For many in the party, there was little upside seen in commenting on a legal matter that was certain to be considered by the Supreme Court — and likely to be struck down by the justices there. Their subdued reaction was driven, in part, by concerns that outward celebration would play into Trump’s hands, inflaming his supporters and giving fodder for him to argue that the judicial system was stacked against him.

“It just kind of adds to the pile of wood that he puts on the fire,” said a senior Democratic strategist, speaking candidly on condition of anonymity. “And I just don’t think it’s helpful.”

But it was also sparked by fears that cheering on the decision would make people dismiss the severity of the ruling and risk positioning Biden as hoping the court system was doing his political work for him.

“I would not engage in a discussion about this,” said David Axelrod, the longtime party operative. “I would be preparing to face Trump. The way they’re handling it is the right way. You don’t want to tell the American people — I don’t trust you to make the decision.”

Few Democrats on Wednesday challenged the merits of the Colorado court’s decision. In fact, several Biden allies said they believed that the 4-3 ruling, issued by all Democratic-appointed justices, had been correct.

“I think it’s on point. I think they’re right in what they’re doing,” said former Sen. Ted Kaufman, who served as Biden’s former chief of staff. “That’s what the Constitution says. It says it’s an insurrection, clearly what they did was an insurrection. It’s pretty straightforward, isn’t it?”

Party officials also dismissed the idea that the court had started the country down a slippery slope, inviting a conservative state judicial body to respond by throwing Democrats off their ballot, however specious the reasoning was.

“If you’re worrying about that, you’re buying into a Republican premise, which is that courts are hopelessly politicized,” said Pat Dennis, president of the Democratic super PAC, American Bridge 21st Century. “And I think that is like a fundamental premise that they need in order to delegitimize a legitimate prosecution of the former president. I don’t buy that premise.”

Republicans, meanwhile, were quick to denounce Tuesday night’s ruling, saying that the findings by the four justices amounted to political interference in the election. They argued that they had far exceeded their authority and warned that Trump would only benefit from the decision.

Trump’s rivals in the primary defended him as well, stressing that they preferred to defeat him at the ballot box — a line later mirrored by the Biden campaign.

“We’re not going to comment on ongoing litigation,” said Biden campaign deputy communications director, Brooke Goren. “What I will say is that the president looks forward to defeating Donald Trump or whoever else emerges from the Republican primary on the ballot box in November in 2024. So I’ll leave it at that.”

Those who did openly celebrate were the longtime conservative lawyers who had helped spearhead the case as well as a portion of the legal and political left that had joined their efforts.

Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) argued that even were the Supreme Court to reverse the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision, it have some residual benefit — reinforcing public perception that the high court is beholden to the former president.

“It’s going to feed into how partisan and beholden the U.S. Supreme Court is to Donald Trump,” Lieu said. “It feeds into the whole Roe v Wade decision, and how he appointed ultra religious justices to overturn Roe versus Wade. And do you really want Trump, again, who is going to appoint even more.”

Ian Bassin, executive director of the group Protect Democracy noted that, at a minimum, the decision meant that heading into the election, a state Supreme Court “has found that Donald Trump engaged in insurrection.” He also noted “an almost Shakespearean irony” produced by the decision.

“Trump’s MO has always been to accuse others of the transgressions of which he himself is guilty, largely to obfuscate his own guilt,” said Bassin. “So it’s fitting that after rising to political power by falsely accusing Barack Obama of not being eligible to be president, it’s Trump who it turns out has now been found by a court to be the actually ineligible one.”

Sam Stein and Jennifer Haberkorn contributed to this report.