images

Ofcom asks X about reports its Grok AI makes sexualised images of children

Ofcom has made “urgent contact” with Elon Musk’s company xAI following reports its AI tool Grok can be used to make “sexualised images of children” and undress women.

A spokesperson for the regulator said it was also investigating concerns Grok has been producing “undressed images” of people.

The BBC has seen several examples on the social media platform X of people asking the chatbot to alter real images to make women appear in bikinis without their consent, as well as putting them in sexual situations.

X has not responded to a request for comment. On Sunday, it issued a warning to users not to use Grok to generate illegal content including child sexual abuse material.

Elon Musk also posted to say anyone who asks the AI to generate illegal content would “suffer the same consequences” as if they uploaded it themselves.

XAI’s own acceptable use policy prohibits “depicting likenesses of persons in a pornographic manner”.

But people have been using Grok to digitally undress people without their consent and without notifying them.

The European Commission – the EU’s enforcement arm – said on Monday it was “seriously looking into this matter” and authorities in France, Malaysia and India were reportedly assessing the situation.

Meanwhile, the UK’s Internet Watch Foundation told the BBC it had received reports from the public relating to images generated by Grok on X.

But it said it had so far not seen images which would cross the UK’s legal threshold to be considered child sexual abuse imagery.

Grok is a free virtual assistant – with some paid for premium features – which responds to X users’ prompts when they tag it in a post.

Samantha Smith, a journalist who discovered users had used the AI to create pictures of her in a bikini, told the BBC’s PM programme on Friday it had left her feeling “dehumanised and reduced into a sexual stereotype”.

“While it wasn’t me that was in states of undress, it looked like me and it felt like me and it felt as violating as if someone had actually posted a nude or a bikini picture of me,” she said.

Under the Online Safety Act (OSA), Ofcom says it is illegal to create or share intimate or sexually explicit images – including “deepfakes” created with AI – of a person without their consent.

Tech firms are also expected to take “appropriate steps” to reduce the risks of UK users encountering such content, and take it down “quickly” when made aware of it.

Dame Chi Onwurah, chair of the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee, said the reports were “deeply disturbing”.

She said the Committee found the OSA to be “woefully inadequate” and called it “a shocking example of how UK citizens are left unprotected whilst social media companies act with impunity”.

And she called for the government to take up recommendations by the Committee to compel social media platforms “to take greater responsibility for their content”.

Meanwhile, European Commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier said on Monday it was aware of posts made by Grok “showing explicit sexual content,” as well as “some output generated with childlike images”.

“This is illegal,” he said, also calling it “appalling” and “disgusting”.

“This is how we see it, and this has no place in Europe,” he said.

Regnier said X was “well aware” the EU was “very serious” about enforcing its rules for digital platforms – having handed X a €120m (£104m) fine in December for breaching its Digital Services Act.

A Home Office spokesperson said it was legislating to ban nudification tools, and under a new criminal offence, anyone who supplied such tech would “face a prison sentence and substantial fines”.

Source link

What images and videos tell us about why Swiss bar fire spread so quickly

Richard Irvine-Brown, Kevin Nguyen and Kayleen DevlinBBC Verify

BBC A branded image with the BBC Verify logo, with a blue border surrounding an image of sparklers attached to champagne bottles being held up by people in the Swiss ski resort bar just before the fire started - with a small orange patch of fire seen on a foam ceiling above the sparklers.BBC

Investigators are racing to establish how and why the deadly New Year’s Eve fire at a bar in a Swiss ski resort spread so rapidly.

Authorities on Friday said in a press conference that sparklers attached to champagne bottles that were held “too close to the ceiling” appear to have started the blaze in the basement of Le Constellation bar in Crans-Montana.

But how the fire took hold with such ferocity, killing at least 40 people and leaving 119 injured, many seriously, is now a key focus for officials – as is the bar’s safety record.

​​BBC Verify has been examining videos taken by survivors and onlookers and speaking to fire safety experts to find clues about what went wrong.

Bottles with sparklers held in the air

Two striking images shared widely online show people carrying champagne bottles with lit sparklers above their heads, with a crowd around them.

One image shows flames starting to gather on the ceiling above people holding five of these bottles aloft.

People hold sparklers attached to champagne bottles in the Swiss ski resort bar just before the fire started - with a small orange patch of fire seen on what looks like a foam ceiling above the sparklers.

The second image is a closer-up angle, showing a person wearing a crash helmet and holding a bottle with a lit sparkler, sitting on the shoulders of another person wearing a Guy Fawkes mask.

The sparks from this bottle appear to be closer to the ceiling.

A person wearing a motorbike helmet sits on the shoulders of another person. Both of them are holding champagne bottles with sparklers attached, close to the ceiling and walking through a bar busy with people.

​​BBC Verify determined these images were taken after midnight on 1 January by confirming there were not earlier versions and matched them against public photos of Le Constellation – using details including the bar design and distinctive pipework.

And there was no evidence the images had been ​​manipulated using artificial intelligence (AI).

In other videos we verified from the night of the fire, some people in the bar can be seen filming the flames as loud club music thumps in the background. In one video, some people start to hurry for an exit stairwell while shouting.

On Friday, Béatrice Pilloud, the attorney-general of the Valais region, said everything led investigators to believe the fire had started from sparklers attached to bottles of champagne that were “moved too close to the ceiling”.

Questions about foam padding on ceiling

Another focus is on foam-like padding on the bar’s ceiling and whether it was compliant with safety standards.

Two fire safety experts told BBC Verify that the materials visible in photos and videos of Le Constellation appeared to show “egg box foam”, a type of sound-absorbing material made from polyurethane (PU).

