
RUSSELL Brand has been found guilty of sex attacks on a string of victims as part of a depraved campaign to sleep with 5,000 women.
The 51-year-old became a “ruthless, calculated and manipulative” predator as he sought to satisfy his “voracious” sexual appetite.
Brand preyed on women between 1999 and 2009 and used his growing fame – from presenting Big Brother’s Big Mouth and Hollywood movies – to target the victims in a range of locations.
The three counts he was found guilty of today include a sexual assault at a Soho bar, where Brand was accused of touching a woman’s breasts while they were talking about Big Brother in 2004.
Brand has also been found guilty of sexual assault at a radio station in a “violent, sloppy and frenzied” attack in 2005.
He raped a woman at his Hampstead townhouse in 2009, telling her to “clean up after herself” afterwards, it was found.
The jury also found him guilty of sexually assaulting a Channel 4 worker in 2009, who was forced to give him a massage.
He was found not guilty on three other counts – attempted indecent assault and two counts of rape.
The trial at Southwark Crown Court was told the offences took place when Brand’s “public profile was taking off”.
Instantly recognisable by his trademark skinny jeans, back-combed hair and heavy eye make up, Brand became known for falling out of nightclubs with female admirers draped from his arm.
Some of his victims were lulled into a false sense of security by Brand and believed the comedian was gay as part of his “strategy” to dupe women.
Once they were behind closed doors, the fiend’s mask would drop and he’d become a “monster” hell-bent on fulfilling his rapacious quest to bed 5,000 women.
Prosecutor Riel Karmy-Jones KC said the star was “childlike in his expectation that his every desire should be met” and only cared about his “birth right to orgasm”.
She told jurors all the women were “wholly unconnected” but each “described a pattern that resonates with who Brand was in the period 1999 to 2009”.
Ms Karmy-Jones added: “Six women who have nothing to gain, who have not sought the limelight, who have not looked out for some form of publicity, who have not taken part in a documentary, not made claims for compensation.
“There is no benefit to them, apart from perhaps some closure by coming before you and telling you their accounts of what happened to them so long ago.”
One woman who Brand raped at his home told how the comedian made her feel like a “piece of meat”.
She told she had met the celeb after seeing his show at the Hammersmith Apollo in London with a friend in 2009.
He told her his age range was from “16 to death” before she was invited to a backstage bar where they kissed and had a threesome, it was said.
The woman said she went to his home the next day where Brand told her: “Your hair smells funny”.
He then made her take a shower and wash her hair while he watched through a glass shower cubicle.
Once in the bedroom, the woman said they had consensual sex after he told her: “This is the best decision you’ve ever made, well done”.
She told the court Brand raped her and looked “absolutely f***ing horrified” – making her think he would apologise.
But the woman added: “But actually what he said was ‘you need to clear up the mess that you’ve made’.”
Another woman was in her 20s working at a radio station in the mid-2000s when Brand sexually assaulted her.
She told the court Brand was a “perfect stranger” to her at the time and said his assault was “violent”, “sloppy” and “frenzied”.
The woman also said she had locked eyes” with one of his entourage and was “pleading with her” to stop what was happening.
One victim said Brand “lunged” at her and grabbed her breasts when they were talking about Big Brother in a Soho bar in July 2004.
At the time, he had a “big, weird grin” on his face and “quite strongly” pulled her into the toilet where he orally raped her, she told cops.
When she protested, Brand told her: “Oh come on don’t be a spoil sport, you want to.”
The sixth woman worked for Channel 4 when she met Brand while he was filming a project.
She said she was informed Brand was “unhappy” and the situation would not improve unless she gave him a massage.
The woman said he walked up to a chair she was sitting on and placed his head directly into her groin area.
During his evidence, Brand wore a crucifix and wrung his hands together as he claimed his “promiscuous” past had been twisted into the allegations made against him.
He had admitted having an “obsession” with sex when he was younger but claimed consent is “non-negotiable” and “more important than sex itself”.
Brand added: “I do recognise I have been a very determined and focused man and with regard to the latter, with women, of course, which is the subject of my trial.
“I’ve been persuasive, seductive, begging and flirting, and dedicated a lot of my life to what seems now beyond-reckless philandering and idiocy.”
He admitted it had been “wrong” of him to use his fame for sex but denied he had ever forced himself on a woman.
Brand also tried to paint himself as someone who had reformed but whose life had been “consumed” by the allegations.
He moaned about how he had lost friends and said he was unable to persuade anyone to give evidence on his behalf.
But Brand had one supporter in the public gallery – his wife Laura Gallacher – sister of sports presenter Kirsty – who took to the stand herself after weeks of walking into the court hand-in-hand with Brand each day.
The mum gushed over the star – calling him an “amazingly attentive husband” and a “kind and a wonderful father”.
She told jurors “I love him very much” and claimed they always have sex “at my pace”.
Discussing when they began dating in 2007, Laura added: “I was not experienced, I had only had one partner before Russell.
“I felt entirely cared for and looked after by Russell.”
She told jurors Brand “respected my view” if she said she did not want to do something.
Laura said she was 19 when she met Brand, who was 31 at the time, at Edinburgh Festival.
The mum, who shares three children with the comic, revealed they broke up in summer 2007 when she became “very aware” of Brand’s promiscuity.
She added: “When I met him I was aware that he liked women, and I was aware towards the latter half of that year that he was engaging with other women.
“I wasn’t interested in having a relationship with him if he was sleeping with other people.
“I was invested, we both had told each other we loved each other but it was clear it was difficult for him to be monogamous.”
She said they got back together again as a couple in 2015 and married in 2017.
Brand, who displayed little emotion during the trial, was seen in the dock beaming as his wife spoke on his behalf.
He even laughed when she told the court: “We do have many friends and there are colleagues, and we are grateful for those people.”
In recent years, Brand had re-invented himself into a born-again Christian influencer – an image he bolstered in court by clutching a bible each day.
But his new life in the US came crumbling down when the allegations came to light in a Channel 4 Dispatches and he was thrust back into the public eye.
Brand is now facing a lengthy prison term when he is sentenced.