bans

Supreme Court likely to uphold state bans on trans athletes competing on girls’ sports teams

The Supreme Court justices sounded ready on Tuesday to uphold state laws that forbid transgender athletes from competing on school sports teams for girls.

Idaho, West Virginia and 25 other Republican-led states say a student’s biological sex at birth should determine who can play on the girls’ or boys’ teams.

They say it is unfair to girls to permit biological males to compete against them in sports like track and field or swimming. “Biological males are, on average, bigger, stronger and faster than biological females,” West Virginia’s state lawyers said.

While the court’s conservative majority court is likely to rule for these states, the justices said they prefer a narrow decision limited to these laws.

If so, such a ruling for the red states will not directly change the law in California and the more than a dozen other Democratic-led states that forbid discrimination based on gender identity. Those laws protect rights of transgender girls to compete on a girls’ team.

A similar dispute came before the court last year.

Then, the conservative justices ruled Tennessee and other red states may prohibit gender-affirming drugs and medical treatments for teenagers who suffer from gender dysphoria.

The 6-3 majority said this was not unconstitutional discrimination based on the teenagers’ transgender status. But that ruling did not strike down the conflicting law in California.

In recent months, the Trump administration joined the transgender sports cases on the side of West Virginia and Idaho.

But its lawyers argued only that the Constitution permits states to exclude transgender girls from girls’ teams. It does not require that they do so, their lawyers said.

Even a West Virginia lawyer agreed. “There is enough room for California to make a different interpretation,” state solicitor Michael R. Williams told the court.

Deputy Solicitor Gen. Hashim Mooppan said these Democratic states “are violating Title IX,” the education law that allows separate sports teams for girls and boys. But he said the court should not rule on that question now.

Last year, in response to the court’s ruling on gender-affirming care, President Trump cut off federal funds to hospitals and medical facilities that provided such care.

A ruling upholding restrictions on transgender athletes could spur the Trump administration to threaten Democratic states with a loss of federal education funds.

Becky Pepper-Jackson, now 15, has carried on a lonely legal fight to compete on her school’s track team in Bridgeport, W.Va.

Designated male at birth, she says she is the only transgender girl competing in her state and has been the target of complaints and protests.

In middle school, Becky participated in cross-country as a sixth-grader and described herself as slow. She “routinely placed near the back of the pack,” her attorneys told the court.

But upon reaching high school, she has been winning.

In 2024, she “placed in the top three in every track event in which B.P.J. competed, winning most,” the state’s attorneys said. Last spring “focusing on strength events, B.P.J. bumped female competitors out of the state tournament, then placed third in the state in discus and eighth in shot put while competing against much older female athletes,” they told the court.

Her attorney, Joshua Block of the American Civil Liberties Union, said she has been winning in the shot put and discus “through hard work and practice.”

He said she “received puberty-delaying medication and gender-affirming estrogen that allowed her to undergo a hormonal puberty typical of a girl.”

He urged the court to rule for Becky because she does not have a physical advantage due to her biology.

But the justices did not sound inclined to rule on the issue of puberty blockers.

Source link

‘Prettiest ever’ village bans key thing and it’s like stepping back in time

It has been called Lancashire’s ‘most beautiful village’, and it’s easy to see – the picturesque spot is so well-kept it feels a world away from modern life

This stunning village is meticulously maintained by the family that owns it, seamlessly blending into its scenic surroundings whilst remaining within the Forest of Bowland Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Downham is part of the historic Assheton Estate, belonging to the notable Lancashire family, the Asshetons. Given this ownership, at their behest, the area is devoid of any traces of contemporary life amongst its idyllic cottages and undulating countryside. There are no TV aerials or telephone wires running in between houses, nor are there any road signs. This uniqueness makes the village feel even more otherworldly, as they have held ownership for more than 450 years.

This enables them to make choices that preserve the historic charm of the location, with all properties in Downham, including farms, being leased out to prevent any further contemporary encroachments. One attraction that lures numerous visitors to the region is the magnificent manor house, Downham Hall, which has remained in the family’s possession since 1558.

Yet at the village’s centre lies the welcoming pub, the Assheton Arms, where you can enjoy hearty fare in a classic pub environment. The establishment itself radiates history through its low-beamed ceilings, aged timbers and period features, providing the perfect relaxed ambience.

Guests consistently post glowing TripAdvisor reviews following their visits, with many describing the venue as “beautiful”. One visitor wrote: “We had the pleasure of a two-night stay at the Assheton Arms after reading many positive reviews. From our arrival to our departure, our experience was nothing short of exceptional.

