles on October 29, 2025 in Kyiv region, Ukraine. The 1129th Anti-Aircraft Missile Regiment, an air defense mobile firing unit based in Bila Tserkva, defends the Kyiv region from Russian Shahed drones and cruise missiles. (Photo by Andriy Dubchak/Frontliner/Getty Images)
A Ukrainian mobile fire group with a machine gun (not pictured) and Stinger MANPADS during the defense of the Kyiv region against Shahed/Geran drones and cruise missiles on October 29, 2025, in the Kyiv region. Photo by Andriy Dubchak/Frontliner/Getty Images Andriy Dubchak/Frontliner

While relatively small in number, Ukraine has been successful in using Western-supplied air defense systems, including specific counter-drone equipment, to tackle the Shahed/Geran menace. At the same time, Ukraine has ramped up the production of locally developed interceptor drones, some of which are specifically designed to counter the Shahed/Geran series.

Russia is testing newly developed Geran type drones and other drones at this test site in Totsky District, Orenburg region.

Google images from 2022 and 2025.

Note: Drone storage and ramp launchers

Location: 52.594543, 52.728405 pic.twitter.com/ecqrN68IWN

— kim høvik (@kimhvik2) January 11, 2026

Whether or not the Geran-5 is introduced in an air-launched capacity, the emergence of a new type of long-range one-way attack drone is another problem for Ukraine, provided that Russia can produce it in large volumes.

Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com

Thomas is a defense writer and editor with over 20 years of experience covering military aerospace topics and conflicts. He’s written a number of books, edited many more, and has contributed to many of the world’s leading aviation publications. Before joining The War Zone in 2020, he was the editor of AirForces Monthly.




Source link

Police, military launch joint probe into N. Korea’s claim of drone incursion

People watch a TV news report on North Korea’s claims of drone incursions by South Korea being aired at Seoul Station in central Seoul on Sunday. Photo by Yonhap

Police and military officials launched a joint investigation Monday to investigate North Korea‘s claims of drone incursions across the inter-Korean border.

On Saturday, the North’s military claimed that South Korea violated the North’s sovereignty by sending drones into its territory in September and on Jan. 4, but Seoul’s defense ministry denied the claim.

The joint team of some 30 police and military officials has started investigating the alleged incursions, according to the National Police Agency’s National Office of Investigation.

South Korea’s military has denied sending the drones or operating the models allegedly found in the North, raising the possibility that private entities may have been behind them.

Police are reportedly prioritizing looking into past cases involving drones similar to the model unveiled by North Korea.

Experts have rejected the drones in question were operated by the military, saying they appear to use low-cost commercial parts unfit for military purposes.

Some have said the drones appear similar to a model from Chinese drone manufacturer Skywalker Technology.

Source link

Walmart plans drone delivery for another 150 stores in 4 more cities

Jan. 11 (UPI) — Wing and Walmart on Sunday announced plans to expand the retailer’s drone delivery service to more major metropolitan areas and more than 150 additional stores this year.

The expansion plans doubles the number of cities that where drone delivery service is available from Walmart, which the top 25% of customers have used three times a week as overall deliveries tripled in a six month period last year.

The new service areas include Los Angeles, St. Louis, Cincinnati and Miami, while service is already up and running in northwest Arkansas, the Dallas-Fort Worth and Atlanta metropolitan areas, is set to start in Houston on Jan. 15 and has already been announced for Charlotte, Orlando and Tampa, according to a press release.

“Drone delivery plays an important role in our ability to deliver what customers want, exactly when they want it it,” Greg Cathey, senior vice president of digital fulfillment transformation at Walmart, said in a press release.

“The strong adoption we’ve seen confirms that this is the future of convenience,” he said.

Walmart started experimenting with Wing’s drone delivery service in Bentonville in 2021, making about 150,000 drone deliveries, before announcing in June 2025 that service would be expanded to Atlanta, Charlotte, Houston, Orlando and Tampa over the course of the next 12 months.

Initially, the service was available from 100 stores in northwest Arkansas and Dallas-Fort Worth to customers within a 6-mile radius of the store. Service launched from six Walmart stores in Atlanta at the beginning of December.

The June announcement included plans to offer drone service in all five metro areas from 100 stores by some time this year, with the four-city expansion adding another 150 locations.

In 2027, Wing said in the release, drone delivery will be available from more than 270 Walmart locations in cities coast-to-coast in the United States and be available to roughly 40 million people.

Supporters of ousted Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro carry his portrait during a rally outside the National Assembly in Caracas, Venezuela on Monday. Photo by Jonathan Lanza/UPI | License Photo

Source link

N. Korea accuses S. Korea of drone incursions, warns Seoul ‘pay price’

People watch a TV news report at Seoul Station in Seoul on Sunday about North Korea’s claim that a South Korean drone violated its airspace. Jan. 11, 2026. Photo by Yonhap News Agency

North Korea claimed Saturday that South Korea infringed on its sovereignty with drone incursions in September last year and earlier this week, saying that Seoul should be ready to “pay a high price” for what it called a provocation.

But South Korea’s defense ministry rejected Pyongyang’s claim, saying the South’s military did not operate drones on the dates asserted by the North.

A spokesperson of the General Staff of the Korean People’s Army issued a statement denouncing South Korea as “the most hostile” enemy, insisting that Seoul has continued to stage provocative acts, contradicting its overtures for dialogue with Pyongyang, according to the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA).

“The Republic of Korea (ROK) should be ready to pay a high price for having committed another provocation of infringing on the sovereignty of the DPRK with a drone,” the spokesperson said, referring to South Korea by its official name. DPRK is short for the North’s official name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

On Jan. 4, North Korea’s military captured and tracked an air target moving northward from the sky over South Korea’s Ganghwa County, Incheon, and struck the drone with special electronic warfare assets, forcing it to fall in Muksan-ri near the North’s border city of Kaesong, the KCNA said.

It also said that on Sept. 27, a drone, which took off from the South’s border city of Paju, fell into Jangphung County, Kaesong, after being struck down by the North’s electronic means. The drone was returning after infiltrating the sky above Phyongsan County, North Hwanghae Province, it said.

The spokesperson said that the drone, which crashed this week, was equipped with surveillance devices, while citing the North’s analysis that the drone was set to record the North’s major objects while flying a distance of 156 kilometers for more than three hours.

North Korea released photos of debris from the drones, recording devices and images presumed to have been filmed by the unmanned aerial vehicles. It described South Korea as a “perfect copy of Kiev’s lunatics,” likening the South to Ukraine fighting against Russia.

Pyongyang accused the South Korean military of being behind the drone infiltrations, saying those drones freely passed over areas where the South Korean Army’s radar systems for detecting low-altitude targets and anti-drone equipment are located.

“The ROK is the enemy most hostile towards us that can never be changed in nature, and the object to be certainly collapsed by us if it attacks,” the spokesperson said. “The ROK military warmongers will be surely forced to pay a dear price for their unpardonable hysteria.”

In response to an inquiry by Yonhap News Agency, Defense Minister Ahn Gyu-back rejected North Korea’s claim as “absolutely not true,” noting the drones shown in the photos released by the North are not models owned by the South Korean military.

The defense ministry said President Lee Jae Myung ordered a “thorough” investigation into the matter and relevant government agencies are verifying it.

Experts assessed the drones disclosed by the North do not appear to be aerial vehicles operated by the military, noting they are likely made up of cheap parts not fit for military purposes.

In October 2024, North Korea said South Korean drones carrying anti-North Korea propaganda leaflets were detected over Pyongyang three times that month, threatening to respond if such flights occur again.

The South Korean military is suspected of having sent drones over Pyongyang during former President Yoon Suk Yeol’s administration in an apparent bid to provoke North Korea and use it as a pretext for his martial law bid in December 2024.

North Korea’s claims of drone infiltrations came as North Korean leader Kim Jong-un has declared inter-Korean ties as those between “two states hostile to each other.”

Since taking office in June, the administration of President Lee has been seeking to mend ties with North Korea and resume dialogue with it.

Expert said North Korea is apparently cementing its hard-line stance toward Seoul ahead of an upcoming key party congress set for January or February. The North is expected to formulate a five-year policy line covering diplomacy, the economy, the military and other areas.

“North Korea is expected to reflect the ‘two hostile states’ stance in the ruling party’s rules and regulations at the party congress and seek to revise the constitution to codify it at a key parliamentary meeting in the first half,” Hong Min, a senior researcher at the Korea Institute for National Unification, said.

[email protected]

Copyright (c) Yonhap News Agency prohibits its content from being redistributed or reprinted without consent, and forbids the content from being learned and used by artificial intelligence systems.

Source link

Missile Fragments Add To Evidence MQ-9 Reaper Drone Carried Out Venezuela Strike

Evidence that the United States employed AGM-114 Hellfire or AGM-179A Joint Air-to-Ground Missiles (JAGM) in a covert strike on a target in Venezuela has now emerged. The U.S. military also recently disclosed an attack on what it says was a trio of drug-smuggling boats sailing in a convoy. Just earlier this week, TWZ highlighted exactly these potential scenarios in the broader context of recent sightings of U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drones flying over the Caribbean with unusually heavy weapons loads.

Spanish-language television network Telemundo, headquartered in Miami, Florida, first broadcast imagery of U.S. missile fragments, which we will come back to in a moment, that it said were recovered in Venezuela’s far northwestern Alta Guajira region. What looks to be the full video clip that those images were taken from is also now circulating online. NBC News had previously reported that members of Venezuela’s Wayuu indigenous community had witnessed a mysterious explosion in Alta Guajira on December 18. U.S. President Donald Trump had first disclosed that the U.S. government had carried out a covert U.S. strike on Venezuelan soil on December 26, but it remains unconfirmed exactly where or when that occurred. Other details, including that the operation targeted a “port facility” or “dock” and that it was carried out by a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) drone, have been reported since then, as you can read more about here.

Sería el 1er ataque estadounidense, directo, en suelo de #AméricadelSur. Se ven restos de rocket de motor de 52 kilogramos encontrado en la Alta Guajira. Esto es un fragmento del video original donde se infiere inicio de ataques de 🇺🇸 a objetivos terrestres en 🇻🇪 pic.twitter.com/U7uw3SVkgg

— Plácido Daniel Garrido D. (@DanielGarrido) January 1, 2026

Imágenes obtenidas por Telemundo desde la Alta Guajira muestran fragmentos destruidos cuyas características coinciden ampliamente con las de un Hellfire. Este nuevo indicador sugiere que un ataque encubierto de Estados Unidos tuvo lugar al noroeste de Venezuela. pic.twitter.com/wARjIy6mFG

— Daniel Blanco (@DanielBlancoPaz) January 1, 2026

A map highlighting the location of Venezuela’s Alta Guajira region in relation to the rest of the country. Google Maps

Returning to the missile fragments reportedly found in Alta Guajira, they are relatively small, but have distinctive “WARNING” and “52.0” markings that are clearly visible. This is fully consistent with the markings seen on AGM-179A Joint Air-to-Ground Missiles (JAGM), as well as some variants of the AGM-114 Hellfire. Similar fragments have been seen on many occasions following confirmed and reported U.S. drone strikes around the world, including ones tied to the CIA and the U.S. military’s secretive Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC).

A missile fragment reportedly recovered in Venezuela’s Alta Guajira region with “WARNING” visible in lettering. capture via Telemundo/X
Another missile fragment with “52.0” in white letting still legible. capture via X
An example of a similar missile fragment. This one was recovered following the U.S. strike that killed Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in Iraq in January 2020. via X

The AGM-179A is derived directly from the AGM-114R variant, and both missiles share an identical rear body. JAGM’s main area of improvement over its predecessor is its new dual-mode seeker, with laser and millimeter-wave radar guidance modes, which gives it more flexibility to engage targets, as you can read more about here. Every JAGM and Hellfire has a label at the tail end that says “WARNING” and “2-MAN LIFT,” and lists their weight in kilograms and pounds. Each JAGM is roughly 115 pounds (52 kilograms). The stated weight of the baseline R model Hellfire is approximately 110 pounds (49 kilograms). However, there are many subvariants of the AGM-114R, some of which have very different configurations from the standard type. This includes the R9X version, which features an array of pop-out sword-like blades instead of a traditional high-explosive warhead.

A briefing slide showing a general breakdown of the components of the AGM-179A JAGM, including portions directly carried over from the AGM-114R Hellfire. US Army
An official Army infographic that provides details on various Hellfire variants, including their weights. US Army

MQ-9s armed with AGM-114s have been flying from Rafael Hernandez Airport in Aguadilla in Puerto Rico since September 2025, ostensibly in support of expanded counter-drug operations in the Caribbean. Starting last month, local spotters noticed Reapers operating from the airport carrying steadily larger loads of Hellfires, up to as many as 10 at a time. The drones have not been seen with JAGMs, or any other munitions, under their wings. The U.S. military still does not appear to have officially confirmed the integration of JAGM onto the MQ-9, but adding the missiles to the Reaper’s arsenal is at least planned, and there has been evidence in the past that it has already occurred.

New publicly available images show that nine USAF MQ-9As have flown/are flying out of Aguadilla (BQN/TJBQ) 🇵🇷 in support of ongoing counternarcotics ops in the Caribbean.

The nine serials are: 14-4242, 14-4269, 14-4275, 17-4348, 17-4355, 17-4356, 19-4390, 19-4398, 20-4408. https://t.co/1vL60eEoG6 pic.twitter.com/1cUkfIfB2W

— LatAmMilMovements (@LatAmMilMVMTs) December 24, 2025

The U.S. military does have other aircraft, fixed-wing and rotary, that can employ Hellfires and/or JAGMs. However, the MQ-9 would still be particularly well-suited for a covert strike on Venezuela, given the ranges and other likely operational parameters involved.

As TWZ wrote in our recent exploration of Reaper operations in the Caribbean:

“The aforementioned descriptions of the target [of the covert strike] in Venezuela as being a ‘port facility’ and a ‘dock’ would seem to point to something of substantial size. This, in turn, could well have necessitated the employment of a relatively large amount of ordnance, such as what we’ve recently been seeing on Puerto Rico-based MQ-9s, to ensure adequate destruction.”

