Rayner

Labour MPs despondent, says minister after Mandelson and Rayner chaos

Kate WhannelPolitics reporter and

Henry ZeffmanChief political correspondent

Getty Images Peter Mandelson is wearing a pair of glasses and a white shirt with a red tie.Getty Images

Scottish Secretary Douglas Alexander has said Labour MPs will be feeling “despondent” following a chaotic week which has seen the sacking of Lord Mandelson and the resignation of Angela Rayner.

Sir Keir Starmer is facing questions over why he appointed Mandelson as the UK’s ambassador to the US despite his known links to the convicted paedophile Jeffery Epstein.

The government said Mandelson was dismissed after emails were published which appear to show the Labour peer offering Epstein support after his conviction.

MPs and government insiders are increasingly blaming the prime minister’s chief of staff Morgan McSweeney for the appointment.

Several senior Labour figures claimed that McSweeney had been resisting the inevitability of Mandelson’s departure on Wednesday, with one insider describing “cold, hard fury” amongst those in Downing Street about the episode.

However, another senior Downing Street source claimed this was nonsense, saying that by Wednesday afternoon McSweeney was adamant that Mandelson’s position was untenable.

A government minister said they were “starting to wonder how sustainable it is” for McSweeney to stay in post.

One Labour MP said: “Panic has started to set in”, urging the prime minister to “get a grip” and warning that only publishing correspondence between No 10, McSweeney and Lord Mandelson before his appointment as ambassador would “put this to bed”.

Another Labour MP said “It’s quite clear the buck should stop with him [McSweeney].

“When Sue Gray was chief of staff [Mandelson] wasn’t even on the short list. It’s just disgusting.”

One other said the handling of the situation had been “a shambles”.

Speaking to BBC Breakfast, Scottish Secretary Douglas Alexander said: “In retrospect, of course, if (it) had been known at the time what is known now, the appointment wouldn’t have been made.”

Acknowledging it had been a difficult week for Labour he said: “Many of us were devastated by [deputy PM] Angela Rayner’s departure from the government last week.

“She’s an extraordinary woman who’s overcome the most extraordinary challenges and we are grieving and feel quite acutely that sense of loss.

“Now to have the dismissal of Peter Mandelson just the next week, I totally get it, of course Labour MPs will be despondent that in two weeks in a row we have seen significant resignations from public service.

“These are not the headlines any of us in government or in Parliament would have chosen or wanted.

“But the fact is when the evidence emerged, action had to be taken and we are looking forward, therefore, to moving on.”

Conservative frontbencher Alex Burghart said his party would force a vote in Parliament to release the documents that the prime minister and the foreign secretary were shown before appointing Lord Mandelson.

“Those documents exist, they will be on file… it’s inconceivable they would not have been shown concerns raised by the security services through the vetting process,” he told BBC Breakfast.

The Liberal Democrats have said there should be a review of vetting procedures.

Paula Barker – who dropped out of the deputy Labour leader race on Thursday – said: “The delay in sacking him has only served to further erode the trust and confidence in our government and politics in the round.”

Charlotte Nichols said Mandelson’s sacking was “not immediate enough unfortunately, as he should never have been appointed in the first place”.

Sadik Al-Hassan said there were “serious questions about the vetting process of the ambassador”.

Reform UK Leader Nigel Farage said Lord Mandelson was “an enormously talented bloke” but his appointment “was a serious misjudgement from the prime minister.”

He said it “is about the prime minister’s judgement but also about the role that Morgan McSweeney plays in this government” adding: “I think McSweeney’s role is now considerably in doubt.”

Some Labour MPs have publicly expressed anger at how the situation with Mandelson has been handled.

Lord Mandelson’s association with Epstein was publicly known when he was given the Washington job.

However, at the start of the week, US lawmakers published documents from Epstein’s estate including 2003 birthday messages from Mandelson in which he refers to Epstein as “my best pal”.

Sir Keir initially stood by Lord Mandelson and on Wednesday said “due process” had been followed in his appointment.

