SAIC Motor Corp.’s harsh treatment by European Union negotiators is becoming a cautionary tale of Chinese companies being ill-equipped to operate in Western business and political domains.
Author of the article:
Bloomberg News
Bloomberg News
Published Aug 25, 2024 • 4 minute read
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
Article content
(Bloomberg) — SAIC Motor Corp.’s harsh treatment by European Union negotiators is becoming a cautionary tale of Chinese companies being ill-equipped to operate in Western business and political domains.
Of the three Chinese automakers singled out by the EU, SAIC has been subjected to an extra 36.3% tariff on the EVs it sells in Europe. That’s more than twice BYD Co., which will pay an additional 17% on top of existing customs duties of 10%. Volvo Car AB parent Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co. is in the middle with an added charge of 19.3%. The proposed tariffs were revised down slightly last Tuesday.
Advertisement 2
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O’Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.
Daily content from Financial Times, the world’s leading global business publication.
Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O’Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.
Daily content from Financial Times, the world’s leading global business publication.
Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
Sign In or Create an Account
or
Article content
The main factor driving the uneven treatment appears to be varying “levels of cooperation,” the European Commission said in its 208-page provisional decision document posted in July, which included a detailed part just for SAIC. In particular, the Shanghai-owned carmaker’s responses were “found to be highly deficient,” it said.
For its part, SAIC was concerned about the security of its information and also simply lacked access to some of its own suppliers’ data, people familiar with the matter said, asking not to be identified discussing confidential matters. An unfamiliarity with the required documentation as well as internal bureaucracy were other challenges, the people added.
Representatives for SAIC, best known outside China for its MG models, didn’t respond to a request for comment. But the automaker said in a social media post last month that the EU had requested sensitive business information, such as providing the chemical formula it uses in batteries, which it said was out of the scope of the investigation.
SAIC’s scant response to the EU was at odds with peers BYD and Geely, which pro-actively engaged international law firms and conducted thorough data collection, and in BYD’s case, hired policy experts in Brussels, one of the people said.
Top Stories
Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Thanks for signing up!
A welcome email is on its way. If you don’t see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Top Stories will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Article content
Advertisement 3
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
“Look at the different automakers and where they fall in terms of the degree of tariffs and it’s almost like a road map to tell you who’s better at local public relations or government lobbying,” said Stephen Dyer, managing director at consulting firm AlixPartners. One factor may be a manufacturer’s openness to embrace business cultural differences and their ability to adapt, he said.
It’s further evidence that while Chinese EV makers are capturing an impressive share of the continent’s car market, they’re not displaying the same prowess when it comes to intangible influence that powerful companies usually wield — like navigating the delicate dance with EU negotiators, or even comparatively trivial things like making their voices heard at global auto shows, prime networking ground for industry executives.
The fact that state-owned enterprises in China have multiple objectives other than just profit tends to make them less agile in these situations, Dyer said. There’s a danger with Chinese companies assuming that everything is political and hence feeling that it’s meaningless to cooperate, he added.
Advertisement 4
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Given it’s unrealistic for Chinese EV makers to abandon their plans to expand in Europe, better engagement with Europe’s civil society and regulatory systems would help, said Gregor Sebastian, a senior analyst with Rhodium Group. Some Chinese firms may have underestimated the political and legal challenges related to entering the EU market and not put enough resources into it, he said.
The disconnect was on display at The Battery Show Europe 2024, a trade event to showcase the latest in cell design and engineering. So prevalent were Chinese companies that they accounted for more than one-fifth of total exhibitors at the Stuttgart event in late June.
Yet during the three-day seminar that ran in parallel, almost no Chinese speakers shared the stage with the scores of white, mostly male auto executives because they mostly declined invitations to speak.
Chinese manufacturers will take time to adapt to their new cultural surroundings, including press requests, advertising and membership of industry associations, Jochen Siebert, managing director at consultancy JSC Automotive, said. They still lack an understanding of the importance of local reporters and reviewers, for example, who play a substantial role in swaying consumers in Europe, he said.
Advertisement 5
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Even BYD, which got the lowest of the proposed tariffs, isn’t getting its approach 100% right. Its European website now patiently explains that NEV stands not for ‘neighborhood electric vehicle’ but ‘new energy vehicle’ after public confusion following the carmaker’s sponsorship of the UEFA European Football Championship 2024 where the term NEV was used widely in marketing materials.
It’s nevertheless paying at least more attention to an area largely ignored by its long-time local rivals.
“It’s the old story — if you and your friends are being chased by a tiger, you don’t need to run faster than the tiger,” Dyer said. “You simply need to run faster than your friend.”