“More clandestine assets could still have been used instead, but there also would have been no real need to do so if something like a Reaper could have accomplished the job with a reasonable level of survivability. The strike on the target in Venezuela, which did not prompt any kind of immediate response on the part of Venezuelan authorities, at least that we know of, raises additional questions about the effectiveness of the country’s air defenses. Whether or not any standoff electronic warfare support, of which there is plenty in the region currently in the form of Navy EA-18 Growler jets and at least one Air Force EC-130H Compass Call plane, was utilized during the operation is unknown, but this seems likely to have been the case. As TWZ has explored in detail in the past, Venezuela’s air defense capabilities are limited, but could certainly present real threats.”

It is also worth noting here that Colombian President Gustavo Petro separately claimed this week that the United States had struck a target in or around Venezuela’s port city of Maracaibo, which lies to the immediate south of Alta Guajira. Petro described it as a “factory” tied to Colombian leftist guerrilla group Ejército de Liberación Nacional (ELN; National Liberation Army), where “we fear they mix coca paste there to make it cocaine,” according to a machine translation of a post from his official account on X. At the time of writing, this all remains unconfirmed. The ELN is understood to regularly operate in Alta Guajira, which is in close proximity to the Colombian border.

Resulta que muchas lanchas atacadas con misiles, como está pasando en las incautaciones.que hacemos en Colombia o, con ayuda nuestra fuera de Colombia, no llevaban cocaína sino cannabis.

Problema paradójico: en EEUU, en muchísimas partes es legal. Y el Congreso de Colombia no… https://t.co/EJb6yxZKat

— Gustavo Petro (@petrogustavo) December 30, 2025

In addition, Venezuela’s dictatorial president Nicolas Maduro said that he “might discuss” the U.S. government’s direct action against his country “in a few days,” in a recent interview with the Telesur television network. Telesur is jointly sponsored by the governments of Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua. Maduro also took that opportunity to focus blame for drug-trafficking in the region onto Colombian groups, and claim his willingness to work with American authorities on a variety of issues. Maduro is currently under indictment in the United States on charges related to illicit narcotics, including his alleged leadership of a cartel now officially designated as a foreign terrorist organization (FTO).

Asked about a reported CIA drone strike in Venezuela, Maduro declined to comment, saying it “could be something we talk about in a few days.” pic.twitter.com/qC0wlYe3GJ

— Clash Report (@clashreport) January 2, 2026

Maduro:

All of the cocaine that is moved in this region is produced in Colombia. All of it. All of the cocaine.

We’re the victims of Colombian drug trafficking, not from today, from decades. pic.twitter.com/A4SEtafVwp

— Clash Report (@clashreport) January 2, 2026

In TWZ‘s recent detailed look into U.S. MQ-9s flying over the Caribbean with ever-larger loads of AGM-114 Hellfires, we also wrote:

“As already noted, it is not otherwise clear what new mission requirements and/or intelligence streams may have fueled the decision to begin arming MQ-9s flying from Puerto Rico with the significantly larger loads of Hellfires. The need to respond to drug cartels sending out larger waves of boats in order to survive, or to provide armed overwatch due to concerns about surface threats from small boats, are possibilities, but there are no indications so far of either of these being the case.”

On New Year’s Eve, U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) shared videos of “kinetic strikes against three narco-trafficking vessels traveling as a convoy,” which it said had occurred the day before.

The released footage does include clips that show impacts consistent with aerial gunfire, pointing to the involvement, at least in part, of an Air Force AC-130J Ghostrider gunship. MQ-9s and AC-130Js are among the platforms understood to be involved in this controversial campaign of strikes on alleged drug-smuggling boats, which has been ongoing since September 2025.

On Dec. 30, at the direction of @SecWar Pete Hegseth, Joint Task Force Southern Spear conducted kinetic strikes against three narco-trafficking vessels traveling as a convoy. These vessels were operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations in international waters. Intelligence… pic.twitter.com/NHRNIzcrFS

— U.S. Southern Command (@Southcom) December 31, 2025

SOUTHCOM said the strikes on the trio of boats on December 30 killed “three narco-terrorists,” but that other individuals survived, and that it had contacted the U.S. Coast Guard to conduct a search for survivors. The Coast Guard subsequently confirmed that request, and, by extension, that the strikes had occurred somewhere in the Eastern Pacific Ocean, rather than the Caribbean. At the time of writing, that effort is still ongoing, but there have been no reports of anyone being recovered. Colombian President Petro has also offered his country’s assistance and shared a map showing what he says is the approximate location where the boats were struck.

On Dec. 30th, the @uscg was notified by the @DeptofWar of mariners in distress in the Pacific Ocean.  The U.S. Coast Guard is conducting search and rescue operations. Updates will be provided when available.

— USCG Pacific Area (@USCGPACAREA) January 1, 2026

The Coast Guard is continuing the search for survivors from a U.S. military strike against suspected drug vessels that took place earlier this week. We now know roughly where those strikes took place: Approximately 400 nautical miles southwest of the Mexico/ Guatemala border.

— Idrees Ali (@idreesali114) January 2, 2026

Aviso a todos los gobiernos de la zona. Está parece ser la zona exacta donde cayeron los lancheros que se arrojaron de embarcaciones que fueron bombardeadas.

Se sabe que tres personas murieron, el resto quedó viva porque se arrojaron al mar.

Información conseguida por nuestra… pic.twitter.com/Xj5oJo2AcD

— Gustavo Petro (@petrogustavo) January 2, 2026

SOUTHCOM later announced strikes on two more alleged drug smuggling boats on New Year’s Eve, but did not explicitly say whether they had been sailing together or separately. Where those vessels were targeted is not clear.

On Dec. 31, at the direction of @SecWar Pete Hegseth, Joint Task Force Southern Spear conducted a lethal kinetic strike on two vessels operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations. Intelligence confirmed the vessels were transiting along known narco-trafficking routes and… pic.twitter.com/4AE5u4cEff

— U.S. Southern Command (@Southcom) January 1, 2026

There is certainly a visible trend now toward the targeting of multiple boats in a single day, which would mark a notable uptick in tempo in these operations. As TWZ has previously noted, between September 2 and December 29, the U.S. military is known to have attacked 31 vessels in the Caribbean Sea, as well as the Eastern Pacific Ocean, an average of one strike on a single boat every four days.

This all follows a major, months-long build-up of U.S. air, naval, and ground forces in the region, which is still ongoing. There has also been a steady ratcheting up of the U.S. government’s pressure campaign against Maduro, specifically, now punctuated by at least one covert strike. Whether that may evolve into overt action against the regime in Caracas still remains to be seen.

In the meantime, there is still-growing evidence that the role of U.S. MQ-9 drones in the region is expanding in scale and scope. Altogether, U.S. operations in and around the Caribbean have already taken an increasingly kinetic turn in recent weeks.

Contact the author: joe@twz.com

Joseph has been a member of The War Zone team since early 2017. Prior to that, he was an Associate Editor at War Is Boring, and his byline has appeared in other publications, including Small Arms Review, Small Arms Defense Journal, Reuters, We Are the Mighty, and Task & Purpose.




Source link

RQ-170 Sentinel Stealth Drone Supported Maduro Capture Mission

At least one, and possibly two, of the U.S. Air Force’s secretive RQ-170 Sentinel stealth drones appear to have taken part in last night’s operation to capture Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro and his wife. Spotting an RQ-170 in the context of a real-world mission is very rare, but it would not be unexpected in this case. The RQ-170 was designed by Lockheed’s Skunk Works exactly for this application, to provide persistent surveillance of high-value targets deep inside contested environments, including in support of special operations missions just like the one overnight in Venezuela.

Readers can get caught up on what is known about the U.S. mission overnight in Venezuela, nicknamed Operation Absolute Resolve, with our ongoing coverage here.

A local spotter in Puerto Rico captured video said to show the RQ-170 returning to the former Naval Station Roosevelt Roads earlier this morning, as seen in the social media post below. The same spotter also filmed clips of other aircraft arriving at the base today, and has been otherwise visually monitoring air traffic there for some time now. This facility, also known as Jose Aponte de la Torre Airport, has been a major hub for expanded U.S. military operations in and around the Caribbean since September 2025. This is just one focal point in a much larger buildup of American air, naval, and ground assets in the region over the last five months.

U.S. RQ-170 stealth drone returning to Puerto Rico this morning.

This is a quiete rare footage of the drone, spotted after supporting US strikes on Venezuela last night.

[📹 Nando Curbelo Rodriguez]pic.twitter.com/dYVHcfGvbQ

— Massimo (@Rainmaker1973) January 3, 2026

It’s also worth noting here that, back in December, Air Forces Southern (AFSOUTH) had posted pictures on social media highlighting a visit by Air Combat Command (ACC) head Gen. Adrian Spain to its 612th Air Operations Center at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona. AFSOUTH is the U.S. Air Force’s top command for operations in and around much of Latin America. One of those images included an individual wearing a name patch with an RQ-170 silhouette, as well as the shoulder sleeve insignia of the 432nd Wing. The posts and pictures contained therein were subsequently taken down. The 30th and 44th Reconnaissance Squadrons, both assigned to the 432nd Wing at Creech Air Force Base in Nevada, are the only units the Air Force has acknowledged publicly as operating RQ-170s. Many had taken this as a sign that Sentinels might be flying operational missions in and around the Caribbean.

The Air Force officially acknowledged the RQ-170’s existence more than a decade and a half ago, but continues to be exceptionally tight-lipped about the Sentinel fleet, which is said to number between 20 and 30 of the drones in total. However, what is known about its operational activities to date fully aligns with the operation in Venezuela last night.

The RQ-170 is now a 20-year-old design, at least, and is not a cutting-edge, very-low-observable aircraft. At the same time, it still offers a stealthy tool for persistent intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) missions that many opponents are less likely to detect even when flying deeply inside their airspace. The drones are thought to be able to carry a variety of sensors, including an active electronically-scanned array radar with synthetic aperture imaging and ground-moving target indicator capabilities, a sensor ball with electro-optical and infrared video cameras, and/or electronic/signals intelligence suites.

With that array of capabilities in hand, RQ-170s would have provided a valuable way to discreetly track Maduro’s movements and otherwise establish his ‘patterns of life,’ as well as those of the forces guarding him, for an extended period of time in the lead-up to the actual launch of the operation to capture him. During the mission itself, having one of the drones orbiting overhead would have provided an indispensable source of real-time information, including to help spot threats that might unexpectedly appear. Those same feeds would also have given senior leaders, including President Donald Trump, a way to watch the operation as it happened.

“I was able to watch it in real time, and I watched every aspect of it.” Trump had said in a phone interview with Fox News earlier today.

The Sentinel fleet was used in exactly this way before and during the raid that led to the death of Al Qaeda founder Osama Bin Laden in a compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, in 2011. Other aspects of the planning for the Venezuela mission also reportedly mirrored the playbook used ahead of the Bin Laden operation, including the construction of a full-scale replica of Maduro’s safe house and the infiltration of a CIA advance team to gain additional insights into his daily routine.

Past use of RQ-170s over Iran to keep tabs on its nuclear program is another general example of its ability to persistently surveil key sites even in denied areas, though one of the drones was notably lost in that country in 2011. Sentinels are also likely to have conducted flights at least very near North Korean airspace while operating from South Korea. The drones have also been at least deployed elsewhere in the Pacific in the past, and may have been sent into the Black Sea region to collect intelligence on Russian forces on the heavily-defended occupied Crimean Peninsula between 2022 and 2023.

With all this in mind, RQ-170s could also have surveilled Venezuelan military bases and other sites that U.S. forces struck as part of the operation overnight, and helped with post-strike assessments. The Air Force has disclosed having at least conducted tests in the past of the Sentinel in the bomb damage assessment role in combination with B-2 bombers.

During a press conference today, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff U.S. Air Force Gen. Dan “Razin” Caine also stressed the degree to which Venezuela’s air defenses played in planning for the mission last night, which also could have played a role in the decision to employ the RQ-170. Though Venezuela’s capabilities and capacity in this regard were limited – and are likely far more so now following the U.S. strikes – they still presented risks that had to have been taken into account. This is something TWZ had already explored in detail in the past.

A firefighter walks past a destroyed anti-aircraft unit at La Carlota military air base, after U.S. President Donald Trump said the U.S. has struck Venezuela and captured its President Nicolas Maduro, in Caracas, Venezuela, January 3, 2026. REUTERS/Leonardo Fernandez Viloria pic.twitter.com/dFE3aOY4L3

— Idrees Ali (@idreesali114) January 3, 2026

“As the force began to approach Caracas, the Joint Air Component began dismantling and disabling the air defense systems in Venezuela, employing weapons to ensure the safe passage of the helicopters into the target area,” Caine explained. “The goal of our air component is, was, and always will be to protect the helicopters and the ground force and get them to the target and get them home.”

Caine’s comments here are further underscored by the use of F-22 Raptors, arguably the most survivable manned tactical jet known to be in the U.S. inventory today. A dozen Raptors also landed at the former Naval Station Roosevelt Roads this morning following sorties over or around Venezuela. It isn’t clear if the F-22s flew direct from their base in the U.S. or staged in Puerto Rico shortly before the strikes commenced. The F-22 owes its very existence, at least in part, to fears about the dangers posed by the extensive array of air defense systems in service in Syria in the immediate post-Cold War period, as you can learn more about here.

In addition to F-22s, the aerial elements of the U.S. force package employed during the operation last night included “F-35s, F[/A]-18s, EA-18s, E-2s, B-1 bombers, and other support aircraft, as well as numerous remotely piloted drones,” according to Caine. Suppression and destruction of enemy air defenses (SEAD/DEAD) would have been a key mission set for the stealth F-35s, too. F-22s and F-35s played a similar role during strikes on Iranian nuclear sites earlier this year, nicknamed Operation Midnight Hammer. It is likely that RQ-170s also played a role in that operation as well, providing direct overhead coverage of the strikes and intel for post mission bomb damage assessments.