But the following day he decided to sack his ambassador.

It came after a series of emails from Lord Mandelson to Epstein were published by the Sun and Bloomberg.

The emails included supportive messages Mandelson sent after Epstein had pleaded guilt to soliciting prostitution from a minor in June 2008.

In one message, Mandelson is reported to have told Epstein to “fight for early release” and, the day before began his sentence, “I think the world of you.”

The BBC has been told the information published on Wednesday evening was not available to those in government when Lord Mandelson was appointed, as they came from what has been described as a “long closed” email address.

Douglas Alexander said he felt “incredulity and revulsion” when he read the emails, which he said “had not in any way reached the prime minister” during the appointment process.

“When that reached the prime minister’s desk, he acted and dismissed the ambassador.”

He said Lord Mandelson had initially been appointed because the UK needed an “unconventional ambassador” to work with Donald Trump’s “unconventional presidential administration”.

James Roscoe, the deputy head of the Washington embassy, has been appointed as interim ambassador ahead of the US President’s state visit to the UK next week.

Additional reporting by political correspondents Nick Eardley and Georgia Roberts

Source link

British Deputy MP Angela Rayner resigns over tax scandal

The now-former British Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, seen here arriving for a cabinet meeting in London, Britain in July. She resigned Friday over a tax underpayment scandal. File Photo by EPA/ANDY RAIN

Sept. 5 (UPI) — British Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner announced Friday she will resign following a scandal over her underpayment of taxes on her home.

“Given the findings, and the impact on my family, I have therefore decided to resign as Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, as well as Deputy Leader of the Labor Party,” Rayner said in a press release.

“I have long believed that people who serve the British public in government must always observe the highest standards, and while the Independent Adviser has concluded that I acted in good faith and with honesty and integrity throughout, I accept that I did not meet the highest standards in relation to my recent property purchase,” she added.

Rayner had stated Wednesday that she referred herself to Independent Adviser on Ministerial Standards, Sir Laurie Magnus, in order to reach a determination on her realization that she paid an incorrect rate for Stamp Duty Land Tax on a home she purchased in May.

According to Raynor, she paid for her new home with a combination of a mortgage and money acquired from selling her stake in the residence she maintained with her former husband and their kids.

She alleges that she was given bad advice from her lawyers in regard to how much tax, or stamp duty she owed.

“I deeply regret my decision to not seek additional specialist tax advice given both my position as Housing Secretary and my complex family arrangements,” Rayner said.

“I take full responsibility for this error,” she added. “I would like to take this opportunity to repeat that it was never my intention to do anything other than pay the right amount.”

Magnus issued a judgement Friday in which did note that “I believe Ms. Rayner has acted with integrity and with a dedicated and exemplary commitment to public service.”

“I consider, however, that her unfortunate failure to settle her SDLT liability at the correct level, coupled with the fact that this was established only following intensive public scrutiny, leads me to advise you that, in relation to this matter, she cannot be considered to have met the ‘highest possible standards of proper conduct’ as envisaged by the [Ministerial Code],” he added.

The Ministerial Code are the standards all ministers are expected to uphold.

“Accordingly, it is with deep regret that I must advise you that in these circumstances, I consider the Code to have been breached,” he concluded.

She also said she had resigned because of media pressure on her family.

“While I rightly expect proper scrutiny on me and my life, my family did not choose to have their private lives interrogated and exposed so publicly. I have been clear throughout this process that my priority has, and always will be, protecting my children and the strain I am putting them under through staying in post has become unbearable,” Rayner explained.

“Thank you for informing me of your decision to resign from the Government,” wrote Prime Minister and leader of the Labor Party Keir Starmer in a handwritten letter. “I am very sad that your time as Deputy Prime Minister, Secretary of State and Deputy Leader of the Labor Party has ended in this way.”

She also received praise from Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero and former Labor Party leader Ed Miliband, who called her “one of the great British political figures of our time” in an X post Friday.

“I know she will continue to stand at the front of the fight for social justice in this country,” he added.

However, other British political parties criticized Rayner and Starmer.

