Neptune

New ‘Bulged’ Neptune Cruise Missile Variant Emerges In Ukraine

Ukraine has unveiled a new version of its Neptune cruise missile, which appears to have added fuel tank ‘bulges’ for increased range. The missile looks to be distinct from the extended-range Long Neptune derivative, imagery of which first emerged earlier this year. Originally designed as an anti-ship weapon, the Neptune family has now become a key means for Ukraine to launch strikes at targets on land inside Russian territory.

Denys Shmyhal, Ukraine’s defense minister, shared a picture of the new Neptune variant, seen at the top of this story, on social media today in relation to a recent visit by Lithuanian Prime Minister Inga Ruginiene and other Western dignitaries. Other domestically developed weapon systems that Ukrainian authorities have showcased before, including the Peklo ‘missile drone’ and a Magura-7 uncrewed surface vessel (USV) armed with R-73 anti-air missiles, were also put on display for the delegation.

The R-73-armed Magura-7 USV that was also shown to Prime Minister Ruginiene and the other Western officials during their recent visit to Ukraine. Denys Shmyhal/Ukrainian Ministry of Defense

The baseline Neptune, also designated the R-360, is primarily an anti-ship weapon, but has a basic secondary land attack capability. It is itself derived from the Soviet-era Kh-35, variants of which remain in service in Russia and elsewhere globally. Current production Neptunes can be readily distinguished from Kh-35s by the shape of their main fins, which have a distinctive stepped or ‘cranked’ sweep to them. The missile, which is powered by a small turbofan jet engine, has a stated maximum range of 190 miles (300 kilometers), according to the developer, the Luch Design Bureau.

An R-360 Neptune missile. Office of the President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy
Russian forces fire a ground-launched version of the Kh-35 during training. Russian Ministry of Defense

Since 2023, Ukraine has also been employing a land-attack optimized version, which reportedly has a guidance package that combines a GPS-assisted inertial navigation system (INS) and an imaging infrared sensor in place of the original active radar seeker. A Ukrainian defense official previously told TWZ that this variant has a range of at least 225 miles (360 kilometers). There is also the Long Neptune, which we will come back to later on.

The new Neptune variant shown to Prime Minister Ruginiene and the other Western officials has two prominent bulges on either side of the forward body immediately in front of the main fins. Though their purpose is currently unknown, additional fuel tanks are the likely explanation. Adding more fuel would be a relatively straightforward way to extend the missile’s reach without dramatically changing its design. It could also help maintain the weapon’s existing range following the addition of a heavier payload, such as a new warhead, although this is less likely based on what we know about the Neptune design. It is possible that fuel was added here to makeup for a larger warhead, but again, this is the less likely of the two options.

A close-up look at the new Neptune variant’s ‘bulges.’ Denys Shmyhal/Ukrainian Ministry of Defense

It’s possible the fairings could contain something else, but nothing logical comes to mind. Based on what is known of the Kh-35’s internal layout, this portion of the Neptune’s body should otherwise house elements of its navigation system and avionics. The missile’s warhead should be directly in front of that section, with the main seeker then in the nose.

As noted, the missile does not appear to be the Long Neptune derivative, also known as the RK-360L, which has a reported maximum range of 621 miles (1,000 kilometers). Ukrainian authorities released an image of that missile in August, which shows that it is externally very distinct from earlier Neptunes, as well as the new variant that has now been revealed. The Long Neptune is longer overall and has a wider main body, with the tail and nose sections having tapered profiles as a result. The main fins are also bigger and have a straight sweep.

The RK-360L Long Neptune. Government of Ukraine

Extending the reach of the baseline Neptune would offer a new tier of capability between the original missile and the RK-360L, allowing for the latter to be reserved for strikes that make use of their full range. An extended-range variant of the R-360 might also be cheaper and/or easier to produce than the Long Neptunes, or even something that could be created by converting existing missiles.

It’s also worth noting here that increasing the reach of the baseline Neptune could be relevant to expanding Ukraine’s ability to target Russian ships at sea, as well as strikes on land targets.