General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff:

The force included F-22s, F-35s, F-18s, EA-18s, E-2s, B-1 bombers, other support aircraft, and numerous remotely piloted drones.

As the force approached Caracas, the joint air component began dismantling and disabling… pic.twitter.com/3XWtcQDJu3

— Clash Report (@clashreport) January 3, 2026

TWZ also previously highlighted the particularly important role EA-18G Growlers could play in kinetic action against Venezuela after a squadron of those jets arrived in Puerto Rico last month. Growlers had already been in the region by that point as part of the air wing aboard the supercarrier USS Gerald R. Ford. At least one EC-130H Compass Call aircraft, which offers additional electronic warfare capabilities, was also recently deployed to Puerto Rico.

Many questions remain about how Venezuela’s air defense network responded, or didn’t, to the U.S. operation overnight. One U.S. helicopter is known to have been damaged by unspecified ground fire during the mission, but remained flyable. No other aircraft are known to have sustained damage at this time.

What we do have now is clear evidence that at least one RQ-170 took part in last night’s operation in Venezuela.

Contact the author: joe@twz.com

Joseph has been a member of The War Zone team since early 2017. Prior to that, he was an Associate Editor at War Is Boring, and his byline has appeared in other publications, including Small Arms Review, Small Arms Defense Journal, Reuters, We Are the Mighty, and Task & Purpose.




Source link

Russia claims Ukrainian drone attack killed 24 people in Kherson | Russia-Ukraine war News

Russia has accused Ukraine of killing at least 24 people, including a child, in a drone attack on a hotel and cafe where New Year celebrations were taking place in a Russian-controlled part of Ukraine’s southern Kherson region.

Vladimir Saldo, the Russian-installed governor of the region, first made the claim in a statement on Telegram before Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and senior politicians later accused ⁠Ukraine of carrying out “a terrorist attack”.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Saldo also published photos of what he wrote was the aftermath of the attack, which Al Jazeera has not been able to verify.

At least one person’s body was visible in the images beneath a white sheet.

The building showed signs that a fierce fire had raged, and there were what appeared to be bloodstains on the ground.

In the statement, ​Saldo said three Ukrainian drones had struck the site of New Year ‌celebrations in Khorly, a coastal village, in what he said was a “deliberate strike” against civilians. He said many people were burned alive.

Russia’s Foreign Ministry said initial information indicated that 24 people had been killed, and that 50 people had been injured.

“There is ‌no doubt that the attack was planned in advance, with ⁠drones deliberately targeting areas where civilians had gathered to celebrate New Year’s Eve,” the ministry said in a statement, calling the attack “a war crime”.

Flames and smoke rise from a fire following what Russian-installed authorities described as an overnight Ukrainian drone strike on a hotel and cafe, amid the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict in the village of Khorly, in the Kherson Region, a Russian-controlled area of Ukraine, January 1, 2026. Governor of Kherson Region Vladimir Saldo via Telegram/Handout via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY. NO RESALES. NO ARCHIVES. MANDATORY CREDIT.
Flames and smoke rise from a fire following what Russian-installed authorities described as an overnight Ukrainian drone attack on a hotel and cafe [Handout/Governor of Kherson on Telegram via Reuters]

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said in a statement on Telegram that ‌Ukraine’s backers in the West were ultimately to blame.

Senior politicians, including the speakers of both houses of Russia’s parliament, condemned Kyiv.

Kherson is one of the four regions in Ukraine ‍that Russia claimed as its own in 2022, a move Kyiv and most Western countries denounced as an illegal land grab.

Ukraine’s ‍military ‍did not comment on Moscow’s claim, but it said it had hit Russia’s Ilsky ⁠oil refinery in ​the Krasnodar region overnight, ‍adding that the results of the attack ‍were still ⁠being confirmed.

In a statement on Telegram, the military also said it hit the ​Almetyevsk ‌oil facility in Russia’s Tatarstan region.

The Almetyevsk facility is ‌more than 965km (600 ‌miles) from ⁠the nearest part of Ukraine, and even further ‌from the nearest territory currently controlled by ‍Kyiv.

Russia releases video of ‘attack’ on Putin’s residence

On Tuesday, Moscow claimed that Ukraine launched a long-range drone attack against one of President Vladimir Putin’s official residences in northwestern Russia, which Kyiv has denounced as a “lie”.

Russia’s Defence Ministry released a video on Wednesday of a downed drone it said was involved in the attack.

The night-time clip showed a man in camouflage, a helmet and a Kevlar vest standing near a damaged drone lying in snow.

The man, with his face covered, talks about the drone. Neither the man nor the Defence Ministry provided any location or date.

The video and claims could not be independently verified.

Peace talks

Kyiv has called the allegations of an attack on Putin’s residence a ruse to derail ongoing peace negotiations, which have ramped up in recent weeks on both sides of the Atlantic.

In his New Year’s address, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said a peace deal was “90 percent ready” but warned that the remaining 10 percent, believed to include key sticking points such as territory, would “determine the fate of peace, the fate of Ukraine and Europe, how people will live”.

Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff said on Wednesday that he, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner had had a “productive call” with the national security advisers of the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Ukraine to discuss the “European peace process”.

“We focused on how to move the discussions forward in a practical way on behalf of [Trump’s] peace process, including strengthening security guarantees and developing effective deconfliction mechanisms to help end the war and ensure it does not restart,” Witkoff said in a post on X.

Lead Ukrainian negotiator Rustem Umerov also reaffirmed that European and Ukrainian officials plan to meet on Saturday, while Zelenskyy is due to hold talks next week with European leaders.

Russia’s attacks on Ukraine

Elsewhere in Ukraine, Russia attacked the Odesa region overnight, targeting civilian infrastructure in several waves of drone attacks, according to regional head Oleh Kiper.

In a post on Telegram, Kiper said a two-storey residential building was damaged and that a drone hit an apartment on the 17th floor of a high-rise building without detonating. No casualties were reported.

In its daily report, the air force said air defence forces had downed or suppressed 176 of 205 drones targeting Ukraine overnight.

It said 24 drone hits were recorded at 15 locations, and the attack was ongoing.

Source link

Russian drone strike on Odessa injures 6, including 3 children

Drone strikes on the Ukrainian city of Odessa overnight injured at least 6 people, including 3 children, as Russia doubled down on a month-long campaign targeting the strategically key region on the Black Sea. File photo by Igor Tkachenko/EPA-EFE

Dec. 31 (UPI) — At least six people, three of them children, were injured in the southern Ukrainian port of Odessa in a Russian drone strike overnight that blacked out parts of the city, cutting off electricity, water and heat, said local officials.

The victims, including a 7-month-old infant, an 8-year-old girl and a 14-year-old boy, belonged to two families in the same apartment building after Shahed-type drones targeted residential areas, causing structural damage and setting apartments ablaze.

Four buildings were hit in all, with firefighters rescuing at least eight people from one burning high-rise.

Private energy provider DTEK said two of its facilities in the region had been badly damaged, bringing to 10 the number of its plants attacked since the beginning of December.

Across the province, more than 170,000 people were without power, Deputy Energy Minister Oleksandr Vyazovchenko said.

Elsewhere in Odessa Oblast, logistics warehouses were set on fire in a separate strike.

The attacks came amid a sustained aerial campaign targeting port, energy and civilian infrastructure in the strategically key coastal province, which sits on the Black Sea.

The drones menacing Odessa overnight were among 127 that injured at least five other people across Kyiv, Chernihiv, Dnipropetrovsk and Kherson provinces. The Ukrainian Air Force said it downed or disabled all but 26 of the UAVs.

Over the past day, at least three people were killed by Russian artillery fire in the frontline regions of Sumy, Zaporizhzhia and Kharkiv.

Another three civilians were killed and four were injured in the eastern Donetsk province, where Ukrainian forces are engaged in intense battles with Russian forces to hold onto the remaining territory they control.

The attacks follow claims by the Kremlin of an attempted strike by Ukrainian drones on the state residence of President Vladimir Putin, northwest of Moscow, on Monday.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov vowed the attack, which he described as terrorism, would not go unanswered and warned it would affect the current peace talks.

Kyiv categorically rejected the claim, with President Volodymyr Zelensky calling it a “complete fabrication intended to justify additional attacks against Ukraine” and cover for Moscow’s refusal to take steps to end the war.

Source link

US issues Iran-Venezuela sanctions over alleged drone trade | US-Venezuela Tensions News

Washington accuses Tehran and Caracas of ‘reckless proliferation of deadly weapons’ amid spiraling tensions.

Washington, DC – The United States has issued sanctions against a Venezuelan company over accusations that it helped acquire Iranian-designed drones as Washington’s tensions with both Tehran and Caracas escalate.

The penalties on Tuesday targeted Empresa Aeronautica Nacional SA (EANSA), a Venezuelan firm that the US Department of the Treasury said “maintains and oversees the assembly of” drones from Iran’s Qods Aviation Industries, which is already under sanctions by Washington.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The department also sanctioned the company’s chairman, Jose Jesus Urdaneta Gonzalez, accusing him of coordinating “with members and representatives of the Venezuelan and Iranian armed forces on the production of UAVs [unmanned aerial vehicles] in Venezuela”.

“Treasury is holding Iran and Venezuela accountable for their aggressive and reckless proliferation of deadly weapons around the world,” Treasury official John Hurley said in a statement.

“We will continue to take swift action to deprive those who enable Iran’s military-industrial complex access to the US financial system,” he said. The sanctions freeze any assets of the targeted firms and individuals in the US and make it generally illegal for American citizens to engage in financial transactions with them.

In its statement, the US alleged Tehran and Caracas have coordinated the “provision” of drones to Venezuela since 2006.

Iran’s Ministry of Defence and Armed Forces Logistics (MODAFL) has been under US sanctions since 2020 for what Washington said is its role in both selling and procuring weapons. The US is by far the largest weapons exporter in the world.

On Tuesday, the US Treasury Department also imposed new sanctions against several Iranians it accused of links to Iran’s arms industry.

The actions came a day after President Donald Trump threatened more strikes against Iran if the country rebuilds its missile capabilities or nuclear programme.

The US had joined Israel in its attacks against Iran in June and bombed the country’s three main nuclear sites before a ceasefire ended a 12-day escalation.

“Now I hear that Iran is trying to build up again, and if they are, we’re going to have to knock them down,” Trump said on Monday during a joint news conference with visiting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “We’ll knock them down. We’ll knock the hell out of them. But hopefully, that’s not happening.”

Iran was quick to respond to Trump’s threats.

“The response of the Islamic Republic of Iran to any oppressive aggression will be harsh and regrettable,” President Masoud Pezeshkian wrote in a social media post.

The Trump administration has also taken a confrontational approach towards Venezuela.

The US president announced this week that the US “hit” a dock in the Latin American country that he said was used to load drug boats. Details of the nature of the strike remain unclear.

Trump and some of his top aides have falsely suggested that Venezuela’s oil belongs to the US. Washington has also accused Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, without evidence, of leading a drug trafficking organisation.

The Trump administration has simultaneously been carrying out strikes against what it says are drug-running vessels in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean, a campaign that many legal experts said violates US and international law and is tantamount to extrajudicial killings.

Over the past month, the US also has seized at least two oil tankers off the coast of Venezuela after Trump announced a naval blockade against the country.

Venezuela has rejected the US moves as “piracy” and accused the Trump administration of seeking to topple Maduro’s government.

Source link

Zelensky: Russian drone attack claim an attempt to derail peace talks

Dec. 30 (UPI) — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky accused Russia of lying over a large-scale drone attack on President Vladimir Putin’s state residence 300 miles northwest of Moscow, which it claims was carried out by Kyiv.

Monday’s alleged attack shortly after high-level U.S.-Ukraine talks at Mar-a-Lago ended was an excuse to attack Ukraine, most likely Kyiv and government buildings there, and keep the war going, Zelensky told reporters.

Zelensky said it was no accident that Moscow announced the attack after he and U.S. President Donald Trump said they had made good progress toward finalizing a peace agreement framework, as well as lengthy security guarantees, in talks Sunday at Trump’s resort in Palm Beach.

“It’s obvious that yesterday we had a meeting with President Trump, and it’s clear that when there is no scandal for the Russians, when there is progress, it is a failure for them. They do not want to end this war and are only capable of doing so under pressure. So they are looking for a pretext,” said Zelensky.

“Russia is at it again, using dangerous statements to undermine all achievements of our shared diplomatic efforts with President Trump’s team. We keep working together to bring peace closer. This alleged ‘residence strike’ story is a complete fabrication intended to justify additional attacks against Ukraine, including Kyiv, as well as Russia’s own refusal to take necessary steps to end the war. Typical Russian lies,” Zelensky wrote on X.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Monday that Moscow had already decided on when and which targets it would hit in retaliation for Kyiv’s targeting of Putin’s residence in the Novgorod region with 91 drones, which he described as a terrorist attack.

All the drones were downed by air defenses or electronic means and neither Putin or anyone else was hurt in the incident, according to Lavrov.

However, he warned Russia would revise its stance on the peace negotiations accordingly, “taking into account the Kyiv regime’s final transition to a policy of state terrorism,” but said Moscow would not be sharing details of its new tougher policy.

Speaking at a briefing on Tuesday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov ruled out Moscow pulling the plug on the peace talks.

“Russia is not withdrawing from the negotiation process, and will certainly continue talks and dialogue, primarily with the Americans,” he said.

Speaking to journalists at Mar-a-Lago on Monday night, Trump said he was very angry about the attack, which he said he learned about directly from Putin, saying it was not the right time for offense when peace negotiations were in such a “delicate phase.”

“I don’t like it. It’s not good. I learned about it from President Putin today. I was very angry about it. It’s a delicate period of time. This is not the right time. It’s one thing to be offensive, because they’re offensive. It’s another thing to attack his house. It’s not the right time to do any of that.”

