inspectors

Iran says return of IAEA inspectors is not resumption of full cooperation | Nuclear Weapons News

There is no final agreement between the IAEA and Iran yet, says Iranian foreign minister, but talks will continue.

Iran says the return of inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) does not mark the resumption of full cooperation with the United Nations nuclear watchdog.

Inspectors from the IAEA have entered Iran with the consent of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, Iran’s foreign minister said on Wednesday.

“No final text has yet been approved on the new cooperation framework with the IAEA and views are being exchanged,” Abbas Araghchi said, in comments cited by the state broadcaster.

He noted that “the changing of the fuel of Bushehr nuclear reactor has to be done under the supervision of inspectors of the international agency”, the state news agency ICANA reported.

Iran suspended cooperation with the agency following a 12-day war with Israel in June, with Tehran pointing to the IAEA’s failure to condemn Israeli and US strikes on its nuclear facilities. Bushehr was not targeted in the attacks.

IAEA chief Rafael Grossi confirmed on Tuesday that a team of inspectors was “back in Iran”.

“When it comes to Iran, as you know, there are many facilities. Some were attacked, some were not,” Grossi told Fox News in an interview aired on Tuesday.

“So we are discussing what kind of … practical modalities can be implemented in order to facilitate the restart of our work there.”

The announcement comes after Iran held talks with the United Kingdom, France and Germany in Geneva on Tuesday, with Tehran seeking to avert the so-called snapback sanctions European powers have threatened to reimpose under the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) nuclear deal.

Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei warned Europe’s top three powers that reimposing sanctions on the country will have consequences.

The UK, France and Germany – parties to the 2015 deal – have threatened to trigger the accord’s “snapback mechanism” by the end of August.

Both sides will continue nuclear talks in the coming days.

Tuesday’s meeting was the second round of talks with European diplomats since the end of the June war, which began with an unprecedented Israeli surprise attack targeting senior military officials and nuclear facilities.

The conflict derailed Iran’s nuclear negotiations with the United States.

Israel says it launched the attacks to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon – an ambition Tehran has repeatedly denied, insisting its programme is solely for civilian purposes such as energy production.

Under the JCPOA, Iran committed to regular inspections of its nuclear energy programme in return for relief on some Western sanctions. The nuclear deal was torpedoed in 2018 when Donald Trump, during his first term as president, unilaterally withdrew the US and slapped harsh sanctions on Iran.

Source link

U.N. nuclear inspectors depart Tehran after Iran ends cooperation

1 of 2 | A satellite image shows a view of craters and ash on a ridge at Iran’s Fordo underground uranium enrichment facility after U.S. airstrikes June 21. Satellite Image 2025 Maxar Technologies/EPA

July 4 (UPI) — U.N. nuclear inspectors on Friday departed from Iran two days after the Middle Eastern nation suspended cooperation with the program and weeks after the United States and Israel bombed nuclear sites.

Rafael Grossi, the inspector general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, had aimed to assess the uranium-enrichment facilities and see whether alleged nuclear bomb efforts had been set back.

IAEA hasn’t reported the inspectors findings.

They remained in the capital, Tehran, during the conflict between Israel and Iran.

“An IAEA team of inspectors today safely departed from Iran to return to the Agency headquarters in Vienna, after staying in Tehran throughout the recent military conflict,” the U.N. agency posted Friday on X.

“IAEA Director General rafaelmgrossi reiterated the crucial importance of the IAEA discussing with Iran modalities for resuming its indispensable monitoring and verification activities in Iran as soon as possible.”

On Wednesday, Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian signed legislation that halts cooperation with the agency, blocking oversight of Iran’s nuclear program.

Inspectors will not be allowed to visit nuclear sites without approval from Iran’s Supreme National Security Council.

Iranian lawmakers gave two conditions for resuming cooperation, according to state media. The safety of its nuclear program and scientists is secured, and an acknowledgment about its right under international law to enrich uranium.

The spokesperson for U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said the Iranian law was “obviously concerning.”

“I think the secretary-general has been very consistent in his call for Iran to cooperate with the IAEA, and, frankly, for all countries to work closely with the IAEA on nuclear issues,” Stephane Dujarric told reporters.

Iran has been critical of a resolution on June 12 by the IAEA that accused Iran of non-compliance with its nuclear obligations.

This was one day before Israel attacked.

Iran and the United States had been engaged in talks for a nuclear deal. The U.S. used B-2 bombers to send missiles deep underground.

“We are for diplomacy,” Iran’s deputy foreign minister, Majid Takht-Ravanchi, told NBC News on Thursday, adding the U.S. government needs “to convince us that they are not going to use military force while we are negotiating. That is an essential element for our leadership to be in a position to decide about the future round of talks.”

President Donald Trump, who doesn’t want Iran to be enriching uranium, said that the U.S. bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites “obliterated” the program.

Grossi earlier said that Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium remains unaccounted for, and the program may have been delayed only a few months, and not years.

“It can be, you know, described in different ways, but it’s clear that what happened in particular in Fordo, Natanz, Isfahan, where Iran used to have and still has, to some degree, capabilities in terms of treatment, conversion and enrichment of uranium have been destroyed to an important degree,” Grossi said in a CBS News interview on Saturday. “Some is still standing. So there is, of course, an important setback in terms of those of those capabilities.”

Iran has contended its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes but the agency reported in May that Iran stockpiled about 900 pounds of uranium enriched to 60% purity, enough to build nine bomb. That’s up 50% since February.