Existing versions of Neptune have also proven to be especially key weapons in Ukraine’s arsenal for conducting strikes on targets inside Russia. Ukraine’s Navy claims to have successfully struck more than 50 Russian targets with Neptune-series cruise missiles in the past year, according to an interview with the service’s spokesperson, Dmytro Pletenchuk, which Ukrainian newspaper Dzerkalo Tyzhnia published just today.

The expanding Neptune family also reflects a broader push by Ukrainian authorities to step up domestic arms production. Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said the goal is for 50 percent of all munitions being used on the front lines to be manufactured within the country by the end of the year. Foreign partnerships are part of the plan to achieve this, according to Zelenskyy. It is possible that the ongoing development of the Neptune family, as well as the production of those missiles, may already be benefiting from collaboration with allies and partners.

When it comes to stand-off strike capabilities capable of hitting targets deeper inside Russia, Ukraine’s current arsenal includes air-launched Storm Shadow and SCALP-EG cruise missiles provided by the United Kingdom and France, respectively, as well as ground-based Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) short-range ballistic missiles from the United States.

Hide and seek. Last night, dozens of russian missiles and Shaheds searched for Ukrainian planes and Storm Shadow missiles at the airfields. But it wasn’t until today, in Chonhar and near Henichesk, that the russians finally found them. pic.twitter.com/Ei09qyFwR2

— Defense of Ukraine (@DefenceU) August 6, 2023

In addition, Ukrainian forces have access to an extensive array of domestically-produced long-range kamikaze drones, as well as munitions that blur the line between those weapons and traditional cruise missiles, like the aforementioned Peklo. The country unveiled a new ground-launched cruise missile, called Flamingo, which reportedly has a range of 1,864 miles (3,000 kilometers) and a warhead weighing 2,535 pounds (1,150 kilograms), in August, as well. Ukraine also has an active domestic ballistic missile program, but how close it is to delivering a useful operational capability is unclear.

New footage from the launch of the Ukrainian Flamingo cruise missile.

The flamingo is a migratory bird and migrates depending on its species and habitat to find suitable feeding and breeding grounds.

This fall, the flamingo will fly primarily to russia. 🔥🔥🔥 pic.twitter.com/dyYgSCLfUK

— Jürgen Nauditt 🇩🇪🇺🇦 (@jurgen_nauditt) August 22, 2025

Earlier this year, the U.S. government also approved the delivery to Ukraine of thousands of new and relatively low-cost standoff missiles developed under the Extended Range Attack Munitions (ERAM) program. There is now talk that Ukraine could receive additional long-range strike munitions from its American partners, possibly including Tomahawk cruise missiles. Tomahawks would give Ukraine a new means to hold any target within roughly 1,000 miles of its borders at risk.

“I’ve sort of made a decision, pretty much,” U.S. President Donald Trump said yesterday in response to a direct question about Tomahawks for Ukraine. “I think I want to find out what they’re doing with them. Where are they sending them, I guess. I’d have to ask that question.”

BREAKING: Trump says he has made a decision on sending Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine.

He wants to first confirm how they will be used. pic.twitter.com/KEiT5KGl7j

— Clash Report (@clashreport) October 6, 2025

In a post on Facebook yesterday, Yegor Chernev, a member of Ukraine’s parliament from Zelenskyy’s Servant of the People party and deputy chairman of the country’s parliamentary committee on national security, raised significant questions about any future Tomahawk deliveries. He specifically called out how long it might take for the missiles to actually be delivered and restrictions American authorities might impose on their employment.

Trump had also said yesterday that he was “not looking to see an escalation” in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. The President has previously pushed back on the possibility of sending long-range missiles to Ukraine over concerns about escalation. Former President Joe Biden and other members of his administration also regularly highlighted the potential for escalation as a key factor in discussions about expanding the scale and scope of aid to Ukraine, especially in terms of weapons capable of striking Russia.