“What did Keir Starmer know, and when?” asked Conservative Party leader and Member of Parliament, or MP Kemi Badenoch in a video clip posted online. “Did he mislead the public?”

“He has now lost a Deputy Prime Minister after losing a Transport Secretary, an Anti-Corruption minister and a Homelessness minister to scandal,” she continued, noting other members of Starmer’s administration who have resigned over varied reasons.

“You can’t be Housing Secretary, and avoid [$53,731] of stamp duty,” said Reform UK leader MP Nigel Farage in an online video. “Angela Rayner is gone.”

Source link

Why cutting Angela Rayner loose could cause even more trouble for Keir Starmer

CUTTING Angela Rayner loose will not end the trouble she has caused Sir Keir Starmer – in fact it could get a whole lot worse.

Millions of appalled voters will rightly expect her to scurry sheepishly off into the deep freeze along with any future ambitions.

Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner speaking to Sky News.

2

In the looming battle for the soul of the Labour party, it is easy to see Angela Rayner emerging as the socialists’ standard bearerCredit: Enterprise
Keir Starmer, flanked by Angela Rayner and Rachel Reeves, at Prime Minister's Questions.

2

It is no secret Rayner is far to the left of Sir Keir Starmer, and that theirs has always been a tricky forced political marriageCredit: AFP

But to her legions of militant supporters, she is far from a busted flush – she is a martyr, and soon quite possibly their Red Queen over the water.

It is no secret Rayner is far to the left of Starmer, and that theirs has always been a tricky forced political marriage.

Remember when Sir Keir tried to clip her wings in 2021 only to end up giving her a promotion after she kicked off big time?

Now outside the Cabinet tent – and with no real sense of loyalty to the PM – she could turn from his right-hand woman into a right old headache.

Many in the Labour tribe are already furious with Starmer for turning his back on the left-wing causes he once championed.

From welfare, to taxes, to migration, there is no shortage of issues on which soft-left MPs are ready to scrap with No10.

As the PM tries to stem the bleeding to Reform with more hardline policies, those rows will only intensify.

Especially given Jeremy Corbyn’s new rabble and the Greens threaten to sap voters from Labour’s leftward flank.

In this looming battle for the soul of the party, it is easy to see Rayner emerging as the socialists’ standard bearer.

With the might of the unions and members also on her side, Rayner could quickly accumulate a large powerbase.

Angela Rayner’s flat VANDALISED with graffiti calling her a ‘tax evader’ after she admitted underpaying stamp duty

Maybe one even big enough to mobilise against her old boss.

Think of the grief Boris Johnson or Nigel Lawson caused Theresa May and Margaret Thatcher from the backbenches, leading to their downfalls.

Starmer had no choice but to push Rayner out.

Her fate was set as soon as Sir Laurie Magnus threw the book at her for breaking the ministerial code.

In this looming battle for the soul of the party, it is easy to see Rayner emerging as the socialists’ standard bearer

His gushing, personal, hand-written goodbye note is as clear a sign as any that he wanted to give her the heave-ho in as gentle a way as possible.

But it might not stay friendly for long.

Source link

Starmer refuses to say if he will sack Rayner if she broke rules

Chris MasonPolitical editor and

Kate WhannelPolitical reporter

Watch: BBC’s Chris Mason questions Starmer on Rayner tax investigation

Sir Keir Starmer has repeatedly refused to say if he will sack Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner if his standards adviser concludes she broke the ministerial code.

Rayner referred herself to Sir Laurie Magnus after she admitted underpaying stamp duty on an £800,000 flat in Hove.

She has said the “mistake” was the result of incorrect legal advice which failed to “properly take account” of her circumstances.

Speaking to the BBC, Sir Keir said he would “of course act” on the conclusions of Sir Laurie’s report which he expected to be “comprehensive” and delivered quickly but would not be drawn on whether Rayner would be fired.

Sir Keir rejected a comparison with Boris Johnson, who as prime minister did not sack Priti Patel as his home secretary despite the then-adviser, Sir Alex Allen, saying she had broken the ministerial code.

