Barely 12 months ago, Premier Peter Malinauskas rode a public wave of concern about the state of South Australia’s public hospitals into government.
The Labor leader became the state’s 47th premier after voters sent the Liberal party a message, seen in no small part to be about the rise of ambulance ramping and clogging of emergency departments.
Now, the Malinauskas government’s second budget points to Labor’s determination to avoid that same fate of its Liberal predecessors.
Mr Malinauskas and Treasurer Stephen Mullighan are pouring billions of extra dollars into the health system, with a clear focus on delivering on that hallmark pledge to “fix the ramping crisis”.
Delivering on that promise has proved challenging for Labor so far, with demand on hospitals and paramedics showing no signs of slowing down.
But the government is hoping the extra $2 billion, over the next few years, will make a noticeable dent — and help ambulances get to South Australians when they desperately need them.
Cost-of-living relief measures won’t be available to all
Health was one of three “bread-and-butter” focuses of the 2023-24 budget, along with cost-of-living and housing.
On the latter two, there is plenty to help out with major problems — people being snowed under by mounting bills and also struggling to find anywhere to live.
But it will not help all of those who are struggling.
The budget certainly has offerings in those areas but you have to qualify for some of what’s on the table.
Cost-of-living relief measures are largely targeted at those who are doing it toughest, such as the energy bill relief scheme designed with the federal government.
Leading into the budget, the state government was keen to make as much noise as possible about its decision to sign on to the Albanese government’s program, which was announced as part of its budget last month.
The scheme has repeatedly been branded the biggest cost-of-living measure in the state’s history, with $500 payments to go to around 420,000 households and 86,000 small businesses.
Mr Mullighan says it means one in two South Australian households will get assistance because it goes to people who qualify for state concessions and federal tax benefits.
But by that logic, it also means one in two households won’t get that help.
They also face power bill hikes of more than 20 per cent from July.
“We did have choices with this. We could have provided a lesser amount of support to a greater number of people,” Mr Mullighan said.
“Or we could have made sure that we provided a much more meaningful amount of support to those people who need the most support in the community.”
Dumping stamp duty to cost millions
Mr Mullighan argues there are other broad measures designed to help ease the pinch on hip pockets, like extending school discount programs and reducing the car parking charges for health care workers.
Housing measures are targeted too and assume people are in a position to save a 2 per cent deposit as rents continue to soar.
The treasurer describes the decision to scrap stamp duty for some first home buyers as putting home ownership “back in the grasp” of those who are set to save cash.
“Right now, for most young South Australians, home ownership is out of the reach,” he said.
Few would argue that point, with the state — and country more broadly — lurching through a housing affordability crisis.
Abolishing stamp duty will cost state coffers nearly $130 million over four years and is expected to benefit nearly 4,000 buyers a year, effective from today.
It is a targeted measure which just applies to new builds, with the peak support available for homes with a value of $650,000 before being phased out at $700,000.
For South Australians looking to buy a house, it is a saving of tens of thousands of dollars.
That could be the difference between being able to buy a house, or not, for many.
But, like the power subsidies, substantial numbers of South Australians will not get relief from the stamp duty plan.
There are measures in this budget that will make a big difference to the many South Australians struggling to pay the bills.
But those who will not benefit from the targeted relief may be left wondering whether the state budget will help ease their financial struggles.