Sat. Nov 2nd, 2024
Occasional Digest - a story for you

Noel Pearson isn’t easily deterred.

“It’s a 15-year-old game and we’re in the last quarter here”, the veteran campaigner for Indigenous rights and co-architect of the Voice concept told the ABC, while sitting in the red dirt at the Garma Festival.

Despite the polls continuing to head in the wrong direction for the Yes case, Pearson says he’s feeling good. He’s been active over the past month or so. Very active. Knocking on doors, speaking at community events, pulling out all stops in the final push to the referendum line.

The confidence of Yes campaigners at Garma can be difficult to fathom when looking at the hard numbers and trend lines that usually dictate political campaigns.

Another poll yesterday, this time from Redbridge, was even uglier for the Yes case than most. It put the No case ahead 56 to 44 per cent.

And yet there’s no outward sign of despair. Yes strategists have a range of explanations as to why the numbers aren’t more favourable. The polls are flawed, they’re meaningless at this stage, most voters are yet to seriously tune in, the No campaign is running out of scares, the feedback is much better at the grassroots level.

The Yes campaign might be right. Referendum campaigns aren’t necessarily akin to election contests. Polls aren’t always predictors. There’s still time for a campaign blitz to push this over the line at the end.

Still, the numbers can’t be ignored. The Yes campaign is behind. And it’s trying new angles and avenues to appeal to anyone still on the fence.

Anthony Albanese, wearing a hat, walks among indigenous performers.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese attends a bunggul ceremony at the start of Garma Festival.(ABC News: Michael Franchi)

For his part, that’s involved the prime minister issuing a warning. If this referendum fails, there won’t be another shot at it any time soon. Finding some other form of Indigenous recognition everyone can happily agree on, is folly. This moment of healing will be lost.

Opposition leader Peter Dutton has argued a simpler form of recognition, without enshrining a Voice in the Constitution, would garner bipartisan support and therefore much stronger backing amongst voters.

He would rather legislate the Voice and settle on a purely symbolic form of words to recognise Indigenous Australians in the Constitution.

Source link