The prime minister said he had strengthened the ministerial code and the role of the adviser since taking office.

The code sets out the standards ministers are expected to uphold including honesty and integrity.

Sir Laurie can advise on whether ministers have adhered to the code, but the prime minister decides what if any action to take.

Asked about report, which sources say could be published as early as Friday, Sir Keir said: “I do think in the end we need to establish the facts, which the independent advisor will do and come to a conclusion.

“I don’t think it’ll take long now for that bit of process to conclude and then, of course, it does fall to me.

“I completely accept that, to make a decision based on what I see in that report.”

Sir Keir said he knew on Monday that Rayner was taking further advice on her tax payments.

. Timeline-style infographic showing key steps in Angela Rayner's stamp duty underpayment: In 2016, she and husband Mark buy a house in Greater Manchester. In 2020, their son receives an NHS payout, which is placed in a trust. In 2023, the couple divorce and split the house ownership - 25% each, 50% into the trust. In 2025, Rayner sells her 25% share to the trust. That same year, she buys a new property in East Sussex, paying £30,000 in stamp duty on it as her primary residence. However, because her son (the trust beneficiary) is under 18, Rayner and her ex-husband remain co-owners of the Greater Manchester property for stamp duty purposes, meaning she should have paid the higher “second home” rate of £70,000..

Rayner’s team initially said she had paid the right amount of stamp duty on Thursday in response to a report in the Daily Telegraph.

However, on Friday evening she asked a lawyer to review her situation. On Wednesday morning the KC offered their final advice which concluded she had not paid the right amount.

Acknowledging the underpayment, Rayner said: “I deeply regret the error that has been made. I am committed to resolving this matter fully and providing the transparency that public service demands.”

The prime minister – along with other cabinet ministers – has backed Rayner, telling MPs he was “very proud to sit alongside” her.

Both the Conservative and Reform UK have called on Rayner to resign.

Tory Party chair Kevin Hollinrake told BBC Breakfast: “If this was a Conservative member of Parliament, who was in the same situation, I think Angela Rayner would be calling for that person to step down.”

“You cannot be hypocritical in these matters, you’ve got to be consistent.”

Source link

British Deputy MP Angela Rayner admits million-dollar tax underpayment

British Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, seen here arriving for a cabinet meeting in London, Britain in July. Rayner admitted Wednesday to underpaying taxes on a home purchase by more than a million dollars. File Photo by EPA/ANDY RAIN

Sept. 3 (UPI) — British Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said Wednesday she mistakenly underpaid taxes on a home purchase by a mark of over a million dollars.

“I am committed to resolving this matter fully and providing the transparency that public service demands,” Rayner said in a press statement.

“It is for that reason I have today referred myself to the independent adviser on ministerial Standards, and will provide him with my fullest cooperation and access to all the information he requires.”

The independent adviser on ministerial standards is a nonpartisan position intended to advise the British prime minister in regard to the conduct expected of governmental ministers.

Raynor said she shorted the stamp duty on a property she purchased in May by around $1.08 million but alleged it was due to a misunderstanding.

According to Raynor, following her 2023 divorce, she maintained a residence with her ex to continue co-parenting their children, but that home was willed to one of their children, who due to having special needs, was named the eventual sole beneficiary of that house, which was placed in a trust for that child.

Raynor said some of the accrued interest on that home was transferred into the trust, and then sold her remaining stake in the residence.

She asserted that she still lives there, but bought another home in May, and used the lump sum received from selling the stake of her original home into the new property, in addition to using a mortgage to finance the rest of what was owed.

“When purchasing the property my understanding, on advice from lawyers, was that my circumstances meant I was liable for the standard rate of stamp duty,” Raynor said in her statement.

“However, given the recent allegations in the press I have subsequently sought further advice from a leading tax counsel to review that position and to ensure I am fully compliant with all tax provisions,” she continued.