However, he acknowledged the attack may never have taken place and vowed that U.S. intelligence would get to the bottom of it.

According to the Kremlin, the attack in the early hours of Monday local time came “almost immediately” after the American and Ukrainian teams’ talks ended on Sunday evening.

Zelensky and Trump emerged from the talks to say they were at least 95% agreed on extendable 15-year security guarantees for Ukraine, but that the issues of territory and the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant remained sticking points.

Source link

Ukraine Now Using Drone Boats To Attack Russian Riverine Targets

Ukraine is expanding its uncrewed surface vessel (USV) attacks to hit Russian targets on the Dnipro River and its tributaries. Kyiv’s USV campaign has previously hit enemy shipping, warships, and infrastructure in attacks made famous by the country’s State Security Service (SBU) and Defense Intelligence Directorate (GUR).

Meanwhile, as Russia begins to build out its own USV effort, Ukraine also said it struck a storage site for those vessels on Tuesday night in a preemptive effort to keep them from being deployed.

The 40th Coastal Defense Brigade of the 30th Marine Corps recently released a video showing the Barracuda USV it developed carrying out a mission in the Dnipro region. The video purports to show the Barracuda making its way through an inlet before hitting a small camouflaged Russian boat and outpost. The video then cuts to aerial drone views showing an explosion and resulting destruction.

“The unmanned boat ‘Barracuda’ carried out another successful mission,” the Corps stated on Telegram.

Много говорят про БЭКи “Магура” от ГУР МО Украины и Sea Baby от СБУ, хотя СОУ применяют и другие средства, не так часто показывающие свою результативную работу в эфирах всяких там “марафончиков”.

Одним из таких БЭК является Barracuda 40-й ОБрБО.

Одно из видео как БЭК выполнил… pic.twitter.com/MSBQAeGHQX

— Alexander Kovalenko (@zloy_odessit) December 24, 2025

The Barracuda USV is operated by a special unit of the same name, according to the 30th Marine Corps.

“The eponymous special unit, subordinated to the 40th Marine Brigade, independently designed and launched a water drone, which is already defending the coasts of Ukraine,” the Corps explained

A Barracuda uncrewed surface vessel designed and operated by Ukraine’s 30th Marine Corps. (30th Marine Corps screencap)

Unveiled earlier this year, the Barracuda was designed to carry out several missions, including one-way attack, strikes with grenades and first-person view (FPV) drones and resupply, according to the Corps.

A Ukrainian Barracuda USV equipped with grenade launchers.
A Ukrainian Barracuda USV equipped with launchers. (30th Marine Corps screencap)

This modular design is similar to the Sea Baby USVs produced by the SBU and the Magura line of USVs operated by GUR that have frequently staged attacks in the Black Sea. In addition to serving as one-way attack weapons, the USVs previously deployed by Ukraine have brought down jets and helicopters and launched attacks using aerial drones. This onslaught has already kept Russia’s Black Sea Fleet (BSF) at bay, forcing it to retreat from Crimea to Novorossiysk. Ukrainian USVs have also damaged enemy military facilities in occupied Crimea and the Kerch Bridge.

In an exclusive interview, Ukrainian Lt. Gen. Kyrylo Budanov, head of the Defense Intelligence Directorate (GUR), talks about his drone boat campaign against Russia.
One of GUR’s Magura-7 USVs. (GUR) GUR

However, unlike Ukraine’s long-range USVs, the Barracuda is not equipped with satellite communications.

“Its range is therefore limited, making it suitable primarily for short-distance missions among the islands of the Dnipro River, which corresponds with the operating area of the 40th Coastal Defense Brigade,” the Ukrainian United24 media outlet noted.

The unit claims that the Barracuda is guided in part by artificial intelligence, but does not provide any details.

🇺🇦 Ukraine’s Marines unveil a new riverine naval drone — Barracuda.

Built by the 40th Coastal Defense Brigade, it’s modular, AI-enabled, and tailored for Dnipro island warfare: mining channels, striking with grenade launchers, and resupplying positions. pic.twitter.com/0a11OsO7R5

— Ivan Khomenko (@KhomenkoIv60065) August 24, 2025

Overall, the Barracuda appears to be a bit cheaper and less complex design that is better optimized for lower priority targets in riverine and shallow littoral areas. The lack of a satellite communications system is interesting as control of the boat would have to be provided locally, within line of sight of the boat or at least within line of sight of a relay, such as a drone, flying overhead. The boat could also follow waypoint navigation autonomously, but making pinpoint attacks in complex waterways would be a challenge for such a concept of operations.

The Barracuda attacks are part of a fight taking place on the Dnipro, its inlets and islands since the Ukrainian’s recaptured Kherson City in November 2023. With neither side being able to launch a major cross-river attack due to the difficulty of crossing a body of water while under fire from drones and artillery, the two sides have been jockeying for position in this area on a much smaller scale.

The success of Ukraine’s USVs has not been lost on Russia. Earlier this year, Moscow carried out a drone boat attack on a Ukrainian Navy reconnaissance ship in the mouth of the Danube River. That incident marked Russia’s first confirmed use of these weapons. In addition to building its own drone boats, Russia also created dedicated units to operate them. You can read more about Russia’s USV development in our story here.

The following video shows the August Russian USV attack on the Ukrainian ship.

Though there have been no confirmed Russian USV attacks since August, Ukraine remains concerned about the potential for future strikes. 

“As part of a systematic reduction of the Russian aggressor’s military-economic potential, on the night of December 24, units of the Ukrainian Defense Forces carried out successful strikes on several enemy targets,” the Ukrainian Armed Forces General Staff claimed on Wednesday. “The storage and maintenance site for unmanned boats in the area of Mirny in the temporarily occupied Ukrainian Crimea was hit.”

Ukraine says it launched an attack on a Russian drone boat storage and maintenance facility in Myrnyi, Crimea. (Google Earth)

The General Staff did not provide any visual evidence of the results of the attack and said that the extent of the damage is still being determined.

While Ukraine’s Barracuda USVs have not yet been carrying out attacks on high-value targets, the drone boats give Kyiv’s beleaguered forces another weapon they can use to help defend its internal waterways.

Contact the author: howard@thewarzone.com

Howard is a Senior Staff Writer for The War Zone, and a former Senior Managing Editor for Military Times. Prior to this, he covered military affairs for the Tampa Bay Times as a Senior Writer. Howard’s work has appeared in various publications including Yahoo News, RealClearDefense, and Air Force Times.




Source link

Loyal Wingman Drone Appears On China’s Supersized Type 076 Amphibious Assault Ship

An image has emerged that appears to show, for the first time, one of China’s growing series of low-observable combat drones aboard the country’s super-sized Type 076 amphibious assault ship, the Sichuan. The development is in line with previous predictions that this vessel will be capable of supporting high-end aerial drone operations as well as traditional amphibious assaults.

As it seems, for the first time a mock-up of one of the CCA UCAVs shown in September was seen on the deck of the PLANS-51 „Sichuan“ … Looks like a navalised variant of the Type-C. pic.twitter.com/Bs1Gxfiq9R

— @Rupprecht_A (@RupprechtDeino) December 26, 2025

The image in question began to circulate recently online and shows the rear portion of the drone on the deck of the Sichuan, partly obscured by one of the vessel’s twin island superstructures. The characteristic twin, outward-canted tailfins of the drone suggest that this is a navalized version of the design that has been informally dubbed Type C by Chinese aerospace observers. It is part of a collection of aircraft that are considered to be broad Chinese equivalents of the U.S. Air Force’s Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA).

Well, back from work and back to this strange picture: 🤔
I start with my layman’s attempt to sort them a bit + adding the names according to Huitong’s CMA-Blog.

1. pic.twitter.com/GPXjD2q1r3

— @Rupprecht_A (@RupprechtDeino) September 10, 2025

While the image appears to be genuine, it should be considered at least possible that the drone in question is a mockup. China makes considerable use of aircraft mockups, on land and at sea, to assist with the development and subsequent service introduction of aircraft carriers and assault ships.

The so-called Type C is a subsonic CCA or “loyal wingman”-type drone. Its key features include a swept lambda wing planform, the aforementioned canted tail fins, an internal stores bay, and a single jet engine fed by a dorsal intake. Overall, in terms of configuration, it has some similarities with the U.S.-made XQ-58A Valkyrie, but it is much larger. According to unconfirmed reports, it is said to be optimized for air-to-ground missions, although intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) and electronic warfare would also be likely roles. The Type C is one of at least four new CCA-type drones that were publicly unveiled at the parade celebrating 80 years since the defeat of Japan in World War II, held in Beijing on September 3, 2025.

An unmanned aerial vehicle is seen during a military parade marking the 80th anniversary of victory over Japan and the end of World War II, in Beijing's Tiananmen Square on September 3, 2025. (Photo by Pedro PARDO / AFP) (Photo by PEDRO PARDO/AFP via Getty Images)
The so-called Type C drone on display at the Beijing parade marking 80 years since the defeat of Japan in World War II, on September 3, 2025. (Photo by GREG BAKER/AFP via Getty Images)  PEDRO PARDO

It would make a good deal of sense for the drone to now be evaluated by the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) onboard the Sichuan. As you can read about here, the first of the Type 076 assault ship left port for its first sea trials last month.

China's first super-sized Type 076 amphibious assault ship, the Sichuan, has left port for its first sea trials.
The Type 076 amphibious assault ship Sichuan prepares to leave Hudong-Zhonghua Shipyard for its first sea trials. Government of the People’s Republic of China Government of the People’s Republic of China

Thanks to its electromagnetically-powered catapult, the 44,000-ton Type 076 is unlike any other big deck amphibious warship in terms of the kind of air wing that it can accommodate, which is expected to be dominated by uncrewed types.

Previously, Type 076’s air wing was expected to include naval versions of the GJ-11 stealthy flying-wing uncrewed combat air vehicle (UCAV), sometimes known as the GJ-21. This theory was supported by apparent GJ-11 mockups that appeared at a test and/or training site right on Changxing Island in Shanghai, very close to where the Type 076 was being built. This may well still be the case, but it now looks like a navalized Type C drone will at least supplement it.

As it seems, for the first time clear images of a GJ-21 in flight are posted and this one – based on the still installed pitots – has its tail hook down. pic.twitter.com/5h1nVZHzIe

— @Rupprecht_A (@RupprechtDeino) November 1, 2025

The navalized GJ-11 is expected to operate primarily from China’s true aircraft carriers, including the catapult-equipped Fujian, which was commissioned last month. This carrier is expected to be followed by six more by 2035, according to a Pentagon report, which would provide the PLAN with a total of nine. Recent imagery indicates that China is now progressing with work on its fourth flattop, which is expected to introduce nuclear propulsion.

Returning to the Sichuan, in addition to drones, the warship will accommodate various helicopters, and very likely also a crewed tiltrotor aircraft, which is now in flight testing.

While we don’t yet know whether the Type C has been launched from the Sichuan, there have already been signs of preparations for flight trials. Shortly before the vessel left port for the first time, full markings had been painted on its flight deck, as part of its final fitting out.

Furthermore, as seen in the social media post below, evidence emerged at the end of October showing what looked to be a red-colored catapult test ‘truck’ on Sichuan’s deck. This, in turn, pointed to the start of testing of the ship’s lone catapult.

Again, as we have discussed before, as well as the catapult, the layout of the Type 076 design is heavily focused on sustained flight operations. These features include its unusually wide flight deck and the ship’s two islands. As such, fixed-wing drones can be launched by the catapult at the bow end and recovered via some form of arresting gear.

As TWZ previously wrote about the overall significance of the Sichuan:

“The potential value to the PLAN of having a fleet of very large deck amphibious assault ships that are highly capable of large-scale drone operations as well as traditional amphibious assaults is clear. These ships could be used to launch and recover UCAVs like the GJ-11 and other types of drones to perform a host of missions from maritime strike to intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR). They could be used to provide additional ‘mass’ in support of the operations of larger carrier strike groups and help to free the air wings of flattops like Fujian up for tasks they might be better suited for. In addition, they could provide a lower tier of naval aviation support that could be employed independently.”

“Simply having more naval aviation capacity overall would give the PLAN added flexibility for various operations closer to the mainland, including a potential military intervention against Taiwan or defending its expansive and largely unrecognized territorial claims in places like the South China Sea. Type 076s could also help project naval and air power further from China’s shores, something that has also been a driving factor behind the country’s broader carrier ambitions.”

Chinese PLA Navy’s First Type 076 Amphibious Assault Ship “Sichuan” Conducts First Sea Trial




It remains to be seen if the PLAN’s current ambitions include introducing the navalized Type C as part of the regular air wing for the Type 076, or whether it is currently being used as part of an evaluation that may lead to a different type of uncrewed aircraft going aboard the warship. By the same token, we don’t yet know if China currently plans to acquire more Type 076s, or if this design is also initially intended more to prove out the concept of super-sized assault ships.

For now, however, the appearance of the Type C, or a mockup thereof, aboard the Sichuan, underscores China’s broader goal of deploying a host of different uncrewed types aboard aviation-capable warships of various kinds.

Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com

Thomas is a defense writer and editor with over 20 years of experience covering military aerospace topics and conflicts. He’s written a number of books, edited many more, and has contributed to many of the world’s leading aviation publications. Before joining The War Zone in 2020, he was the editor of AirForces Monthly.




Source link

YFQ-48A ‘Fighter Drone’ Designation Given To Northrop Grumman’s Talon By USAF

The U.S. Air Force has formally designated Northrop Grumman’s Project Talon drone as the YFQ-48A and described it as a “strong contender” to be part of its future Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) fleets. This follows news that the service has handed contracts to nine companies to refine a wide array of designs under Increment 2 of its CCA program. Northrop Grumman, together with its subsidiary Scaled Composites, only lifted the lid on Project Talon earlier this month, as you can read more about in our initial report here.