In the photo of the bottles being held up, flames are visible on a part of the ceiling with a foam-like covering.

PU foam is often treated with fire-retardant before being installed as a noise dampener in factories and entertainment venues.

But untreated, it can be highly flammable.

“Once ignited, polyurethane acoustic foam can exhibit rapid flame spread across its high-surface-area profile and produce dense, toxic smoke, significantly accelerating fire growth and reducing available escape time,” said Dr Peter Wilkinson of Loughborough University.

Professor Edwin Galea, from the University of Greenwich, said the effectiveness of retardant treatment on PU foam can wear off over time.

The Swiss authorities say they cannot confirm what type of foam-padding was used in the bar and whether or not it complied with safety standards.

In Friday’s press conference, officials talked about a “flashover” happening in the bar.

Professor Galea explained this is what happens when hot gases rise to the ceiling, reach a critical temperature and then ignite the room near instantaneously.

According to Michael Klippel, a fire safety expert at ETH Zurich University, “survival after flashover is very unlikely”.

The authority responsible for overseeing fire safety inspections in Crans-Montana is the Office Cantonal du Feu (OCF) of the Canton of Valais. The inspections are carried out by local officials.

Swiss authorities said in a press conference that inspections on a building the size of Le Constellation should have been carried out each year.

BBC Verify has contacted the OCF to request access to previous inspection documents.

Exit routes from the bar

The authorities say they will also focus on exit routes at the bar, which sits across two levels – a ground floor and a basement. The fire is thought to have started in the basement, where the two images referred to above were taken.

Videos filmed as the fire took hold show people trying to extinguish the flames before trying to get out of the basement up a narrow set of stairs.

Prof Galea said staircase exits can be fatal bottlenecks with people tripping and getting trampled.

He said even if there were other fire exits, panicked people in unfamiliar spaces were more likely to go out the way they came in.

Officials also confirmed there was more than one exit from the building, but added they were “not currently able to say” whether the emergency exit was open or closed at the time.

Valais state councillor Stéphane Ganzer said: “There is not just one door, even though at the time of the fire, it seems that most people left through the main entrance. But this building is a public place. It was obviously equipped with an emergency exit.”

Pilloud told journalists that the two French managers of the bar had been interviewed as well as people who escaped the fire.

One of the bar’s owners reportedly told local media the establishment had been inspected three times in the past ten years and that everything had been done according to regulations.

Sparklers used before

The investigators say they have also been analysing other videos of the venue.

One video we found shows sparklers attached to bottles being used inside the bar as far back as 2024.

YouTube An image taken from a YouTube video posted in 2024 which shows someone holding a bottle with a lit sparkler attached in the air in Le Constellation bar. YouTube

A still image from a YouTube video posted in 2024 showing someone holding a bottle with a sparkler in Le Constellation bar.

It shows women dressed in distinctive crash helmets carrying the bottles and pyrotechnics to customers, before detaching them and pouring drinks.

The footage was uploaded to YouTube in May 2024 by the account @ConstellationCransMontana, though we can’t be certain when it was filmed.

Source link

House Democrats release latest Epstein images as DOJ deadline looms | Donald Trump News

Legislators have been publishing photos related to convicted sex offender as Justice Department faces Friday deadline to release more.

Democrats in the United States House of Representatives have released dozens more photos from the estate of financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The release on Thursday comes a day before the Department of Justice faces a deadline to release a more comprehensive set of files related to Epstein, who died in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting sex-trafficking charges.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

In a statement, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee said they would “continue releasing photographs and documents to provide transparency for the American people”.

“It’s time for the Department of Justice to release the files,” they said.

The latest trove includes photos of Epstein with public intellectual Noam Chomsky, as well as images of billionaire Bill Gates, filmmaker Woody Allen and former Donald Trump strategist Steve Bannon at Epstein’s compound.

One release shows a screenshot of a text exchange in which an unknown sender appears to discuss recruiting young women.

“I have a friend scout she sent me some girls today. But she asks 1000$ per girl. I will send u girls now. Maybe someone will be good for J?” the post says.

An undated photo released by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee on Thursday, December 18, 2025 shows professor and political activist Noam Chomsky with Jeffrey Epstein.
An undated photo released by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee on Thursday, December 18, 2025, shows professor and political activist Noam Chomsky with Jeffrey Epstein.

Other images show women’s passports and the body of an unidentified woman with messages written on her skin, next to Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita, a novel about a man’s sexual obsession with a child.

Like a trove of images released last week, the materials released on Thursday were not accompanied by any further context or details. Last week’s images also showed Bannon, Allen, and Gates, as well as former US President Bill Clinton and former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak.

Another image showed US President Trump surrounded by three young women, his hand clutching the waist of the woman to his right.

Trump has acknowledged a prior relationship with Epstein, but has denied taking part in the sex abuse ring that Epstein ran. He said the two men had a falling out years before Epstein’s arrest.

In emails previously released by House Democrats, Epstein said that Trump “knew about the girls”. In another, Epstein described Trump as “the dog that hasn’t barked”.

The president had initially opposed a more complete release of files related to Epstein, but faced mounting pressure, including from within his own Make America Great Again (MAGA) base.

Speculation has focused on the influential figures in Epstein’s orbit, and any involvement they made have had in his crime. The intrigue has been fueled by the murky circumstances surrounding Epstein’s death in a New York jail cell, which was ruled a suicide.

Last month, Trump pivoted on the issue, signing into law a bill requiring the Justice Department to publish materials connected to the Epstein investigation.

However, the Justice Department has remained silent on whether it will meet Friday’s deadline outlined in the law, dubbed the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Source link