- Jackson, a 51-year-old appeals court judge, could serve on the high court for decades.
- She was confirmed by the Senate three months ago, picking up three GOP votes and all Democrats.
- Jackson is unlikely to upend the conservatives 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court.
WASHINGTON – Ketanji Brown Jackson, a former public defender and Miami native who rose to become a judge on a powerful federal appeals court, made history Thursday when she was sworn in as the first Black woman to serve on the Supreme Court.
Jackson, 51, a Harvard-trained lawyer who was confirmed by the Senate nearly three months ago, will take the seat occupied by Associate Justice Stephen Breyer for nearly three decades. Breyer announced his retirement in January, clearing the way for President Joe Biden to name Jackson as his first pick for the nation’s highest court.
Previously a judge on the powerful U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Jackson took the oath of office at a fraught moment for the high court, as its decisions to overturn Roe v. Wade and expand access to handguns have exacerbated tensions among the justices and underscored divisions among Americans over culture war issues.
But none of that was on display as Chief Justice John Roberts administered one oath of office to Jackson and Breyer – for whom Jackson clerked more than 20 years ago – administered the other. With that, Jackson became the 104th associate justice – marking the first time women and people of color outnumber white men on the court.
In brief remarks, Roberts noted that the oaths allowed Jackson to exercise her duties as she had been “anxious” to do “without any further delay.”
“I am pleased to welcome Justice Jackson to the court and to our common calling,” Roberts said.
When the justices return to Washington in October with Jackson in her seat, there will be four women and two African Americans on the nation’s highest bench for the first time in the court’s 233-year history.
Bio:What to know about Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, next Supreme Court justice
In her words:We watched 14 hours of Jackson’s speeches. Here’s what we learned.
Insight:After hearings, experts debate how Jackson would interpret the Constitution
Jackson was confirmed 53-47, picking up the support of three Senate Republicans along with all Democrats. Because she is replacing Breyer, who was nominated by President Bill Clinton, Jackson is not expected to change the court’s conservative tilt. Relatively young for a Supreme Court justice, Jackson could serve for decades.
Though Republicans largely praised Jackson’s temperament, some accused her of being soft on crime and questioned her role defending alleged terrorists who were classified as enemy combatants after the 9/11 attacks. Though some of that criticism was sharp – unfair, according to Democrats – Jackson sailed through the hearings.
Because she sat on Harvard University’s board of overseers, Jackson announced in March that she will recuse herself from a case pending at the Supreme Court challenging the affirmative action policies at Harvard College and at the University of North Carolina. Arguments in that appeal are expected to take place in the fall.
Jackson will be the first former federal public defender to serve on the Supreme Court. She will be the only justice with experience on the U.S. Sentencing Commission, a bipartisan agency that makes recommendations about criminal sentences in federal court On a court where many of her colleagues worked in presidential administrations before becoming appeals court judges, Jackson will be one of two justices – along with Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor – to have served as a trial court judge.
Defender:Jackson would be Supreme Court’s first federal public defender
Justice:Review of Jackson’s opinions shows outcomes cut both ways
Diversity:For Black women judges, blazing a trail has meant opportunity, scrutiny
Some of Jackson’s decisions drew criticism from conservatives, including a 2019 case in which she ruled that President Donald Trump’s former White House counsel, Don McGahn, had to testify as part of a congressional impeachment inquiry. She was also criticized on the right for ruling against a Trump effort to expand the number of immigrants in the country illegally who would be subjected to expedited deportation.
Those same critics rarely mentioned other cases in which Jackson sided with Trump, such as in a challenge to his controversial border wall. In another case, she ruled that federal immigration law allowed faster removals for certain migrants seeking asylum.
Jackson will arrive on the court after a historic term in which tensions between the justices spilled out into the open, a dramatic leak of a draft opinion in the abortion case undermined confidence in the court’s protocols and protests erupted in response to that leak, including some that took place outside the homes of the justices themselves.
She has quietly watched those events following her confirmation, leaving her in the unusual circumstance of being a confirmed Supreme Court justice without an actual seat on the court for months. Breyer had always intended to retire at the end of the term, but his decision became public in January, prompting Democrats – with the slimmest of majorities in the Senate – to move quickly to confirm her.
“Justice Jackson’s swearing in reflects a long overdue but welcome historic milestone,” said Elizabeth Wydra with the liberal Constitutional Accountability Center. “She will join a court at a historic crossroads, too, with two starkly different visions of the Constitution and our country represented by the conservative majority and more liberal dissenters.”
Source by