Wed. Nov 6th, 2024
Occasional Digest - a story for you

George Bailey has rejected any suggestion Cameron Bancroft’s Test absence is political, telling the opener the ball-tampering scandal is completely in the past.

The Sheffield Shield’s leading run-scorer for the past two seasons, Bancroft was told on Tuesday he had missed out in the race to replace David Warner.

With Steve Smith to open and Cameron Green returning to the side at number four Bancroft then had the added blow of seeing Matt Renshaw picked ahead of him as a back-up batsman and current next in line if Smith or Usman Khawaja retire.

Bancroft’s non-selection is a contentious one on many fronts.

The likes of Ricky Ponting and Justin Langer had called for Australia to go with a specialist opener to replace Warner, a fact selectors do not believe to be crucial.

The man at the centre of sandpaper-gate, Bancroft returned from his nine-month ban to open for Australia in the 2019 Ashes before being dropped after two Tests.

He created headlines again in 2021 when he responded that it was “self-explanatory” when asked if the bowlers were aware the ball was being tampered with at Cape Town in 2018.

Telephoto shot of two umpires and a cricketer standing and talking onfield.
Umpires talk to Cameron Bancroft during the ball-tampering scandal of 2018.(Gallo Images via Getty: Ashley Vlotman)

Former Test all-rounder Tom Moody has been among those to question the non-selection, and whether there was an “agenda” in the call.

But despite that, chief selector Bailey was adamant there had been no push from the bowlers to not have Bancroft selected.

Source link