“It is past time for our commander-in-chief to adopt a new approach that targets the actual sponsors of terrorism in the region,” Wicker, the lead Republican on the Senate Armed Service Committee,
said in a statement.

“The Biden admin must be decisive with sustained retaliatory strikes and begin to enforce oil and other sanctions to cut off the source of terror funding,” McCaul, the chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee,
said in a statement.

Sen. Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), a member of
the SASC, said: “These strikes, announced well in advance, likely did not accomplish nearly enough to stop Iran’s axis. Whatever next steps the President takes must be significantly stronger.”

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), also a
SASC member, posted: “Finally. Iran needs to know the price for American lives.”

Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.), posted: “To
restore effective deterrence, President Biden must hit Iran where it hurts. Weak, telegraphed responses will not cut it. We need leadership, not appeasement.”

Military veterans from both parties were quick to air their opinions.

Rep. Mike Waltz (R-Fla.), a former member of the
U.S. Army Special Forces, posted: “It’s a huge expenditure of precision munitions from increasingly depleted stockpiles that are needed in the Indo-Pacific.”

Navy veteran Rep. Jen Kiggans (D-Va.)
wrote that the strikes must “kneecap” Iran’s presence and threats against Americans.

Meanwhile, Rep. Austin Scott (D-Ga.), a member of the House Armed Services Committee,
wrote in a post: “I applaud the bravery and skill of
@CENTCOM, who carried out multiple airstrikes against Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Quds Force and affiliated militia groups today.”

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.)
posted that Biden, in ordering the strikes, had “circumvented Congress.”

“Our troops need to come home. Our president needs to follow the constitution,” she added.