Raynor further stated she has since been advised that “although I did not own any other property at the time of the purchase, the application of complex deeming provisions which relate to my son’s trust gives rise to additional stamp duty liabilities.”

“I acknowledge that due to my reliance on advice from lawyers which did not properly take account of these provisions, I did not pay the appropriate stamp duty at the time of the purchase,” she admitted. “I am working with expert lawyers and with [His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs] to resolve the matter and pay what is due.”

Prime Minister Keir Starmer appeared alongside fellow Labor Party member Raynor on Wednesday in Parliament and said he is “proud to sit alongside Rayner,” but political opponents from the Conservative Party have gone on the attack.

“It’s utterly extraordinary that while working families and businesses are being hammered by Labor’s tax hikes, Angela Rayner has failed to pay the right amount of stamp duty,” posted Member of Parliament, or MP Mel Stride to X Wednesday. “The Deputy Prime Minister should not be setting the rules when she fails to keep them herself.”

“The property tax-dodging free-loading Deputy Prime Minister has finally admitted breaking the law and evading paying taxes owed,” said MP Priti Patel in a social media post Wednesday. “She says that she’s sorry, but she’s only sorry that she was caught out.”

“If Keir Starmer had a backbone, he’d sack Angela Rayner immediately,” posted Conservative Party leader and MP Kemi Badenoch to X Wednesday. “She has to go.”

Source link

Rayner asks China to explain redacted mega-embassy plans

Angela Rayner has given China two weeks to explain why parts of its plans for a new mega-embassy in London are redacted.

The deputy prime minister’s Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government sent a letter asking for further information and requested a response by 20 August, the BBC understands.

Beijing’s plans for the new embassy have sparked fears its location – very near London’s financial district – could pose an espionage risk. Residents nearby also fear it would pose a security risk to them and attract large protests.

The BBC has contacted the Chinese embassy in London for comment.

A final planning decision on the controversial plans will be made by 9 September, the BBC understands.

In a letter seen by the PA news agency, Rayner, who as housing secretary is responsible for overseeing planning matters, asks planning consultants representing the Chinese embassy to explain why drawings of the planned site are blacked out.

The Home Office and the Foreign Office also received copies of the letter.

It notes that the Home Office requested a new “hard perimeter” be placed around the embassy site, to prevent “unregulated public access”, and says this could require a further planning application.

There are concerns, held by some opponents, that the Royal Mint Court site could allow China to infiltrate the UK’s financial system by tapping into fibre optic cables carrying sensitive data for firms in the City of London.

Pro-democracy campaigners from Hong Kong also fear Beijing could use the huge embassy to harass political opponents and even detain them. Last month, the UK condemned cash offers from Hong Kong authorities for people who help in the arrest of pro-democracy activists living in Britain.

Alicia Kearns, the shadow national security minister, said: “No surprises here – Labour’s rush to appease Xi Jinping’s demands for a new embassy demonstrated a complacency when it came to keeping our people safe. Having deluded themselves for so long, they’ve recognised we were right to be vigilant.”

Responding to security concerns earlier this week, the Chinese embassy told the BBC it was “committed to promoting understanding and the friendship between the Chinese and British peoples and the development of mutually beneficial cooperation between the two countries. Building the new embassy would help us better perform such responsibilities”.

China bought the old Royal Mint Court for £255m in 2018. At 20,000 square metres, the complex will be the biggest embassy in Europe if it goes ahead.

The plan involves a cultural centre and housing for 200 staff, but in the basement, behind security doors, there are also rooms with no identified use on the plans.

Beijing’s application for the embassy had previously been rejected by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022 over safety and security concerns.

It resubmitted an identical application in August 2024, one month after Labour came to power.

On 23 August, Sir Keir Starmer phoned Chinese President Xi Jinping for their first talks. Sir Keir confirmed afterwards that Xi had raised the embassy issue.

Rayner has since exercised her power to take the matter out of the council’s hands amid attempts by the government to engage with China after a cooling of relations during the final years of Conservative Party rule.

Senior ministers have signalled they are in favour if minor adjustments are made to the plan.

Source link