“The manager and his staff could not do enough for us, and the quality of our accommodation was everything we hoped for. Advance dining reservations were made for both evenings of our stay, and the food was of a very high standard and plentiful. We will certainly return.”

Another guest shared: “Beyond the fantastic accommodation, the food was outstanding. Every dish was beautifully presented and full of flavour, using high-quality ingredients. The pub itself has a warm and inviting atmosphere, with breathtaking views of the surrounding countryside – such a peaceful and scenic location.”

This picturesque location has served as a filming destination for numerous productions throughout the years, including the 1961 classic, Whistle Down The Wind. The BBC also chose it for Born and Bred, whilst it featured in another BBC drama in 2012 called The Secret of Crickley Hall, owing to its genuine rural charm.

Whilst wandering through the locale, visitors frequently discover St Leonard’s Church, positioned next to the village inn. Guest reviews highlight it as “picturesque” and “peaceful”, boasting its 15th century tower constructed in 1910. One reviewer noted: “Very picturesque church in a most beautiful village. Parts of the church date back to the 15th century.”

Source link

Bangladesh bans IPL broadcast amid growing tensions with India | Cricket News

The move comes after star Bangladesh fast bowler Mustafizur Rahman was dropped by his IPL team on the BCCI’s directives.

Bangladesh’s interim government has banned broadcast ‍of this ‍year’s Indian Premier League (IPL), the latest flashpoint in a growing row with neighbouring India, which has now extended to cricket ties between the two nations.

The move follows the decision by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to have the Kolkata Knight Riders drop Bangladesh pacer Mustafizur Rahman, ​who had signed for the IPL franchise for ‍this season.

The unceremonious dumping of a “star player” like Mustafizur from the IPL “defied logic” and had “hurt people”, the country’s Ministry of Information and Broadcasting said in a statement explaining its decision.

Bangladesh have also refused to play their matches of next month’s Twenty20 (T20) World Cup in India, demanding that those ‍be staged ⁠in Sri Lanka, co-host of the 20-team tournament.

The Bangladesh Cricket Board’s directors met in an emergency meeting on Sunday and confirmed their decision shortly afterwards.

“Following a thorough assessment of the prevailing situation and the growing concerns regarding the safety and security of the Bangladesh contingent in India and considering the advice from the Bangladesh Government, the board of directors resolved that the Bangladesh national team will not travel to India for the tournament under the current conditions,” it said.

“The board believes that such a step is necessary to safeguard the safety and wellbeing of Bangladeshi players, team officials, Board members and other stakeholders and to ensure that the team can participate in the tournament in a secure and appropriate environment,” the statement added, urging the ICC to take swift action.

The International Cricket Council (ICC) has not publicly responded to Bangladesh’s ‌demand to play World Cup matches in Sri Lanka.

Tensions have risen ‌in recent weeks between India ⁠and Bangladesh.

Following the protests, the Indian board asked ‍Knight Riders to drop Mustafizur.

The IPL, the ​world’s richest T20 league, is scheduled ‌from March 26 to May 31.

Source link

U.S. bans travel from 20 more nations and entities

Jan. 2 (UPI) — Travel restrictions for 20 more nations and locales took effect on Thursday in accordance with President Donald Trump‘s Dec. 16 order expanding travel restrictions to 39 nations.

President Donald Trump has restricted travel from a total of 39 nations and entities due to deficiencies in their respective screening and vetting processes that make it difficult to protect the United States against public safety and national security threats.

“The United States government has identified additional countries that are unable to meet basic criteria for identifying their nationals and residents who may pose national security and public safety risks, or for sharing necessary information with the United States,” U.S. Customs and Immigration Services officials announced on Thursday.

“It is paramount that the United States government ensure aliens in the United States do not intend to threaten its citizens or undermine or destabilize its culture, government, institutions, or founding principles,” USCIS added.

“Entry will not be granted to aliens who advocate for, aid or support designated foreign terrorists or other threats to our national security or public safety.”

A dozen high-risk nations identified by the White House are Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, and their citizens are fully restricted from traveling to the United States.

Another five nations, Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, South Sudan and Syria, plus anyone holding travel documents issued by the Palestinian Authority, also are subject to full restrictions on U.S. travel.

Full restrictions also are in effect for travelers from Laos and Sierra Leone, which previously were subjected to partial restrictions.

Prior to the Dec. 16 order, 19 nations were subject to travel restrictions, but the president added the 19 additional nations and the Palestinian Authority amid ongoing violence and recent revelations of fraud.