YFQ-48A is the third ‘fighter drone’ designation the U.S. military has now applied to a CCA-type design. The service announced in March that the drones General Atomics and Anduril have been developing under Increment 1 of the CCA program had received the designations YFQ-42A and YFQ-44A, respectively. However, the Project Talon design is not part of Increment 1, as we will come back to later on.

“The MDS designation highlights the ongoing partnership between the Air Force and Northrop Grumman and acknowledges the continued progress of the YFQ-48A as a strong contender in the CCA program,” according to an official Air Force release.

A top-down look at the Project Talon drone. Northrop Grumman

“We are encouraged by Northrop Grumman’s continued investment in developing advanced semi-autonomous capabilities,” Air Force Brig. Gen. Jason Voorheis, the service’s Program Executive Officer for Fighters and Advanced Aircraft, said in a statement. “Their approach aligns with our strategy to foster competition, drive industry innovation, and deliver cutting-edge technology at speed and scale.”

“Northrop Grumman’s commitment to innovation, low-cost manufacturing, and calculated risk-taking aligns perfectly with the CCA acquisition strategy and the Secretary of War’s Acquisition Transformation Strategy,” Air Force Col. Timothy Helfrich, Director of the Agile Development Office, also said. “Project Talon is a testament to their ability to push boundaries and experiment with new technologies, ultimately advancing solutions that could enhance the future of airpower.”

While details about the Project Talon drone itself remain limited, Northrop Grumman has made clear that it is based on lessons learned from its losing entry in the Increment 1 competition. The company has said that its Increment 1 design was at the higher end of the performance and capability spectrum, and had a price to match. Talon, by extension, has been described as “cheaper and better” and “significantly different” from the Increment 1 offering, and a first flight is now targeted for late next year. You can learn more about what TWZ has been able to glean so far here.

Project Talon is here. This next-gen autonomous aircraft is made to adapt fast.

➡️ Modular by design
➡️ Mission-ready
➡️ Built for the challenges ahead pic.twitter.com/6UOhLSBHKn

— Northrop Grumman (@northropgrumman) December 4, 2025

“Northrop Grumman remains in a vendor pool that can compete for future efforts, including the Increment 1 production contract and subsequent increments,” an Air Force spokesperson told TWZ when asked about the current relationship of Northrop Grumman and Project Talon to the CCA program.

“As the Air Force continues to advance the CCA program, the ongoing collaboration with Northrop Grumman and the defense and aerospace industry will ensure that the Air Force remains at the forefront of airpower innovation,” the Air Force’s release today also noted. “These types of partnerships will help the Air Force meet the challenges of an increasingly complex and competitive global security environment while maintaining the technological superiority necessary to prevail in future conflicts. “

General Atomics’ YFQ-42A, one of the two designs now in development under Increment 1 of the Air Force’s CCA program, seen during a test flight. GA-ASI
Anduril’s YFQ-44A, also known as Fury, the other design now being developed under the CCA program’s Increment 1. Anduril Courtesy Photo via USAF

TWZ has also reached out to Northrop Grumman. Northrop Grumman and Scaled Composites have also previously said that Project Talon, which has been described so far as a demonstrator effort, is not explicitly aimed at a particular contract opportunity, such as the Air Force CCA program’s Increment 2.

As mentioned, the Air Force has separately confirmed that nine companies have now received initial concept refinement contracts under the CCA program’s Increment 2, which were all awarded earlier this month. The service is presently declining to name any of those companies, one of which could be Northrop Grumman. An Air Force spokesperson told TWZ that the vendor details are currently “protected by enhanced security measures.”

“These designs [being refined under Increment 2 now] represent a broad spectrum, ranging from more affordable, attritable concepts to higher-end, more exquisite designs,” that same spokesperson also told TWZ. “This variety ensures that the program explores different approaches, optimizing for cost-effectiveness while maintaining the flexibility and capabilities necessary to enhance operational effectiveness.”

That the Air Force is again considering a mix of lower and higher-end designs for Increment 2 is a notable development. The service had indicated previously that it would focus heavily on less exquisite and cheaper designs for the second tranche of CCA drones based on its experience with Increment 1. It’s also worth remembering here that Increment 2 has also long been expected to include foreign participation, which would have impacts on the requirements. In October, the Netherlands announced it had formally joined the Air Force’s CCA program.

The U.S. Marine Corps and U.S. Navy also have their own CCA programs, which are formally intertwined with the Air Force’s effort, including in the development of common command and control and autonomy architectures. However, the Marines and Navy have been pursuing specific airframe designs to meet their respective needs independently. The Marine Corps is moving to field an operational version of Kratos’ XQ-58A Valkyrie drone following extensive testing with that design. The Navy has four companies under contract now for conceptual aircraft carrier-based CCA designs.

A US Marine Corps XQ-58A Valkyrie, one of a number of these drones the service has been using for test and evaluation purposes. USAF Master Sgt. John McRell

“The next competitive contract award will occur after the Concept Refinement Phase, as the Air Force evaluates the technical and operational merits of the submitted designs for prototyping,” the Air Force spokesperson added. “Increment 2 will be structured similarly to Increment 1, where more than one awardee may be selected for prototyping. This approach allows for competitive development and ensures that the Air Force can evaluate various solutions before selecting the final designs to move into production.”

“For CCA Increment 2, following concept refinement, the Air Force will proceed with prototyping, with plans for a future competitive award leading to production awards,” they continued. “The specific timeline for these milestones will depend on the results from Concept Refinement and the vendor’s performance during testing.”

Many questions remain about the Air Force’s CCA plans, including exactly how many drones the service is set to acquire under Increment 1, and whether that initial fleet will be all YFQ-42As or YFQ-44As, or a mix of both. The Air Force, Marine Corps, and Navy are all still very much refining their core concepts of operations for future CCA fleets, including deployed, launched, recovered, supported, and otherwise operated on a day-to-day peacetime basis, let alone employing them tactically.

In the meantime, the Air Force is clearly pushing with the development of additional CCA types, including Northrop Grumman’s and Scaled Composites’ Project Talon design. With Increment 2 now underway, more insights into the new field of CCA competitors may begin to emerge.

Contact the author: joe@twz.com

Joseph has been a member of The War Zone team since early 2017. Prior to that, he was an Associate Editor at War Is Boring, and his byline has appeared in other publications, including Small Arms Review, Small Arms Defense Journal, Reuters, We Are the Mighty, and Task & Purpose.




Source link

Ukraine Strikes Russia-Linked Tanker In The Mediterranean With ‘Bomber Drone’

In a significant escalation of the ‘tanker war’ between Russia and Ukraine, which has so far played out mainly in the Black Sea, Ukrainian aerial drones have struck a tanker belonging to Russia’s so-called ‘shadow fleet’ in the Mediterranean. The latest incident comes after a tit-for-tat series of attacks, and a warning earlier this month from Russian President Vladimir Putin that he would “cut Ukraine off from the sea” in response to Kyiv stepping up its campaign against Russian commercial shipping. 

A source from within the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), the government’s main internal security agency, told TWZ that “a new, unprecedented special operation” was carried out “more than 2,000 kilometers” (1,243 miles) from Ukrainian territory.

A video appeared online allegedly showing a drone attack on a Russian shadow fleet tanker in the Mediterranean sea.

Reportedly, it was a QENDIL tanker that transports Russian oil that was empty at the moment of the strike. There are reports that the vessel was critically… pic.twitter.com/G50Sf579If

— Anton Gerashchenko (@Gerashchenko_en) December 19, 2025

The target was the Oman-flagged crude oil tanker Qendil, empty at the time of the attack and sailing from the Indian port of Jamnagar, where it had been unloaded on December 1.

“Accordingly, this attack did not pose any threat to the ecological situation in the region,” the SBU said.

Before unloading, the tanker had left Russia’s Black Sea port of Novorossiysk on November 4, sailing through the Bosphorus and Mediterranean, then passing the Suez Canal en route to India. The vessel was built in 2006 and has a capacity of 115,338 deadweight tonnes.

Russian tanker hit in Ukrainian drone strike

A Russian oil tanker tied to Moscow’s so-called shadow fleet has sustained critical damage after being struck by Ukrainian aerial drones in the Mediterranean Sea, according to reports. #MarineTraffic data shows the tanker Qendil… pic.twitter.com/jb82QT40S7

— MarineTraffic (@MarineTraffic) December 19, 2025

According to Lloyd’s List Intelligence vessel tracking, the attack likely occurred when the tanker was heading west in the Mediterranean between Malta and Crete, which would put it around 930 miles from Ukraine. According to AIS data, the vessel made a U-turn immediately before midnight and then turned toward the east, for unknown reasons, changing its destination to Port Said in Egypt.

The SBU explained that aerial drones were used as part of a “multi-stage” operation that was conducted by forces from its Special Group “Alpha.” The same group was responsible for yesterday’s aerial drone attack on Belbek Air Base in Crimea, which you can read more about here.

The SBU shared a video with us that purports to show the attack on the tanker. Here, munitions can be seen dropped onto the deck from a hexacopter-type aerial drone, indicating a short-range attack, with ‘bomber drones’ likely having been launched from a nearby vessel. The launch of these drones from a neighboring country would only be possible if the target was half a dozen or so miles off the coast.

The SBU claims that the tanker “suffered critical damage and cannot be used for its intended purpose.” The video evidence suggests that damage was inflicted on the tanker’s topside infrastructure, although it’s unclear how severe this was.

“Russia used this tanker to circumvent sanctions and earn money that went to the war against Ukraine,” the agency added in a statement. “Therefore, from the point of view of international law and the laws and customs of war, this is an absolutely legitimate target for the SBU. The enemy must understand that Ukraine will not stop and will strike it anywhere in the world, wherever it may be.”

In a statement, the security firm Vanguard said that the attack reflected “a stark expansion of Ukraine’s use of uncrewed aerial systems against maritime assets associated with Russia’s sanctioned oil export network.”

The EU and the United Kingdom sanction Qendil, since it is considered part of the shadow fleet, a term for vessels used by Russia (as well as by Iran and Venezuela) to evade sanctions with deceptive practices. These include changing flags and complex chains of ownership, often using shell companies.

AHTOPOL, BULGARIA - DECEMBER 8: The Kairos oil tanker, a Gambian-flagged vessel believed to be part of Russia's shadow fleet, remains anchored on December 8, 2025 in Ahtopol, Bulgaria. Last week, the ship was sailing from Egypt toward the Russian port of Novorossiysk when it caught fire after an alleged attack by Ukrainian naval drones. Bulgarian maritime authorities are planning the evacuation of the remaining crew. The tanker was sanctioned by the European Union in July for its involvement in Russia's so-called shadow fleet, a clandestine network of vessels that help the country skirt price-capping sanctions on Russian oil sales, penalties that were imposed after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. (Photo by Hristo Rusev/Getty Images)
The oil tanker Kairos, a Gambian-flagged vessel believed to be part of the Russian shadow fleet, remains anchored on December 8, 2025, in Ahtopol, Bulgaria. The ship was sailing from Egypt toward the Russian port of Novorossiysk when it caught fire after an alleged attack by Ukrainian naval drones. Photo by Hristo Rusev/Getty Images Hristo Rusev

It might not be a coincidence that the attack took place on the day of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s annual end-of-year press conference. During this, Putin said that Russia would respond to recent Ukrainian attacks on shadow fleet tankers.

Since the start of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia has relied heavily on the shadow fleet, estimated to number more than 1,000 ships, to circumvent sanctions and export crude oil, bringing much-needed revenue.

Putin said today that Russia would “definitely respond” to Ukraine’s campaign against its shadow fleet. “Ultimately, this will not lead to the expected result,” he said. “It will not disrupt any supplies, but will only create additional threats,” Putin added.

Ukraine has previously used drone strikes to target Russian shadow tankers in the Black Sea.

As we have previously reported, Ukraine carried out three attacks on Russian-connected oil tankers in the Black Sea in late November and early December. This campaign has drawn a response in kind from Russia, using a Shahed-type drone, as you can read about here.

Ukraine’s SBU security service says its Sea Baby naval drones today struck another Russian “shadow fleet” tanker in the Black Sea.

Video from an SBU source purports to show the oil tanker “Dashan” being hit by the attack drone and explosions in the stern area. “The vessel,… pic.twitter.com/mtfBqYe1gQ

— Christopher Miller (@ChristopherJM) December 10, 2025

However, the first confirmed Ukrainian strike on a Russian-linked vessel this far from the Black Sea theater is a significant development. It is highly likely that the clandestine anti-ship war waged between Iran and Israel — something we have reported on for years now —likely provided a template for this.

The ability to use short-range drones to prosecute attacks in the Mediterranean indicates that vessels could be under threat elsewhere in European waters or even beyond. Beyond that, we could see Ukraine start to use longer-range systems, including one-way attack drones equipped with Starlink terminals, in the future.

Regardless, this development not only makes it potentially harder for Russia to export oil but also means that other commercial shipping will have to be aware of the increasing risks and potentially take measures to enhance their protection.

While the attack on Qendil appears to be the first of its kind in the Mediterranean, a further geographical expansion of Kyiv’s campaign against the Russian shadow fleet should not be ruled out.

Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com

Thomas is a defense writer and editor with over 20 years of experience covering military aerospace topics and conflicts. He’s written a number of books, edited many more, and has contributed to many of the world’s leading aviation publications. Before joining The War Zone in 2020, he was the editor of AirForces Monthly.


Howard is a Senior Staff Writer for The War Zone, and a former Senior Managing Editor for Military Times. Prior to this, he covered military affairs for the Tampa Bay Times as a Senior Writer. Howard’s work has appeared in various publications including Yahoo News, RealClearDefense, and Air Force Times.




Source link

Littoral Combat Ship Launches Shahed-136 Kamikaze Drone Clone

The U.S. Navy personnel in the Middle East have test-launched a Low-Cost Uncrewed Combat Attack System (LUCAS) long-range kamikaze drone from the Independence class Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) USS Santa Barbara. Described as a first-of-its-kind achievement, this comes two weeks after the U.S. military announced it had established Task Force Scorpion Strike (TFSS) in the region, armed with the LUCAS drones from SpektreWorks. Being able to employ the one-way attack drones from the sea, as well as from sites on land, opens the door to new operational possibilities on top of what was already a major new addition to the U.S. military’s long-range strike arsenal.