In December, the IAEA said Iran was rapidly moving closer to the 90% threshold needed for weapons-grade material.

In 2018, Trump unilaterally exited the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and reimposed harsh sanctions during his first term in office.

In 2015, Iran reached a deal with the United States, Britain, Germany, France, Russia, China and the European Union.

Source link

Leeds maternity services now ‘inadequate’ after inspectors act on parents’ concerns

Getty Images Picture of a newborn baby's naked feet, which are crossed at the ankle. There is a plastic identification tag on one ankle and is laying on a white cotton sheet.Getty Images
Divya Talwar & Sarah Bell

BBC News

Maternity services at two Leeds hospitals have been downgraded from “good” to “inadequate” by the healthcare regulator, because their failings posed “a significant risk” to women and babies.

Concerns from staff and patients around quality of care and staffing levels were substantiated by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) during unannounced inspections at Leeds Teaching Hospitals (LTH) NHS Trust.

England’s regulator has now issued a warning notice which requires the trust to take immediate action to improve. Neonatal services have also been downgraded from “good” to “requires improvement”.

Over the past six months, the BBC has spoken to 67 families who say they experienced inadequate care at the trust, including parents who say their babies suffered avoidable injury or death. We also talked to five whistleblowers who said the previous CQC “good” rating did not reflect reality.

In response to the CQC downgrade, LTH said it had committed to improving its maternity and neonatal services at Leeds General Infirmary (LGI) and St James’ University Hospital.

‘At risk of avoidable harm’

During its December 2024 and January 2025 inspections, the CQC found official regulation breaches relating to risk management, safe environment, learning following incidents, infection prevention and control, medicines management and staffing.

Areas of concern highlighted in the maternity units at both hospitals included:

  • People being “not safe” and “at risk of avoidable harm” – while investigations into incidents, and points raised from these to enable learning, were not always evident
  • Babies and families not always being supported and treated with dignity and respect
  • Leadership being “below acceptable standard” and not supporting the delivery of high-quality care
  • Staff being reluctant to raise concerns and incidents – because “the trust had a blame culture”
  • Staff, despite being passionate about their work, struggling to provide their desired standard of care because of staffing issues

LTH provided evidence to the CQC showing it had reported 170 maternity “red flag incidents”, indicating there had been staffing issues, between May and September 2024.

The CQC’s findings also highlighted staffing concerns in neonatal services at both hospitals, with a shortage of qualified staff to care for babies with complex needs.

This coming autumn, the trust says 35 newly qualified midwives are due to start work and it has also appointed additional midwifery leadership roles.

The regulator will be monitoring the trust’s services closely, including through further inspections – says the CQC’s director in the north of England, Ann Ford – to make sure patients receive safe care while improvements are implemented.

“We would like to thank all those people who bravely shared their concerns,” she said. “This helps us to have a better picture of the care being provided to people and to focus our inspection in the relevant areas.”

MARTIN MCQUADE / BBC Amarjit and Mandip pictured standing next to each other. Amarjit has long brunette hair and black-rimmed glasses. She is wearing a blue jumper and a silver necklace. Mandeep has dark hair which is tied back, black-rimmed glasses and a short beard. He is wearing a red t-shirt and grey woollen cardigan. They are pictured in front of a white-framed window with green plants outside. MARTIN MCQUADE / BBC

Amarjit Kaur and Mandip Singh Matharoo’s daughter Asees was stillborn in January 2024

One family who told the BBC they believe their child would have survived had they received better treatment is Amarjit Kaur and Mandip Singh Matharoo, whose baby was stillborn in January 2024.

The CQC report highlights “how inadequate the service is, which leads to patient harm”, they told us.

“Unfortunately, it’s too little too late for our daughter Asees and us, but we hope that this will trigger serious change within the system and take the concerns of patients using the service more seriously.”

Fiona-Winser Ramm, whose daughter Aliona died in 2020 after what an inquest found to be a number of “gross failures”, described the CQC’s findings as “horrific”.

“The concerns we have been raising for five years have been proved true,” she says.

But she believes the CQC has been slow to act.

“The CQC inspected Leeds in 2023 and somehow rated them as being good. Let’s be clear these problems haven’t just appeared in the last two years, they are systemic.”

In response, the CQC said the 2023 inspection had been part of a national maternity inspection programme focussing specifically on safety and leadership, which found some areas for improvement, but also identified some good practice.

“As the independent regulator we are committed to ensuring our assessments of the quality and safety of all services are accurate and reflect the experiences of the people that use them,” added Ann Ford.

All 67 families who have spoken to the BBC want an independent review into the trust’s maternity services – and a group of them have asked Health Secretary Wes Streeting for it to be led by senior midwife Donna Ockenden.

Some Leeds families also joined other bereaved parents from across England this week to urge Mr Streeting to hold a national inquiry into maternity safety – he is yet to make a decision.

Chief executive of LTH, Prof Phil Wood, said in a statement: “My priority is to make sure we urgently take action to deliver these improvements.”

The trust is committed to providing “safe, compassionate care”, he added, and has already started making improvements, including recruitment, and addressing concerns around culture.

“We deliver more than 8,500 babies each year and the vast majority of those are safe and positive experiences,” he said. “But we recognise that’s not the experience of all families.”

Do you have more information about this story?

You can reach Divya directly and securely through encrypted messaging app Signal on: +44 7961 390 325, by email at [email protected], or her Instagram account.



Source link