Some exceptions to the travel bans are allowed for diplomats and athletes competing on teams that are participating in the Olympics, FIFA World Cup and other events.

Source link

Adam Peaty’s sister Beth reveals lavish bridesmaid gifts from Holly Ramsay after he bans his family from wedding

ADAM Peaty’s sister Beth has revealed the lavish bridesmaid gifts she received from her new sister-in-law Holly Ramsay.

The Olympic swimmer tied the knot with Gordon Ramsay‘s daughter on Saturday in a festive ceremony at Bath Abbey.

Adam Peaty’s sister Bethany (right) has revealed the lavish bridesmaid gift from Holly RamsayCredit: Getty
The Olympic swimmer tied the knot with Gordon Ramsay‘s daughter on SaturdayCredit: Splash
Adam’s parents were uninvited from the weddingCredit: Instagram

But the nuptials had been overshadowed by Adam’s ongoing feud with his family, including his parents who were uninvited from the wedding.

Adam’s older sister Beth was the only family member to be invited to the big day – and along with Holly’s sisters Tilly, 24 and Megan, 27, she was one of the three bridesmaids.

Beth has now revealed the generous bridesmaid gift she received prior to the wedding.

She took to Instagram to share personalised items Holly had sent her, including a pot of Charlotte Tilbury Magic Cream, which retails for £79. 

family at war

5 unanswered questions in Adam Peaty’s family feud over Holly Ramsay wedding


for peat’s sake

Adam Peaty ‘uninvited Olympic swimmer from wedding’ leaving pal ‘broken’

It was engraved with the words ‘Magic Beth’.

Beth wrote in the post: “Love you Holly.”

She was also treated to personalised pillow cases with her name on it and the word ‘Bridesmaid’, as well as matching tote bags for her and her partner Dan.

Beth shared a snap of her pre-wedding prep which also included a pair of black pyjamas, a sleep mask and a handkerchief which was embodied with the words ‘Beth Bridesmaid 27.12.2025.”

Just yesterday The Sun revealed that Adam uninvited his great aunt and uncle from his wedding – just four days before the ceremony.

The lead up to their nuptials was fraught with drama, after Adam, 31, uninvited his mum Caroline when a feud erupted over her failing to be invited to Holly’s hen do.

It was then revealed that Adam had said his dad Mark could attend the wedding – but he would have to sit at the back of the church.

Unsurprisingly, Mark chose not to attend, as did Adam’s brothers James and Richard.

Now, The Sun can reveal that his great aunt Janet, 73, and uncle Eddie were uninvited in a very brutal way just four days before the ceremony.

A source said: “They got an automated message basically saying they were off the guest list and to respect Adam and Holly’s decision.

“It was so impersonal, and just four days before the big day.”

The brutal text came despite the fact the couple had already shelled out hundreds of pounds on accommodation, outfits and gifts.

Following the wedding ceremony, a reception was held at Kin House in Kington Langley, Wiltshire.

It saw Holly’s dad Gordon deliver a fiery speech where he made a dig at Adam’s absent parents.

The 59-year-old chef said his wife Tana “will be a good mum to them both”.

Gordon gushed at how beautiful Holly looked and told Adam he was a “lucky man”, adding: “Look at Tana and that’s what you have to look forward to.” 

And in a sly dig at Adam’s parents he told Holly, 25: “Shame you don’t have the same.” 

His words left Caroline “outraged and hurt” with an insider telling the Daily Mail: “Caroline can’t believe Gordon brought their family troubles up his speech. It is outrageous and very hurtful.

“By him saying Tana will be a good mum to them both makes Caroline sound like a bad mum. It was a cruel dig at her.

“She has always done her best for all her children. She is a very good mum.”

However, the newlyweds brushed off any further drama as they were pictured leaving Gordon’s London home on Monday to jet off on honeymoon.

Their trip comes after Adam changed his name on social media to Adam Ramsay Peaty, a move that was quickly criticised by his ex-girlfriend.

Eiri Munroe – who shares five-year-old son George with Adam – told friends she thought it was “hypocritical”.

A friend of his artist ex – who he split from in 2021 – says she wanted George to take her surname plus Adam’s, but claims he refused.

Eiri’s pal told The Sun: “It feels a bit rich to Eiri that Adam has been quick to change his name but didn’t allow her the same right for their son.”

Beth (right) was the only family member of Adam’s to be invited to the weddingCredit: Getty

Source link