TWZ has previously explored in great depth the arguments for arming Navy ships with various types of uncrewed aerial systems to provide additional layers of defense, as well as enhanced strike, electronic warfare, intelligence-gathering, and networking capabilities, which you can find here. Just earlier this year, we also laid out a detailed case for why America’s armed forces should be heavily investing in rapidly-producible long-range kamikaze drones — Shahed-136 clones primarily — just like LUCAS, as you can read here.

Personnel from U.S. Naval Forces Central Command’s (NAVCENT) Task Force 59 conducted the rocket-assisted launch of the LUCAS drone from the stern flight deck of the USS Santa Barbara on December 16, according to an official release. The ship was operating in the Arabian Gulf, more commonly known as the Persian Gulf, at the time. Established in 2021, Task Force 59 has been leading efforts to expand the Navy’s operational use of uncrewed platforms, as well as new artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities, in the Middle East. The LUCAS drone itself had been provided by TFSS, which falls under the auspices of U.S. Special Operations Command Central (SOCCENT), the regional headquarters for special operations activities under U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM).

“Bravo Zulu. U.S. Navy forces in the Middle East are advancing warfighting capability in new ways, bringing more striking power from the sea and setting conditions for using innovation as a deterrent.” – Adm. Brad Cooper, CENTCOM Commander https://t.co/TgQ4WLbph3 pic.twitter.com/WUiAVojTht

— U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) December 18, 2025

The official release from NAVCENT does not provide specific details about capabilities demonstrated during the test, such as how far the LUCAS drone flew, how it was controlled or directed, and whether it hit a mock target of some kind at sea or on land at the end of its flight.

TWZ reached out to CENTCOM, which declined to provide more granular information. We have also reached out to NAVCENT and SpektreWorks.

The LUCAS drone seen right after launch from the stern flight deck of the USS Santa Barbara. NAVCENT/C5F/U.S. Army Spc. Kayla Mc Guire

General details about the LUCAS drones the U.S. military now has deployed in the Middle East remain limited. It is known that SpektreWorks directly reverse-engineered the design from Iran’s Shahed-136, and initially with an eye toward its use as a threat-representative target for training and test purposes. At some 10 feet long and with a wingspan of around eight feet, LUCAS is slightly smaller than the Iranian drone. SpektreWorks has also publicly provided specifications for the related target drone, called the FLM 136, which has roughly half the range and payload capacity as the Shahed-136. However, it is unclear whether this reflects the capabilities found on operationalized configurations. LUCAS is also said to have a unit cost of around $35,000.

Iran and its regional proxies have employed a growing number of variants and derivatives of the Shahed-136 design in recent years, including in attacks on targets in Israel and on ships sailing in and around the Red Sea. Russia also now produces its own still-expanding array of Shahed-136-based drones domestically, which it regularly employs in attacks on Ukrainian cities, as well as forces around the front lines.

The video below includes a montage of clips from Iranian state media showing Shahed-136s being employed during an exercise.

Баражуючий іранський боєприпас «Shahed 136»




Pictures of the LUCAS drones the U.S. military has released so far show a modular, reconnaissance design that could also be used for surveillance and reconnaissance missions, as well as in the decoy role. As TWZ has previously written:

“We see two variants of LUCAS. One is not of particular note, it seems geared to strike the static targets we have become accustomed to for this type of weapon. The other features two very interesting details. It has what appears to be a gimbaled camera system mounted on its nose and, most importantly, a miniature beyond-line-of-sight satellite datalink mounted on its spine. This is a major development that would allow these weapons to not only be controlled dynamically after launch at great distances, but also to hit moving targets and targets of opportunity.”

A previously released picture showing LUCAS drones at a base within the CENTCOM area of operations. Both of the known configurations of the LUCAS drone deployed in the Middle East are visible here. Courtesy Photo

“In addition, this capability would help enable swarm tactics, where the drones work to attack targets cooperatively with their progress monitored and altered in real-time by human operators, regardless of whether they have the satellite terminal or not. This is made possible by providing simpler, lighter line-of-sight datalinks on the drones equipped with warheads only, which then connect line-of-sight to the drone carrying the satellite communications terminal, acting as a force-multiplying networking hub. This also means you can have many simple drones paired with a much smaller number of more costly ones equipped with cameras and networking equipment, but achieve the same overall effect as if they all had the more advanced capabilities. This modularity which is ‘greater than the sum of its parts’ is a central tenet of emerging drone warfare TWZ highlighted a decade ago.

A closer look at the more advanced camera and networking-equipped variant of LUCAS. Courtesy Photo

“Seeing as swarms can be tailored to various objectives, with mixing and matching BLOS networking enabled units with strikers, and placing them in real time to minimize risk and maximize effect, America’s Shaheds should be significantly more survivable and effective. The ability to work together, reacting to their environment, and leverage real-time intelligence gathered by the full gamut of U.S. and allied assets, are even larger advantages. This is in addition to pairing them with combined arms tactics, from electronic warfare to kinetic strikes, to ensure they get to their target areas. Even if some die to air defenses, that can be viewed as a win, depending on what engages them. Consuming costly and finite effectors is a feature, not a bug, for these relatively cheap weapons, as you can read all about in our larger feature.

All of this is further magnified by the ability to employ LUCAS drones from any ship with sufficient deck space, as well as launchers on land, which could be semi-fixed or mobile. This is something TWZ highlighted explicitly in our past feature on the prospect of integrating drone swarms onto Navy ships.

Observations for years now of how Iran and its proxies, as well as Russia, have been employing variants and derivatives of the Shahed-136 have underscored their ability to be sent along often circuitous routes to attack targets from unexpected vectors. Even without the addition of more dynamic targeting and fully networked swarming capabilities, this creates immense challenges for defenders. This is only further compounded by the breadth of areas targeted simultaneously and the sheer volume of drones that can be launched in mass barrages, owing in large part to their relatively low cost.

Iran has also notably fielded a number of one-off sea base-like ships with aviation and other capabilities, including the ability to launch long-range kamikaze drones, as well as cruise and ballistic missiles. Iranian forces have also made use of commercial vessels modified as covert motherships to coordinate attacks, including by regional proxies, and to gather intelligence.

U.S. officials have themselves been quick to highlight the new operational capabilities LUCAS offers, especially in light of the newly announced test launch from the USS Santa Barbara.

Another picture of the LUCAS drone being test-launched from the USS Santa Barbara. NAVCENT/C5F/U.S. Army Spc. Kayla Mc Guire

“A cutting-edge, low-cost attack drone asset, launched from a naval vessel that can sail and operate wherever international law allows, is a tremendous new capability to employ in the region,” Navy Capt. Timothy Hawkins, CENTCOM’s top spokesperson, told TWZ.

“U.S. Navy forces in the Middle East are advancing warfighting capability in new ways, bringing more striking power from the sea and setting conditions for using innovation as a deterrent,” Navy Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of CENTCOM, also said in a statement.

“This first successful launch of LUCAS from a naval vessel marks a significant milestone in rapidly delivering affordable and effective unmanned capabilities to the warfighter,” Vice Adm. Curt Renshaw, commander of NAVCENT and U.S. Fifth Fleet, added in his own statement accompanying the official release. “This achievement demonstrates the power of innovation and joint collaboration in this critical region.”

“This platform will undoubtedly enhance regional maritime security and deterrence,” Renshaw added.

Conducting the test in the Arabian Gulf also underscores previous statements from CENTCOM about how the deployment of LUCAS in the Middle East specifically offers a new way to challenge Iran.

USS Santa Barbara seen sailing in the Arabian Gulf (Persian Gulf) around the time of the LUCAS test. NAVCENT/C5F

“We are now at a point where not only are we building them in mass, but we have already based them in [the] Middle East for the first time,” a U.S. official told TWZ earlier this month when the establishment of TFSS was announced. “In essence, we are able to flip the script on Iran.”

As we mentioned at the time, the benefits that kamikaze drones like LUCAS offer to U.S. forces also extend well beyond the Middle East. Separate U.S. Marine Corps testing of LUCAS drones at the U.S. Army’s Yuma Proving Ground (YPG) in Arizona points to plans to field long-range kamikaze drones more broadly across America’s armed forces.

A LUCAS drone seen being tested at Yuma Proving Ground. US Army/Mark Schauer

As an aside, using an Independence class LCS for the recent maritime LUCAS test launch highlights another potential mission for these ships, as well as the Navy’s Freedom class LCSs. Both types of LCS have chronically underdelivered for the Navy, and the service has spent considerable energy searching for ways to get more operational utility out of the vessels. Last year, then-Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro announced plans to arm “many” Independence and Freedom class LCSs with new containerized missile launchers as a new way to boost their firepower, as you can read more about here. Giving these ships the ability to launch waves of low-cost, long-range kamikaze drones would be another way to approach this goal.

In general, the market space for Shahed-136-like long-range one-way attack drones is already growing in the United States, with Griffon Aerospace having also been pitching its own design called the MQM-172 Arrowhead to America’s armed forces. This is a trend that has also been emerging elsewhere globally, especially in China, where multiple Shahed-esque designs have appeared in recent years. Russia is also said to be helping North Korea set up its own domestic capacity to produce Shahed-136s, or derivatives thereof, in exchange for Pyongyang’s help in fighting Ukraine.

American Shahed 2? You bet! Meet the MQM-172 “Arrowhead”, an enhanced US copy of the Iranian Shahed-136 kamikaze drone. This is apparently the second Shahed clone; the first, called LUCAS (Low-Cost Uncrewed Combat Attack System), was developed by Arizona-based SpektreWorks and… pic.twitter.com/ptI5iq9vk9

— Air Power (@RealAirPower1) August 8, 2025

This is 🇨🇳China’s version of the Geran-2 Drone, The Feilong-300D Suicide Drone, a low cost-High performance drone, and the future of combat.

It carries a High-explosive warhead, and has a range of over 1000km in just a cost of $10,000 USD. pic.twitter.com/XZBEGW1AoK

— PLA Military Updates (@PLA_MilitaryUpd) November 2, 2025

China is testing the LOONG M9, a new loitering munition from LOONG UAV that closely resembles the Iranian Shahed-136.

The drone reportedly carries a 50 kg payload, has a 200 kg takeoff weight, and reaches speeds up to 223 km/h with a range of 1,620 km and 8–9 hours of endurance.… pic.twitter.com/cFBe1ElJRS

— OSINTWarfare (@OSINTWarfare) December 2, 2025

Whatever plans the rest of the U.S. military may have now for drones like LUCAS, the recent at-sea test launch from the USS Santa Barbara shows that American forces in the Middle East are already working to expand their ability to employ this already important new capability at least in that region.

Contact the author: joe@twz.com

Joseph has been a member of The War Zone team since early 2017. Prior to that, he was an Associate Editor at War Is Boring, and his byline has appeared in other publications, including Small Arms Review, Small Arms Defense Journal, Reuters, We Are the Mighty, and Task & Purpose.




Source link

MiG-31 Foxhound Among Russian Air Defense Assets Targeted In Crimean Drone Strike

A key Russian airbase in occupied Crimea has been targeted by a Ukrainian drone strike, according to Ukraine. Authorities in Kyiv claim that drones hit a MiG-31BM Foxhound interceptor, as well as elements of an S-400 air defense system, at Belbek Air Base, near Sevastopol.

The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), the government’s main internal security agency, reported that a successful drone strike operation was carried out overnight by forces from its Special Group “Alpha.” Russian officials, including the governor of Sevastopol, claim that the attack was repelled with 11 drones downed and resulted in no damage.

Minus russian MiG-31 jet 🔥
Last night, the warriors from the @ServiceSsu Alpha Special Operations Center struck a russian MiG-31 fighter jet with a full combat load at the Belbek military airfield in temporarily occupied Crimea.
An S-2 Pantsir air defense system, an S-400 air… pic.twitter.com/qEsjJwrd0o

— Defense of Ukraine (@DefenceU) December 18, 2025

The SBU has published a series of video stills showing the attack, with footage taken from the perspective of the long-range one-way attack drones heading toward their targets. Based on the imagery, the drones could well be the same fiber-optic types that have been launched from Ukrainian drone boats.

Further videos were posted to social media by residents of Crimea, showing explosions and attempts by Russian troops to shoot down the drones. At this point, it should be noted that, without the full videos of the strikes, we cannot be sure whether the drones detonated or the degree of damage they might have caused.

According to the SBU, damage was recorded to a MiG-31, a 92N6 (NATO reporting name Grave Stone) long-range multifunction radar that is part of the S-400 system, two Nebo-SVU long-range surveillance radars, and a Pantsir-S2 surface-to-air missile system.

Nebo-SVU long-range surveillance radar. SBU
Pantsir-S2. SBU

Ukraine claims that the targeted MiG-31 was carrying a full combat load, although the available video reveals that it carries no armament under its wings. Potentially, it carries air-to-air missiles below the fuselage, but the forward-mounted examples are also not visible. While it looks like a real aircraft rather than a decoy, it remains possible that it may have been a non-operational example. However, recent satellite imagery assessed by TWZ shows a MiG-31 sporadically at the base in recent weeks, sometimes sitting out in the open.

MiG-31. SBU

It’s worth noting, too, that the reported 92N6 system (seen below) was covered with camouflage and/or anti-drone netting, making its positive identification harder. It could also have been a 96L6 (Cheese Board) all-altitude detection radar, also associated with the S-400 air defense system.

SBU

It’s a cheeseboard, its been axtive at Belbek for a long time, you made a good id, you can recognise it because the radar array has a round base and on the gravestone its rectangular pic.twitter.com/f4RDqfaoYY

— NLwartracker (@NLwartracker) December 18, 2025

As to the estimated value of these items of equipment, the SBU put a figure of $30-50 million on the MiG-31, depending on configuration and armament, $30 million on the 92N6, $60-100 million for each of the Nebo-SVUs, and $12 million for the Pantsir-S2.

