The proposal sought to notify parents if their child changes their name or pronouns at school or requests to use facilities or play sports that don’t match their gender on official records. It also would have banned California doctors from prescribing hormones or otherwise providing gender affirming care to minors.
In order to qualify for the ballot, proponents had to submit more than half a million signatures of registered voters by Tuesday to meet a deadline imposed by the California Secretary of State.
The campaign fell short of that requirement but gathered more than 400,000 signatures, according to Jonathan Zachreson, a Roseville school board member who was leading the initiative.
“If we had a little more time and a little more money, we would have easily qualified for the ballot,” he said.
Zachreson said the initiative had the support of tens of thousands of volunteers, with the most signatures collected from counties including Los Angeles, Orange and San Bernardino.
But the measure was always a political long shot in left-leaning California, home to some of the strongest LGBTQ+ protections in the nation.
The campaign raised $200,000, according to Zachreson, a paltry number in a state where some past ballot measure campaigns have collected hundreds of millions of dollars.
Supporters of the measure sought to bring Republican-backed debates over “parental rights” playing out on school boards in conservative pockets of California to the statewide level. California Democrats in turn have fought to thwart “gender notification” policies attempted by several school boards, measures they said are harmful to transgender students who may feel safe at school but not at home.
Last week, Democratic state lawmakers in Sacramento introduced a bill that seeks to ban the school policies and shield teachers from retaliation for supporting transgender students as lawsuits over the issue are pending across the state.
The legislation comes after California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit last year against the Chino school district, alleging its parental notification policy was discriminatory and violated civil rights and privacy laws.
Bonta also challenged the ballot title of the proposed measure that fell short Tuesday. Last month, a Sacramento Superior Court Judge tentatively sided with Bonta, who titled the measure the “Restrict Rights of Transgender Youth” initiative, while backers wanted to call it the “Protect Kids of California Act.”
Zachreson said they plan to appeal that decision. He said supporters will “absolutely” continue to push for similar ballot measures in the future and are now throwing their weight behind opposing the state legislation introduced last week.
They are hoping for the financial support of billionaire Elon Musk, who has criticized healthcare for transgender youth.
LGBTQ+ advocacy groups have warned that “parental rights” debates over gender identity are harmful to youth who already face high rates of suicide.
“Across the country and here in California, LGBTQ+ young people are under attack from extremist politicians and school boards seeking to ban books, terrorize teachers and make transgender youth afraid to be themselves at school,” Equality California Executive Director Tony Hoang said in a statement.