The artist has worked on the fringe of the Angkor Wat temple complex for seven years, making a living selling paintings inspired by the jungle and ancient ruins to tourists.
Now, his home and gallery will be flattened as the Cambodian government clears 10,000 families living within the sprawling UNESCO world heritage site, and many of those facing eviction are unhappy.
“Since I heard about the relocation plan, I have felt numb,” said Chan Vichet.
“I have to force myself to work to fund my family’s livelihood, but I don’t have full concentration or creativity.”
Authorities have said that they are acting to protect the ruins by moving squatters whose informal settlements are damaging the local environment by producing rubbish and overusing water resources.
Once their home is demolished, Chan Vichet and his family will move 25 kilometres (15 miles) away to Run Ta Ek, a new community on former rice paddies that are currently still a construction site.
Families are given a 20-by-30-metre plot of land, $350 cash, 30 pieces of tin roofing material and access to a welfare card, but they have to build their own houses.
Before the pandemic, more than two million foreign tourists came every year to explore Angkor Wat’s ruined temples, half-swallowed by the jungle.
For a poor country, the swarms of visitors eager to see the remains of the Khmer Empire’s capital from the ninth to 15th centuries brought welcome cash.
The tourist trade spawned a micro-economy of stallholders, food and souvenir sellers and beggars, and the local population exploded from an estimated 20,000 in the early 1990s to about 120,000 by 2013.
Now, the government of Prime Minister Hun Sen has said that the settlements lack the infrastructure and sanitation they need, and with visitor numbers expected to rise now that pandemic travel restrictions are over, it aimed to clear them within the next four months.
“Despite that, they are here illegally, the government is doing a lot of things to support their livelihoods,” said Long Kosal, a spokesman for the Apsara National Authority, which manages the archaeological park.
“The area here can not allow such unorganised settlement and there is very poor [sanitation].”
The government has recognised that some villages near the temples date back centuries, and insisted only recent unauthorised settlements have been targeted.
Apsara aimed to regenerate the jungle by planting trees where ramshackle huts, without proper sewerage, running water or in some cases electricity, once stood.
Like many others facing the end of their business selling to tourists, Chan Vichet feared he will be worse off financially.
As earthmovers levelled plots across the hot, dusty landscape at Run Ta Ek, Heav Vanak watched his grandchild play in the dirt, and worried about the lack of jobs for his four adult children.
“I don’t have enough money to buy materials to build a new home,” said the 51-year-old.
“We are powerless. How can we protest?”
Apsara insisted that the families are “happy to move”, and spokesman Long Kosal said that construction is under way on a school, hospital, market and pagoda.
“The place is liveable,” he said, adding there would also be jobs at the new Siem Reap international airport opening soon.
As well as being a linchpin of Cambodia’s tourism industry, Angkor Wat is so central to the country’s identity that an image of its towers dominates the national flag.
Hun Sen, who has run the kingdom with an iron fist for nearly four decades, has warned opposition parties not to turn the displacements into an election issue when Cambodia holds national polls in July.
“If we don’t resolve this, in the future our Angkor Wat will be withdrawn from the World Heritage [list],” he said in September.
But in a statement to AFP, UNESCO said that, while it had raised concerns about urban development risks in 2008, it had “never called for population displacements”.
Shifting communities from UNESCO heritage sites has long been fraught with controversy, notably at Jordan’s cave city of Petra and Luxor in Egypt.
The agency’s guidelines said relocations should be carried out with the consent of the population concerned, and that local communities should be the primary beneficiaries of tourism from heritage sites.
But it was not only newcomers to Run Ta Ek who are unhappy at the relocations.
Longtime residents complained that with plots being handed over to new arrivals, they no longer have enough land to support themselves.
“Before we grew rice and had enough for our family, now, we are only able to raise chickens and ducks, but it’s not enough income. I also owe a bank debt,” said Horn Ravuth, 41, a third-generation resident.