“The SBU continues its effective work to destroy air defense systems in Crimea that cover important military and logistical facilities of the occupiers,” the agency said in a statement on its Telegram channel. “The elimination of components of this echeloned system significantly weakens the enemy’s defense and military capabilities in the Crimean direction.”

Belbek plays a key role in Russia’s war in Ukraine and, as such, has been targeted by Ukraine in the past.

The significance of the airbase, in particular, lies in the fact that its aircraft and air defenses help extend coverage deeper into Ukraine, as well as providing critical screening for the nearby Russian naval base at Sevastopol, and also extend this coverage far out into the Black Sea.

Several photos recently posted on the “warhistoryalconafter” TG channel showing a VKS Su-27P/S. Visible AAMs include an R-73, R-27ET & R-27ER. Photos appear to be from Belbek (thanks to @StefanB2023 for IDing the base) – the jet is presumably assigned to the 38th IAP based there. pic.twitter.com/e6Dm4fGjfX

— Guy Plopsky (@GuyPlopsky) July 28, 2024

Belbek Air Base was used by Ukraine before Russia annexed Crimea in 2014. Today, it is home to the 38th Fighter Aviation Regiment (38 IAP, in Russian nomenclature), a unit that you can read more about here. When Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Belbek received an influx of additional combat aircraft deployed from units in Russia. These have included examples of the Su-30SM and Su-35S, as well as Su-34 Fullback strike fighters, and MiG-31s.

MiG-31s, together with the very long-range air-to-air missiles they carry, have been a particular threat to the Ukrainian Air Force.

In October 2022, during take-off from Belbek, a MiG-31BM departed the runway, crashed, and was completely burned out. The navigator/weapons system officer ejected successfully from the rear cockpit, while the pilot was killed.

The airbase’s value means that it has received new hardened aircraft shelters and additional construction to help shield aircraft from drone attacks and other indirect fire. This is part of a broader push by the Russian military to improve physical defenses at multiple airfields following the launch of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

A view of the central section of Belbek, showing hardened aircraft shelters. Google Earth

Notably, the MiG-31 was targeted while standing in the open, unprotected. Its twin cockpit canopies were open, suggesting it was being prepared for a sortie or had recently returned from one.

As well as previous drone attacks, Ukrainian forces have employed U.S.-supplied Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) short-range ballistic missiles with cluster munition warheads against the base, with a notably destructive ATACMS barrage in May of last year. That attack resulted in two MiG-31s being burnt out, confirmed in post-strike satellite imagery. Since then, however, the use of hardened aircraft shelters at Belbek will have made the resident aircraft less vulnerable to the effects of ATACMS armed with cluster munitions, in particular.

Clearly visible damage to a portion of Belbek’s flightline and adjacent areas can be seen in this satellite image taken on May 16, 2024. PHOTO © 2024 PLANET LABS INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRINTED BY PERMISSION

The Russian Aerospace Forces began the current conflict with around 130 MiG-31s in active service, a small number of them adapted to carry Kinzhal aero-ballistic missiles. The two aircraft destroyed previously at Belbek are the only confirmed combat losses, though thast ight change when more details of the latest drone strike become available.

Russian MiG-31 Downs Ukrainian Su-25 from high altitude




The same attack on Belbek in May 2024 saw the Russians lose elements of an S-300 or S-400 air defense system, including what looked to be another 92N6 radar.

And here are the first photos from the ground showing the aftermath of Ukrainian strikes with ATACMS missiles on Russia’s Belbek Air Base in the Crimea last night.

That appears to be a destroyed 92N6E Grave Stone multi-function engagement radar from the S-400 surface-to-air… https://t.co/anrjNVYdfm pic.twitter.com/fclOaYBnVQ

— Status-6 (Military & Conflict News) (@Archer83Able) May 15, 2024

The targeting of Belbek again overnight, which Ukraine claims caused significant damage to prized air defense assets, shows that Ukraine is continuing to apply pressure on Russian forces in Crimea and is using a variety of weapons to achieve this.

Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com

Thomas is a defense writer and editor with over 20 years of experience covering military aerospace topics and conflicts. He’s written a number of books, edited many more, and has contributed to many of the world’s leading aviation publications. Before joining The War Zone in 2020, he was the editor of AirForces Monthly.




Source link

Kyiv Escalates Drone War with Fatal Strikes on Russian Territory

NEWS BRIEF Ukrainian drone strikes killed three people, including two crew members of a Russian-flagged oil tanker, in overnight attacks on the port of Rostov-on-Don and the town of Bataysk in southern Russia. The strikes mark a continued escalation in Kyiv’s campaign targeting Russian energy infrastructure and maritime assets, as both sides trade accusations of […]

The post Kyiv Escalates Drone War with Fatal Strikes on Russian Territory appeared first on Modern Diplomacy.

Source link

Aftermath Of Ukraine’s Underwater Drone Attack On Russian Submarine Seen In Satellite Imagery

Satellite imagery is now available showing the aftermath of a Ukrainian attack yesterday on a Russian Navy Improved Kilo class diesel-electric submarine in the Black Sea naval stronghold of Novorossiysk. The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) claimed that this was the first attack against a Russian vessel using an uncrewed underwater vehicle (UUV). The operation could also mark the historic first successful use of a UUV as an anti-ship weapon, but the actual level of damage inflicted on the submarine remains unclear. Readers can first get up to date on the attack in our initial reporting here.

TWZ obtained satellite images of where the attack occurred in Novorossiysk from Vantor (formerly Maxar Technologies). Additional imagery from Planet Labs has also been circulating online.

The satellite imagery confirms that the UUV — named by the SBU as a Sub Sea Baby, a previously unknown type — detonated off the stern of the submarine, which was at a pier in the port of Novorossiysk. A substantial chunk of the pier itself was destroyed in the attack. This all aligns with video footage shot during the attack from a position on the ground nearby, which the SBU released yesterday.

Satellite image from after the attack, with an overview of the targeted submarine, within the harbor, and another submarine moored outside of it. Other ships are also moored nearby. Satellite image ©2025 Vantor

The post-strike imagery shows that the Improved Kilo class submarine, also known as a Project 636.3 Varshavyanka class type, is in the same position as it was before the attack. Two other submarines that were moored nearby when the attack occured have moved. Other submarines and ships are still in the moorings, including on the outside edge of the damaged pier.

Some of the imagery available now suggests that the submarine that was attacked may now be sitting lower in the water, but that can’t be readily confirmed. Any damage below the waterline would also not be visible in the images. At the same time, there are also no clear signs of any emergency measures having been taken to keep it afloat, or to contain the leakage of oil or other potentially hazardous fluids, as one might expect to see if the damage was severe.

A closer view of the submarine targeted in the SBU’s attack and the surrounding areas, with the damage to the pier also clearly visible. Satellite image ©2025 Vantor
The same area seen before the attack, in an image from December 11, 2025. Satellite image ©2025 Vantor

Based on the estimated length of what is visible of the submarine, some observers have noted that the epicenter of the explosion looks to have been less than 65 feet from the stern. The size and configuration of the Sub Sea Baby’s warhead, as well as other details about the UUV and its capabilities, remain scant.

Satellite imagery shows the aftermath of a strike by a Sea Baby underwater drone against a submarine pier in the port of Novorossiysk.

According to the image, the strike occurred approximately 20 meters from the stern of a Project 636 Varshavyanka-class submarine, which remains… https://t.co/SVecegvkeD pic.twitter.com/fxOicR5AAW

— OSINTWarfare (@OSINTWarfare) December 16, 2025

To note, the stern section of Kilo-class submarine remains submerged so presumably it was even closer than 20 meters.

Highly probable that at least the propelled end got affected in a kinetic way.

(satellite imagery I’ve used is not recent and used for illustration purposes… https://t.co/fwO0UldAZs pic.twitter.com/qxNHs2AEQf

— Status-6 (Military & Conflict News) (@Archer83Able) December 16, 2025

It’s also worth noting that wider views of the port of Novorossiysk following the attack show four Project 636 submarines still present. There is nothing definitive to indicate that the targeted boat might have been replaced by another to conceal the extent of the damage.

Satellite reveals that four Kilo-class submarines are docked at the Novorossisk port in Russia. One of them appears to have a slightly different waterline compared to the other three. Ukraine claimed that its underwater UV launched an attack on the area via Mizarvision #OSINT pic.twitter.com/k1DLtOcloL

— GEOINT (@lobsterlarryliu) December 16, 2025

For its part, the Russian Ministry of Defense had unsurprisingly denied that any damage was inflicted on the submarine or to any personnel at the port. The ministry has released a video that it claims shows the undamaged boat, but does not offer a view of the stern end. The background is also heavily censored. Even so, it does still reveal what looks like piles of broken concrete debris left on the pier after the explosion, which was clearly visible in the SBU’s video of the attack, as well as in the satellite imagery available now.

The press service of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, which operates the submarine, also denies any damage to its vessels. This is also consistent with reports from various Russian naval monitoring channels on social media, but clear corroborating evidence has yet to emerge.

Overall, at this stage, we still cannot say with any authority what degree of damage, if any, the submarine may have actually sustained.

On the other hand, the attack does show Ukraine was at least able to slip a UUV into a heavily defended harbor, in daylight, and detonate its warhead only a few dozen or so feet away from a prized Russian submarine worth, according to the SBU, around $400 million.

At least one Ukrainian UUV was therefore notably able to penetrate past barriers erected at the mouth of the port, intended specifically to protect the vessels within. It’s worth noting, however, that the defensive barriers Russia has already built around ports were primarily put there in response to Ukraine’s uncrewed surface vessel (USV) campaign. This underscores the significance of the use of a UUV in this attack, as another example of the steady adaptation of weapons systems and tactics in response to countermeasures that has become a particular hallmark of the conflict in Ukraine.

Barriers at the entrance to the Novorossiysk naval base, seen after the attack. Satellite image ©2025 Vantor
The same area, seen before the attack, on December 11, 2025. Satellite image ©2025 Vantor

With that in mind, Russia is likely to introduce new countermeasures against this particular mode of attack, one which Ukraine has spent some time developing.

The results of yesterday’s attack, while inconclusive for now, will likely spur further such developments in Ukraine, as well. Before SBU targeted the submarine in Novorossiysk, Ukraine had unveiled a UUV dubbed Marichka, designed to launch kamikaze attacks against ships and maritime infrastructure. At least one other Ukrainian UUV, known as Toloka, has previously been disclosed. It’s unclear if either of these has any relationship to the Sub Sea Baby.

Video of the Toloka UUV:

Автономний підводний дрон TOLOKA




Furthermore, the attack confirms that the Black Sea Fleet is very much still a prime target for Ukraine. This applies especially to the submarines like the Project 636 types and corvettes that are able to launch Kalibr long-range cruise missiles. These weapons have been regularly used in Russia’s nightly barrages launched against targets across Ukraine.

Already, Ukrainian naval actions had forced the Black Sea Fleet to retreat from bases on the occupied Crimean Peninsula to Novorossiysk. Attacks in Crimea were also prosecuted against another Improved Kilo class submarine. In September 2023, the Rostov-on-Don was severely damaged during a combined missile and USV attack on Sevastopol. Ukraine later claimed it was destroyed.

Photo showing damage to the Improved Kilo class submarine at Sevastopol, apparently first published by the Conflict Intelligence Team. CIT via X

At the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the Black Sea Fleet had a total of six Project 636 submarines available.

Other navies around the world will likely have watched yesterday’s attack with interest.

As well as the United StatesChina and many other nations are developing their own UUVs for missions like this one.

UUVs are able to attack vessels and other targets at long distances and can be launched from submarines and motherships, further extending their range. They can also be used for surveillance and mine laying, among other duties. You can read more about these vessels in various TWZ stories here.

Ultimately, whether or not the Russian submarine was damaged, the attack has demonstrated once again that the war in Ukraine is a crucible for the development of new military technologies, especially uncrewed ones.

Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com

Thomas is a defense writer and editor with over 20 years of experience covering military aerospace topics and conflicts. He’s written a number of books, edited many more, and has contributed to many of the world’s leading aviation publications. Before joining The War Zone in 2020, he was the editor of AirForces Monthly.


Joseph has been a member of The War Zone team since early 2017. Prior to that, he was an Associate Editor at War Is Boring, and his byline has appeared in other publications, including Small Arms Review, Small Arms Defense Journal, Reuters, We Are the Mighty, and Task & Purpose.




Source link

China’s Stealthy CH-7 Flying Wing Drone Has Flown

We have got what could be our first look at China’s CH-7 stealthy flying-wing drone in flight. While it’s no longer the biggest Chinese drone of this configuration, it’s still of impressive size and, as we have noted in the past, appears to be tailored for intelligence, reconnaissance, and surveillance (ISR), as well as possibly a secondary strike role.

We have got what could be our first look at China’s CH-7 stealthy flying-wing drone in flight. While it’s far from the biggest Chinese drone of this configuration, it’s still of impressive size and, as we have noted in the past, appears to be tailored for intelligence, reconnaissance, and surveillance (ISR), as well as strike missions as an uncrewed combat aerial vehicle (UCAV).
One of the first officially sanctioned images showing the CH-7 in the air. via Chinese internet

Video and stills released by Chinese state media today show the drone, for the first time, being prepared for flight, taking off, and landing. The video includes air-to-air footage of the CH-7 and, overall, the suggestion is that Beijing is making a notable effort to promote the progress of this program, especially in contrast to other, far more secretive flying wing drone programs.

It’s also notable that the CH-7 appears to have made its first flight from Pucheng Airport in Shaanxi province, which also saw the recent maiden flight of the Jiutian heavyweight jet-powered ‘mothership drone,’ which you can read more about here. The Pucheng facility is operated by the China Flight Test Establishment (CFTE), underscoring its growing importance as a drone ‘center of excellence.’