Trump’s comments do follow a major change in the U.S. government’s stance regarding Ukraine, as well as Russia, in recent weeks. Earlier in the year, the Trump administration’s relationship with Ukraine had dramatically cooled, and the flow of American aid to Ukrainian forces was notably disrupted. Washington had moved to engage more with Russia, which led to a summit between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska in August. Since then, however, the U.S. President has been increasingly outspoken in his frustration with his counterpart in Russia, especially over the lack of progress on a deal to end the war in Ukraine.

In the meantime, further iterating on the Neptune design continues to offer Ukraine a valuable way to expand its long-range strike capabilities and capacity domestically.

Contact the author: [email protected]

Joseph has been a member of The War Zone team since early 2017. Prior to that, he was an Associate Editor at War Is Boring, and his byline has appeared in other publications, including Small Arms Review, Small Arms Defense Journal, Reuters, We Are the Mighty, and Task & Purpose.




Source link

Neptune Cruise Missiles Used To Strike Factory In Russia: Ukrainian Navy

Ukraine claimed it attacked a major electronic connector production facility with R-360 Neptune ground-launched cruise missiles early Monday morning. The Elektrodetal plant, located in eastern Bryansk Oblast, was attacked from well inside northern Ukraine, according to Ukrainian officials, who are still working to determine the extent of the damage.

“We are adjusting the work of the Russian defense factories,” the Ukrainian Navy stated on Telegram. “At night, our ‘Neptune’ successfully struck the Russian Karachevsky ‘Electrodetal’ plant. Another link in the enemy’s supply chain is down.”

The attack on the Elektrodetal plant in Karachev, Bryansk region, was carried out by four Neptune missiles, according to Ukrainian Navy Commander Neizhpapa. pic.twitter.com/wi5k1yGzKW

— EMPR.media (@EuromaidanPR) September 29, 2025

The Ukrainian Armed Forces General Staff offered more details about the strike and the target.

The attack involved four Neptunes fired from a distance of roughly 240 kilometers (about 150 miles). That would put the launch site about 25 miles across the border in Ukraine.

The Karachev Electrodetal Plant “manufactures various electrical connectors for military and general industrial applications, including low-frequency, high-frequency, and combined connectors,” the Ukrainian Armed Forces General Staff explained. “The products are used in aerospace, electronics, instrument engineering, and other industries. These include connectors for printed circuit boards, military equipment, aircraft, antennas, base stations, and other systems, as well as components for various measuring instruments.”

“Explosions and a fire have been recorded on the premises of the facility,” the general staff added.

The plant produces “most of the inter-block connections of Russian cruise and ballistic missile wings,” the Ukrainian Colonel General Staff Telegram channel reported on Monday. In addition, its products are also used in the production of first-person view (FPV) drones such as the Chimera, the Ukrainian Militarnyi news outlet reported.

Ukraine says it struck the Elektrodetal production facility in the eastern Bryansk region. (Google Earth)

Ukraine’s forces famously used Neptunes to sink the Russian Navy’s Project 1164 Slava class cruiser Moskva in 2022 and reportedly began employing a new land-attack version in 2023. The R-360 is derived from the Soviet-era Kh-35 and is very similar externally to that missile, which remains in service in Russia and elsewhere today. You can read more about what is known about this variant of the missile here.

Neptune Missile crimea ukraine russia
Ukraine modified Neptune anti-ship missiles to strike ground targets. (Ukrainian MoD) Ukraine MOD

Earlier this year, Ukraine showed off another variant, called the Long Neptune. In the past, the maximum stated range of the anti-ship version of Neptune has been said to be around 190 miles (300 kilometers). A Ukrainian defense official told TWZ that the original land-attack version could have a range of up to 225 miles (360 kilometers). With its extended body having capacity for additional fuel, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky claimed Long Neptunes can strike targets at a range of about 620 miles (1,000 kilometers). Zelensky said that the new version has already been tested in combat.

A first official look at Ukraine’s other operational land attack cruise missile; the Long Neptune.