The CH-7 over Pucheng Airport in Shaanxi province. via Chinese internet

The CH-7 seen in the new imagery retains the yellow-colored coat of primer that was seen in video and stills of the drone on the ground, released by Chinese state media earlier this year. Yellow primer is frequently seen on Chinese aircraft during their test phase. The drone also has air data probes on the leading edges of the wing and nose, again consistent with it being a prototype or perhaps a pre-production machine. Overall, the CH-7 has a ‘cranked-kite’ planform, of the kind that we have seen on various other Chinese drones. There are also various measures to reduce the radar and infrared signature, including a slot-like low-observable platypus engine exhaust, with the nozzle fully concealed from most angles of view, and serrated edges on doors and panels.

Interestingly, the attachment points previously seen on the upper surfaces of the rear of the drone have been removed in the new official imagery. It seems these were used to mount vertical tail surfaces.

Unofficial imagery, captured from an observer on the ground, suggests that the CH-7 was initially flight-tested with outward-canted tailfins, presumably to ensure stability during initial sorties, or otherwise to test an alternative aerodynamic configuration.

While the identity of this drone has not been confirmed, it appears to be the CH-7, with the outward-canted tailfins fitted. via Chinese internet

Compared to the previous imagery, we now also get to see some other details of the CH-7, including a distinctive small teardrop-shaped fairing mounted below the fuselage. This enclosure is very likely an air-to-ground datalink used for line-of-sight control of the drone and is a common feature on larger drones, including the U.S. MQ-9 Reaper. This very unstealthy feature would be removed for most operational uses once the aircraft has entered service.

via Chinese internet

We now have a much better look at the series of antennas that runs in a line along the spine, flanked by two air scoops. There are also two prominent blade aerials, above and below the fuselage. Below the fuselage, immediately behind the nose landing gear, there appears to be a large radio frequency sensor aperture, and there could also be space for conformal arrays under the inner wings.

via Chinese internet
via Chinese internet

As we presumed, the previous prominent gaps inboard of the trailing-edge flaps, where the wing meets the blended body section, were a temporary configuration and have now been filled.

The latest configuration of the CH-7, with the attachment points for tailfins deleted and with the gaps removed inboard of the trailing-edge flaps. via Chinese internet
via Chinese internet
This view of the CH-7 prototype on the runway reveals the previous gaps inboard of the trailing-edge flaps. via Chinese Internet

The CH-7 was previously assumed to have an internal payload bay. That is not immediately obvious in the new imagery, but there is a suggestion of a notably long and slender bay immediately inboard of the main landing gear on the right-hand side, presumably with a similar bay on the left-hand side, too. If these are indeed for weapons, then they would be able to accommodate smaller stores only. This could point to a secondary strike role, but that seems somewhat less than likely at this point.

An underside view of the drone reveals only limited evidence of internal stores bays. via Chinese internet

The CH-7 has already gone through several different iterations since it was first revealed, as a full-scale mockup in 2018, with the design being progressively adapted. Earlier changes included a less sharply swept wing compared to at least one early model, as well as an apparent growth in overall size.

The CH-7 (or Caihong-7, meaning Rainbow-7) has been developed by the state-owned China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC), specifically by its 11th Research Institute. A high-altitude, long-endurance drone, it is generally understood to be optimized for penetrating into or very near hostile airspace. It achieves this through a combination of a low-observable (stealth) design and flying at high altitudes, leading it to operate for extended periods of time without being successfully engaged.

via Chinese internet

Published specifications for the CH-7 include a length of 10 meters (33 feet), a maximum takeoff weight of 10,000 kilograms (22,000 pounds), a maximum speed of 926 km/h (575 mph), and an endurance of up to 15 hours. Bearing in mind the various design changes, these figures should be considered very much as provisional.

Earlier this year, Chinese state-owned media reported that the CH-7 had completed testing and was scheduled to complete development in 2024. This would imply it had also completed the flight-test program by this date, which remains possible, and the new imagery may actually date back a year or so.

via Chinese internet

Regardless of the timeline, the CH-7 is a fascinating program.

It represents one part of China’s accelerated efforts to develop low-observable, long-endurance drones, and there is a general expectation that, once in service, it will be used for both ISR and as a UCAV. Official statements from Beijing claim that, as well as bringing back critical intelligence, the CH-7 should also be able to strike strategic targets.

When it was unveiled, the CH-7 was described as a high-altitude, long-endurance stealth combat drone. Its chief designer, Shi Wen, said the aircraft would be able to “fly long hours, scout, and strike the target when necessary.”

via Chinese internet
via Chinese internet

It should be noted, however, that the latest imagery doesn’t provide definitive evidence of an extensive internal payload capacity, which might throw some doubt on the strike role, at least as a primary mission.

Even if the CH-7 ends up being exclusively an ISR platform, it remains highly relevant within China’s growing portfolio of stealthy drones, especially since it is apparently tailored to penetrate into or very near hostile airspace at high altitudes. Flying ISR missions with this profile would be especially relevant for China in a naval context, with the drone potentially roaming far out into the Pacific, monitoring the movements of enemy ships and providing targeting data for ground-based long-range missiles, for example, as well as anti-ship missiles launched from warships and bombers. Other theaters of operation in which a drone of this kind would be valuable include around the islands of the South China Sea and along the border with India.

A rear three-quarter view of the CH-7. via Chinese internet

Furthermore, it seems that the CH-7 will be offered for export. This hypothesis might also be supported by the unusually open nature of the imagery that’s been released of the drone so far.

If the CH-7 were to be offered for foreign customers, it would come with advanced capabilities that no other country is currently pitching on the arms market. It would also come without the various restrictions that limit the sale of high-end U.S. and other Western defense products.

A still from an official video showing what is purported to be a control center used for the CH-7 testing. via Chinese internet

Not only is the United States not currently able to offer for export a stealthy long-endurance surveillance drone or UCAV, but it’s also possible that no uncrewed platform of this class is even under development in that country — the still-mysterious RQ-180 may have fit in this category, but its current status is unknown. The stark contrast between the U.S. and Chinese approaches to very stealthy uncrewed aircraft for independent strike missions is something that we have addressed before in this feature of ours.

At this point, we should remember that we don’t know exactly how far the development of the CH-7 has progressed and when it might end up being ready for service with China, let alone with export customers. It remains possible that they might have to wait for a downgraded or otherwise sanitized version of the drone.

via Chinese internet

Since the first appearance of the CH-7, two other, far larger high-altitude, long-endurance (HALE) drones have emerged from China. There are, meanwhile, also several medium-sized flying-wing surveillance drones and multirole UCAV types, one of which appears to be already in operational service. All of this emphasizes just how much effort and investment China is currently putting into flying-wing-type drones, not to mention diverse other kinds of uncrewed aerial vehicles.

Nevertheless, the CH-7 program remains very much one to watch. Provided it fulfills its promise, it could provide China with a multirole low-observable drone family that could also be offered for export. For now, the CH-7 stands as more evidence of the huge strides that China is making in terms of drone technology, and the particular focus being placed on stealthy uncrewed aircraft.

Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com

Thomas is a defense writer and editor with over 20 years of experience covering military aerospace topics and conflicts. He’s written a number of books, edited many more, and has contributed to many of the world’s leading aviation publications. Before joining The War Zone in 2020, he was the editor of AirForces Monthly.


Source link

Ukraine Claims World’s First Underwater Drone Attack On Russian Submarine

Ukraine’s state security service (SBU) said it carried out the first-ever uncrewed underwater vehicle (UUV) attack on a Russian vessel. The strike was on a Project 636 Varshavyanka class, or Improved Kilo class diesel-electric submarine, in the Black Sea naval stronghold of Novorossiysk. It would mark a historic first successful use of a UUV as an anti-ship attack weapon.

The SBU released a video it says shows the submarine docked at Novorossiysk along with several other ships. The video pans from right to left and at about the 16-second mark, the submarine erupts in an explosion. That means the UUV, which is not visible in the video, was able to navigate a packed harbor to strike a specific vessel. While we cannot independently verify the SBU claim about the use of a UUV in the strike, they did confirm that assertion to us directly.

Russia, meanwhile, denies any damage was caused by the attack.

The information disseminated by special services of Ukraine about the alleged ‘destruction’ of one of the Russian submarines in the bay of the Black Sea Fleet’s Novorossiysk naval base does not correspond to reality,” the Russian Defense Ministry (MoD) claimed on Telegram. “Not a single ship or submarine as well as the crews of the Black Sea Fleet stationed in the bay of the Novorossiysk naval base were damaged as a result of the sabotage. The watercraft serve normally.”

Today’s UUV attack appears to be the culmination of Ukraine’s development of these weapons and once again shows that the war-torn country is at the forefront of modern drone warfare innovation. Little is known about the Sub Sea Baby UUV, not to be confused with the highly adaptable Sea Baby uncrewed surface vessels (USVs) that have wreaked havoc on the Russian Navy.

Ukraine is developing several UUVs, at least that we know of. It released images in September 2023 of a UUV dubbed Marichka, designed to launch kamikaze attacks against ships and maritime infrastructure. That followed the announcement earlier that year of another UUV known as Toloka, which you can see in the following video.

Автономний підводний дрон TOLOKA




Being able to operate underwater not only helps greatly in avoiding detection and destruction, but it can also potentially mitigate some defensive barriers Russia has already built around ports as a result of Ukraine’s uncrewed surface vessel (USV) campaign. This onslaught has already kept Russia’s Black Sea Fleet (BSF) at bay, forcing it to retreat from Crimea to Novorossiysk. Ukrainian USVs have also damaged enemy military facilities in occupied Crimea and the Kerch Bridge, You can see one Ukrainian USV being destroyed below.

Russian Defense Ministry announced that Ukraine attempted to attack the Ivan Khurs signals intelligence ship of the Russian Navy with 3 unmanned surface vessels (USVs) in the Black Sea this morning.

Moscow released footage allegedly showing the destruction of one of the USVs. pic.twitter.com/YfS7xWSGWw

— Status-6 (Military & Conflict News) (@Archer83Able) May 24, 2023

The U.S., China and many other nations are developing their own UUVs for missions like the one that struck the Improved Kilo class submarines. UUVs can provide the ability to strike vessels and other targets at long distances and can be launched from submarines and motherships, extending their range. They can also be used for reconnaissance and mine laying, among other duties. You can read more about these vessels in our catalogue of stories here.

In the case of the Improved Kilo class boat, “the vessel suffered critical damage and was effectively put out of action,” the SBU claimed. “On board the submarine were four launchers for ‘Kalibr’ cruise missiles, which the enemy uses to strike at the territory of Ukraine.”

ISTANBUL, TURKEY - FEBRUARY 13: The Russian Navy’s Kilo-class submarine Rostov-na-Donu B-237 transits the Bosphorus Strait en route to the Black Sea on February 13, 2022 in Istanbul, Turkey. Russia has been reinforcing its Black Sea Fleet over the past week as a Russian military invasion of Ukraine being reported as imminent. With the arrival of the Rostov-na-Donu, the Russian Black Sea Fleet will have four improved Kilo-class submarines equipped with Kalibr land-attack missiles deployed in the Black Sea. (Photo by Burak Kara/Getty Images)
The Russian Navy Improved Kilo class submarine Rostov-on-Don transited the Bosphorus Strait en route to the Black Sea on February 13, 2022 in Istanbul, Turkey (Photo by Burak Kara/Getty Images) BURAK KARA

The submarine damaged by the Sea Baby UUVs is one of six Improved Kilo class boats that were operated by the Russian Black Sea Fleet, a retired Russian Navy officer who uses the @Capt_Navy X handle told The War Zone.

These submarines are quite capable and can be very hard to detect when dived and running on battery power. These submarines carry Kalibr long-range cruise missiles that have frequently been used to attack Ukraine.

The Sub Sea Baby UUV attack “was a joint operation of the 13th Main Directorate of Military Counterintelligence of the SBU and the Naval Forces of Ukraine,” SBU explained, adding that the estimated cost of one of the Russian submarines is about $400 million.

Ukraine says it struck a Russian submarine with an uncrewed underwater vehicle (UUV) in Novorossyisk, Russia. (Google Earth)

This incident also marks the second time an Improved Kilo class submarine in Crimea was attacked by Ukraine. In September 2023, the Rostov-on-Don was severely damaged during a combined missile and uncrewed surface vessel (USV) attack on Sevastopol. Ukraine later claimed it was destroyed. You can see the damage to that submarine below.

One of two photos of the damage to the Improved Kilo class submarine apparently first published by the Conflict Intelligence Team. CIT via X A picture showing damage to a Kilo class submarine following a Ukrainian cruise missile strike on Sevastopol in September 2023. CIT via X

If today’s attack did damage the submarine significantly, Russia would be left with four examples operating as part of the Black Sea Fleet.

While much about the Sub Sea Baby UUVs remains a mystery, a proven ability to use them as weapons holds Russian vessels at even greater risk. Novorossiysk was seen as something as a relative safe haven for the Black Sea Fleet, although aerial and sea drone attacks have occurred there. But the idea that Ukraine can use underwater drones to strike ships in port there changes this calculus, if that is indeed the true method of the attack. As a result, we will also be seeing a change in Russia’s defensive posture at the sprawling port located on the northeastern edge of the Black Sea.

At the same time, if this attack was executed by a UUV, it would be another world first and is likely a harbinger of things to come. Hitting ships in port over great distances via underwater drone attack is an asymmetric capability. It’s also one that America’s adversaries are investing in heavily, and especially China.

With all this in mind, the attack on the submarine serves as another reminder that the war in Ukraine has become a conflict where theory and development are put into practice.

Contact the author: howard@thewarzone.com

Howard is a Senior Staff Writer for The War Zone, and a former Senior Managing Editor for Military Times. Prior to this, he covered military affairs for the Tampa Bay Times as a Senior Writer. Howard’s work has appeared in various publications including Yahoo News, RealClearDefense, and Air Force Times.




Source link