The Neptune LACM reportedly has a range of roughly 1000km, and has already seen combat this year. pic.twitter.com/cPHJ5sjZlu

— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) August 25, 2025

The attack on the Elektrodetal facility came shortly after Ukraine struck an energy plant inside Russia’s Belgorod region, reportedly launched by a U.S.-made Army High Mobility Rocket System (HIMARS).

U.S. President Donald Trump has signed off on Ukraine using American-made standoff weapons inside Russia on a case-by-case basis, Keith Kellogg, a White House special envoy to Ukraine, told Fox News on Saturday. He did not say what weapons Ukraine might use, but confirmed the Tomahawk Land Attack Cruise Missile (TLAM), which the Trump administration is considering sending to Ukraine, was not one of them. 

That the administration is now considering giving TLAMs to Ukraine highlights the ephemeral nature of Trump’s support for Kyiv, which may have to rely on U.S. weapons for years to come. As we recently noted, after saying long-range munitions were off the table and throttling the supply of weapons and intelligence to Ukraine, the American president has reversed course on both, as we noted in our recent story, which you can read here.

Meanwhile, as we have frequently reported, the U.S. wants to restock its own supply of a wide array of long-range missiles.

“The Pentagon, alarmed at the low weapons stockpiles the U.S. would have on hand for a potential future conflict with China, is urging its missile suppliers to double or even quadruple production rates on a breakneck schedule,” The Wall Street Journal reported on Monday.

The brainchild of Deputy Defense Secretary Steve Feinberg, this new effort is called the Munitions Acceleration Council. It is focusing “on 12 weapons that the Pentagon wants on hand for a potential conflict with China,” the publication reported, citing unnamed sources. “The list includes Patriot interceptors, Long Range Anti-Ship Missiles, the Standard Missile-6, Precision Strike Missiles and Joint Air-Surface Standoff Missiles. Patriot is a particular priority because Lockheed has struggled to keep pace with surging global demand.”

The Navy no longer plans to acquire a version of the AGM-158C Long Range Anti-Ship Missile with additional land-attack capability.
The Pentagon is looking to dramatically boost production of Long Range Anti-Ship Missiles (LRASM) among several other munitions, according to The Wall Street Journal. (USAF) USAF

Trump and War Secretary Pete Hegseth “are exploring extraordinary avenues to expand our military might and accelerate the production of munitions,” Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell told the Journal, when asked about the plan. “This effort has been a collaboration between defense industry leaders and senior Pentagon officials.”

However, some involved in the effort, both inside and outside of the government, “worry that the government’s targets aren’t realistic,” according to the newspaper. “Individual missiles can take two years to fully assemble. It can take several months and hundreds of millions of dollars to test and qualify weapons from new suppliers as safe and reliable enough for U.S. service members to use.”

Exclusive: The Pentagon, alarmed at the low weapons stockpiles the U.S. would have on hand for a potential future conflict with China, is urging its missile suppliers to double or even quadruple production rates on a breakneck schedule https://t.co/eBIrjE8cOT

— The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) September 29, 2025

The U.S. is already working to expand its ability to make missiles. It is opening up new plants, expanding work at existing ones and increasing the budget for buying new munitions. These existing efforts include jumpstarting production overseas for certain missiles, as well. How much more all this can be accelerated without using other means, like the Defense Production Act, isn’t clear, but what is clear is that the Pentagon knows this isn’t enough.

The war in Ukraine and fighting in the Middle East have shown the extreme importance of deep stockpiles of long-range strike missiles and air defense interceptors. As China shows increasing belligerence in the Pacific, the need to support Ukraine with weapons has no end in sight, and NATO’s relationship with Russia continues to spiral, as well as a massive spike in demand for these weapons around the globe, the race is on in the U.S. to ensure it can meet these challenges.

Contact the author: [email protected]

Howard is a Senior Staff Writer for The War Zone, and a former Senior Managing Editor for Military Times. Prior to this, he covered military affairs for the Tampa Bay Times as a Senior Writer. Howard’s work has appeared in various publications including Yahoo News, RealClearDefense, and Air Force Times.




Source link